Times Advocate, 1999-12-08, Page 27Wednesday,December 8, 19It
Exeter T 27
Community
Scheduling timetable for secon
Dear Editor:
There has been discussion recently regarding the
scheduling timetable for our secondary schools,
specifically that secondary school principals are
planning to return their Grade 9 and 10 'classes next
September to a traditional year-long schedule.
The new provincial elementary curriculum is now
in place and the new secondary school curriculum
has begun to be phased in with this year's Grade 9s,
who will graduate at the end of Grade 12. The new
rigorous curriculum affects all grades -- thirteen
years of schooling are now condensed to twelve
years. .Many topics formerly taught at higher grades
are now being taught at lower grades.
The new provincial curriculum policy expects more
of students sooner in terms of academic achievement
and growth. Teachers will have to change not only
what they teach but how it is taught and how stu-
dents achievement is assessed and evaluated.
Students and teachers will require time .to reflect, to
process and to evaluate the teaching and learning
process. Time may. be the one resource we can
return to teachers and students as they face these
challenges. This time comes not in the total amount
of instructional time (110 hours is still the require-
ment fon' a credit course) but in length of classes and
the time between classes, in other words, in the
structure of the timetable schedule for the school
year.
Under the new secondary curriculum, there is less
opportunity for student choice because more of the
program has been made mandatory. Students are
expected to graduate after four years of secondary
school. The days of fast -tracking (graduating early
by taking an extra course each year or in the sum-
mer) appear to be over. In addition, students will be
required to pass a provincial Reading and Writing
Test which most students will write in Grade 10. All
of these factors strongly suggest that we need to
review how the secondary school program is being
delivered. What may have served our students well
in recent years may now required improvement or
change. For example, under a traditional (year-long)
timetable, students in Grade 10 may write the
mandatory Reading and Writing Test in the spring of
Grade 10, rather than in the fall, giving our students
additional time to prepare.
A traditional year-long timetable allows students
more time to absorb content and to master "skills.' It
allows teachers more time to recognize areas of
weak student performance and to help them. It will
improve learning for students taking sequential
Hosts with the most
courses, courses that build on each other, by elimi-
nating the large time gaps in time between courses
which are possible under semestering. For example,
in a traditional timetable, a student will study Grade
9 mathematics for a year, and then take mathemat-
ics in the fall of one year, and not be able to take
Grade 10 mathematics until the spring of the follow-
ing year, a delay of 12 months. These delays, even if
experienced by only a few students in a class, has
resulted in more time being spent on review. This
eats up some of the time available for teaching new
content and practising new skills.
The traditional year long schedule typically allows
the student to cover more content, and achievement
in some academic subjects has been found to be
higher. Semestering created a situation where less
content is often taught and fewer in-depth assign-
ments have often been given because of the five
month time period allocated for the duration of the
course.
Under a traditional schedule, a class in the same
subject in each of the two streams can more easily be
timetabled at the same time of day, so that, if a stu-
dent wishes to change from one class to the other, it
is easily arranged and does not affect the other
courses which the student is taking.
Also, under the traditional timetable, the course
work load for students is spread out equitably over
the academic year, whereas under semestering some
students experience a very heavy course load one
semester and a very light one the next. Under a tra-
ditional year long time table, students take the same
courses all year and adjust to their teaches and their
teaching styles only once each year. Under the
semestered model, students start all over again in
February with new teachers and new courses and
make that same adjustment mid -way through the
year.
Co-operative Education,, working for half a year at
a school -supervised job placement away from the
school for school credit, is usually taken by senior
students. We recognize the value to our students of
Co-operative Educaiol and a traditional timetable
schedule, if applied to senior grades, would provide
sufficient flexibility so as to ensure student pa1'ticipa-
tion. Distance education, correspondence courses
and alternative programming are potential options
for rounding out a student's course load while they
are taking Co-op. Other options for these students
would include scheduling Co-operative Education
time at the beginning or end of the school day or
scheduling Co-operative Education on a semestered
The Zurich peewee rep team won their own recent tournament with a 5-4 overtime victory over Stephen
Township in the final. On ice, from IeftAndrew Degroot, Justin Laporte, Jeff Debus; front left: Nick Ducharme,
Sam Datars, Ricky Geoffrey, Chad Snell, David Gingerich, Corey Regier, Brent Durand; back left:Zurich Lions
Club member Carl Finkbeiner, trainers Erich Freiter and Peter Datars, Deryk Rader, Dan Masse, Byron Freker,
coach Kevin Geoffrey, assistant coach Corey Wildfong and Zurich Lions Club member John Becker.The Zurich
Lions Club sponsored the team's sweaters. (photo/Craig Bradford)
school
basis along with a selection of other courses which fit
that format equally well. This arrangement would
also permit those few students to graduate mid -year
who have only a small number of courses left to take.
I am confident that students' needs can continue to
be met through creative responses.
Because the introduction of semestering was
accompanied by an increased period length, the two
are often associated with each other. Class length
often went from about 40 minutes to about 75 min-
utes when semestering began. A traditional timetable
can also accommodate periods of a number of
lengths through such scheduling devices as block
timetabling, multi -day cycles and so on. Some cours-
es and subjects do benefit from a longer. -class period
time, for example art and science. With longer peri-
ods, but fewer of them, the total amount of time
devoted to setting up and taking down equipment is
reduced, since setting up and taking down need only
occur once a period. Under a traditional timetable
model this can continue.
Our priority is providing a quality education for our
students. If text books costs were to increase in doing
so, that would be a legitimate expenditure and we
would have to make economies elsewhere. New text
books will be required in all courses as the new cur-
riculum is phased in. We will be fully using the
Ministry of Education grants related to text book
costs for implementation of the reformed secondary
curriculum.
If schools adopt a traditional year long time table
schedule, it will be because that provides the best
learning environment for our students. This may
very well attract students to our schools from other
jurisdictions, students whose parents support a focus
on excellence and quality education. Principals are
empowered to exercise sufficient flexibility to meet
individual students' needs, and, if a school were on a
traditional timetable for all grades, could include a
selection of semestered courses in each semester,
transition courses, alternative education and dis-
tance education. As always, our teachers will work
hard to ensure identified students' needs are met.
Secondary principals have determined that a tradi-
tional timetable schedule is in the besteducational
interests of their students in the first years of the
new, challenging secondary curriculum and are
designing a traditional year-long timetable for their
Grade 9 and 10 students for next year.
No timetable schedule is perfect. You may recall
strong arguments from some quarters against
semestering schools when it was first contemplated
and many are now defending it. But on careful analy-
sis of the new curriculum, a more demanding, a
more rigorous and a more structured curriculum, the
secondary principals are convinced that returning to
a traditional year-long timetable schedule for next
year's Grade 9 and 10 students provides them with a
better learning environment and a better chance for
success. School staffs and school councils are
involved in the discussion now underway in the
schools.
A report on secondary school timetable scheduling
will be on the agenda of the December 14, 1999
Board meeting.
Sincerely,
DR. LARNE RACHLIS
Director of Education
Ringette
Dec. 5 - Tillsonburg 5 at Exeter (1I) 1
Goal: Laura Parsons
Assist: Tamar d�am
Goaltender: Holly-Hern
Nov. 27 - Huron -Perth 'AA' 9 at Hamilton Junior 'AA'
Goals: Jessica Boersma (5), Jennifer Bradley, Ashley Andrews, Brittany
Brown(2)
Assists: Jessica Helmuth. Boersma (2), Bradley, Andrews, Angie Keller,.
Denise Ritchie, Melissa Leith (2). Pam Gibson, Juice Pelton. -Brown
Nov. 27 - Huron -Perth 'AA' 3 at Mississauga 'AA' 2 "
Goals: Boersma (2). Gibson
Assists: Bradley, Ritchie, Gibson
Dec. 4, 5 and 6 - Sudbury tournament
Game 1 - Huron -Perth 'AA' 7 vs. Gloucester 'AA' 2
Goals: Helmuth, Boersma (4), Andrews, Pelton
Assists: Helmuth,Bradley (3), Andrews, Gibson
Game 2 - Huron-erth 'AA' 4 vs. Sudbury 'AA' 3
Goals: Boersma (3), Ritchie
Assists: Hebmuthp. Gibson
Game 3 - Huron -Perth 'AA' 15 vs. Hamilton 'AA' 1
Goals: Helmuth, Boersma (9), Bradley, Andrews, Ritchie, Gibson, Pelton
Assists: Boersma. Andrews. Ritchie Leith (2), Gibson, Pelton, Brown (2)
Game 4.Ottawa 'AA' ti Vs. Huron -Perth 'AA' 5
Goals: Boersma (2). Ritchie. Leith. Gibson
• Assists: Boerma, Keller. Gibson
Game 5 - Huron -Perth 'AA' 1 w. Mississauga 'AA' 2
Goal: Ritchie '
AMMO: Halm*. Kendra Mudge