Loading...
The Rural Voice, 2019-02, Page 32Whether selling bulls or quickly replacing a dairy herd with superior genetics, dairy farmers say genomics are a tool they use to increase profitability in their herds. Three dairy farmers, with unique marketing goals, highlighted the pros and cons of using genomics during a dairy panel on January 3 at Grey Bruce Farmer’s Week. Wayne Wagler of Claynook Farms Ltd, near New Hamburg; Philip Armstong of Armstrong Manor Farms north of Brampton and Gary Markus of Markhill Holsteins near Ingersoll have specialized goals for their dairy farms. Wagler sells bulls and has a huge goal of one day having every dairy cow in the world linked to a Claynook bull. Armstrong and his partners cull any heifer with a Lifetime Profit Index (LPI) below 2800 to improve their herd and profit on cattle sales while Markus’s goal is a herd transformation over the next four years using six high-end animals he recently purchased. Each farmer uses genomics to reach these goals. “We want to stay on the leading edge of genetics as we sell bulls worldwide,” said Wagler, following a presentation by Lynsay Beavers of the Canadian Dairy Network. She said that 40,000 holstein females were genotyped in 2017 and that almost 70 per cent of semen is now used from genomic young sires. “Use of genomics is not rising as quickly as we thought it would but it is being used,” said Beavers. “Genomics is a herd management strategy where, in an environment where it’s difficult to expand, it allows farmers to cull and raise only the heifers they want for replacements.” She teaches that by using genomics, breeders can double the genetic progress of their herd. Genomics “increases the reliability of genetic evaluation from 35 to 70 per cent LPI.” Testing is done by taking a hair and tissue sample and costs about $33 for a basic panel of information. Results are available in about three weeks. Beaver said when starting to use genomic testing, it’s important to choose results based on your goals, to set a threshold, and don’t forget the “real deal.” “If you have a heifer with a high index but she has a terrible bout of pneumonia, she will never live up to her genetic potential,” said Beavers. Wagler said Claynook Farms has been using genomic testing since inception. “It has been lucrative for us,” he said. “We wanted to know if our cows had the stuff or not and if they didn’t, we wanted to know what we had to buy.” “We don’t test an animal that doesn’t have the potential to create bulls for us,” said Wagler of the family farm that now involves the third generation with three families in ownership. They crop 340 hectares, 183 tie stalls to milk in, keep 200 cows and retain 400 young cattle including 70 bulls. Since using genomics, Wagler believes the herd has both better conformation and better conception rates. The Waglers test 80 per cent of their females to measure their value as bull dams while 70 per cent of males are tested for potential as artificial insemination (AI) bulls. He would like to see better testing for recessive genes and haplogroups (scientists have identified nine haplogroups that appear to cause embryo loss or stillbirths when they exist in the homozygous state) to 28 The Rural Voice Genomics can double genetic progress Thee dairy farmers says genetic testing is a useful tool to speed up marketing and production goals Members of the panel of genomics at the Grey Bruce Farmer’s Week Dairy Day were: (left to right) Gary Markus of Markhill Holsteins, Wayne Wagler of Claynook Farms, Philip Armstrong of Armstrong Manor Farms and Lynsay Beavers of the Canadian Dairy Network. •By Lisa B. Pot • Dairy