Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1983-02, Page 26by John DePutter UNCLE SAM WANTS TO BUILD STRONG GRAIN MARKET BASE WITH NEW PROGRAM: It was a number of weeks ago that the so-called payment in kind (PIK) program was officially backed by the Reagan Administration. But legislation got stalled in Congress. Finally, on January 11th, President Reagan and Agriculture Secretary John Block confirmed that the program will go through in spite of Congress dawd- ling. In addition to already existing acreage reduction programs which allow complying farmers to cut acreage of corn and wheat by 20%, the PIK scheme pays eligible farmers to further reduce their acreage up to a 50% cut. In return, the government pays them in grain from government stocks. What will market impact be? It depends on how many farmers participate and on how analysts interpret details. USDA said that without PIK, the corn crop for 1983 could be predicted to be around 7.6 billion bu., but with PIK in place, it should be around 6.8 billion. "We don't expect a wild price run-up as the result of this program, but when you reduce carry-over and stocks, you expect to build a base and foundation for price recovery in the agricultural community," said Secretary Block. FERTILIZER DEMAND WILL FALL, SAYS U.S. GOVERNMENT: Usage cuts will be partly the result of tight econo- mic conditions, and partly the result of less acreage in the U.S. Nutrient con- sumption in 1983 could drop 3 to 5% from 1982. Farm prices paid by U.S. farmers for commercial fertilizers next spring could average 1 to 2% lower than last spring. These estimates came from USDA before the PIK program was announced, so they might be even lower now that further acreage cuts are expected. Fertilizer companies, seed and equipment firms were lobbying against PIK because of its impact on usage of these inputs, although some industry reps admitted long term gains of the program would outweigh short- term pain. EEC AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION The world is getting smaller every day and international events can influence decisions you make about your farm business. In this monthly column John DePutter will be alerting Rural Voice readers to trends which could affect the farming community. Since market news it outdated as soon as it is written due to shifts in government policies, weath- er, political events, etc., readers should be aware that these articles were pre- pared Jan. 12. 1983. FARM MARKET PERSPECTIVE RUNNING AT RECORD LEVELS: Des- pite world surpluses, the European Economic Community is churning out record production of cereals, rapeseed, sugar, milk, sheep, pork, eggs, poultry, wine and apples. European consump- tion is not keeping up. In fact, it's declining for many products, due to rising unemployment and reduced pop- ulation. The upshot? The European community will be forced in future to sell its production excesses on world markets, at prices far lower than its domestic prices. EEC export subsidies are being decried by U.S. politicians. So far, the U.S. has not retaliated by dumping its scary butter and cheese oversupplies on world markets as earlier threatened. But it has announced ano- ther 11/4 billion dollars in credit aid to foreign buyers of its grain, in order to compete with the EEC and other world grain suppliers. TRADE WAR PROBLEMS STILL LOOM OVER GRAIN MARKETS: U.S. pro- grams to aggressively merchandise their products into world markets are being pushed by American politicians. Accor- ding to Douglas Mutch, Head Econo- mist for Canada's Livestock Feed Board, "the major danger is that (fur- ther) export subsidy programs by the U.S.... to increase their market share, would probably be matched by other global exporters through similar pro- grams or lower grain offerings. The net effect would be lower grain prices but little or no change in market shares." WILL DAIRY BE NEXT? In agriculture, there are cycles. Ups and downs. It seems that even supply -management marketing boards are not immune to world market gyrations. Such is the reality of milk marketing in Canada today. Depressed world markets are resulting in quota cuts and increased export levies. One Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food rep. recently said that the Ontario Farm Financial Adjust- ment program at first was mainly offering help to debt -ridden livestock farmers; and more recently the aid has been drastically needed by cash crop- pers. "I think dairy will be next," he said. DECEMBER PIG REPORT GIVES REASON FOR OPTIMISM: The Decem- ber 22nd USDA hog and pig count was initially seen as a little negative to near-term future prices, because it showed supply reductions were not quite as sharp as traders expected. Long term, though, most analysts were bullish. Some market -watchers figured prices could rise well above late De- cember levels, as we move into spring. The report showed all hogs and pigs in the U.S. at 9% below a year ago, PG. 26 THE RURAL VOICE, FEBRUARY 1983 market hog numbers down 10%, and breeding inventory down 7% from the previous Dec. Slaughter for the first quarter of 1982 was expected to be down 10 to 12%. WATCH THE DEMAND SIDE, BUT DON'T BE SCARED: Most analysts seemed willing to predict profits through all of 1983. for efficient, well adjusted pork producers. "We have a smaller pig crop (in U.S.) this winter, which will be the hogs that come to market next summer," said Larry Martin of the University of Guelph. "Given that last summer prices were extra -ordinarily high, one would normally expect prices to be higher next summer." But Martin added that the danger in making high predictions is, "we don't know what's going to happen on the demand side, and I think demand is a real problem at the moment." He said farmers thinking of expanding. should pay off the debts they already owe before they expand. INTEREST RATES: GOOD NEWS! Ca- nadian bank primes are finally down to the 12% mark, and the Farm Credit Corporation, which used to adjust its rates semi-annually. is now adjusting rates on a monthly basis. FCC is currently at 131/4%, with farmers in trouble being eligible for a 2 year discount of 4°i°. One Economist, Ray Worseck. of H.G. Edwards & Sons in St. Louis, told the annual meeting of the American Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers that the general trend in interest rates is down. He said however, that an uptick in the near term is possible. Worseck based his long term outlook on the view that inflation is coming down. "The economy is so weak, and liquidity so low, that we're not going to see the inflationary psy- chology re -appear." However. some economists feel that a change in policy by the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank to allow some "reflation" could change the trend later on. BOOKS TO IMPROVE MARKETING STRATEGIES Following are some comments by John DePutter on three books about agricultural marketing. These books re- present examples of the many informa- tion sources which are available to farmers wishing to build their know- ledge of futures markets. Marketing for Farmers. Edited by Gene A. Futrell. This book is a must, for farmers who would like to understand American farm markets from start to finish. Futrell is a Professor of Economics at Iowa State University. He not only gives insight into how futures markets work; he also traces