The Citizen, 1999-09-29, Page 7THE CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1999. PAGE 7.
Approaching the Millennium
Education - yesterday, today and tomorrow
By Janice Becker
Citizen staff
From the little red schoolhouses
which dotted rural townships to
large centralized facilities accom
modating hundreds of children, edu
cation has gone through many
changes in the last 100 years.
At the turn of the last century, the
only transportation to school was
walking, horseback or maybe a
sleigh ride.
The local school was a one-room
building with one teacher looking
after 30 to 40 children from Grade
1 to Grade 8.
During those years, education was
rarely a priority, particularly with
farm families when help bringing in
the crops and looking after the live
stock was more important. It was not
uncommon for children to finish
their formal schooling by Grade 8.
Teaching in those one-room
schoolhouses hold special memories
for Eluned McNair and Jeanne
Ireland of Brussels.
McNair taught from 1934 to 1977,
only taking off 15 years in the mid
dle to raise her family.
She started at Cranbrook #7,
before moving to #10, #6, Union,
Brick in East Wawanosh, then com
pleted her career at Grey Central
Public School from 1965 to 1977.
All her years were spent in Huron
County except for one when she
travelled with her
Chatham. Her annual
$500 when she started
$2,700 by the 1960s.
Noting that she liked all the
schools, Union, where she spent
eight years, was her favourite.
Once she began to explain the
conditions at most rural schools dur
ing those early years, it was easy to
see why Union may hold a special
place in her heart, other than the
wonderful children.
While most buildings did not have
indoor washrooms, electricity or
central heat, Union did. However,
McNair is quick to point out that the
washrooms were not flush. She was
just glad they were inside.
Ireland began her teaching career
in 1945 in St. Marys where she
taught for one year before moving to
Huron County. She stayed at a
school a mile and
Fordwich until she
family to
salary was
and rose to
a quarter from
came to Morris
1
Remembering the past
Schools such as Wallace’s School, Lot 10, Cone. 8, Morris
Twp. were where many rural children began their educa
tions until central schools were constructed in the mid
1960s.
Twp. after her marriage in 1948.
Ireland taught at Orangehill, Grey
#3 and Home School before leaving
to raise her family.
Upon her return, she entered a
brand new school, as the kinder
garten teacher at Brussels Public
School in 1967. She remained until
1981.
“It was nice to get into a more
modem school,” she says. “I had a
lovely room.”
Ireland enjoyed teaching the little
ones “with their sweet little faces
and crying in the first day.”
This is one aspect of the system
(or society) which has not changed
for the better, according to Ireland'
In those days, when a five-year-old
cried, whether hurt or simply miss
ing Mom, Ireland used to pick the
child up and cuddled them against
her shoulder. Today, that would not
be allowed.
“I’m told you can’t even touch
them now.”
When McNair returned to teach
ing in 1965 at a new centralized
school, she says there was a great
difference in the workload.
“I went from having 20 children in
all grades to 30 Grade 1 students. I
had more than 100 notebooks to
check through every night as each
student had five books.”
McNair and Ireland also see a
change in how teachers are
able to deal with the workload.
“When I first started at
Brussels Public School,” says
Ireland, “the teachers had a lot
of fun together in off hours.
Eventually more pressure was
put on them (decreasing those
opportunities.)”
McNair agrees that the
workload was different. In the rural
schools, there may have been only ’
one or two students in a grade. You
could teach them the Grade 5 social
studies one year and do the Grade 6
the next year.
Ireland says there was far more
time for individual attention then as
well.
However, the hours were not
short. Work assignments for the fol
lowing day were often written on the
blackboards the night before. “We
had to pull the maps down to cover
it so they wouldn’t do it when they
weren’t supposed to,” smiles
McNair.
She says she was more tired work-
' ing at Grey Central. “I spent half the
I summer making devices to use in
teaching.”
i The pair also see changes in how
children are handled in class.
: “Things happen today that we
I wouldn’t have stood for,” says
McNair, referring to the manner of
• the children and their outspoken
i ways. “I know someone who had a
Grade 1 student swearing at them.”
: “Kids are growing up sooner
; now,” adds Ireland.
However, they do say they believe
i there has been a crackdown on disci-
I pline in recent years.
Teaching methods have also
I changed. “We didn’t have much to
work with in the rural schools,” says
: McNair. “Reading was done with
t Dick and Jane.”
t Both women are firm believers in
the phonics method to teach reading
i and were not impressed with the
creative style of spelling experi
mented with a few years ago.
I “There were young people in high
t school and university who couldn’t
write a sentence. They didn’t know
i what a noun was,” says McNair.
Noting that phonics is not the
• whole answer, Ireland says it should
i still be the basis.
They would also like an emphasis
i on using one’s head for math, a
Education has moved
from one-room
school houses to
centralized systems
return to grammar and composition
as a focus and importance put on
neatness.
Willie Lawrie, the current princi
pal at Blyth Public School has a
much different perspective on the
education system, having begun her
career in the mid 1970s.
“When I started, there were up to
40 children in a class. There were
also new teaching methods being
tried.”
Team teaching and open concept
classrooms where being tested. In
open concept, two classes were put
in a room and the teachers were
taken out of the fours walls. The
teaching staff worked as a team.
In spite of experimental things
being tried, more children were slip
ping through the cracks because of
the large classes, says Lawrie.
It was also during that time that a
formative years program was devel
oped, recognizing the importance of
early years learning. “That program
was not replaced until this govern
ment,” says Lawrie. “It was ahead of
its time.”
Special education emerged.
Children who were having difficul
ties were diagnosed, but there was
not yet a formalized program.
However, teachers began in earnest
to take special training to assist
those students.
Lawrie says there was more indi
vidualized planning 20 years ago
where today there is goal setting.
Children were given objectives as to
what they could do by the end of the
lesson. Now there are expectations.
The boom years of the 1970s also
saw an increase in course specialists.
There were physical education spe
cialists and music specialists.
It was also during the 1970s when
Technology
Computer use has increased rapidly in schools,
teachers first had to have an under
graduate degree before entering
teachers’ college. The college
became part of the faculty of educa
tion at universities rather than being
run more independently and funded
through the government as before.
Technology of the 1980s brought
new possibilities in the classroom
and concern for parents.
“When we began using video cas
settes or special education broad
casts from TVO in the class, parents
were worried the television would
replace the teachers,” says
Lawrie.
Computers first arrived in the
mid 80s with the big old icons,
she says. “There was one
Commodore 64 in the school,
with no printer attached. It was
used only once material had
been proofed and re-written. It
was not used like we do today,
as a word processor.”
Lawrie says this was very difficult
to get used to because she had had a
computer at home since 1983 when
she was completing her Master’s
degree.
During those years, teachers were
taught basic programming to use the
computer and the programs on the
machine were very elementary.
As the years progressed, Lawrie
says the teachers’ federation began
to lobby for smaller class sizes, aim
ing for a mid-20s figure.
It was Bill Davis’ Conservative
government which finally brought in
a regular special education program.
“A lot of people don’t realize it,
but the 1980s were a very tight time
for paper and supplies. There was a
wage freeze and very few teachers
were hired,” says Lawrie. For years,
she was one of the youngest teachers
on staff.
With the rollbacks, specializations
used in earlier years were now being
combined. It became harder to pro
vide some programs, says Lawrie.
One memory which will stay with
Lawrie is the change over to photo
copiers from the old ditto machines.
She went through a pregnancy won
dering what effect the toxic fumes
might have on her child.
Funding in the education system
continued to tighten into the 1990s.
Flexibility was lost in many schools
as there were no longer specialists.
Teachers may teach a course they
are not experts in or are not interest
ed in.
“There is a mandate to teach spe
cial interest courses, but there is not
the personnel to do it,” says Lawrie.
When there is not a specialist in
courses such as music or physical
education, a child’s skill level may
not be carried through because they
do not receive consistently increased
knowledge from the teacher, she
says. As the specialists became
classroom teachers, they were no
longer available to teach the special
ty to ail the students.
For new teachers trying to find a
school, Lawrie suggests the system
needs more multi-faceted people.
“We need music, drama and phys.
ed. teachers.”
One improvement in recent years,
Lawrie notes is the in-school social
worker who works in conjunction
with the Children’s Aid Society. The
social worker can now work with
those children both in school and at
home.
The development of partnerships
with many organizations and com
panies has helped bring the board
through difficult times. Educational
assistant training offered in
Clinton has allowed the caliber of
the employees to improve.
There is now a huge infrastructure
and technicians to back up the sys
tem, she says.
The biggest change for the chil
dren, in her 25 years of teaching is
the introduction of junior and senior
kindergarten, she says.
“I was quite a proponent of the
program. It gives the children an
opportunity to be better matched as
they enter Grade 1.”
The smaller class size has also
helped teachers work with individ
ual children more, allowing the stu
dents to work at their level and the
teachers to differentiate the way they
teach to particular pupil.
The volunteerism in the school
has been very helpful in providing
that one-on-one time needed by stu
dents.
There has also been a great move
towards inclusion of all children in
the system. There are many schools
which have deaf, blind, autistic or
tube-fed students in the schools.
“It has a great effect on both the
children with the disabilities and
those learning to communicate with
those with the challenges.
In the last few years, annual edu
cation plans, standardized testing,
common curriculums and portfolio
assessments have gone a long way to
equalizing the education system
across the province.
However, no matter what the tech
nology or other changes which have
infiltrated the education system in
the last 100 years, one thing still
holds true. The teachers do what is
best for the children and try to be the
best teachers they can be.
“The good teachers have always
known that,” says Lawrie.