Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1978-02, Page 19current problems there are now a great number of people wanting to get into the industry because it is organized and does offer some stability, some guarantee of being able to pay the bills and have something left to live on, an important factor when considering that in 1976 and 1977 net farm income dropped 32 per cent. The drop in grain prices had allowed a six cent per dozen decrease in the price of eggs in 1977, a contrast to most products, he said. The broiler industry has been in trouble because of low priced imports from the U.S.. particularly Georgia which have flooded the Toronto and Montreal markets. The imports are produced by large corporations and both producers and processors there do not come under the minimum wage act and so labour costs are much lower. Ontario broiler producers have asked for a national marketing plan but Alberta. Manitoba and Newfoundland have refused to join such a plan. Mr. Munro said he expects input costs for farmers to stay high despite the uncertain grain market but said the new grading system instituted in early January should give producers a little better break in the grading of some carcasses. Monkton man honoured by Holstein Assoc. A Monkton man, R.A. Ellacott, R.R. 3. Monkton was honoured at the annual meeting of the Perth County Holstein Breeders Association in Brodhagen in January. Mr. Ellacott had been a member of the Canadian Holstein -Friesian Association for 44 years. A pin. marking the occasion was presented to him by Alan Bain, R.R.3. Stratford, area director for the organiza- tion. , When Mr. Bain later suggested that fees be increased it was not kindly received. He told the gathering that at the annual meeting of the national association this matter was to be on the agenda. It would be to increase membership fees from $10 to $25 per year; registration fees from $5 to $7.50 per animal and a $2.50 increase added in the transfer of ownership fee for registered Holsteins. Mr. Bain explained that the suggested increases would put the association in good financial standing for the next five years. He added that the $10 membership being paid is more than returned as the Holstein Journal costs $9 per year and each county organization gets $2 per member back from the national association. When the speaker suggested that the national association is considering reduction in the number of Ontario directors while increasing the number from Quebec Ron Skinner, ' R.R.1 Mitchell. suggested that the number of directors should be determined by memberships rather than -animal registrations. This idea brought general agreement. John Murphy, London, manager of the agricultural services for the Royal Bank of Canada, addressing the Perth association, pointed out that good management makes the difference between successful farmers and those who fail. He said that his job was to make bankers out of farmers and farmers out of bankers. Making similar investments, he pointed out, farming can be as profitable as any other private business and while poor farmers complain on a poor return for their investment good farmers can realize higher returns than in other private businesses. To illustrate his point he used figures from CANFARM record books, a record-keeping service outlining differences that exist in farm management and the resultant success. 1976 figures showed an average group of farmers had an average return of 8.3 per cent on investment while a top group of farmers realized 13 per cent. This meant a 70 per cent greater profit from investment. The speaker said that good management showed up in smaller ways like the production of more crop per acre. Keeping good records makes good management easier to achieve. His comment that individual farmers are responsible for most of their problems drew unfavorable response from the audience. Mr. Murphy offered five suggestions for success financially: price. which farmers could achieve by becoming involved in organizations that represent them to add strength to them; up price deficiencies except in the case of milk producers who find it more difficult to get additional quota; reduced costs by growing more of one's own feed and conservation of time. Here he felt that the bank should be willing to go to the farmer, not taking the farmer's time to visit the bank to borrow money: reduction of investment to increase profits, e.g. buying only the machinery required; and. lastly, having a firm set of priorities with effort towards the needs rather than the wants. Here he stressed that decision-making is of great importance. In conclusion Mr. Murphy told the dairymen that he does not expect a private farm to be replaced with large corporate operations since cows need individual attention. The last consoling note was his statement that it will be a long time before the owner of a 40 -head purebred Holstein herd cannot make a good return on his investment. Gordon Bell, St. Marys; fieldman for the provincial association in this area, presented production record certificates to Morley Lannin, R.R.2 Dublin. Harry Van Ness, Omar Wagler and Sons, Gordon Vines and Stonetown Farms. St. Marys, Charles and Roy Ready, R.R.6 St. Marys, had the top herd in the county, followed by Casey Tagenbosch, R.R. 2 Atwood; Ken Weitzel, R.R. 2 Tavistock; William • Klooster. Shakespeare and Ivan Roes, R.R.1 Milverton. Lyle Ballantyne, R.R. 3 Stratford, succeeds Bill Broughton, R.R. 2 Atwood, as president. Other officers are: first and second vice-presidents, Robert Haw- thorne, Listowel, and George Lindner, R.R. 1 Gadshill; Floyd Willows. Stratford, THE has been returned as secretary treasurer for the 14th year. Township directors are: Logan, Barry' Dietz; Hibbert, Winston Jibb; Fullarton, Morris Willows; Ellice, Lloyd Kipfer; Elma, Robert Hawthorne and Barry Buchanan; Wallace, Royden Clark; Mornington, Meryl Shantz; North East - hope, George Lindner; South Easthope, Tony Danen; Downie, David Packham and Lyle Ballantyne; Blanshard, Don Stephen. Auditors will be Bill Rohman, St. Marys and Ken Parkinson, R.R.6 St. Marys. Professor against marketing board exemption The exemption of farm product marketing boards from the new Competi- tion act is a serious weakness Professor W.T. Stanbury, associate professor of commerce and business administration at the University of British Columbia told a food policy forum held recently at the University of Manitoba. Prof. Stanbury claimed the exemption is yet another demonstration of the power of agricultural interests in the federal political process. "It is apparent that all provincial agricultural marketing boards are to be totally immune from the federal competi- tion legislation. And given the manner in which a number of these boards have operated - namely as government - mandated producer cartels impervious to the wider public interest - this is an undesirable element of competition pol- icy." He said, for example, that the Competition Act will be useless if one of Canada's problems seems to be a monopoly level of prices maintained by farm product marketing boards. "If farm marketing boards are permitted to operate outside federal competition legislation. then the utility of the legislation to deal with this problem will be non-existent." He said Ottawa's Food Prices Review Board supports his views, since the board remarked in its final report that many foolish and contradictory food policies stem from the marked reluctance of politicians to speak out against agricultural interests. "A competition policy which can only scrutinize the behavior of processors, distributors and retailers has one arm tied behind its back," said Prof. Stanbury. "It seriously limits competition policy's role to examine farm gate prices established by producer -controlled marketing boards." He also said the new Competition Act will not halt mergers that increase concentrations of power and monopolies in the food industry. The act is predicated on RURAL VOICE/FEBRUARY 1978, PG. 19.