The Brussels Post, 1974-05-22, Page 2ISTAILIINSO
len
WEDNESDAY, MAY 22, 1974.
Serving Brussels. and the surrounding eommunity,.
Pu'(Ilished each Wednesday afternoon at Brussels, Ontario
by McLean Bros.Pu eshers, Limited.
Evelyn Kennedy - Editor Tom Haley Advertising
Member Canadian Community Newspaper Association and.
Ontario Weekly Newspaper Association.
Subscriptions (in advance) Canada $6.00 a year, Others
$8,00 a year, Single Copies 15 cents each.
Second class mail Registration No. 0562.
Telephone 887-6641.
Brutssels Post
BRUSSELS
ONTARIO
6
Not all affluent
Everyone has heard about the sudden affluence of
the farming community. Farm properties have
doubled in price, food prices are higher than they've
ever been and someone--- the farmer probably --- is
"raking in the dough". This is the way most
non-rural people see the current agricultural
economy.
Then in the middle of this optimism (and perhaps
envy on the part of city slickers) Agricultural
Minister William Stewart tells us that for hog
farmers, things aren't so rosy. Farmers are losing $5
per pig on the 3,200 hogs consumed in Toronto each
day, Mr. Stewart told a Toronto audience recently.
There are other indications that the large chain
food stores are getting a larger chunk than the
farmers of the prosperity that rising food prices are
bringing. And as an editorial from the United Church
points out, not all farmers benefit from the higher
prices. The editorial continues:
Possibly as many as 25 percent of all Ontario or
Quebec farmers cannot make a decent living off their
land.
Let's look at a typical farmer. on a 150-acre farm
between Peterborough and Port Hope. This is a
century farm and he is the fourth generation to work
it. Up until five years ago, he would have had trouble
getting $30,000. for the acreage and all the buildings
on it --- a pitiful record for years and generations of
saving and scratching.
He buys approximately 50 young heifers at an
average price of $200. and will try to sell them as
springers (near calving) in 16 to 18 months. Two or
three of the animals will have died by then, some
others won't get a calf and yet others will not thrive.
At any rate, he will have difficulties realizing $400
for' the animals he sells, even at the present firm
market.
From this maximum gross profit of $9,500 or so, he
will have to take off as much as $4,500. for high
protein feed which is not grown on his fields, seed,
fertilizer, minerals, salt, fuel for the tractor, wear
and tear plus repairs on equipment, casual labor
during haying and crop time. There will have to be
some custom work done, taxes, interest, finance
charges on car, truck and equipment.
All in all, in good times, he may net $5,000. for
more than a year's work. Being an ambitious man
with a young family to raise and educate, he also
works full time at an outside job. His day begins in.
the barn at 6 a.m., he returns there after work and
usually comes into the house at 9 or later.
Why does our friend do it? No one really knows
except that he may not stick with it much longer
because people from the city keep offering more
money for his land, and one day when he is more
tired than usual and the offer is high enough, he will
decide to sell. •
Another farmer in the same circumstances but
living in the Temiscamingue area of Quebec is not so
fortunate since he has had his farm listed for more
than a year at $10,000 asked, without an offer.
Canadians have paid a lower percentage of their
income for food than any other nation, but this era is
over From now On, either directly or through
subsidies, the consumer will have to pay more for his
fare.
The farmer has resigned from hit rOle as the
beheVolent provider for Canada's gigantic barbecue.
I can understand why a president or a
king is assassinated. What I fail to
understand is why town councillors are not
assassinated fairly frequently.
In the first case it is usually done by a
crank, nut, or fanatic. In the second case it
would be done by a group of irate citizens.
What is done in many small towns these
days in the name of "progress" is so
difficult to believe that the mind reels at
the prospect.
You've all seen it. In a desperate attempt
to get bigger and more progressive, towns
across Canada have assaulted the eye, the
ear, the nose, and plain common sense.
I believe the definition of rape is,
"Carnal knowledge without consent." If
this is so, there is a lot of rape going on in
Canada these days, in villages, towns and
cities.
Again, yOu've all seen it. Turn the fertile
farmlands on the edge of town into new
"developments". Cut down all the trees.
Pave everyt hing that isn't paved. All in the
name of those great modern gods, "the
car", and "business". And all with the
benign approval of misguided town
councillors, who actually believe, in the
dim little recesses of their minds, that they
are contributing to "progress."
"Progress" is usually just a synonym for
what the town's businessmen want. And
what they want is more business, so they
can make more money.
That's fine. That's their bag. But very
often they can apply pressure and exert
influence with results that cynically
bulldoze the desires of the average citizen,
who is not cognizant of their wheeling and
dealing until it's too late.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not just an old
grump, who thinks any change is going to
be disastrous.
I've served on the other side of the
fence, and I am aware of the abuse a
councillor receives, the long hours he
spends on other people's business, and the
lack of appreciation for *hat he does.
But on the other hand, as a councillor, a
reporter, and a citizen, I have seen sotne of
the dimmest characters in town elected to
council because none else wanted the job.
And I have seen what they can do to reduce
a beautiful small town to an ugly, noisy,
stinking mess.
Bigger isn't necessarily better. In fact,
it's usually ‘vorser.
But many a municipal councillor thinks
lie's going to get into the Canadian history
books or something if he helps make his
town bigger. Too few of them stop to think
farther than five years ahead.
As I suggested, strongest influence on
the councillors comes from businessmen.
But the latter's closest ally is nearly always
the "town engineer",
More councillors have been bamboozled
by town engineers than there are flies on a
dead dog.
- Your average councillor doesn't have
much technical knowledge. Consequently,
he is mystified and awed by such terms as
"access road" and "drainage" and
"hardtopping" and "right of way."
Quite wrong is the councillor. He should
question and find out what the hell is going
on. Engineers, in my opinion, are not
superior beings. They are people who like
to build things, and tear things down. And
the latter often precludes the former.
Show an engineer a tree and he'll hand
you a chain saw. Show an engineer a curve
and he wants to straighten it. Show an
engineer a garden and he wants to pave it.
Show him a hill and he wants to flatten it.
Show him a beautiful rushing river and he
wants to dam it.
It's the engineers who should be damned
in this country. We need trees and curves
and gardens and hills and rivers.
We don't need stumps and straight lines
for speeding and more parking lots and
bulldozed flats, and dams that flood
thousands of acres. We need fewer, many
fewer, engineers.
Show me a town engineer who has ever
looked at a 100-year-old maple without lust
in his heart, who has ever looked at a space
more than 25' x 25' without wanting to
asphalt it, or who sees any running water,
even from the kitchen sink, without
Wanting to divert it, and show you a
freak who will be kicked out of the
Professional Engineers' Association at its
next Meeting,
'Oh, well, all is not lost, My neighbour
brought me two huge platesfUll of cleaned
smelt last. There's still hope for the i
But not for , dumb councillors and
rapacious
o hpee.n gineers. They
will
all go to hell I
Empty house in Spring
Sugar and Spice
By Bill Smiley
LI
•
Con
teas p
ent
I. V
ngag
ce
Itai
1av
ary
or an
'try
hool
quid
ado]
Mr.
d be
ancc
e sa
viso
tilize
vid
ifil
eze t
°ugh
del
Y
Y iU
ade
d Ge
ltan
isit
to a
by
er,
we
hel
if
tags
ford
Vii
k to
Tian
Ilin E
eph
n fav
offic(
90
Sh
he ,!
Want
se 0
both
ion
eded
ord ;
office
it sh
asis,
irm;
ted
e fo
r ar
Itant
an a
r of t
an't 'e
gasl
eed