The Wingham Advance Times, 1932-03-17, Page 2til t
.SAE TWO
TH WINGHA.M ADVANCE -'!IME$
2.m4sugwMM1N kwugaxnsy.i�,H^•WWF ?�
Thursday° March l'lth, 19$2
seefievieeeeeese
The
Wingharn Advance -Tunes
Published at i
WINGHAM - ONTARIO
Every n
Thursday Y Morni8 by
1
The .Advance -Times Publishing Co.
Subscription Rate .— One Year $2,00
Six months, $1.00 in advance
To U. S. A,., $2.50 per year.
Foreign rate, $3.00 per year. 1
Advertising rates on application.
'HYDRO
Hon. Mr. Justice Middleton, Royal!
Commission, is ill, necessitating a de- I
lay in the investigation of certain'.
Hydro matters. Of late there has
been considerable activity, on the
part of certain politicians, to give the
impression that all is not right as
far as Hydro is concerned; while oth-
ers paint a picture showing Hydro as
free from all wrong.
Be that as it may, one thing is cer
'rain,' that the growth of Hydro, in.
the last number of years, has been a
wonderful development and has sav-
ed the people of this province vast
sums of money that otherwise would
have gone to the power barons.
In the last ten years the peak load
carried has increased to the startling
figure of 1,520,989 horse power, an.
increase of 915,989.
The number of consumers has in-
creased until Hydro is now serving
615,000 homes and 'factories.
The growth of rural service has
not been neglected and in future will
show even a larger increase, At pre-
sent about 56,000 rural customers are
served.The capital investment has natur-
ally increased with this great expan-
sien and stands today at $265,000,000.
Hydro development has been . 'one
-of the bright lights in Ontario's his
tory, and with the St. Lawrence de-
velopment completed ,another 1,000,
000 horsepower will be available for
use in Ontario.
When : the smoke of the Royal
Commission has cleared away and
the game of football with Hydro is
over, it is hoped that the people's
faith in this vast 'enterprise will in
no way be diminished, and Hydro
will continue to serve efficiently and
economically as it has in the past.
m: * *
HELP KEEP TAX RATE DOWN
Great effort is being made by those
in 'charge 'of affairs, in all the mun-
icipalities of this country, to strike
a tax rate that will not be a burden
to their people. However in a great
many instances the rate has gone
higher in place of being held or low-
ered.
With regard to general situations
in this town, the finances are in good
stable conditions.
So far this year requests for im-
provements and additions to public
services are exceedingly numerous. If
these demands are granted by the
Council no 'doubt a higher tax rate
would result, By proceeding care-
fully, however, and maintaining pre-
sent sei-vices, with required repairs
from time to time, the council should
be able to hold at least the present
rate and possibly make a .slight de-
crease.
The fact that but twelve families
are receiving direct relief here is an
important item: In a great many
towns and villages this relief work is
,costing their people a great amount
of money, while here the cost to the
town is 'comparatively small.
It is quite certain that no rate-
payer- wonld want an odd -streetlight
out off or hydrant removed or any
similar service curtailed in order to
decrease the tax rate.
Iai;;urts available` indicate that the
debenture debt will take a material
drop about 1935 which will be imme-
diately evident by a lower tax rate.
* *
OUR PUBLIC LIBRARY
Thefact that our Public Library,
is a great asset to the town maybe
verlookcd by some of us, However,
there are a great many who take ad-
vantage of the services rendered,
Last year there was a• total of 15674.
books read, which is an increase of
2077 books out over the figures of
1930, The peak of daily circulation
is reached on Saturdays and as many
as. 200. books are exchanged on this
day. This is efficiently handled by
Miss E. Holloway. The total num-
ber of books available is 6903 for
adults and 2732 for children.
Conditions in the Reading Room
are constantly improved by the "board
and considering the moderate ex-
ernse put on the library, the service
to, the public is of high order.
* * * *
No reason Was given for the earth
tremors at Ottawa last week, but the
general public have their suspicions.
* * * *
March was lamb -like the first week
but has again preserved its reputation
as the contrary month.
* *' * *
Gangsters behind, prison bars in
united States offer, if released, to
locate the Lindbergh baby. They
feel it takes a thief to catch a thief.
* * * *
Aird papers wanted at the Hydro
probe, were thrown out as garbage.
Buffalo man states he can produce
them for $5000. Rather expensive
garbage,
* . *, * *
A $15,000 contract returned by •a
baseball player demanding $18,000.
1Vlany men would like a contract for
the difference in these amounts.
WAR DEBTS
AND REPARATIONS
•
\Ir. M. Grattan O'Leary in a radio
talk over the Canadian National
Broadcasting Chain on the history of
reparations and war debts, received
i letters from all over Canada request-
ing further information, so he set
aside one complete broadcast ,in or-
der that these questions would be
answered.
His answers to these questions
were most interesting and -instructive
so we are publishing same, as we feel
that our readers will appreciate it.
The first question asked—and it is
asked by very many—is this: "Where,
end when, and under what circurn-
etances and conditions did Great Bri-
tain offer to cancel all international
ivar debts?"
The answer is this: "In 1922 the
Congress of the United States creat-
ed the World War Foreign Debt
Commission and invited the debtor
nations to fund their war debts.
On August lst of the same year,
1922, Britain, through her then For-
eign Secretary, Lord Balfour; sent a
note to the United States Govern-
/tient, the heart of the note being this
"The poliey favored by His Majesty's
government is that of sitrrenderieg
} heir share of , G.eeinan reparations
and writing 'off through one great
irutsaction the whole body of ]ut'er-
;tilled indebtedness. l;ut, if this be
found ililpoes,ble of acconiplishinent,
w. wish it to be understood that we
do not in any event desire to anike
a ,profit yet of any less satisfactory
agreement, In no circumstances do
we propose to ask there Froin our
debtors than is necessary to pay our
creditors."
This was the British offer; an of-
fer Tilade despite the fact that by its
acceptance Britain stood to loce,
counting her share of German repar-
ations, soave 13 billion dollars.
As -events have shaped themselves,
Britain today i$ not receiving from.
her debtors anything like the equiv-
alent of what she is compelled to pay
to the United States. Tre reason is
that Britain's debt to the United
States is fixed in gold dollars, so that.
at the present price of sterling, it .will
take nearly half as many, pounds
again as had been originally antici-
pated to make her payments. At the
•present rate of exchange, indeed, Bri-
titin will; have to find 48 million
Pounds sterling to pay the $160,000,-
000 site Will have to hand over to the
United States when the existing Mor-
atorium expires. Ordinarily it would
have taken but 37 million pounds."
The next question asked, is this:
"It it be held that Germany cannot
pay reparations, and if, in this event,
the Allied nations decline to pay, or
are unable to pay the United States,
will not the position be that the Unit-
ed .States will be made to pay' the
greater part of the cost of; the war?"
The answer to this, I am bound to
say, is decidedly in the negative. The
total cost ,of the war, according to
figures prepared by the League of.
Nations, was 186 billion dollars. The
cost to Great Britain was 44 billions;
the cost to the whole British Empire,
including the colonies and dependenc-
ies, was over 50 billions. France, for
her share, spent 24 billions; Russia,
up to the time of the revolution, 22
billions; Italy 12 billions—or a grand
total for these countries—and not in-
cluding Belguirn—of 108 billions. The
expenditure of the United States was
but 22 billions.
Clearly, therefore, the ten billions
of dollars which are owing to the
t nited States represent but a fraction
of the money that the Allies threw
into the War. Put those 10 billions
on top of the United States war ex-
,penditure of 22 billions, and the total
is still more than 8 billions short of
what Great Britain spent alone. It
is but 60 per cent. of what the Bri-
tish Empire spent; is only 32 per
cent, of what the Allies spent. In the
light of these facts, the argument
that cancellation of war debts would
mean that the United States would
be paying for the War is not, to say:
the least, a valid argument.
The third question asked is as fol-
lows: "When: in the course of the
war, the United States inade these
loans to the allied countries, was it
understood that they were loans to
be repaid, or Was it generally believ-
ed that they fcirmed a part of Am-
erica's contribution toward twinning.
the war?"
On this point, naturally, there is
considerable ' controversy. Perhaps
the best and fairest answer that can
be given, is to sttnimon,two great fig -
!tree of the Republic, men who were
leaders in United States war effort
.
and let them tell what they believed.
Our first witness is Senator Reed
Smoot,. who has been a member of
the United States Senate for 29 years
and who is at present chairman of the
Senate Finance Conimittee, and who
was a distinguished member of the
War Foreign Debt Cotnniission. In
speaking from the floor of the 'United
States Senate, Senator Snirint used
these words: Our first contribution to the cause
could oniy. be money, Those of us
I t,'lio were herein 1917 and 1918 know
how we felt then. There was no
thought of commercial loans or in-
vestment of our resources 'in the
ht nds of 'our allies. We were bound
tegether in a common cause. Money.
was'all we had to give, and we gave
it freely"
My second Witness is one who
ranks among the greatest Americans
of his generation, perhaps among the
greatest of all ,time. These are his
swords:
"We are'fighting for what we be-
lieve to 'be the rights of, mankind and
for the ft.tttire peace and security of
the world. To cio this great' thing
w'rrthily sand successfully,' we must
devote ourselves tri ,the .service With-
out Regard to •Profit or Material Ad-
vantage , . We must supply abund-
ant_'food for ourselves and for- our
armies .utd our seanwn, Aitcl Also. for
a Lam 4n Part of the Nat�hens With
Whom Wt. Haw Now, Made i. o n,
mon c Luse, ii: I:,'i'(, t S4tiptrirt t And
By Whose Sides. We :1%411 Be 3. i;xht-
1 its.t',
WI: must `snntrly ,sl,T;,.t by the Inn.
nails ow; of 610 0A,, anti ;ilrttn-
d.tnt nun'riabt Ont or ,itis ix.lcls and
our mines and our factories with
Which not only to clothe and equip
our ti§en forces on lands andisea, but
also to elothe and support the armies
with which we are • co-operating in
Europe, and to keep the loons and
inanufactbries there in raw material;
coal to keep the fires going in ships
at sea and' in;,the furnaces of hun-
dreds of factories across the sea;
steel out of whirl to make e,rnis' and
ammunition both here and there;
rails for worn out railways back of
the fighting fronts; locomotives and
rolling stock ta, take the place of
those every day going to pieces; ev-
erything with which The People of
England and ;France and Italy and
Russia Have Usually Supplied Them-
selves
selves Iiut Cannot Now Afford."
I have been quoting, ladies and
gentlemen, from America's great war
President, 7iVoodrow Wilson. These`
words were -used by hint in an appeal
which he 'issued to the American na-
tion, and they are to be found arnong
the "Public Papers of Woodrow Wit
son,"edi'ted by Professor Albert
Bushnell Hare.
The next question—and this has
been asked by the greatest number
is: "What; is the point of view of
those in the United States who sin
cerely believe •that. these war debts
should be 'paid?"
Several arguments are advanced
against debt cancellation, the most
forceful of which is this: "That if
the debtor nations of Europe can af-
ford to maintain great armies and
navies, 'and consistently refuse to dis-
arm, then they should be made to pay
their expenditures in the last war;
To thisargument—admittedly a
powerful one and supported by a
powerful British newspaper like the
Manchester. Guardian—France makes
this rejoinder. She points out that
when the Treaty of Versailles was
being drawn up, Clemenceau and
Foch saw hope 'for world peace only
in the creation of an independent
Rhineland. It was President Wilson,
backed by Lloyd George, who fought
against this,. and what they offered
as the, equivalent in security for
France was .a promised guarantee of
a Franco -British -American alliance,
plus the League of Nations, with its
famed, Article Ten. Clemenceau ac-
cepted this compromise. But the Un-
ited States; later an, irejected the al-
liance, and repudiated the League,
this leaving France without that sec-
urity upon which she had staked ev-
erything. In the circumstances—to
continue the French argument—the
only thing left to France is the sec-
urity of her own army. Finally,
France points ty America's own ex-
penditures for armaments, contend-
ieg that if such defensive measures
are necessary on thus' continent, then
they cannot be denied to a people
who have learned in the anguish of
defeat and thehumiliations of inva-
sion to keep their frontier:; guarded.
Our next question --and, a most in-
teresting one—is this: "lit you talk
of last Sunday you mentioned that
Certain States of the Union -were in
default to Europe. Is it not true that
these loans were made to Confeder-i
ate States at the time of the Rebel' -
ion? 'If this is wrong, will you state
when these: loans were ,made, and to
what States; and when repudiation
took place, and under what circum-
stances?"
Eight Staves are in default. They
are Georgia, South Carolina, North
Carolina, Alabama, Lousiana, Arkan-
sas, Mississippi and Florida. The to-
tal Of the principle sumo is about 60
million dollars, and the accumulated
ittterest is 300 million Some of these
defaulted loans go back is far as 18.31
but rnost of them were made in the
reconstruction period followiirg the
Civil War.
in 1868-69 Smith Carolina issued
bon tis for T'ailway construt:tron. Solve
six million dollars worth were sold
its Great Britain and subsequently re-
pudiated.
In 1879, Nortlr Carolina' repudiated
12 million dollars worth of bonds is-
sued by the State prior to the Civil
War and immediately atter the Civil
War. The bonds were issated for rail-
way construction.
Alabama, after the Civil War, is-
sued $15,000,000 of bonds: to assist, in
r<eilivay construction, In 1874 these
bonds were repudiated, most of the
bond holders being in Britain,
, Arkansas, in 1873, and later, issued
bonds for railway construction and
fro- levees, In 1884 these bonds were
repudiated 'by an atnendinentof the
State constitution, $8,700,00 being
lest to British investors,` :
Florida, in 1833, sold bonds for the
purpose of starting a iiienl:; sold more
bunds , in 1855 to aeeist in railway
,,instructiton. Banks' and railways
failed wheretahon the State rcptuli at -
ed tit.: bends, and $7,000,000 of these
13,01ds are still held in Britein.
Georgia, it 1866-69, jested' bonde
to assist its railway constr'ttctiott, rew_
pudiatt:d them in 1.871; British. hives -
top., t. n this e ccasion losing $1'3,000,-
000,
'tVi<le,ttit,ad nliseottCt'litions exist
it regard 't'i these repudiations, :It is
commonly believed, for example, that
the money was loaned during the
Civil War to the Confederate States,
and that no payment. has been made
because such debts were declared 11011
and void by the : Federal Government
of the United States. The historic
truth is that not a dollar of this ition-
ey was loaned to a Confederate State,
not a dollar loaned' during, the period
of the Civil War. Nobody is .claim-
ing, or, has ever claimed,' that Con-
federate debts should be paid,
The truth is that the injustice clone
to British and European bond -hold-
ers is well-recognized in the United
States, where they have never lacked
for powerful friends. Thus, Nicholais
Roosevelt. in his book "America and,
England," published in 1930, says:
"Contrary to general belief these
bonds were not loans, of foreigners to
help the South (luring the Civil Wee
In behalf of Americans the
tntut that can besaid is that the
conditions under which the bonds
were issued made it plain that risks
were great. •But whatever the pre-
text advanced in defense of repudia-
tion, these State debts are a blot on
the good' name of the United ,States,
and the failure to make a settlement
is as unwise politically as it is mor-
ally indefensible."
And Raymond Turner, . Professor
of History at John Hopkins Univer-
sity, writing in Current History of
January, 1926, discussed this question
in relationship to war debt settle-
ments, said this:
"Many a one in the United States
will ponder over this situation at a
tittle when his government is insist-
ing that foreign debtors shall pay
what they owe, all excuses aside, al-
though they are staggering under
terrible taxation, hard tines, and
have a greatly lowered standard of
living; and when American statesmen
are deploring non-payment or delay
as striking at the sanctity of contract
and' the foundations of that honesty
upon which the relations of men
should be founded."
The 'final question before me is
this: "What reason is there for be-
lieving that Germany cannot pay re-
parations, cannot be compelled to
Pay?" .
in answer to this, there is testi-
mony, first of all, of the German
Chancellor Battening, wins anle- yes-
terday informed Britain that when
the Lausanne Reparations Conferen-
ce: convenes, Germany will tell the
world that her ability to pay repara-
tions is at an end. There is the tes-
timony .of the finance experts of the,
Young Plan Advisory' Committee,
who, after a complete investigation
of Germany's capacity to pay, issued.
a report less than two weeks ago in
eitich they said:
"Germany would be justified ,in de-
claraing that she will not be able to
make her postponable Young Plan
payment of 268 million dollars due
next July."
And, again:
"Germany will also be unable to
make the whole of per non -postpon-
able Young flan payment of 157 'mil-
lion dollar=s next July."
This concludes both questions and
answers. I can only hope.tliat I have
answered fairly,. without prejudice or
malice, and that no phrase or word
of mine has dimmed what John Mor-
ley once called the lamp of loyalty
to Reason.
tt
C01111
e
"Idreamed last .night that—er—ah
—1 proposed to you. I wonder what
that is a sign of?"
"It's : a sign that yoti!ve more sense
when you are asleep that .when you
are awake."
' x: *
Wife: "What a time you are, 1.")o
he quick. I simply' must go out. and
show off` any new fru- coat."
Husband: "Wait a minute. I simp-
ly Tnttst cut the fringe off niy coat
Cuff."
"Do you believe in dreams?"
:"I ,used to, but I don't: now."
"And:why not?"
"I married one. five years ago."
"Last :night George said he'd :kiss
urc or die in the attempt." '
"Did he' kiss 'you?"
"Well, he was alive this morning,"
* >t: * *
•'An angler inquired froth his Billie
if there we're many fish in a Certain
r vt;r,
"11
you were to boil the water' you
take out of it," said the 'gillie,, "you'd
he getting the taste of salmon in
yrrAir tea."
* 1,
"T suppose you visited the great art
galleries While you were abroad?"
." ti, we "didn't need to. Yon '':ieci
rant dattgliter Paints,"
Now you can positively identify your
favorite D. L. & W. Scranton Anthracite
(hard coal) before you burn it.
It's trade -marked (tinted blue) for your
protection.
Order from your ealer NOW—
and know what 'blue coal'
comfort mewls
For Sale in Wingharn by ,
MacLean Lumber and Coal Co.
"Ever been locked up?" demanded
counsel,
"I have been," admitted the wit-
ness.
"And .what had you been doing to
get yourself locked up?"
"I was on a prolonged jury case!"
• * * *
•
"Oh, my!" ,exclaimed the excited
woman who had mislaid her husband.
"I'm looking for a. small man with
one eye."
"Well, madam," replied the polite
shopwalker, "if he's a very small man
Perhaps you'd better use both eyes."
* * * *
"I have been on this train 10
years" said the conductor of a train
that had, just passed through Osh-
awa.
"Where did you get on," asked the
tired passenger.
* a: * e
At a recent political meeting et was
quite obvious that some hecklers
were present. The candidate com-
menced his speech with: "I ani Isere
"So am I! shouted a voice.
"Quite so,"retorted the candidate,
"but, you are not all there."
.1 * * e
At a police court the habitual
drunkard was summoned for the us-
ual cause.
"Ten shillings or fourteen days,"
remarked the magistrate,
"But I've only two shillings in the
world," replied the prisoner..
"Well, you must go to prison then.
If you hadn't spent the money get-
ting drunk you would have been able
to pay the fine!"
Indian Tribesmen, to Help Gandhi
London—Forty thousand tribes-
men, rnobolized under arms in the
northwest frontier province, plan to
march upon Peshawar, the capital,
and demand the release of Mahatma
Gandhi, dispatches to the Daily Her-
ald from Bombay, said today. The
dispatches said aeroplanes of the Bri-
tish Royal Air Force Flying over the
district were fired upon by the tribe
followers of the aged Nationalist
leader.
The best
thing you
can buy
for
SI1.IOUSl1ESS and
SICK HEADACHES
Sold everywhere in
25c and 75c red pkgs.
mks ks 7lVen PULS
,xt.i( tt'*d0adi85,N.A
c
Y
i o4 t a ta.5+ k.,,-Fir41,hi'N"dlrACt s'* 51* 0',
EG
s
®0
s
dine e, I cos{ ce C
Limited
Wingham, - Phone 166
U
`. SAV 1 N G
EY
People who save system-
atically make fewer needless
expenditures and derive satis-
faction and comfort in watch-
ing bank balances grow.
Money is available when they
want it and interest coax.
pounded half yearly accrues
M tl k,.:
There is a branch of this ban
near you. Open
l a saving's
TH DOMINION BAN]
ES' ,tt,.B1,R,':r] ED 1371
.Pa tnIeair' tit Enrr7ry Brectrttcl�