Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1983-07, Page 43STRIKING BACK Draining and Tiling - 1881 by Detonator Dan Drainage! The very word conjures up angry neighbours, incompetent engi- neers, indecisive councils, high cost contractors and out-of-date government regulations. Yet, drainage of agricultural land creates new money in the form of higher crop yields and generally more efficient field husbandry. The farmers of the 1870's recognized the many benefits of land drainage, a fact attested to by the numerous favourable submissions to the 1881 Agriculture Commission. Mr. Dickson of Tuckersmith gave a typical testimony to the Commission: "My drainage has produced excellent results, the wet land which has been drained is the finest land on the farm. In the land with a clay bottom like ours, you can grow one-third more when it is drained than you can when it is not drained. Cedar drains will last longer than any other type of wooden drain. project was undertaken. Once the general layout was determined and the lateral lines marked, a horse, plow and shovel were used to turn out the dirt; the final digging was done with the spade. Quicksand was difficult to work in, and many times, drains were laid open for a few months to remove excess water, then the tile would be placed sometime before the fall wet season. The best spades and shovels were imported from Birmingham, England, at a cost of $3.50 each. Frances Malcolm, a member of the 1881 Agriculture Commission, suggested that Canadian -made spades are entirely worthless being weak and inferior in material (we all thought that it was just recently that Canadian manufactured to those of other goods were inferior countries.) will quote the costs involved in draining a ten acre field during the 1870's: 301/2 days labour at 75c per day $22.871/2 Board for men $ 8.00 2400 feet of 2" tile $17.00 $ 1.30 $ 7.75 $ 7.00 $63.92 V2 100 feet of 1" tile Laying of tile and filling, 5c per rod at 155 rod Hauling tiles Total cost There are considerable quantities of land in my district that ought to be drained." Many different types of material were used for drain construction - willow sticks, hollowed out bricks, stone, wood, for box -type drains and clay tile. During the late 1970's, clay tile, 21/2 inches in diameter cost ten dollars per thousand at the yard. Tile sizes were available from one and 1/2 inch diameter and up, along with "horse-shoe file", a type that had no bottom. Professor Brown of the Model Farm suggested that wet land such as swamp, is of no agricultural value; half -wet meadow land is worth 50 cents per acre in rent and well -drained land is worth $3.50 per acre in rent. In 1881, drainage paid for itself in four years, if followed my good farming. Drains were generally laid out by the farmers themselves, working with what capital and materials they had available. Outlets, cutting and grading were given serious consideration when a drainage Detonator Dan [a pseudonym as you may have quessedj is a practicing farmer in the boondocks of Colborne Township, Huron Cnl,nty The construction costs really have changed in 100 years! The Ontario Government "got into the Act" in 1878, with the Ontario Tile Drainage Act. It stated: "municipalities may borrow from the Government on 20 year debentures, bearing 5 per cent interest, payable with sinking funds, representing eight per cent in all, in 20 years, sums not less than 2,000 dollars or more than 10,000 dollars, in amounts to be loaned to owners of lands within the municipalities for the purpose of the tile draining. Not more than 1,000 dollars can be loaned to any one person." The Act was changed in 1879 to also include stone or timber drains. (The money which today's Government uses to subsidize the tile drain loan interest rate is an infinitesimal amount of money in the scheme of government spending. Yet, for every one dollar of money spent by the Ontario government in tile drain loan subsidy, up to four dollars of new money is created. This subsidy is the only one that provides a plus -return to the economy, yet govern- ment continues to reduce the amounts available!) Subsoiling was used in some instanc- es to break up a supposed hard pan or plow pan. Cost of the subsoiler was about nine dollars, and required the power of a span of horses. Professor Buckland said subsoiling was only beneficial on well -drained land. Other farmers suggested that only orchards would benefit from subsoiling. There is no doubt that the pros and cons of subsoiling created as much contro- versy as the benefits of tiling. Next month we share the Commis- sions views on the Dairy industry in 1881. 011111# lits 1:minofi We manufacture a heavier, stronger tubing at competitive prices. Our representative works closely with the local contractor. ?tam 7de Toe. R.R. 3, WALKERTON, ONTARIO NOG 2V0 Plant location: Four roads north of Teeswater, one road west of Highway 4. Use our Toll Free Number 1-800-265-3008 THE RURAL VOICE, JULY 1983 PG. 41