The Rural Voice, 2000-01, Page 10READY TO LAY
PULLETS
BABY CHICKS
WHITE & BROWN EGG LAYERS
FISHER POULTRY FARM INC.
AYTON.ONT NOG 100
519-665-7711
INDUSTRIAL &
FARM SUPPLIES
• Nuts & Bolts (all grades)
• Hydraulic hose & fittings
• Belts • Bearings
• Grade 70 Transport Chain
• Roller Chain
• Tools
Brian Gibson
Springmount Industrial Park
519-376-0283 FAX 519-376-7202
LESLIE HAWKEN
& SON
Custom Manufacturing
LIVESTOCK & FARM EQUIPMENT
• Big Bale Rack
• Cattle Panels
• Headgates & Chutes
• Portable Loading Chutes
• Gate -Mounted Grain
Feeders
• Bale Throwing Racks
• Feed Panels
• Self Locking Feed Mangers
• Round Bale Feeders
Self Standing Yard Dividers
For the best quality and service - Call
Jim Hawken
Rural Route Three
Markdale 519-986-2507
6 THE RURAL VOICE
Keith Roulston
Watching democracy slip quietly away
I've been thinking of Teddy
Roosevelt lately, and wondering
where we can find a leader like him
when we need one.
Teddy Roosevelt is a pretty minor
historical figure these days. I probab-
ly wouldn't know of him if I hadn't,
for some reason
that escapes me
now, chosen his
life as topic for a
public speech I
had to give back
in high school.
Roosevelt is
relevent as the
century turns,
however,
because he spent
two terms as
president of the
United States,
battling the
concentration of
power by huge
corporations. That was almost exactly
100 years ago.
The movement to prevent big
trusts from running the U.S. had
begun with the Sherman Anti -Trust
Act of 1890 but Roosevelt made
battling what he called the
"malefactors of wealth", his mark on
U.S. history. Sounds pretty radical
doesn't it — like an NDP leader or at
least Pierre Trudeau. Roosevelt,
though, was a Republican who was a
main stream conservative in other
areas, declaring the right of the U.S.,
for instance, to interfere in Latin
American countries.
But Roosevelt realized large corp-
orations were using their power to
bully smaller rivals and make ordin-
ary Americans captive to their
demands. His views dominated the
rest of the century until the globaliz-
ation mania of recent years convinced
governments that corporations should
be set free from restrictions.
Maybe it's something about the
end of a century but we're now
facing the same kinds of conditions
Roosevelt did. American author and
journalist Robert Kaplan says half of
the 100 largest economies in the
world are corporations (it may be
more by now since Kaplan made the
comments in a speech at the
GrainWorld conference last March).
The 200 largest corporations
employ less than three-quarters of
one per cent of the world's workforce
but control 25 per cent of the world's
economic activity, Kaplan said.
But while a century ago Roosevelt
and other political leaders were trying
to keep business from being too
powerful, today multinational
businesses seem beyond the control
of mere national governments.
What's more, governments seem to
be actively promoting greater power
for corporations.
Recently up in Marathon, Ontario
there's been a case of exactly the
kind of abuse of power that
Roosevelt battled. Bananas in a
Loblaws-owned Extra Foods
supermarket were selling at one third
what they'd cost in a Toronto. There
-were similar below -cost bargains on
eggs and soft drinks. When locally
owned D.H. Foods complained to the
Competition Bureau in Ottawa the
owner was told our law allows
companies to sell below cost to gain
market advantage. Funny, we get
huffy about that kind of thing in
international trade.
More than that, our governments
seem determined to give more power
to corporations. How else do you
explain the actions of Ontario Farm
Products Marketing Commission in
delivering the pork industry into the
hands of the packers? How else do
you explain a new directive from the
Ontario Financial Services Comm-
ission that new co-operatives trying
to form must pay a fee of a quarter
per cent of the amount of money
they're trying to raise (in the case of
Progressive Pork Producers Co-
operative that would be $52,000)
while a private corporation under the
Ontario Securities Commission
would pay a sixth as much.
What's more the corporate
mindset is reshaping democracy. The
Farm Products Marketing Comm-
ission's provision that future farm
votes must be approved by 66 per
cent of producers representing 50 per
cent of production shows a bias in
favour of large producers over small.
Society is like a company: those who
have more shares get more votes.