Loading...
The Rural Voice, 2000-07, Page 3R.V. Editor: Kcith Roulston editorial advisory committee: Bev Hill, farmer, Huron County Diane O'Shea, farmer, Middlesex Cty. George Penfold, associate professor, University of Guelph Gerald Poechman, farmer. Bruce Cty. contributing writers: Gisele Ireland, Lisa Boonstoppel- Pot, Bonnie Gropp, Ralph Pearce Bob Reid, Mervyn Erb, Sandra Orr, Carl L. Bedal, Janice Becker, Andrew Grindlay, Sarah Caldwell marketing & advertising sales manager: Gerry Fortune advertising representative: Merle Gunby production co-ordinator: Joan Caldwell advertising & editorial production: Dianne Josling printed & mailed by: Signal -Star Publishing, Goderich, Ontario subscriptions: $16.05 (12 issues) (includes 7% GST) Back copies $2.75 each For U.S. rates, add $5 per year Changes of address, orders for subscrip- tions and undeliverable copies (return postage guaranteed) are to be sent to The Rural Voice at the address listed below. Published monthly by: The Rural Voice, Box 429, Blyth, Ontario, NOM I HO Telephone: 519-523-4311 (fax 523-9140). e-mail: norhuron@scsinternet.com Canadian Publication Mail Agreement Number 1375016 held by North Huron Publishing Co. Inc. at Blyth, Ontario. All manuscripts submitted for consideration should be accompanied by a stamped, self- addressed envelope. The publisher cannot accept responsibility for unsolicited manuscripts or photographs, although both are welcome. The opinions expressed here- in are not necessarily those of the publisher. Editorial content may be reproduced only by permission of the publisher. The Rural Voice makes every effort to see that advertising copy is correct. However, should an error occur, please notify The Rural Voice office within 30 days of invoicing in order to obtain a billing adjustment. Behind the Scenes Are we taking water for granted? Let me confess right up front — I was one of those people taking water for granted and playing down the seriousness of impurities in water. A few years ago, before drought meant we had to drill a new well to replace our old shallow well, we had our water tested and found it had both E. coli and other coliform bacteria. We were surprised. We weren't surrounded by close -by livestock farms. We later learned that, since our well wasn't particularly secure, the source of our contamination could be the family dog or the few free - ranging chickens we had at the time. Still, we shrugged it off. We'd been drinking the water for years and nobody was sick. So we shocked the well with bleach and tested again and found the water didn't have E. coli but still had bacteria. We brought water home from our office in town and eventually (a matter of a few months before the well ran dry) installed an ultra -violet purification system. But I think my attitude was somewhat typical of people who grew up on farms and so the seriousness of the Walkerton E. coli outbreak was shocking. And so we put Janice Becker to work to see if we in rural areas have been taking water for granted. She produced a major article for this issue. If Canada has long been known as a hewer of wood and drawer of water for its habit of exporting raw products, rural Ontario is the expottci of raw products to urban Canada. Despite the fact rural areas produce most of the food for the province, little is actually further processed in the small towns that dot the country landscape anymore. Now and again brave individuals carve out interesting niche markets, however. This month we've got the stories of two small successes. Martin De Groot and Ineke Booy have created Ontario's first organic ice cream and yogurt plant on their farm near Teviotdale and their products are now making their way, not only into small health food shops but into large supermarkets. Meanwhile, up in Markdale, Ken Bustin, "The Pickle Guy" has taken the unusual road of community investment in turning a kitchen business into a full-time job.0 — KR Update A wasted by-product In our article last August on Bainton Limited tannery in Blyth, Franklin Snell noted that reduced demand in traditional markets in Asia had lowered the price of hides. Now the Ontario sheep industry is worried about the reduced value of hides and the problem it is creating in the industry. According to an article in Ontario Sheep News, properly salted and preserved hides once brought prices as high as $8 each for abattoirs that processed sheep. But a world-wide glut has reduced prices to the point some abattoirs have to pay to have the skins taken away and even then, some renderers are refusing them so the skins have to be sent to landfills. Abattoirs were complaining so much about the situation, according to the article, that the Ontario Sheep Marketing Agencies tried to work with the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) to donate the skins to economically depressed middle -European countries as a form of foreign aid, but those countries didn't want them. Further investigation showed, the article said, that there would be a market for the skins in Canada but often producer practices or abattoir processes ruin the value of the skins. Producers, truckers and sales barn personnel often use spray bombs to identify sheep but the marks can't be removed in the tanning process, ruining the skin. Some buyers who sell to tanners won't even buy sheep that have been marked. As well, the article says, modern processing machinery can leave tears and cuts in the skins, destroying their usefulness.0