The Citizen, 1991-04-17, Page 6PAGE 6. THE CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 17, 1991.
Bd. of Ed. changes have Hullett parents worried
About 75 concerned parents of
Hullett Central Public School stu
dents attended a meeting last
Thursday evening to discuss the
issue of student transfer and
transportation policy changes with
representatives of the Huron Coun
ty Board of Education (HCBE)
administration and trustees.
Superintendent of Operations for
HCBE Paul Carroll said the issue
has arisen primarily over concerns
the parents have about any pos
sible decision or action the board
may make about boundary
changes. They are afraid, he said,
their children may be forced to
attend a school outside of the
resident area.
Controversy began after a report
was released by the board inform
ing parents of the serious problem
of overcrowding and of govern
ment-mandated bus route changes.
The board listed a five-stage pro
gressive sequence of plans for
consideration. These included: re
defining when the school is full,
stopping the inflow of out-of-area
students into the school, tidying up
the bus routes and returning
out-of-area students. The final
suggestion was the revising of
boundaries to move students out of
Hullett and Huron Centennial into
schools with space, like Clinton and
Vanastra Public Schools.
In providing background infor
mation to the parents at the
meeting. Mr. Carroll outlined the
difficulties facing the board finan
cially. “There is no doubt that the
local tax bill is the greatest
challenge in the board room,” he
said. A bus route operation for one
year is $30,000 while the average
teacher is being paid $50,000
yearly. Cost of a portable classroom
is $35,000 plus utilities for a total
board cost of $115,000.
Property activity was another
area that concerned Mr. Carroll. In
one year alone, there were 1,000
new places created in the county,
he said. “You can imagine the
implication that has.”
Another statistic showed a pro
jected population growth of 4,000
in the future. “The system is full
now. We don’t have room for 4,000
more,” said Mr. Carroll.
Since 1988, the board has been
studying extensively the school
space situation. In the spring of
1989, Mr. Carroll says they identi
fied possible solutions to be imple
mented over the course of a five to
10 year period.
Some ideas, Mr. Carroll said, are
pretty easy to take, like building
additions, “but the minute you
start talking about relocation there
is lots of excitement." He explain
ed about the Urban Analysis Study
conducted by a group from Water
loo on the board’s behalf and stated
that their suggestion as the best
solution was boundary changes.
In a recommendation passed by
the board it was decided to instead
close the doors to any additional
new enrollment from outside the
school area. Also, Mr. Carroll has
been authorized to begin an evalua
tion of the bus routes so there are
no longer any “free rides” for
children attending Hullett, who live
outside the area. With the new
grant regulations handed down by
the government effective July 1.
the buses, he said, will be full
anyway. What this means is that
transfer students presently coming
to Hullett Central from Clinton, for
example, will still be able to attend
if they wish, but must find their
own transportation. Mr. Carroll
expects this will lead to a change in
enrollment at Hullett, estimating
that about two-thirds of those
affected won’t su-fer the inconven
ience.
In an interview after the meet
ing, Mr. ( arroll said these parent,
are obviously ton erned, but f< 1
,omewhal hclples* . ||<- ',;ik| wh j
the enrollment was approved for
their children to attend Hullett it
was on the stipulation that there
would be no extra cost to the board.
With the new transportation grants
and the space problem this would
no longer be the case.
He believes that these changes
will quite likely address the over
crowding issue at Hullett, but if
not, other alternatives will have to
be considered. Only, he added.
with considerable opportunity for
public input.
Mr. Carroll said, in his opinion,
there were a number of parents not
satisfied with the information pro
vided at the meeting, but he has
promised to modify or amend the
report so its intent is clearer. “My
wording of Section 5 of the report I
admitted was unclear. It got action,
which is what the trustees wanted,
but I promised to clarify the
recommendation and the status of
students of Hullett Central and
Huron Centennial for parents.”
Section 5 noted the impacts on the
schools but did not state they were
only proposals.
Hullett trustee John Jewitt was
satisfied with the outcome. “I think
people listened to the reasons why
boundary changes are being dis
cussed and now have an under
standing of why,” he said. “I know
I. have a better understanding of
things that the people involved
won’t stand for.” He stated that it
has been made plain to him that
those concerned will not support
boundary changes should the issue
arise again in the future, but as of
one of 16 trustees it is his opinion
that it won’t come to that.
“Everyone made their feelings
known and I know the direction I
have to go,” he said.