Loading...
The Rural Voice, 2000-04, Page 40similar to a traditional modern barn. Only wet/dry feeders will used to reduce the amount of additional water flowing into the pit. One of the differences is in ventilation. Instead of side vents or tunnel ventilation, all the fresh air comes down from two runs of ceiling baffle. The air is drawn down, over the pigs, and into the pit where it flows over the surface of the composting manure and is drawn out through ventilation fans. The company says this airflow is a key element in making its system successful because the air quality is extremely good. The company's design also replaces a single aisle down the middle between pens along the walls with aisles against the wall and pens in the middle. This, they say, will increase the life of walls and fans. Having looked at the barn first hand, Dietrich is excited about the possibility of bringing the concept to Ontario. With pig prices "a little scary" right now, it's hard to convince farmers to take a shot at building a barn with a new technology but if prices improve, "I think I could talk a guy into it." He estimates the initial cost per square foot would be higher with the high-rise barn but there would be savings in the cost of building the expensive liquid manure tank. There are further operating cost savings in not having to have a large horsepower tractor to agitate the manure and another to pull the liquid manure spreader on trip after trip to the field. Instead, you need a skid -steer to clean out the barn, a dry -manure spreader and a small tractor to pull it. Dietrich estimates a 3000 -pig barn would produce about 50 loads of manure a year and that amount could be spread on only 20-25 acres of land. And because the manure is dry and at least partially composted, complaints about odour would also be reduced, Dietrich feels. That aspect interests Caldwell as he tries to find an acceptable middle - ground between public and pork producers. Putting dry manure on the ground in a form that's not likely to seep into tiles or run off into open streams and drains would solve many of the perceived environmental problems with hog manure would disappear. "If you can get manure on the ground long enough mother nature will do its thing," he says. That volume of manure interests Sam Bradshaw, environmental communications specialist with Things to check if you're building a barn By John Johnson, Engineer OMAFRA, London Recently, there have been significant environmental concerns caused by the construction of new livestock buildings and manure tanks in proximity to field drains. The following are guidelines that should be considered to ensure that risk to the environment is minimized: • Ensure that field drains within 15 m (50 ft) of the barn or manure storage are cut off and redirected away from structures. Older, abandoned tile drains may exist and must also be eliminated. On most farms, it will be necessary to trench around the building site to ensure that all drains have been discovered. Since drainage tile can be quite deep, the perimeter trench should be at least five feet deep. A tile drainage machine or backhoe can be used to make this excavation. • Do not directly connect perimeter foundation drains, surrounding either buildings with internal manure storage or external manure tanks to local field drains. Instead, they should be connected to a monitoring catch basin. The catch basin can be connected to a field drainage system, however provision must be made to allow quick shutoff to the outflowing tile. In the event of a problem, a submersible pump could be used to direct contaminated water either td a storage tank or to a vegetated buffer strips. The owner must monitor this catch basin on a regular basis. • Install the joints in PVC conduit pipes with saddle "T" connectors (as a minimum) or with full "T" connections, making sure that gaskets are used according to manufacturer's specifications. • Make sure that manure tank floors are properly constructed, using water stopping and joint sealers at connections with walls and plumbing entrances. It is recommended that floors have a minimum concrete thickness of 4 - 5 inches. It is suggested that welded wire mesh be used throughout for integrity, at the discretion of the project engineer. Alternatively, other methods, using appropriate clay or plastic liners can be used in conjunction with concrete floors to ensure that the tank is leak proof. These liners should be installed with the guidance of the manufacturer and/or the project engineer. • Make sure that the tank has been properly engineered and that design drawings exist. An appropriate schedule for inspection should be agreed upon between the building official and the design engineer. Responsibility to notify the building official for inspection rests with the owner of • the project. This responsibility is commonly carried by the contractor/builder for the project. For a manure storage project, it is common that there would be up to six inspections at critical times during construction. The following are recommended inspections times — • At the commencement of the building or tank construction, including identification of tile drainage locations. • When ready to construct the footings, verifying site preparation. •.Viewing. the completion of any pipes, valves, etc. for underground systems conveying manure toward or away from a storage tank. • At the completion of the footings and floor and readiness to construct walls, viewing of in-place forming, reinforcing and waterstopping. • At the completion of walls, perimeter drains, prior to backfill and verifying preparation for floor construction. • When the structure is complete and construction drawings are filed with the municipality. For further information, please contact: John Johnson, Engineer, Structural Design, OMAFRA, London 519-873- 4096 or Don Hilborn, Engineer, Byproduct Management, OMAFRA, Woodstock 519-537-6621.0 36 THE RURAL VOICE