The Citizen, 2018-03-29, Page 5Top down's
t was only a small item from one of The
Citizen's community correspondents but it
illustrates what makes living in a small
community special.
A couple of weeks ago Brenda Radford
wrote a few paragraphs about the death of a
quiet Londesborough man who lived alone and
had no relatives in Canada, yet would have
been surprised at how many people attended
his funeral. After reading the item, many local
people probably knew more about the
gentleman than they had during his life.
It's the sort of thing that correspondents
from villages and hamlets have been reporting
in community newspapers for more than 150
years. It's also the sort of feature that has been
mocked about small town newspapers for
many years (I remember the jabs by professors
when I went to journalism school 50 years
ago). So it's easy to see why a decision maker
for a newspaper chain who doesn't actually
live in a small community might decide that
such reporting was a waste of space in their
modern newspaper. The irony, of course, is that
it's exactly the sort of item people post on
social media sites like Facebook which are the
greatest threat to the future of newspapers.
Brenda's little story also appeared just as
the scandal broke about the misuse of data
about Facebook users to try to manipulate
voters. On one hand, you have the personal
touch of a community resident making an
individual better known to his neighbours. On
the other, you have a mammoth corporation
able to collect information on its millions of
users as its huge computers collect every bit of
information about what they look at, then sell
information that can be used to influence what
they buy or how they vote. The community
correspondent is the ultimate in the grassroots
approach. Facebook is the ultimate in
Other Views
replacing grassroots
Keith
Roulston
From the
cluttered desk
centralized control.
At the moment, people are re -thinking their
devotion to Facebook — a poll this week said 73
per cent of users are planning to change how to
use the service. Given the addictive features
built into these social media services, I
somehow doubt users' resolve to use it less will
hold.
Besides, people seem to like dealing with
big, anonymous corporations. While many
people stew over the widening gap between the
ordinary citizen and the ultra -rich, we adopt
habits that make the situation worse. Mark
Zuckerberg, creator of Facebook, is so rich that
when the shares of his company plummeted
after the scandal he lost $6 billion in net worth
(the poor guy's down to his last $60 billion).
He gained this incredible wealth while
contributing to the demise of thousands of
newspapers around the world, the money that
might have been distributed within
communities that were home to those
newspapers going to his California company
instead.
Similarly ordinary Canadians and
Americans keep making Amazon founder Jeff
Bezos ever richer by ordering online. Rather
than spread the wealth among millions of shop
owners and their employees across the
continent, we're concentrating the wealth from
our purchases at Amazon's Seattle
headquarters.
THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, MARCH 29, 2018. PAGE 5.
We seem quite happy to go along with
reshaping of society that leads to all decisions
being made by a relatively few people at the
top instead of millions at the grassroots. That's
not the way the free enterprise system was
supposed to work. In fact we used to mock the
Soviet Union's centralized control as bound to
fail. Now centralized control is the preferred
business model in the so-called "free world".
The secret to this sort of centralization is
so-called "big data", where so much
information is collected on you and me that
computers can predict how we will behave
under all circumstances. The secret to big data
is giving us things for "free" while collecting
information on who we are, what we read,
what we buy and so on. As one commentator
said about the Facebook scandal, "if you buy
something from a company you're a customer.
If you get it for free you're a product to be
sold."
The large newspaper chains long ago
bought into the top-down strategy, dispatching
orders to their individual newspapers from
corporate headquarters. They are branding
newspapers as part of the corporate entity that
is distributed locally rather than a local
newspaper that's part of its community. They
are watching Facebook, etc. and wondering
how they provide an alternative for advertisers.
But as they cut costs by making all the
decisions at the top, they are also blind to
opportunities at the community level because
there are no decision makers at the grassroots.
Each of their newspapers, given wise decision
makers equipped with local facts, might be
more successful if given that freedom.
I worry that we're losing our grassroots
touch — and the means to understand our
neighbours through people like community
correspondents.
Separating a believerfrom the belief
Part of some of the structural changes in
having a new publisher here at The
Citizen is the fact that I'm now doing
more proofreading in hopes of less mistakes
getting through.
I say less because pobody's nerfect and
sometimes these things happen.
As a result of that change, I'm now reading
a lot of the paper before it's in print.
In practice, there's very little difference
between reading stories from Huron East or
Central Huron Council on Monday and
Thursday. Seeing the stories ahead of time,
however, almost makes me feel obligated to
reference to them in this space.
And just so everyone realizes, I do have a
little skin in the game when it comes to
Central Huron and Huron East.
As an example, my wife works in Central
Huron and I spent a good portion of my
formative years in Huron East, so I like to
keep tabs on that.
This week, for example, I wanted to point to
the Huron East Council discussion about the
Tuckersmith Day Nursery.
I could (and, if it continues to be brought up,
likely will) fully express my opinions on
Huron East looking to change the centre
which, as Councillor Ray Chartrand points
out, provides as much of a community service
as the Seaforth and District Community
Centre which receives significant funding
despite running a deficit.
However, when reading the story, I had to
pause at the support that Mayor Bernie
MacLellan found in his drive to have the site
re-evaluated.
It reminded me of an important lesson that I
learned awhile back that may not always be
apparent through the issues I tackle in my
column: you have to separate the individual
from the belief.
When I write about how upsetting to me
Denny
Scott
Denny's Den
some of the changes local councils are making
are, there needs to be an understanding that I
don't think less of them because of it.
I disagree with the decision, and possibly
the motive behind it, but it doesn't mean I
think the people making the decision are evil.
The Tuckersmith Day Nursery situation, for
example, has found support from Councillors
John Lowe and Bob Fisher.
Now, I could point out that John, Bob and
Bernie don't use the daycare because they
don't have children or don't have children of
an age to be in that system so they may be a bit
removed from the necessity of it, but that's a
discussion for another day.
No, my point in naming John and Bob is that
I know both of them.
I didn't know John until I started working at
The Citizen, but, through his own volunteer
activities, his family and now his time as a
municipal councillor, I've come to know him
and I think he's a great guy.
Bob and I go way back. I worked at Pizza
Train in Seaforth for a number of years when
he owned the restaurant and, if you're not
familiar with the place, you should be. In my
humble opinion, it continues to serve some of
the best pizza in Huron County.
Trust me, when my wife moved her horse to
just north of Seaforth, I immediately realized
how great that could be for our family pizza
nights.
Anyway, I was a teenager when I started
working for Bob and earlier this month I
marked my 33rd birthday, so, like I said, we go
way back.
So while it's frustrating that two people with
whom I have personal relationships would
throw support behind an initiative I disagree
with, I have to separate that belief from the
believer. If not just for the fact that I will have
to continue to write about and see these
people, then for the fact that both John and
Bob are reasonable individuals with whom I
have developed a good deal of history.
When you forget to do that, when you forget
to balance the entirety of a person against one
opinion they have, you start responding to
things in an angry manner. As any married
man can tell you, the second you get angry,
you've already lost the argument no matter
how right you may be.
The belief to be separated from the person
can be something as minor as musical taste or
as major as core religious belief. Don't believe
me? Well, jump in the way -back machine to
shortly after I started at The Citizen and a local
pastor took exception to my stance on
cohabitation before marriage.
This pastor was and has continued to be a
great guy and a stand-up member of the
community in my opinion despite our
differing opinions on a potentially messy and
major issue.
It's an important life skill to have not just for
a journalist, but anyone in a small town and
especially anyone in a religiously -diverse
small town like Blyth or Brussels that has
more churches than restaurants.
We all have bad ideas every once in awhile
and we all need the chance to move past them,
as long as we learn from them. Unfortunately
for politicians, their bad ideas are public
record and can often colour people's views
of them for a very long time (or just a
long enough time in an election year like this
one).
ir-/a4S- Shawn
Loughlin
Shawn's Sense
DIY village betterment
The people of Brussels often feel as
though their municipality has turned its
back on them. The municipality is
based in Seaforth and, unfortunately, a lot of
the time it feels as though that decision is
symbolic of a lot more than a nice location.
Hearing Huron East Councillor Alvin
McLellan speak last week, it seems as though
members of the community, whether it's
Brussels, Morris and Grey Recreation
Committee members or service clubs, feel
they need to pay for improvements to their
local arena themselves.
With an influx of girls playing hockey in the
community, the facility's change room
situation is no longer adequate. Councillors
have known that for years, however, it feels as
though some councillors have chosen to
ignore the situation, hoping it will go away.
I understand that local municipalities are
strapped for cash. I have written numerous
articles and columns to that effect. I get it.
However, what sticks in my craw in this
particular situation is what McLellan raised:
that $150,000 from the sale of the former
Brussels Public School would have provided a
great foundation on which the community
could have built upon. That is, if council
hadn't snatched that money away from
Brussels about as quickly as it came in.
Late last year, the municipality realized
$225,000 from the sale of the former school,
which was sold to a local Mennonite
community so it could live on as a school. The
staff recommendation at the time was that
$150,000 from that sale be allocated to the
Brussels, Morris and Grey Community Centre
reserve. However, on the strength of
arguments, largely from councillors from the
Seaforth area, the money was placed in the
general reserve, washed away with all of
Huron East's other money. (Don't ever tell me
that we don't need wards, because tribalism is
alive and well in our small communities.)
This now leaves Brussels in the unenviable
position of having to almost "re -apply" for
general funds for this project, which, I don't
have to tell you, will be difficult.
Long-time Brussels Optimist and decorated
volunteer Doug McArter wrote a Letter to the
Editor chastising council the week after the
decision. His points were hard to doubt.
Now, the community is on its own. The
committee has had to organize its own meeting
to discuss its own funding. If a plan is in place
and the community commits to raising a good
chunk of the funding, perhaps council will
come to the table. Perhaps not.
In (maybe) unrelated news, we're waiting to
see if council will authorize $10,000 for the
Seaforth and District Community Centre's
new viewing room floor, despite the fact that
the centre has over $68,000 in reserves. Hey, I
hear the municipality has $150,000 it's not
using, maybe you can get some of that!
Brussels has a remarkable record when it
comes to fundraising, undoubtedly the best
I've seen in my time here. However, the
residents' willingness to dig into their pockets
when required shouldn't be exploited either.
Chief Administrative Officer Brad Knight, at
the time, said that losing the school was a
major blow to the Brussels community. And,
while it was with general Huron East funds
that the school was purchased, he felt the
profits from the sale (after the purchase had
paid for itself) should go back into that
community. Seems hard to argue against that.
Keep fighting Brussels. Things will happen
in your community, even if you have to do it
yourselves. (Spoiler: You probably will.)