Loading...
The Rural Voice, 2003-11, Page 37News in Agriculture Professor provided the first ray of hope Continued from page 33 truck appeared and loaded up all the stakes that had been so carefully replaced. In the long run there were about 11 wells drilled to study underground water movement. "I think we could have started our own subdivision," he says. In early August a woman arrived by taxi and got out and asked "What does it feel like to be the source of the infection that killed the people in Walkerton." He admits he lost it and said things he shouldn't have said and kicked her off the farm. He later wondered how she got the information when the medical officer of health had a gag order in place. The next day the news of their implication was on television from coast to coast. It was their daughter, in training in London for the Canadian Olympic Rowing team who called to tell them at 7:30 a.m. to tell them the radio was saying they were responsible for the infection. "That was just the start of one of the worst days anyone could have." By 8:00 a.m. the television trucks were coming up the lane and radio stations began calling. It got so bad they put a tractor across the quarter - mile long laneway. They finally set limits, agreeing to talk to people about the water issue only certain days of the week. The OCA helped relieve some of the pressure by issuing a statement, he says. Still the pressure was enormous. Carolyn began avoiding going to Walkerton which had been her hometown. They had been hoping to go to Australia in September to watch their daughter row with the Canadian Olympic Team in the Sydney Olympic Games. "I'm thinking I've got two choices: I can either spend $20,000 and hire a lawyer and do all this to protect myself when (I think) I've done no wrong, or I can say 'go to hell' and go to Australia. We went to Australia." That break almost saved their sanity in the end, he says. After they returned Medical Officer Dr. Murray McQuigge held a news conference to release his findings on the cause of the contamination and showed a diagram that made it look like the Biesenthal farm was virtually sitting on top of Well 5 instead of being the second farm to the west. It also appeared as if it was a straight path downhill from the barnyard to the well when in fact the land fell gently from the barnyard toward the well but there was a rise before the well. "We have a rather unique farm in that water will run up hill," Biesenthal said dryly. The theory was that there was a way for the water to wend its way through several ridges to come back to the well but to do so it had to go through a corn field with four -inch tall corn and a hay field already with a good growth on it, Dr. Biesenthal said. "That's one hell of a trip for water, I tell you," he said. What's more the water was supposed to have taken manure with it all along that circuitous route, even though there was no manure in the barnyard because the cattle were on pasture. Within a week they were served with a lawsuit on behalf of Stan and Frank Koebel and the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission for $350 million. The claim stated they didn't store their manure properly and that they should have known that contaminated water could enter Well 5 and had failed to take precautions to ensure manure would not escape. The claim said they had failed to undertake an Environmental Farm Plan when they had had one for seven years. But the frightening claim for all farmers was the statement that "The Biesenthals are strictly liable for any and all loss and damage arising from the escape of cattle manure." "To me as a farmer that's kind of scary. That puts the onus right on us. We' really have to protect ourselves from incidents like this." The lawsuit did bring support from farmers and farm groups all over the country, he remembers. Periodic visits by a committee of farm leaders involved in Ontario Farm Animal Council and the Ontario Farm Environmental Coalition also was a big help, he recalls. "I felt a lot of the time they just came to support us and make us feel better," he says. "When you're sitting on an island and it feels like everybody's shooting at you it's nice to have another group of people they can hit too." The lawsuit plus the announcement of the provincial inquiry under Justice Dennis O'Connor brought a flood of new lawyers and investigators including the OPP and RCMP to the farm. "You got to answer the same questions over and over and over again." But one good thing that came out of the inquiry was its hiring of Dr. Michael Goss as an expert on water issues. Right off the bat he spotted the slight rise toward the well and from aerial photos he also noticed there was no erosion in the corn where the water would have had to run. "He said I don't understand how water could have run from your farm, carrying a contaminant, to that well. He's probably the first person who came along who gave us hope that maybe there was a light at the end of the tunnel." At this point the records Dr. Biesenthal kept of his farming operation came in handy. He was able to provide records for the previous two. years of soil samples. manure samples, crop inputs and crop yields. "His conclusion was, and this conclusion never seemed to hit the media, was that the overland flow of water seemed less likely than the subsurface flow to make water flow to Well 5." Later another group of hydrologists for the Concerned Citizens of Walkerton asked to do research on the farm. They monitored the farm well and using dye in a nearby creek. Continued on page 34 NOVEMBER 2003 33