The Citizen, 1987-01-21, Page 5Conservationist sees threat
in weeds in bird seed
BY KEITH ROULSTON
In the cold of January many
people throughout North America
and here in Huron County are
taking pity on the local bird
population these days and putting
out bird feed but while they’re
helping the birds, Norman Alexan
der, well-known Londesboro con
servationist, is worried they may
be creating problems for them
selves and their neighbours come
next summer.
Oneof the latest concerns of Mr.
Alexander, who has previously
fought to create new awareness of
the cost of soil erosion, is that
people feeding birds may unwitt
ingly be sowing future problems
for farmers in the form of weed
seeds. That’s because there is a
loophole that leaves bird seed
virtually unregulated. It falls
neither under the regulations of
the Seeds Actor the regulations
controlling livestock feeds.
While much of the bird seed sold
in stores may be clean of weed
seeds, there is nothing to stop
people from packaging weed seeds
for sale as bird feed. While many
bird feed suppliers grow their
own crops, selling bird feed has
also become a profitable way for
some elevator companies to sell
cracked grains and, Mr. Alexander
says, he has even heard of
screenings from bean elevators
being sold as bird feed. A huge
amount of those screenings would
be weed seeds, particularly rag
weed, he said. The seeds can be
carried by the feeding birds to
spread a plague of weeds to
neighbouring properties.
Mr. Alexander also worries
about the possible importation of
new weed varieties through bird
seeds. Imports of seed grains are
strictly controlled to make sure
they are clean of foreign weeds, he
points out, but there aren’t similar
controls on seed to be used for bird
feed.
Whole carloads of millett seed
are imported from North Dakota
unsampled by customs officials,
Mr. Alexander says. Acustoms
official told him that the staff had
enough trouble testing the regular
flow of seed grains let alone getting
involved in bird feed. Besides, it
didn’t really fall under the normal
terms of imported seed.
It might be easy to dismiss Mr.
Alexander’s worries as a tempest
in a teapot. After all, even people
who feed the birds use only a little
bird seed a year. But the accumul
ated totals of bird seed sold in any
communitycanbestaggering. One
small store he heard of, Mr.
Alexander explains, sold tons of
bird seed a year. Multiply that by
the thousands of stores across the
province that sell bird seed and you
have the potential, if weed seeds
are slipped into the feed, of major
headaches for Ontario farmers.
The issue illustrates the twin
concerns Mr. Alexander has
shown over his retirement years of
looking after the welfare of Ontario
farmers and at the same time
worrying about the environment.
The cost of chemical herbicides to
control weeds, for instance, is one
of the major input costs of modern
farmers. And the more chemicals
farmers use, the more danger
there is to the environment with the
runoff of farm fields finding itself
into waterways.
Just as he did when he fought to
show the enormous cost of erosion
at a time when few others seemed
worried about it, Mr. Alexander is
bucking a long-established trend
today that sees weeds as some
thing to be controlled through
herbicides rather than through
eradication. He recalls going to a
touratthe University of Guelph
yearsagoand hearing one of the
speakers say “We have conquered
nature.’’ The speaker said that
through chemical fertilizers and
chemical herbicides and pesti
cides, man could shape nature to
his liking.
But things are changing, Mr.
Alexander says and agricultural
leaders are now starting to think
about sustainable agriculture. Per
haps his own worries about weeds
are just in time to catch the new
wave of thinking.
Since he sold his seed cleaning
plant in Londesboro several years
ago Mr. Alexander has been a
tireless worker for conservation.
He has travelled around the
continent, sometimes in his own
airplane, attending conferences,
talking with people and learning
more. He attended the “Fate of the
Earth’’ conference in Ottawa, for
instance, and learned just how
universal the problem of weeds is.
A Peruvian delegate for instance,
explained that in his country there
is an 18-yearcrop rotation program
in which one of the years is used to
leave the land vacant, cut all the
weeds that grow, dry them and
burn them to get rid of the seed.
Battling weeds is a never-ending
struggle which is why the concern
is so strong to try to eradicate any
possible sources of weed seeds. R.
H. Brownofthe Ridgetown College
of Agricultural Technology points
out that some weed seeds remain
dormant for up to 40 years waiting
for the right conditions to germi
nate. “The old adage ‘One year’s
seeding, seven year’s weeding’ is
still appropriate today. Mr. Brown
said in an article on the cost of
weeds. “Studies indicate that only
about four to seven per cent of the
previous year’s viable weed seeds
will germinate and emerge the
following year.’’ The rest emerge
in later years.
In addition, there is that problem
of how productive weeds are. One
of the most troublesome weeds for
farmers these days is velvet leaf. A
seed from velvet leaf can be
dormant for up to 40 years, Mr.
Alexander says. Farmers try to
keep a close watch on the plant but
if one plant escapes their watch and
reproduces, it can produce 500 to
I, 000 seeds.
There are other problems that
aren’t helping the control of
weeds, he says. In the days of
threshing machines there was a
law that said a threshing machine
had to be cleaned out before going
from one farm to another to prevent
the spread of weed seeds. In the
days of combines, however, Mr.
Alexander says, that law hasn’t
been enforced and it should be, he
says.
Even in the days before wide
spread use of herbicides there
were some farmers who had
property that was virtually weed-
free, Mr. Alexander says. He used
to see that seed come into his plant.
Those farmers made sure any seed
coming onto their farm was
weed-seed free.
Today some farmers are also
finding alternatives to heavy
chemical herbicide dependency.
But even people who have switch
ed to organic farming have told him
no one should ever try to switch
over cold-turkey from use of
chemicals to organic methods. If
they do, they’ll find they have an
explosion of weeds. Anyone want
ing to do it should try a small plot at
first, experiment and learn how to
control the weeds on that area.
THE CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 1987. PAGE 5.
Norman Alexander's interest in conservation and food-production has
made him an avid writer as he researches problems around the world.
then gradually move the program
to the whole farm.
As an avid reader and a student
of history Mr. Alexander is not
surprised to see the wheel turn and
see things of the past come back in
style. Today’s heavy dependence
on corn, for instance, is an echo of
the events of more than a century
ago and when there was too much
monoculture of wheat in the
mid -1800’s. To get a better crop
rotation, forage crops were intro
duced which led to more beef and
dairy cattle. Dairy cattle lead in the
introduction of cheese factories to
use the extra milk and by the early
1900’s there were 1,000-1.200
cheese factories in Ontario.
There is a cycle in Mr. Alexan
der’s own life. He can remember
skipping school in Hensail to go see
‘ ‘The Seed Train' ’, a train sponsor
ed by the Extension Services
Branch of the Ontario Agricultural
College that toured Ontario with a
display that included a small seed
cleaner. The machine fascinated
him. Years later when he had
moved to the Londesboro area he
saw that there was no seed
cleaning plant closer than Exeter
and none to the north either so he
started a plant that became his
main occupation until he retired.
Since then he has kept just as busy
with his interest in conservation.
"I've never enjoyed life better
than now with the things I’m
doing." he says.
Letters to the editor
Writer says editorial 'blatant teacher-bashing'
THE EDITOR,
Your “Bigness Costs’’ editorial
of the past week was illogical,
confusing and totally unacceptable
to me - a citizen of this rural
community and for the interim, a
subscriber to The Citizen, thus, I
write.
If your intent was to criticize
Canada Postfor its inefficiency
because of its large scale opera
tional units and/or the fact it is
people with many different organ
ized labour groups ... so be it. It
does seem though that out of
necessity, it is/was and always will
be a big enterprise.
However, you devoted almost
the entire editorial in condemna
tion of county school boards in
general and the Huron County
Board of Education in particular.
To decry the fact the efficiency of
larger units as was touted in
educational circles in the 60’s is
illusory because of high costs
determined by union strengths is
absurd. To condemn all employees
of the school board because they
have been successful, to a degree,
in obtaining a fair and decent wage
to date for their labours is equally
absurd. It smacks of a dog-in-a-
manger attitude by those who are
not employees of the board.
What was the actual target of
your editorial?
I believe it was blatant teacher
bashing! To state that the largest
percentage of the board’s costs go
to salaries and wages is true - and
true too it would be that teachers
make up the largest group in this
expenditure... along with some
administrators, custodians, secre
taries and bus drivers. That’s the
way it should be of course!
Education Is a people business and
an essential social service in our
time. The end objective is not to
produce a uniform, marketable,
cost determined package of some
thing. At a cost, our children
deserve the best, educationally.
To claim that these costs are
rising more than the cost of living
maybe true, if actually so; but, one
can easily name a host of goods,
services and products outside of
education that surely are doing just
that, unfortunately a sign of our
times.
I refuse to have some self-ap
pointed authority on all subjects
tell me as an elementary school
teacher of some 32 years experi
ence (and due to retire in a few
years, if I should last...) that my
gross salary - which indeed does
exceed $40,000 per annum, finally
- is undeserved. I find, especially
with the challenge of having to
teach today’s adolescents, the job
increasingly difficult to do each
year. Just maybe there’s a rela
tionship between a high standard
of living and the products - socially
speaking - of society today... the
nature of the teaching job and its
commensurate pay and/or costs.
1 still have my first teacher’s
contract for $2,600 (Ontario - 1955)
and after many, many years of
using those famous months of July
and August to do under Grad/Post
graduate and continuing studies, I
have stopped formal study ...
though I’m learning still - there's
no official recognition of that.
For many, many years 1 had to
supplement a pittance of a salary
(compared to many other skilled/
unskilled trade and service occupa
tions) by working part time. Many
a Friday evening and a Saturday
were spent in Brewers' Retail
stores ... away from family ... and
working, 1 assure you out of need
not greed. Indeed, some summers
were totally used working for my
Help save the post office
THE EDITOR,
Once again the rural communi
ties are being lashed out at. Our
Government along with Canada
Post president Don Landers is
attempting to close or privatize 90
per cent of C.P.A.A. Offices of
which ours is one. This would
result in 11,000 jobs lost across
Canada in the Rural areas. We feel
that privatization or closures would
be a further hardship and result in
employer - a school board - doing
maintenance work for minimum
wage.
Yes, 1 am paid well now for my
qualifications and experience -
Why not?
For the record, 1 do not teach in
this county, but. after almost a
decade of living here, 1 believe my
opinion has some validity. 1 say to
you then, thatthere is, in many
instances, less than first quality
Continued on page 23
deterioration oi mail service.
We need your help in this matter
and if all of you receiving mail
through the Blyth Post Office
would contact your Federal Mem
ber of Parliament (no postage
required) we should be able to stop
them from closing this Office.
Remember what an impact the
average citizen had when the
government decided to close the
hospital in Clinton.