The Rural Voice, 2006-12, Page 16Wendy Holm
Attack on western grain farmers and attack on all farmers
Wendy Holm is an
award-winning
Agrologist,
economist and
journalist from
British Colubia.
She can be reach-
ed at holm@
farmertofarmer.ca,
www. theholmteam.
ca
Never before has so much
aggression been directed at farmers
by the Government of Canada.
It began back on July 27, when
Canadian Agriculture Minister Chuck
Strahl held a "roundtable" meeting in
Saskatoon on the future of the
Canadian Wheat Board to which only
those who agreed with abolishing the
single desk selling authority of the
Board were invited.
That afternoon Strahl told
journalists his government would not
be bound by Section 47.1 of the
Canadian Wheat Board Act, which
prohibits any changes to the
marketing of grain in western Canada
unless supported by a producer vote.
Then there was the September 19
email from Regina -based Charleton
Communications to Western Canada
Wheat Growers and others claiming
"the other side is embarrassing us
with their propaganda" and that
"government, MPs and others" had
suggested "we must get into the game
with letters to the editor in weeklies,
dailies and agriculture trade
publications". Charleton Communi-
cations offered to write letters from
farmers to be sent to local and
regional papers — "at least five
letters a week" — backing
government's position on the CWB.
"...this would get us into the propa-
ganda game and save you people
time." Who put Charleton up to this?
There was (and remains) Strahl's
October 5 gag order prohibiting
directors and staff of the Canadian
Wheat Board from defending the CWB's
role as the single -desk seller of
Western Canadian wheat and barley.
Then there was Strahl's removal
this fall of two CWB appointed
directors (one fired for supporting the
single desk authority of the CWB,
one given a plum for stepping down),
12 THE RURAL VOICE
replaced by two anti-CWB Directors
who are, in the words of Director Art
Macklin, "blatant, partisan patronage
appointments."
Next came Strahl's October 17
order, in the middle of a CBW
election, to remove 36 percent of
western Canada grain growers —
16,269 farmers — from the list of
eligible voters. This year. five direc-
tors will be elected in a vote that runs
from September 5 to December 1.
Electoral districts have had 25 to
48 percent of eligible voters cut from
their lists, now comprised only of
those who have sold grain through
the CWB in the past 15 months. This
has disenfranchised farmers who
have been victims of flood, drought,
or bad harvest weather, are in the
middle of a crop rotation, or still have
their crops in the bin. And to make
matters worse, Agriculture Minister
Chuck Strahl is now actively
campaigning for/endorsing the anti-
CWB Directors.
What Stephen Harper didn't quite
count on was the public backlash his
actions would evoke.
On October 25, Bill C-300, a
private members bill tabled by Gerry
Ritz, Chair of the Agriculture
Committee that would have removed
the single desk authority of the CWB,
went down to defeat (149 to 111) in
the House. (To his great credit, Inky
Mark, four -term Conservative
Member of Parliament for Dauphin -
Swan River -Marquette, opposed
Harper and voted against the Bill.)
On November 1, the government
also lost (121 to 155) an important
vote on a motion put forward by the
Opposition calling for a producer
vote on any changes to the CWB.
Undaunted, Strahl vows to forge
ahead, saying what he can't do with
legislation, he will do with regulation.
What could justify flying in the
face of such strong political
opposition? When in doubt, follow
the money: If farmers lose power,
who gains power?
Obviously concentrated
transnational grain companies will
have access to cheaper grain. In
preparation for this, the
Saskatchewan Wheat Pool just
announced its bid to take over
Agricore. Archer Daniel Midland
would wind up owning 28 per cent of
the new company, which would
control of 44 per cent of the grain
elevators in Western Canada and the
lion's share of the grain handling
facilities at ports. Posted on ADM's
website is the Reuter's story:
"Canada minister upbeat on,
Saskpool-Agricore deal". In it, Strahl
praises the merger as a "good thing"
because it could "create a Canadian
grain powerhouse".
For companies like Monsanto,
getting rid of the Canadian Wheat
Board would eliminate a strong and
vocal farmer advocate that has
become a thorn in their side
frustrating expansion plans; it was the
CWB's strong intervention that was
largely responsible for preventing
Canadian registration of Monsanto's
Roundup Ready Wheat.
Then there is always cheap
feedstock for ethanol. As large
power companies reposition
themselves to compete in a non-fossil
fuel market, rapid expansion in
ethanol production is part of the
forecast. Currently, there are over
1,000 retail locations selling ethanol -
blended gasoline in Canada.
Meeting an Natural Resources
Canada -cited target of 35 percent of
Canadian gasoline containing 10
percent ethanol by 2010 will require
1.4 billion litres of fuel ethanol per
year from 4.2 million tones of wheat
grown on 3.5 million acres of land at
a rate of 11,200 acres a day. This
represents 18 per cent of the tonnage
and 14 per cent of the acres seeded to
wheat in Western Canada in the 2006
crop year.
And that production capacity is
already well under way. Under its
Ethanol Expansion Program, Natural
Resources Canada just funded $78
million in projects by Suncor, Husky
and others to meet this target, adding
750 million litres of annual fuel
ethanol capacity and quadrupling
Canadian production to almost one
billion litres. This capacity alone will
require three million tonnes of feed
grain from 2.5 million acres at a rate
of 8,000 acres of production per day
(13 per cent of tonnage and 10 per
cent of acres). On November 8, ADM
announced they will dominate the
global ethanol market.