The Rural Voice, 1988-10, Page 72BRUCE
44610th St., Hanover, Ontario N4N 1 P9
519-364-3050
• The Rural Voice is provided to Bruce
County federation members by the BCFA.
County Federation of Agriculture NEWSLETTER
BCFA MEETING, AUGUST 25
Murray Elston, MPP, attended the
August meeting of the BCFA. Murray
was appointed Minister of Financial
Institutions on August 16, replacing
Deputy Premicr Robert Nixon, who
rcmains in charge of the Ministry of
Treasury and Economics. Murray also
continues to serve as chairman of the
Management Board and of Cabinet.
Bruce directors told Murray that
they believe agriculture is drastically
underfunded. Murray replied that other
departments such as doctors and hospi-
tals have the same complaint about
underfunding. All ministries, he said,
are restricted budget -wise except in
cases of emergency, like forest fires.
The directors requested that Murray
take back to Toronto crop insurance
concerns and a request to continue the
OFFIRR program at 100 per cenL The
directors are also asking for provincial
and federal support for stabilization on
farm -fed grains. As well, the BCFA
would like to see the provincial govern-
ment support Credit Unions in agricul-
tural lending.
A resolution to remove provincial
sales tax from concrete for farm use was
carried.
Presidents' meetings are scheduled
for Huron, Grey, Bruce, and Wellington
counties on October 21, to be held in
Wingham, Chatsworth, and Arthur.
OFA in-house planning on long-term
policy, structure, and finance is to be
discussed.
A letter from the Niagara Escarp-
ment Commission advising the amend-
ment hearing has been rescheduled to
November 1 and 2, 1988, at the Grey
County Council Chambers in Owen
Sound. Recommendations, concerns,
and input or ideas from people in the
peninsula are requested for presentation
at the November hearing.
Bruce has received 17 new members
as a result of its membership drive.
OFA field representative Gertie
Blake reported that fraud charges have
been laid as a result of ads promising
money to farmers by the Canadian
Government Farm Support Program
scheme.
70 THE RURAL VOICE
The regional directors reported that
crop insurance and drought relief was
discussed at the August board meeting.
It was decided that there must be an ad
hoc payment but it should not under-
mine the crop insurance program. The
CFA informs us that the Canadian West
is no longer in favour of free trade.
OPINION: THE BIG ISSUE
If the results of the opinion survey
published in last month's column are
any indication, agriculture is moving in
a direction contrary to the wishes of the
majority of farmers.
While those who responded were
practically unanimous in the assessment
that many farmers are failing through no
fault of their own, only 21 percent could
endorse more government subsidies as a
possible solution. This comes as no
surprise, for while we all cash in on
government goodies, we decry the state
of affairs that makes them necessary.
Developing hand-out schemes to
deal with the long-term systemic prob-
lems in farming is madness; farmers
have known this for a long time. Now
governments of all nations see that the
hole they have endeavoured to fill is a
bottomless pit. Faced with the prospect
of emptying national treasuries in an all-
out agricultural subsidy war which
would benefit no one, the search for an
alternative course has become urgent.
The alternative bcing championed
by the U.S. administration with enthusi-
astic support from Thatcher and Mul-
roney would take us down a path where
DON'T MISS THE BCFA ANNUAL MEETING
AND GUEST SPEAKER BILL JONGEJAN IN
RIPLEY ON NOVEMBER 4 — CONTACT A
DIRECTOR FOR TICKETS
the scenery is, unfortunately, familiar.
This plan calls for the elimination of
subsidies world-wide so that "market
forces" can bring about an end to surplus
production and bring stability to the
farm economy. The historical fact that
"market forces" have never brought
about anything remotely akin to stabil-
ity, only chaotic, unpredictable fluctua-
tions, seems to have slipped by.
The Public Relations Committee
reported that a random telephone survey
was taken of four per cent of the BCFA
membership. The results are conclu-
sive. A motion was carried to forward
the BCFA Opinion Survey to each
county federation president in Ontario
to obtain a cross -province survey.0
Farmers have been fed this ration
before, and ended up with an acute
stomach ache. They realize that the so-
called "free market" in commodities is
open to manipulation and interference
on every level, that it always has been
and always will be exploited to the
advantage of everyone except the pro-
ducer. Our survey demonstrated this
clearly. When asked to respond to the
statement, "Agriculture needs produc-
tion controls to be financially secure,"
72 per cent of the farmers surveyed
agreed. Only 1 in 5 thought that there
might be some hope for stability outside
of a controlled production system.
The farm community should wake
up now and realize that the course for
agriculture being pursued by the federal
government, a course that will be firmly
entrenched and practically irreversible
once the Free Trade Agreement with the
U.S. is finalized, is in direct opposition
to the saner, more co-operative ap-
proach we have been moving toward.
In this regard our federation is failing
dismally. In the absence of consensus,
we seem to be riding the fence, officially
not supporting the agreement, but offer-
ing only half-hearted opposition.
Twenty years from now we may look
back and realize that while our farm or-
ganizations fumbled around with tax
reform, checkoffs, and other relatively
minor issues, the basic direction of agri-
culture was decided by someone else.0
Respectfully submitted,
BCFA Public Relations Committee
Note: Each month this page will contain an item
of opinion on some current farm issue. We would
like to know what YOU think. If your opinion
differs from the one you have read here, or if you
support our view, call the office at 464-3050.