Loading...
Times-Advocate, 1979-05-16, Page 4Page 4 Times-Advocate, May 16, 1979 Times Established 1873 Advocate Established 1 881 ajmes - Advocate *** Hw**' ************ u»Ue* line* M?1 .. ... . a, ^4 m. .<&*........w Amalgamated 1924 SERVING CANADA'S BEST FARMLAND C.W.N-A., O.W.N.A. CLASS 'A' and ABC Published by J. W. Eedy Publications Limited LORNE EEDY, PUBLISHER Editor — Bill Batten Assistant Editor — Ross Haugh Advertising Manager — Jim Beckett Composition Manager — Harry DeVries Business Manager — Dick Jongkind published Each Wednesday Morning ___Phone 235-1331 at Exeter, Ontario Second Class Mail Registration Number 0386(♦CNA SUBSCRIPTION RATES: Canada $11.00 Per Year; USA $22.00 J Still in doubt As Canadians get set to head to the polls this week, the only thing certain about the outcome, is that it is still very much uncertain. Even the pollsters have been un­ able to get an accurate pulse,indicating that many Canadians won’t know how they’re going to vote until they take pencil in hand and have to mark their ballot. At the outset of the campaign, it appeared that the Progressive Conser­ vatives under Joe Clark had a slight edge, but he has been unable to dispel many of the questions about his leadership qualities while wooing the voters. The negative aspects of the PC advertising campaign have probably been more of a hinderance than a help in that respect. Voters must surely be wondering if Clark doesn’t have a few good qualities that could have been promoted as op­ posed to merely attacking Prime Minister Trudeau. Trudeau, on the other hand, is still plagued by the state of the economy, in­ flation and unemployment. Regardless of his election promises, voters still recognize the fact that he was at the helm of the ship when it started to flounder and it is on that record that they must judge him. The New Democrats have certain­ ly not mustered enough strength to be considered as serious challangers and their renewed support from labor will probably cost them as many votes as it gains. That all leaves voters with little room in which to manipulate and probably sets the stage for a minority government when all the ballots are counted. We give the odds to Clark to head that minority. While that has some disadvan­ tages, it is not without some advan­ tages; not the least of which is it will keep the government on its toes and result in some much-needed housecleaning among those who really run this country — the civil service. “The doctor cured my insomnia — he's got me following the election campaign.” BATTN AROUND ........... with the editor Using the negative approach A warm welcome It’s not always complimentary to advise people their reputation precedes them, but it’s certainly on the positive side that we join the community in welcoming the visiting group of campers to Exeter this weekend. The community has been privileged to play host to previous camp groups and it has been a pleasant association that will undoubtedly be duplicated over this first summer holiday weekend. In extending to them our best wishes for a successful and fun-filled weekend, we do so in the knowledge that the local organizers of the event have worked hard to ensure that success. Irv and Lois Armstrong in par­ ticular should be singled out for their endeavours, not only from the stand­ point of the campers, but in boosting the town’s reputation as a congenial host. We know the residents and businessmen of the community won’t let the organizers down in touting Ex­ eter as a great place and the only regret may be that their stay with us will be all too short. Have fun and come back and visit us again. Something fishy Remember when sports enthusiasts in the Province of Ontario used to eagerly await the opening of the fishing season and the fishing regulations as they pertained to the various sections of the province each year? There’s something about fishing that puts a spring in the step of the old man or old woman (the Queen Mom for example is an excellent and avid fly fisherman, or fisherwoman if you so prefer); and plasters a grin across the face of a youngster.lt doesn’t matter what the calendar says, spring has arrived when the fish are nibbling, the sun is hot enough to make you want to peel off that long-sleeved shirt and the only thing stopping you from doing so are the black flies and the mosquitoes. At least that’s how it used to be in this place to stand and place to grow. Now we find that such an elemen­ tal pleasure as fishing is no longer a simple matter. Along with fishing regulations we now receive three color­ ful booklets from the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Natural Resources. In shades of red, green and blue they are a Guide to Eating Ontario Sport Fish in Northern Ontario, Southern Ontario and the Great Lakes. The three guide booklets outline the degree of “contaminants of concern” contained in the fish, namely Mercury, PCB, Mirex and DDT, and lets the reader know whether or not the various species are safe for human consump­ tion. So much for growing Ontari-ari- ario. ,, . , „Listowel Banner One of the most persistent views be­ ing expressed as the federal election day draws nigh is that the campaign preceding the May 22 date at the polls has been much too long. For almost two months we’ve been subjected to the daily bickerings between the three national parties and, of course that time was made appear even greater due to the fact they spent the year previous to that talking about an election. There’s little doubt that the actual campaign has been much longer than required and steps should be taken to reduce the time alloted for the parties to woo voters. Perhaps the ideal solution would be to initiate a policy touted by most parents: “if you can’t say something nice about a person, don’t say anything”. If the politicians had to follow that edict, the length of their speeches could be drastically curtailed and the whole campaign would be over in short order. The experience of this campaign would indicate that the leaders wouldn’t have anything to talk about if they had to refrain from making nasty comments about their opponents. The TV advertising conducted by the Progressive Conservatives in par­ ticular has been totally negative and has probably led to renewed cynicism among voters in their attitudes towards politics and politicians. Surely Joe Clark must have at least one quality of leadership that could be touted by the party, rather than having to spend all their air time listing some of the faults of the Prime Minister. The commercials are even more hypocritical when viewed through the eyes of a reporter, because most of the comments being attributed to Trudeau are obviously taken out of context. When the news media members pull that stunt on politicians, there’s a great hue and cry about unfair repor­ ting. Oh well, all’s fair in love, war ...and politics! * * * Exeter ratepayers will be interested in the current debate between council and the Public Utilities Commission over the rate to be charged by the latter for billing the sewar surcharge. However, while there may be a winner between the two bodies over the cost, the taxpayers are still going to be the losers because presumably they’ll end up paying the increasing costs of billing whether it’s through their tax rate or through their utility bills. It’s primarily a matter of diciding from which pocket the money will be ex­ tracted. The debate does point up the great “waste” of money that is required to tell people how much they owe and to then collect that money from them. That figure amounted to $31,168 in 1978 and council members are correct in questioning whether that is in fact an exorbitant amount. It’s an area that deserves some scrutiny and hopefully the Com­ missioners can come up with some alternative method of extracting hydro, water and sewer revenues at a more reasonable cost. The undecided voters Mainstream Canada Changing The Rules While they’re waiting for the PUC to fire the next volley in the debate, coun­ cil members could possibly use that time to figure out how much it costs them to collect taxes. They may find that it too is growing at an equally alar­ ming rate and represents an area where some cost cutting could be im­ plemented for the benefit of the beleagured taxpayer. * * * The book debate continues in Huron County, although hopefully the policy approved by the board of education last week will help alleviate some of the controversy, That policy still provides that a stu­ dent can be offered another title if he/she has an objection with the book which has been chosen for the class. The ironical aspect of the whole situation is that it is very difficult for any student to have an objection over a book without having first read their book; in which case, it then becomes too late to save the student from whatever it is that the student wants to be saved from. It’S much akin to the little boy traversing a water puddle. Having gotten his feet wet, he may as well con­ tinue to the other side as turn back. Wonder what happens when a student objects to the fact the book he has been assigned doesn’t contain enough reference to sex or profanity for his liking? /<r B . Roger Worth There’s little wonder mail) Canadians are confused and disturbed about the seemingly endless maze of sometimes con­ tradictory rules and regula­ tions emanating from the na­ tion's capital. While minor variations in rulescan be irritating, the situa­ tion becomes downright ridi­ culous when one general gov­ ernment policy blatantly con­ tradicts another. A case in point. In the late 1960s Ottawa became concerned about con­ sumers, forcing manufacturers and retailers to provide more detailed product and price in- Roger Worth is Director, Public Affairs, Canadian Federation of Independent Business. formation on goods. Armed with the additional knowledge, consumers would be able to make more intelligent buying decisions. Protection - even coddling - of consumers became the order of the day for Ottawa’s mandarins.. Later, a government-ori­ ented program ensured similar product information would be made available to people speak­ ing either official language. Both these moves, while ex­ pensive and inconvenient for manufacturers, suppliers and retailers, were perhaps justi­ fied. Consumers, of course, eventually paid the cost of the changes, but, according to the bureaucrats, the public was finally getting an even break. Now, though, it appears the mandarins in at least one government department have changed their minds. The Department of Con­ sumer and Corporate Affairs is proposing a regulation pro­ hibiting the use of anything but metric measurements in advertising and promotional information on goods. If accepted, millions of Canadian consumers will be left to fend for themselves in a world of metres, litres, grams and kilograms. Inches, feet, ounces and pounds would be outlawed. The Ottawa Metricators be­ lieve this would be a neat way to force Canadians to learn the new system, conveniently for­ getting introduction of the measurements was supposed to be voluntary. What’s interesting to note is that the bureaucrats seeking an outright ban on feet and inches work for Consumer and Corporate Affairs, the depart­ ment that has so jealously guarded and promoted con­ sumer rights. Suddenly, it seems, the de­ partment officials have revers­ ed their field. Under the new mandatory rules, consumers would be deprived of basic in­ formation they need to make knowledgeable decisions. What’s sauce for the goose, it seems, is not sauce for the gander, at least according to the bureaucracy’s new rules. memory lane. Perspectives A few weeks ago I got into a fairly heated discussion over one of the ten com­ mandments as to whether it was an absolute law or whether there were some exceptions to the rule. “Thou shalt not kill” was the law under discussion. In some parts of the world this rule is taken quite literally to the extent that a particular order of Buddhist monks wear surgical masks so that they do not inhale bacteria, thus killing them, In the Hindu world no animals are killed because of their belief in reincarnation. By killing an animal you may be killing the spirit of One of your ancestors. In ‘Christian’ countries killing is viewed with much more tolerance. We cer­ tainly devour large quan­ tities of meat and capital punishment is an event of the not too far distant past in North America. Too, we view war as justifiable homicide, sanc­ tioning it by our use of chaplains on the battlefield, and frequent defense of wars in the pulpit (during the war at least.) Not having ever been involved directly with war it’s pretty difficult for me to offer a very valid opinion one way or the other as to whether killing can ever be justified. One incident though, sticks out in my mind about a man who was really and truly an executioner. I met him near Peter­ borough while I was fishing at a dock, an old Indian gentlemanwhO'had just come in on a small boat. He was carrying a string of fish and walked with a noticeable limp. We chatted about the limp. “An old war wound,” he said, with a little pride in his voice. “What was your job during the war?” I asked. “I was a sniper,” he said. “I used to sit up in a steeple or a tree and pick them off, sometimes three quarters of a mile away, they were. I’d line ’em up in the ’scope’s cross-hairs and that’d be it. They never knew what hit ’em.” There was no pride now in his voice. It was just a statement of1 fact, a job he’d had to do and had done well. There was no trace though of regret or pain on his face as he finished telling me about it. It’s a queer world isn’t it, when one of us has a chance to play God or at the very least, the angel of death, I’m just as pleased that I don’t have to live with his memories. For quite a while, I counted myself among that approximately 30 percent of Canadian voters who were “un­ decided.” From the time he was chosen leader and elected 11 years ago, I have disliked Pierre Trudeau. Perhaps distrusted would be a better word. As a Canadian I was used to good, dull, solid prime ministers like Mike Pearson, a genial, open internationally known diplomat; “Uncle Louise” St. Laurent, a corporate lawyer respected by men of all parties; John Diefen­ baker, a criminal lawyer with great experience in parliament. This new guy, Trudeau, was a little too good to be true. A millionaire’s son who had never really proved himself in business, law (his profession) or the arts. He had no experience in parliament. He had switched ideals too easily, from firebrand to national pacifier. 6 Oh, I could understand the Trudeaumania. With his casual clothes, his boutonniere, and his exotic holidays, he was a regular breath of fresh air to Canadians, accustomed to stodginess at the top, He was photogenic, articulate, and obviously a man with a considerable intellect. He had bags of charm, with the Gallic shrug, the lifted eyebrow. In his national television speeches he was a winner, most persuasive. When he married the lovely Margaret Sinclair, the fairy tale seemed complete, only outdone by the fact they they had three children, bang, bang, bang, two of them born on Christmas Day. It would take a distinguished writer of soap opera to come up with a better script. Yet all the time I didn’t trust him. Too smooth, even slippery, when it came to a forthright statement about his views or the country. At first I thought we might just have a statesman, but it wasn’t long before he was a pure politician to the heels. , My wife was sore at me for what she considered my jaundiced view of Prince Charming. Just as she was sore at me because I wasn’t altogether sold on John F. Kennedy ten years earlier, another guy who had ridden to office on a few million dollars, a barrel of am­ bition, and charm to burn. My jaundice was justified. Since Trudeau took over, Canada has slipped steadily into a stagflation that has made a hell of a lot of other Canadians just as jaundiced. He refused to con­ sider wage and price controls. A year later he switched and stole the idea from the Tories, too late. His government has done virtually nothing about: foreign companies buying Canada; development of the country; unemployment; pollution and a hundred other issues of concern. There was no bold, leadership of Canadian industry, commerce, science. There was .a knuckling-under to militant labour. There was the panicky War Measures Act in Quebec. •There was a steady loss of confidence in Canada on the international level. When Joe Clark was chosen leader of the Tories, taking the place of a much superior man, Robert Stanfield, at least I had some hope. He was young, seemed vigorous, and must have something going for him, even though barely more than half the Tory delegates wanted him, or didn’t want Claude Wagner. As the months have passed, my hopes have withered. Clark seems just the opposite of Trudeau. Not smooth, but awkward. Not intellectual, though hardplugging at his homework. Trying to appear forceful in the televised House of Commons, but a finger­ wagging, jowl-shaking, pale effigy of old John Diefenbaker at his best. There’ll be no bold leadership by this guy, either if he wins. He makes a statement, then waffles. He dodges a television confrontation with Trudeau, and I don’t blame him. He throws out a hugh bribe to the middle-class voter with his mortgage interest scheme. He seems a decent enough chap, as honest as a politician can be, but he appears more like a puppet, gyrating awkwardly to the strings pulled by his advisors, than a real human being. He seems to have virtually no sense of humor, no vision of Canada; nothing but an enormous desire to become prime minister. Clark has never easily accomplished anything outside of politics. He was a hardworking and earnest, but un­ distinguished member of parliament. That’s why he got the “Joe Who?” label after he wiggled into the leadership. What a choice! An aging playboy who has allowed Canada’s national debt, and Canada’s government, swell to epic proportions until Ottawa ap­ pears a huge complacent blood-sucker drawing the life out of the rest of the country. And a hick from High River whose main motive seems to be pure political hunger for power. (No aspersions on High River, whose editor kept me up until 4 a.m. one morning in a great intellectual debate). Where to go? I’m lurching to the left, and I wouldn’t be surprised if many joined me. I’m no socialist, but Broadbent at least isn’t making an ass of himself, has some concrete ideas. We have a good man in our riding, and this time I’m going to vote for the man. 55 Years Ago Mr. S. M. Sanders was in Chicago last week attending the International Convention of Garment Manufacturers. May 24 opened with a drizzling rain but cleared towards the end of the day. In consequence motor traffic was curtailed somewhat. The.usual list of visitors was not as large as in some years. Rev. Linden Harvey of Coatsworth is spending a few days with his parents Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Harvey. Mr. Bruce Rivers left Monday for St. Thomas where he has secured a position. 30 Years Ago W. G. Cochrane has moved into his new house, Senior St. The Huronia choir won first prize at the Woodstock Musical Festival Wednesday evening. Winston Shapton graduated from OAC, Guelph, at the convocation exercises last Wednesday. Ed Hunter-Duvar will open his new service station at the south end of town Friday night with an old and new time dance. 20 Years Ago The Exeter Kinettes plan to purchase a cart of their own through South Huron Hospital channels for the purpose of selling con­ fections and sundry articles to the hospital patients. They have been doing this for some time but used a hospital cart. The Clandeboye station on the CNR.railway has been sold by tender and is to be removed. Between campaign speeches at Wingham and Stratford, Premier Frost attended a luncheon meeting of party workers at Arm­ strong’s Restaurant, Exeter, Wednesday afternoon. Joanne Mair of Exeter and Audrey Rhodes, an out­ standing Stratford athlete, whose parents now live in Exeter, were among the nurses who graduated from St. Joseph’s Hospital School of Nursing, Friday. 15 Years Ago The sons and daughters of members of Exeter Lions swelled attendance to 85 at their “family night” staged at the Exeter Legion. Guest of the evening was Merle “Ting” Tingley, noted cartoonist with the London Free Press. First official practice for the Exeter Mohawks, who have been centered in the Huron-Perth Baseball loop, will be held Tuesday night. Manager Joe Wooden has extended an invitation to all ball players in the area to try out for spots with the club. Joan Westcott, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Roylance Westcott graduated from London Teachers’ College. She is a SHDHS graduate and has accepted a position with the Kitchener public school board. Bob Beavers, son of Mr. and Mrs. Reg Beavers, broke his right leg while playing socceratSHDHS.The bones have had to be reset and he is in Victoria Hospital, London. Attention: Smiley Your indignus article on “Society Breaking Up Fast” has done nothing for the intellect of the male species. Your wish to delete woman from the polls is. pre­ posterous. Mrs. Thatcher is a reflection of that. Its time for you to step down from your pedestal and join the human race. If it weren’t for men like you, "Women’s Lib” would be nonexistent. It stands to reason that when you suf­ focate someone, they fight for air. “Year Of The Man” has exhausted itself over the past 20,000 years. If you would teach what you preach, learn to live and share with others, the world would be in better shape for it. Jacky Hrudka Exeter Dear Editor: As we approach the most important federal election in our history, l am fervently hoping that Canadians will judge political candidates on policies as opposed to such frivolous items as why Joe Clark lost his luggage while on a world tour. Intelligent Canadians will immediately cast off such childish concerns as style and charisma and will in­ stead focus on important issues such as competence and fiscal responsibility. Pierre Trudeau became Prime Minister in April, 1968. Consider the financial record of his administration (source: Public Accounts, Department of Finance; percentage figures have been adjusted to take in­ flation into account): 1) in 1968 the gross federal debt was $33 billion; in 1978 it was $80 billion, increase 25 percent, (When I asked Pierre Trudeau to explain this while he was in Edmonton last year, he typically evaded the question). 2) in 1968 the annual in­ Please turn to page 5