Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1979-11, Page 23RuraiNews in Brief Subdivision approved despite farmer's protest It was no surprise to those attending the hearing of the Ontario Municipal Board in the tiny hamlet of Belgrave in Huron County on October 12, that the appeals against the development of a new subdivision in the hamlet were turned down. The battle actually began about five years ago, according to the reeve of East Wawanosh township, Simon Hallahan, who has some 60 years experience with farm organizations and municipal councils., when the council approved a by-law designating some 20 acres of adjacent land for development. But it all came to a head this year when Lorne Humphries, a developer, actually drew up plans for a subdivision. A classical battle developed between the forces who believe that all agricultural land that can grow crops should be preserved for that purpose, and those who maintain that there is a surplus of land and that this should be developed for other uses. The normal course of an urban develop- ment was followed, by the township drafting a by-law, receiving approval by the ministries of housing and environment, and circulating the by-law to anyone living within 400 feet of the area's boundaries. At the boundary is the farm of John and Noreen Gnay and they hold that "...it is the duty of Canadian s to uphold the principle of the preservation of agricultural land. We must look after it to the best of our abilities in order to pass it on to the next generation." Mr. Gnay, who has a B.Sc. in agronomy grows cash crops on his farm until he will be in a position to give up his job as teacher at Madill Secondary school in Wingham, when he intends to go into farming full time. It is not surprising that the Gnays opposed the proposal, not only for the stated reasons, but also, as was brought out at the latest hearing, to head off the threat of possible curtailment of future plans for farming. The Gnays won a temporary victory on July 9 when their objection was upheld on the grounds that the OMB " ...does not share the opinion to the effect that the proposal would be a harmonious and integrated expansion of the village." However the victory was incomplete, for in the decision as handed down by the vice-chairman of the OMB, D.S. Colbourne; he noted that " ... there is some logic in a balance of development of Belgrave." The reason for the July rejection was that Mr. Colbourne didn't think that 15,000 sq. ft. lots for commercial enterprises, as proposed in the by-law, were appropriate, and he also doubted that the planned multiple dwellings would fit in well with Belgrave. The new by-law left all single dwelling proposals in place and deleted the multiple dwelling plan altogether, putting it in a holding area for later zoning, and limited all commercial lots to 5,000 sq. ft. This left John and Noreen Gnay with the same situation as before, and they objected to this by-law as well. Now the battle was joined once more, with Reeve Hallahan and his council, with the help of their lawyer, Robert Campbell, defending the plan for Lorne Humphries, and the Gnays, assisted by lawyer Murray Elston, trying to defeat the plan. When Mr. Campbell succeeded in having the single residence part excluded from the discussions at the hearing, because Mr. Colbourne had already approved it in his earlier decision, for all intents and purposes, Reeve Hallahan and his council and developer Humphries had won the battle. When Ronald White, executive member of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture outlined the philosophy of the OFA expressing the continuous fear of har ass- ment of farmers -by encroaching residences into the country, the OMB's Mr. Colbourne dismissed this as no real threat. After Gary Davidson, the Huron county planner, testified that the agricultural code of practice was incorporated in the county by-law, Mr. Colbourne decided that this was sufficient protection for the farmers adjacent to urban areas. He remarked that urban residents need also protection against the practices of farmers, regardless who moved where first. Robert Campbell, the township lawyer, said that Mr. and Mrs. Gnay could fight every severance in the Land Division Court if they so wished but under questioning Mr. Davidson stated that no one is notified when a hearing about a severance is held. He also said that the Huron county official plan strongly recommends further development of hamlets and villages. Commercial enterprises should, however, be compatible with the village, and with other enterprises already within the village. In his judgement, Mr. Colbourne decided that adjacent farms areā€¢ already limited by the development of Belgrave in the adjacent township of Morris; the new sub -division wouldn't make any difference. Fertilizer bags no longer under weight Fertilizer companies seem to have cleaned up their act in the past few months. A recent survey by the federal Consumer and Corporate Affairs Department found that about 90 per cent of the fertilizer bags tested contained at least the quantity indicated on the bag. Tests last spring had tound about one-third of the fertilizer bags were underweight. . To date the Ontario department's director hasn't checked whether the same companies and product lines found deficient in the spring are still breaking the law with underweight bags. He says no further checks on fertilizer will be carried out until spring. No charges were laid as a result of the department's finding. The director, Bill Empke, said the department would consider prosecutions in the spring only if "we're down to a one -or two firm problem" after the next survey. "Then it would be a different thing and we'd have to look at prosecutions", he said. In the fall inspection of 214 bags of fertilizer from five plants, 23 bags were found deficient, but only 15 were deficient enough to justify prosecution under the Weights and Measures Act. It's an offense under the act to sell anything by weight short of the quantity purchased. The maximum penalty is a $100 fine and three months in jail. Mr. Empke said, "obviously the (fertilizer) industry has taken the problem seriously." Perth pledges $8,000 to tornado relief The Perth Federation of Agriculture is pleased with response to its tornado campaign. Perth farmers have pledged $8,000 as well as 15,000 bales of hay. Ken Green of R.R. 1, St. Pauls would like to announce that the deadline for contrib- utions has been extended to Nov. 1. THE RURAL VOICE/NOVEMBER 1979 PG. 21