The Citizen, 1992-02-26, Page 5£3 Arthur Black
THE CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 26,1992. PAGE 5.
TheShort
Telling it like it was
in the old days
The guy in the coffee shop was singing a
familiar tune.
“Lookit this Jeffrey Dahmer creep” he
growled, pointing a crescent moon of
chocolate glazed donut at the front page of
the tabloid rag on the counter. “Kills people.
Eats them. Paints their skulls. Ah, I tell ya.”
He went on to grouse about other human
horrors of our time. Wayne Gacey. Charlie
Manson. The KGB/CIA/IRA/PLO.
“I'm tellin ya, I don't know what the world
is cornin' to” he sermonized to no one in
particular.
And then, the kicker:
“Sure wasn't like that in the old days.”
He was a big guy, this coffee shop orator.
He had one of those wallets on a stainless
steel chain attached to his belt, and he
cradled his coffee mug in a big meaty mitt
that looked like it might bounce off, oh say,
the jaw of a smart alec and be little the
worse for the adventure.
Otherwise, I’m sure I would have said
something.
Something like “Horsefeathers”.
I get a little impatient with folks who try
to sell the notion hat, depravity-wise, Things
Have Never Been So Bad.
The truth is, wickedness has always had a
deluxe suite at the Hotel Homo Sapiens.
International Scene
Recessions
are followed
by common sense
BY RAYMOND CANON
If I were to charge for every economic
analysis that I have given over the years, I
would be hobnobbing with the likes of
Donald Trump. However, since he and his
kind of people are not exactly my cup of tea,
perhaps it is just as well that I have not
charged. At any rate, there is nothing like a
recession to bring out the curiosity in people;
it has therefore come to pass that I have been
bombarded with questions. For the price of
this newspaper, you will get the ultimate
truth, not to mention infinite wisdom that I
have been handing out to all and sundry,
whether they have been sitting in rapt
attention in one of my Economics classes or
whether they are friends and relatives plus
any other hangers-on.
For openers I am tired of hearing that this
recession has been made solely in Canada; it
most assuredly has not. We have had some
input but then we usually do. Any country
with an economy as open as ours has to put
up with international fluctuations and we
should not forget for one minute that the
United States, far and away our best
customer (7/10ths or more of our exports)
has not exactly been enjoying good times.
They are as bad off as we are, and with a
government that is less prepared to come to
grips with the situation than ours. That
statement alone should make some people sit
up and take notice.
The current American disease is running
too high a deficit in its fiscal policy (i.e.
govt, spending compared with taxes) as well
We've had our share of saints, holy folk and
just plain good people over the years, but
that same history is pockmarked with ogres
and tyrants, murderers and scalliwags.
We’ve got more nosey reporters around
these days, that's all.
But perhaps you think I'm all wet. Maybe
you're convinced that our parents — or at
least our parents' parents -- lived in an
altogether more innocent time, when people
really were the kinder, gentler folk George
Bush keeps prattling about.
In that case, ladies and gentlemen, allow
me to introduce you to Mister Alferd E.
Packer.
Yes, “Alferd”. Spelling is but one of many
of society's secrets Mister Packer failed to
unravel in his unhappy meander through
Life. Unused to reading or writing, Mister
Packer seldom signed his name, but when he
did, he spelled it ‘Alferd’.
He led an undistinguished life, did Mister
Packer, performing odd jobs that blew him
like so much sagebrush back and forth
across the American southwest. In the winter
of 1874, Fate found Alferd and five
companions slogging through a remote
valley in the San Juan mountains not far
from Lake City, in Hindsdale County,
Colorado. The six men were adventurers,
westward bound, looking for the proverbial
pot of gold.
It was a rough winter with lots of cold and
snow. Indians went hungry and whole herds
By Raymond Canon
as consumers who have been borrowing as if
there were no tomorrow. The Americans
spent most of the 1980's enjoying the peak
of the business cycle and somehow got it
into their heads that it would never end. That
sounds remarkably like the thinking in the
1920's just before the great stock market
crash of 1929.
If all this looks vaguely familiar to what is
happening here, you are right. The similarity
is astounding but it shouldn't be since we are
influenced to a considerable degree by what
the Americans do or what they choose not to
do.
Nor is there prosperity elsewhere in the
industrialized world. Sweden is something
of a basket case right now, Australia has just
replaced its prime minister for failing to
come to grips with a stagnant economy, and
Germany is facing a rising rate of inflation
not to mention the much higher than
expected costs in absorbing the former East
Germany. The swiss, normally a model of
economic rectitude, have inflation of about
six per cent and a stagnant economy while
the British are wondering just when they are
going to see really good growth figures to
signify that they have at last come out of
their recession.
Another problem that is affecting the
industrialized world, including Canada, is
the internationalization of big business. In a
rapidly changing world it is no longer
advisable to sit at home and expect
customers to beat a path to your door; in
order to be competitive you haye to close or
shift plants, and size is no advantage. Just
witness what has happened recently to
General Motors, still the largest car producer
in the world but somewhat backward in
making the necessary adjustments. Far too
often Canadians seem to feel that they are
living in a protected world where the effects
of these adjustments will not be felt by them.
of cattle froze on the hoof. Nobody much
expected to see the six men come spring.
And mostly, they were right -- five of
them never showed up. Just Alferd Packer.
A ... remarkably well-fed Alferd Packer, for
a man who'd supposedly spent the winter
starving in the mountains. After the spring
thaw, horrified investigators found Alferd's
last camp site. There, they discovered the
dismembered remains of Alferd's erstwhile
companions. They had been murdered with
an axe.
And they had been eaten.
Alferd denied responsibility. Then he
confessed to killing one of them in self
defense. Finally he owned up to the whole
shebang: multiple murders plus gastronomy
above and beyond the boundaries of the
Cordon Bleu Cookbook.
It wasn't a pretty case, but I'd have risked
upchucking my lunch to have been in that
courtroom when District Judge Melville B.
Gerry pronounced sentence on the hapless
Packer.
Legend has it that the Judge said this:
“Stand up, you man-eaten' sonofabitch.
Stand up”. Then, the judge thundered:
“There was seven Dimmicrats in Hindsdale
County and you ‘et five of ‘em, damn you. I
sentence you to be hanged by the neck until
you're dead, dead, dead, as a warning against
reducin’ the Democratic population of the
state.”
That's how the legend goes. If it isn't true,
it ought to be.
So, too, are the Americans and it is
becoming obvious what is happening to both
countries.
If the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade negotiations on the vexing agricultural
problem can be brought to a successful
conclusion, prices for Canadian grain will
almost certainly increase; until that happens
our agriculture sector will remain in the
doldrums. The same holds true for other
countries; in short, there is scarcely a sector
that is not affected in some way by the
current economic downturn.
How Canada reacts to these world
problems is, to say the least, the key to our
continued prosperity as a nation. We might
well take a page from what the Americans
are learning from the excesses of the 1980's.
The first is to be a more frugal approach to
consumer spending, the lack of which
contributed greatly to their downturn when it
caught up with them. The second is for
businesses to become more competitive both
at home and abroad. This means, among
other things, that workers become better
trained, more flexible in changing jobs or
even professions. Finally, there is still the
necessity to put aside something for the
proverbial rainy day.
Strangely enough I recall hearing a lot of
this in my youth when we were coming out
of the Great Depression and World War II.
Isn't it strange that so often we have to go
back to relearn the lessons of the past?
Letter to the editor policy
Leiters to the editor must be signed and the
name must also be clearly printed and the tele
phone number and address included. While letters
may be printed under a pseudonym, we must be
able to verify the identity of the writer. In addition,
although the identity of the writer may be withheld
in print, it may be revealed to parties directly
involved on personal appearance at The Citizen's
offices.
of it
By Bonnie Gropp
A kiss
is but
a kiss
The British tabloids are screaming- Prince
Charles didn't kiss his wife the way he
should have when she presented him with a
trophy after his team won a polo match in
India recently.
Give me a break! In the first place who
really cares? Secondly, the royal peck was
good enough for the Indian people- it almost
caused a riot. Let's face it, in Charlie's case,
his smacker would quite likely have been
unfavourably critiqued regardless of the
level of affection it displayed. I almost have
sympathy for a person, albeit a rich royal,
who is openly scrutinized even when kissing
his spouse. The Brits are known for their
reserve and I would assume, not particularly
comfortable with public displays of
affection, especially when you know every
move you make is open for comment.
Certainly, when romantics have labeled a
couple as fairy tale prince and princess, they
will become the object of unwanted
attention, but a front page blowout analyzing
a smooch, complete with before and after
pictures and a banner headline? The Star
asked "Why Can't They Kiss The Way They
Used To?" Show me a couple married 12
years who does! If I were Prince Charlie, I'd
be inclined to tell the press to "kiss off.
The problem, it seems, actually began
earlier than the ill-fated pucker, when
Charles got off on the wrong foot by not
accompanying his wife to the Taj Mahal, the
Indian monument to a man's love for his
wife, thus making them fair game for all
those who should use their time to better
pursuits, such as getting a life.
So the romance is over. So Charles doesn't
love his wife. Not a terrific example from a
future King, but certainly one shared by
many fallable human beings.
Frankly, I can't help feeling that we dwell
just a little too much on the present and past
indiscretions and transgression of our public
figures. For example, look at the recent
situation of Will Ferguson, Kitchener MPP,
who had to resign as Minister of Energy in
order to clear his name, after a woman said
he had a relationship with her 19 years ago
when he was an employee of Grandview
School for Girls. He also allegedly helped
the woman, who was in Grandview for
stealing, escape. At the time Ferguson was
19. Since then, he has become a happily
married man and a respected politician.
But who can care about the present, when
there's a skeleton rattling in someone's
closet, especially if there's a hint of a sex
scandal hiding with it? Whatever happened
to the concept of only being able to cast
stones, if you are free of sin yourself?
Heaven forbid, someone should go digging
for bones at my house. As a teenager in the
60's I admit to some mistakes in my past, not
unlike many others who, as young people,
made their fair share of mistakes while
growing up. (All within the boundaries of
morality and the law, just not those of
common sense, I hasten to add). But, that is
usually the end result - we grow up, thank
goodness.
The colourful details of my past, right or
wrong, have helped to shape the person I
have become, and most of the time I rather
like her.
Certainly, if Mr. Ferguson did help a
criminal escape he has to answer for it. But,
is it really a reflection of who he is today?
It's not like he's made a habit of it! Yet, one
of his constituents, who admitted he has
served the area well, said if the charges are
true she would certainly have to reconsider
her opinion of Mr. Ferguson as a politician.
Definitely not your forgiving kind.
As for Charles and Di, if she can turn the
other cheek so can I.