Times-Advocate, 1986-09-17, Page 4Page 4
Times -Advocate, September 17, 1986
Ames
dvocate
Published Each Wednesday Morning at Exeter, Ontario, NOM 150
Second Class Mail Registration Number 0386.
Phone 519-235.1331
CNA
ROSS HAUGH
Assistant Editor
LORNE EEDY
Publisher
JIM . BECKETT
Advertising Manager
BILL BATTEN
Editor
HARRY DEVRIES
Composition Manager
DICK IONGKIND
Business Manager
SUBSCRIPTION RATES:
Canada: $25.00 Per year, U.S.A. $65.00
C.W.N.A., O.C.N.A. CLASS 'A'
Serving South Huron, No Middlesex
& North Lambton Since 1873
Published by J.W. Eedy Publications Limited
Needs. top priority
The battle to protect Lake Huron's
shoreline from the unusually high water
levels has prompted a new battle among
cottage owners.
They're now starting to battle each
other as concern grows that steps taken
by some to protect their banks from ero-
sion through costly structures has actual-
ly led to greater erosion problems for
their neighbors.
Caught in the middle of what is now
clearly a "catch 22" situation for
everyone involved, are the ministry of
natural resouraces, municipal councils
and the Ausable Bayfield Conservation
Authority:
Unfortunately, the lake and the nor-
mally devastating fall and early winter
storms, give no indication that they will
wait for all the groups to come to grips
with the problem nor provide unlimited
time to explore the best methods of pro-
viding protection for all landowners.
Time is of the essence as some cot-
tages are already precariously close to
the brink of disaster and weather condi-
tions will soon stall any immediate
remedial steps.
Obviously, the property owners need
some urgent answers from their elected
and appointed officials at all levels of
government.
It must be given priority.
At the same time, those officials
should be taking steps to ensure that
habitation in the lakefront dwellings is
safe under the current conditions and the
periodic storms which will probably
arise. The loss of a cottage is bad enough,
but the situation must be monitored to en-
sure there is no loss of human life.
The property owners are in a very
real and frightening battle, and while
some are now finding there are new
roadblocks to face in their struggle, all
of them obviously need more positive
responses to what can be done to protect
their properties on a collective basis.
That is not to suggest that their plight
has been met indifferently to date; but
to emphasize that the situation warrants
some priority treatment as it escalates
into a possible emergency. Some owners
already feel it has reached that stage for
them.
Pour on gasoline
The majority of people know you
don't pour gasoline on a fire to quell it.
However, that appears to be the solu-
tion being attempted at the University of
Western Ontario to curb drunken
rowdyism at football games.
To meet that challenge, it could be
expected that officials would have en-
forced the law which makes drinking in
a stadium an offence.
But no, the experiment will involve
erecting a beer tent at the stadium to give
the student fans a place to go and legal-
ly drink one hour before and after the
game and during half time.
If it works, firemen should experi-
ment with using gasoline instead of water
to quell fires?
Who started the
Major insurance companies
across Ontario have indicated the
current insurance crisis is over
for some groups.
That of course, is welcome
news but the reason for the
positive announcement makes it
somewhat suspect.
The Insurance Brokers
Association of Ontario came up
with the good news at a time
when there is a move by Ontario
school boards to band together to
establish a self-insurance system
to combat the mounting premium
costs they've been facing.
The reality is that if a majori-
ty of school boards join the plan
which has been approved in prin-
ciple by the provincial
superintendent of insurance, the
insurance companies stand to
lose more than $6 million in
premiums.
It appears more than mere
coincidence that the insurance
crisis is declared over at the
same time as the companies en-
vision that $6 million crisis for
themselves.
Association president George
McLean accused proponents of
the school board plan of trying to
"raise a spectre of fear and
uncertainty that liability in-
surance for school boards may
not be available in the future, or
that cost would be prohibitive".
Obviously, those fears and con-
cerns have been raised more by
the action of the insurance in-
dustry in the past couple of years
. than anyone else.
School boards, along with
many other public and private
groups, have had to curtailro-
grams in the face of mounting
premiums and lowered protec-
tion. Many activities have ceas-
ed entirely because of the inabili-
ty of groups to secure insurance.
Some of the industry have led
people to believe that there was
no immediate relief in sight and
in fact forced groups to consider
their own self-insurance systems
or raised suggestions that the
government should get into the
insurance business.
The Insurance Brokers
Batt'n
Around
...with
The Editor
Association will have a great deal
of convincing to do to prove that
the crisis reached a natural con-
clusion rather than one
precipitated by action that now
creates an apparent crisis for
them.
•
Now that the crackdown on
drinking drivers has put a
damper on fund-raising dances
that were once the mainstay of
some local organizations, it is ap-
parent that consideration must
be given to alternative methods
of raising the necessary funds for
those groups as well as the
operators of the halls in which
they were staged.
Local groups and recreation of-
ficials should keep their eye on a
project being staged in St. Marys
next month when a dinner theatre
will be offered at the community
centro.
The popular Letter From
Wingfield Farm, which delighted
panic?
•
audiences at the Huron Country
Playhouse this summer, will be
presented by Itod Beattie after
patrons enjoy a full course roast
beef dinner.
It's an innovative fund-raising
effort and the price tag of 20
bucks a head is relatively cheap
for a meal and a great night of
entertainment.
While diners will be able to en-
joy a cocktail prior to the meal
and probably some wine to com-
pliment the beef, they'll have the
duration of the show to get their
alcohol levels back down to
where they will get. safely past
the breathaliler.
While the declining popularity
of dances has had serious reper-
cussions for non-profit groups
and those charged with
generating revenue from public
facilities, it is not enough for
them to throw up their hands in
despair and expect their bleak
-financial status to be offest by
most funds from the public purse.
They're going to have to show
some enthusiasm and imagina-
tion to fill the void and there's no
doubt people will support them in
their efforts as they have in the
past.
After all, those people sitting at
home on Friday and Saturday
nights who used to enjoy going
out to dances are looking for
alternative forms of entertain-
ment and recreation. The majori-
ty still have as much income to
dispose of in that pursuit.
In short, all the players of the
previous dance "game" still have
the same needs; all they require
is a new game. Surely local
groups and rec officials are in-
novative enough to come up with
the necessary ideas to augment
their coffers.
You're
Listening, says Webster's New
Collegiate Dictionary, is the act
of hearing with thoughtful atten-
tion. How many of us are good
listeners? We all like to be listen-
ed to, but we seldom" take the
trouble to be on the active side of
the game.
I belong to those whose listen-
ing skills could definitely be im-
proved. Elizabeth would call this
a flagrant understatement. Okay,
I'm only an average listener..I
admit that I do not always, when
spoken to, absorb the complete
information that the speaker is
trying to convey.
Am I being rude when I "don't
listen"? That's not my intention.
First of all,let me establish one
thing: there is nothing wrong
with my hearing. It's in the atten-
tion department where I seem to
fall short.
There is always something else
going on up there when a crucial
message is being transmitted to
me like: "We're invited to the the
Hendersons this Saturday." A
couple of days later, my casual
question as to what we're going
to do Saturday night will run into
the surprising answer: "I told
you we re goning to the Hender-
sons, but as usual you didn't hear
what I said."
I'm sure I had heard, but my
listening channel was turned off.
I had probably been wondering
about the state of my finances or
something trivial like that. And
so it goes...
I've been thinking about this
disability of mine for a while. In
a world full of the most astoun-
ding communication devices,
man - I mean mankind - is still
unable to cope with simple verbal
messages transmitted at arms
length, two at a time.
First of all, I would like to in-
vite human communication ex-
perts to carry out some studies on
this problem. What about
"Observations on the Cause and
not listening
Effect of Non -Digital, Biological-
ly Transferred Data Recieved by
Preoccupied, Middle -Aged Sub-
jects"? Maybe the government
could establish a Royal Commis-
sion on Listening- there seems to
be one for just about everything
else.
Secondly, I offer some advice
to my fellow disabled and their
unfortunate respondents: Learn
to realize that you are a poor
listener or that you are married
to (living with) a person whose
abilities in the listening depart-
ment are sub -standard. I know
it's hard to take when all your life
you thought you were getting on
just fine, and suddenly - zap - you
realize youre handicapped.
Step one is for the talker to
signal to the listener that an im-
portant message is about to be
sent. There is no point in wasting
an entire sentence when there is
a good chance that it won't
register. So the talker should in-
dicate: "Please pay atttention.
I'm going to say something that
matters, something that requires
understanding."
Until the listener acknowledges
this signal, the talker should not
go on. The signal ensures that
both parties have their sets turn-
ed on.
Step two is to send one message
at a time and wait for a response.
Ask a question that can only be
answered if the listener was tun-
ed in. Then go on to the next seg-
ment, and so on.
In no time at all, even weak
listeners like me will be forced to
interrupt their other mental ac-
tivity and to concentrate on the
conversation.
The method is easy, so elemen-
tary that I can't understand why
it isn't used routinely, by
everyone. Including myself.
When are we going to learn that
our minds are not multi -
channelled receivers?
We can't ponder the outcome of
the football game or the balance ,
(if any) in our bank aec�q�nt while
listening to a report on how Dun-
can fell down the stairs and bruis-
ed his behind. Something will get
garbled in the process:
something will have to be filtered
out.
I'm no authority on the subject,
of course. Somebody may prove
that is is possible to comprehend
two or three lines of though
simultaneously. But I know I
can't do it. So why don't I im-
mediately turn off one channel
when another is activated?
For one thing, I may wish to
finish the program I'm tuned in-
to. So when my present thoughts
are interrupted by Elizabeth
speaking to me, I should do what
I learned to do on the new-fangled
office telephone: put my private
thought -program on hold, ask
Elizabeth to wait a second, finish
my thoughton line one and get
back on line two as soon as
possible. -
Advice to the talker: don't Ix
offended if I put you on hold. I'll
simply say to you: "Just one se
cond. I'll be listening attentively
as soon as I finish this thought.
I'm willing to give this methoc
a try. I'll report back to yot,
within a few weeks. Maybe I car
improve, even revolutionize my
interpersonal relationships.
Maybe I've stumbled across
something really important here
Maybe....
Sorry, I've got to put this on
hold. Somebody is talking to mc
on line two.
Futures look good
One of the excellent programs
which the Ontario government
has devised is called FUTURES,
formerly known as the OCAP
program. It is directed specifical-1
ly at young people from the ages
of 17 to 22 and is meant to help
them get practical experience on
a job, hopefully one which they
enjoy and would like to pursue in
future years. The Futures people
are very flexible in the types of
jobs which a person might want.
It could be something such as
waitress, a custodian, a dental
assistant. Actually the choice
may be made by the young per-
son as long as he/she can show
• that some training will be done to
upgrade one's skills.
A Futures worker is allowed to
come on a staff for 16 weeks dur-
ing which time he is paid at the
minimum wage. He is encourag-
ed to seek permanent employ-
ment during that four month
period and is still paid even if he
is off at a job interview. It is a one
time shot for the young persons
in that they are not allowed to go
more than the sixteen weeks.
Last year we hired four per-
sohs at my school under this con-
cept, three to help with the han-
dicapped students and one to
train as a computer technical
By the
Way
by
, Fletcher
assistant. In all cases the young
people proved to be willing and
able workers who not only were
of great assistance to our various
programs but felt that they learn
ed much during the time they
were there.
At the end of the training perioc
I was able to give them a letter
of recommendation which 1 arr
sure will be of some help wher
they go out toseek permanenr
employment. Far better for then
to say they have had some prac
tical experience in a particular
field than ttoust have paper
academic qualifications whicl
tell a prospective employer vert
little about their personalities
and capabilities when actually of
a job.
If you have a young person it
your family who would benefi
from Futures you should contac
your local Manpower office of
your closest community collegt
(which handles the actual ad
ministration of the program).
am sure that they will be of hell
to you.