Lakeshore Advance, 2013-05-15, Page 5Wednesday, May 15, 2013 • Lakes lora Advance 5
"ty
letters to the editor
Engineer discusses allocation
When the Lambton Shores Deputy
Mayor replied to my letter to the editor in
the February 27 edition of the Lakeshore
Advance, she dealt with seven issues. Every
one of these seven issues requires correc-
tion and clarification. Over the next several
months, I will write about each of the
seven issues with letters to the editor.
1 raised the question of allocation of,
age capacity, in the new sewage treat -
et facility, for the existing homes and
businesses in Grand Bend, in my earlier
letter. 'Ihe deputy Mayor responded and I
quote "every home that is built in Grand •
Bend was granted sufficient capacity for
full-time residency in the lagoons or has a
septic system."
According to the Lambton Shores
records, there are about 800 homes ,and
about 100 commercial and institutional
connections to the sewers in Grand Bend.
'Ihe Deputy Mayor says that each of these
are allocated capacity in the sewage treat-
ment facility.
Almost every consulting engineer in
Ontario would allocate 1 ms per day per
household, of sewage capacity, to service
these sewer connections. The Ontario
Design Guidelines for Sewage Works 2008
would also require about 1 m' per day per
dk,
household, be reserved for each home,
being serviced by the sewage treatment
facility. 'this allocation of 1 m' per day per
household includes the sewage contribu-
tions from the home, commercial, and
institutional users, as well as infiltration,
inflow, and extraneous flows. To calculate
the expected total sewage flow from the
existing sewer users in Grand Bend when
in full-time usage, we would multiply the
800 households by 1 m' per day per house-
hold and get 800 m' per day of sewage
flow.
So we should expect to see that 800 m'
per day of sewage capacity in the new plant
is reserved for the existing sewer users, if
the Deputy Mayor's statement is correct.
1 searched through the Stantec report,
the ad hoc sewer committee minutes, and
letters from Stantec. to Council, and found
at least three copies of a chart showing that
431 ins per day of sewage capacity has
been reserved for the existing sewer users
in Grand Bend. This is far less than the 800
Ins per day required by prudent design
standards, for full-time use of all 800
households.
'ihe problem is that many of the current
users are seasonal users of the sewer sys-
tem and the 41:i ms per day is the current
annual average sewage flow ( total years
sewage flow divided by 365) coming from
the existing seasonal usage pattern . Under
the current zoning bylaws, and the sea-
sonal usage properties 111 Grand Bend have
the right to be converted to year-round
usage. If the seasonal usage changed to
full-time usage the sewage flow would
increase to about 800 ms per day and the
new sewage treatment facility would be
overloaded.
Council needs to slake some hard
decisions
Council could decide to build a bigger
sewage treatment facility (as per the earlier
Dillon design).
2. Council could pass a bylaw prohibit-
ing full -tine usage of current seasonal
usage properties in Grand Bend.
Council cannot ignore this issue and
hope it will go away. Other municipalities
have passed bylaws prohibiting the full-
tilne usage of Seasonal properties to
address this issue, or have built sewage
treatment plants large enough to handle
the seasonal flow, without flow
equalization.
'These comments are made without prej-
udice, and are based on my 46 years of
experience as an environmental engineer,
and as a reviewer and engineering advisor
in the preparation of the Ontario Design
(Micielines for Sewage Works 2008
Gerry Rupke MSc. PEng.
Farewell to
Lambton Shores
Dear editor,
As the former Lambton Shores CA() and
clerk of Forest council, I really struggled
with how I would say goodbye to a com-
munity that I ha(1 dedicated so much of
my life to and that had achieved so much.
1 low could I thank the people and Coun-
cils it had been my honour to serve? I low
could I ever adequately thank the staff it
was my privilege to work with?
As it turns out 1 found I didn't need to,
the accomplishments of the first 10 years
of this municipality speak for themselves
and the Councils I served and the staff I
worked with already know how I feel about
them.
Although the past few years have been
charged with negativity and personal
attacks I think the community has had
enough of this and is tired of the chaos and
rancour. 1 am confident that in time the
municipality will find a way hack to the
more positive and progressive philosophy
of its past.
At the end of the day I leave with only
fond memories of the people of this c0111-
'nunity, the councils and staff I worked
with and what we acconlplishe(1 and I
leave knowing that I gave it Illy all and xvitl1
great satisfaction with what was achieved.
'Thanks and best wishes
The Great Lakes "White Hurricane" of 1913
Joe Wooden
Special to Lakeshore Advance
'This is the first of a series of articles cover-
ing the Great Storm which devastated the
Great Lakes area in 1913.'Ihe St. Joseph and
Area Ilistorical Society is providing these
articles and in November, the Historical
Society will be offering a dinner theatre
event at Hessenland to commemorate the
Great Storm.
The causes of the weather conditions have
been described in various ways. This report
uses some recent work by James Clary of St.
Clair MI, using US weather service
information.
This year, 2013, is the 100th anniversary of
the most devastating storm conditions every
to strike the Great Lakes since records were
kept and non-native settlements existed.
This storm or storms, to be accurate, pro-
duced heavy snow falls and rains, thirty-five
foot waves, hurricane force winds, the low-
est barometric pressure readings observed
in North America until 2011. These weather
conditions experienced on the Great Lakes
in November, 1913 took the lives of 250 sail-
ors, perhaps more; the numbers vary in dif-
ferent records. Many ships were destroyed,
shore facilities were damaged, and lake -
shore communities were severely affected.
The causes of the weather conditions have
been described in various ways. This report
uses some recent work by James Clary of St.
Clair MI, using US weather service
information.
There were two storms associated with
the two frontal depressions. One of these
formed over northern Wisconsin and it
reached Lake Superior on November 6.
This depression produced northerly gales
on Lake Superior and Lake Michigan on the
night of November 6 and 7 and on Lake
Huron by early November 8. This depres-
sion moved easterly and this resulted in an
easing of storm conditions. As the winds
diminished ships' captains ordered their
vessels onto Lake Erie, into the Detroit River
and the St. Clair River and through the
Mackinac straits and down the St. Mary's
River. So numbers of ships were moving on
November 8 and 9.
What the ships' captains did not know
about was the formation on November 9 of
a frontal depression moving along Lake Erie.
What they did not know was the more than
abnormal barometric pressure readings.
The lowest reading recorded was at Erie.
Pennsylvania where the eye of the storms
was over that town; the reading was 28.61 ':
it has been commented by present day stu-
dents of the weather that occurred in
November, 1913, that this figure may have
been the lowest recorded In the United
States until the hurricane which calve up
the eastern seaboard of the United States in
2011. The lower the barometric pressure
higher and higher wind speeds result. In the
northern hemisphere winds move in a
counter clockwise direction around a frontal
depression and you can plot wind directions
in the lakes as this depression advances.
This depression moved north and created
the weather conditions which devastated
Lake Erie, lower Lake Michigan and Lake
1luron. Wind speeds exploded. The terns
used for what this depression created was
"weather bomb". Winds reached 80-90 miles
per hour. Waves as high as 35 feet were
reported. As the depression moved wind
speeds and directions changed unpredicta-
bly with wave directions changing in a con-
fused pattern. The storm brought rain and
snow.
Snow falls were heavy from Cleveland
north to the shores of Lake Huron with
depths on the ground reaching four feet.
John Byrne
The air was white with wt't snow, ht'ilce tilt'
terns "white hurricane" as the high winds
whirled the snow as it fell. The storms
incredible intensity lasted for 16 hours, late
into the night of November 9-10.
Weather science in U)13 was in its infancy.
'Ihe paths of frontal depressions were diffi-
cult to forecast. In retrospect it seems that
the first depression with its stormy gale force
winds moved off to the east thus creating a
situation which seemed to allow a captain
to order his vessel out. 1Nhat was not known
was the corning of the second storm which
may have come over the Appalachians to
the south of the Great Lakes Basin. So the
absence of forecasting science, the lack of
radio communication on the ships and the
approaching end of the navigation season
all conspired to encourage the shipping
companies and the captains to move their
ships out after the original gales
diminished.
The result was serious Toss of life and the
loss or partial destruction of about 40 ves-
sels. Future articles will provide descrip-
tions of these losses and stories about the
crews. The next article will look at one of the
ships and the rescue of the crew.
Joe Wooden is an author and historian.