The Rural Voice, 2002-10, Page 30Spare the axe. Reap the rewards
Tree bylaws designed to protect woodlots may actually
encourage premature harvesting and cost landowners money
— not to mention damaging health forests
Story and photo by Keith Roulston
Tree bylaws that are
designed to create
healthy woodlots may
actually be having the
opposite` effect because
landowners and loggers are
cutting all trees above the
minimum legal limit, a recent
study by the Maitland Valley
Watershed Partnership has
found.
Under the study funded by
Human Resources Develop-
ment Canada. the Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
and the Maitland Valley
Conservation Authority, the
Forest Health Project's study
team evaluated 101 sites on 78
properties in the area covered
by the watersheds of the
Maitland and Nine Mile rivers
ranging from Lake Huron
inland. They graded the sites
from poor to excellent based
on a number of criteria. Only
one site rated excellent. Sixty
per cent rated only fair or
poor.
Richard Keeso of Keeso
and Sons Lumber in Listowel said he was disappointed
with the results. A member of the study team, Keeso, said
he was surprised to see the Targe percentage of woodlots
that fell into the fair and poor categories. "I think we're far
behind on good forest practices," he said.
Jane Bowles, forest ecologist with the Department of
Plant Sciences at the University of Western Ontario said
the findings confirmed her "gut feeling that a lot of forests
out there are not as healthy as they should be."
The study used many factors to judge the amount of
damage to the forest from being relatively undisturbed by
humans for excellent, to being severely disturbed' for poor.
Such things as invasion of non-native plant species like
garlic mustard and common buckthorn were also taken into •
account in making the assessments.
But the most disturbing factor for most of the study
team was the lack of larger and older trees that are
necessary to make a woodlot grow at its optimum rate.
Only 27 sites had basal areas at or above 15 square meters
per hectare which is the level at which optimal tree growth
is found, according to research published by the Ontario
A study of woodlots in the Maitland River
watershed found they were not as
healthy as they should be.
26 THE RURAL VOICE
Ministry of Natural Resource
in 2000. The basal area is
calculated by measuring the
diameter of all trees at breast
height.
"These results suggest that a
large proportion of woodlots in
the watershed have been cut to
the legal diameter limit and
contain few larger trees," the
study says. "Stands that have
been cut to the diameter limit
tend to be overstocked with
smaller diameter stems, have
high mortality and have poor
lumber quality."
And that, says. Bowles, is
going to cost the landowners
money. If too many large trees
are taken out of a woodlot at
the same time the canopy
above is opened up allowing
more light to the forest floor
and stimulating more
competition. Smaller trees will
be encouraged but there will be
so many trees they'll be
overcrowded. Eventually a
selective cut might help restore
some balance but in the
meantime the trees will grow shorter and not as well.
When trees have to stretch up for the light, as they do
when they're growing among mature trees, they'Il grow
taller and straighter, ideal for logs. If they get too much
Tight, they'll develop more branches and the logs will be
less valuable.
A s
well, Bowles points out, the study team found a
higher percentage of Tess valuable timber like ash
growing in the woodlots than expected. Ash is an
early transition species that ddesn't tolerate shade. The
open canopy of the woodlots with too few mature trees has
meant there's enough light for ash to thrive.
What's more, says Rick Steele of the Maitland Valley
Conservation Authority, those who have cut their woodlots
to the legal limit are going to have to wait much longer
before they can harvest another cut. Over the long term,
says Steele, a member of the study team, a landowner will
make more money by taking less money in the short term
and leaving enough larger trees in place to produce optimal
growth. Those trees left that are just above the minimum
diameter will be bigger for the next cut.