The Exeter Times-Advocate, 1974-12-23, Page 28Oupy APO coed
Mrs. Bertha Py.m, of
HensalL BO on December
23.
Henry Atkins, RR 2
Hensall, 82 on December
28.
Mrs. Mary Brock,
Huronview, Clinton, 90 or
December 29,
it o ...•• ,k 4 ,.> • . i:t.-
zto •
tt. 0
ir it
1, ti
•
/Ai E g
4•
I?'
Time for merriment
and fun, for family
g
gatherings, for caroling
mil if lmlfLI.! 9II I II I Ili,1 I. RI I IlldlR ,Hmt lll,,l, I II1 III I Iq !
Hensall
personals
,111010$!Illiimiliorlollimig01110111,410 1111 001 a. I
Mrs. Fred Beer who was A.
patient in ..South Huron Hospital,
Exeter returned to her home this
Week.
Mrs. Earl Campbell returned
to her home on Thursday, having.
been a patient in South Huron
Hospital, Exeter for several
weeks.
Ask for Crediton sewer plan
Stephen township council has of drains in Crediton in recent
authorized the preparation of a months. Results showed
plan for sewers in the police widespread pollution in the
village of Crediton. drainage ditches of Crediton
Goderich engineer B.M. Ross is caused by septic tank systems
expected to begin preliminary and soil conditions.
studies in the spring. Due to the same environmental
The Ontario Ministry of the conditions an application by Jack
Environment conducted a survey Dye for a housing subdivision at
the northerly edge of Crediton
has been held up by the Huron
County planning department.
A report from Huron planners
also recommended the in-
stallation of sewers.
The tender of Bluewater Truck
Centre in Goderich for the supply
Of a new truck with snow plow
attachments was accepted Bend and Mothers Motors and
recently by council, Larry Snider Motors both of
The Goderich firm's bid of Exeter could not guarantee
$22,791 including trade-in was the delivery for at least 10 months.
highest of four bids received but Approval must be obtained from
was the only one assuring the Ontario Ministry of Tran- delivery in six months, sportation and Communication, The other tenders from " A land severance application
Thompson•Warner Motors Grand from Harvey Hodgins for Lot 14,
South boundary Concession was
given tentative approval,
A building permit was ap-
proved for cemnora Holdings at
Lots 2 and 3 L.R.W. Concession
for cottage renovations
amounting to $26,000
Tom Sawyer
at Biddulph
It was an evening of mixed
entertainment at Biddulph
Central School at parents and
friends were treated to a
Christmas concert "The Choir
boy who couldn't sing" and an
operetta, "Torn Sawyer."
With performances of both
productions on Wednesday and
Thursday nights the students of
Biddulph school proved that they
have indeed been busy the last
few weeks. The casts were en-
tirely different both nights,
giving even more students a
chance perform.
The first production was put on
by the junior grades of the school
and was the story about a little
choir boy who found he could not
sing.
The narrator on Wednesday
night was Robin Caverhill and on
Thursday Tami McRoberts. The
choir boy was played by Jamie
Hodgins and Robbie Black.
Several Christmas carols were
sung by the cast and chorus.
After the intermission Robin
Revington played a piano solo.
The second performance on
both evenings was a production of
• the operetta —Tom Sawyer" by
the senior classes. Again the
casts were different on both
nights.
Tom Sawyer was played by
Peter Scheidler and Pat Bates
who did an excellent job in both
singing and acting. Huck Finn
was played by Doug Latta and
Paul Gilmour and Becky was
portrayed by Sheryl Noyes and
Donna Hodgins.
The ghosts and chorus for both
evenings were provided by the 6A
class.
The shows were excellent and
showed a great deal of work on
the part of all involved. The
students also did their own
scenery and costumes.
At the end of the evening, the
casts of both shows came on
stage to give what director Mr.
Norm Steeper called a "musical
excuse" as they sang a song en-
titled Younger Generation in
which they asked parents to
remember the things they did
when they were young.
Your government's position
on negotiations with
the Civil Service Association of Ontario.
The Government of Ontario has offered the CSAO an average 20% pay increase
over one year and is prepared to go to arbitration. CSAO leadership
has refused this offer and also refuses to go to arbitration.
We believe, as your government, we have offered a fair and reasonable contract.
Apologies
We apologize for the error in
last week's paper. Mr. & Mrs.
Jim Cooper were recently
married, not Tim Cooper.
For almost three months now the Government of
Ontario has been trying to negotiate a new collec-
tive agreement with the Civil Service Association
of Ontario covering some 19,000 civil servants in
the Operational Services Category.
With less than two weeks' negotiating time left
before the current contract expires and the CS AO
threatening an illegal strike on January 1st if it
doesn't have a new agreement by then, we thought
it was time to let you, the taxpayers of Ontario,
know directly how and where things stand.
After all, it is your tax dollars that will be used
to pay for any wage settlement we make with
these employees. And it is your services that will
be threatened with disruption if the CSAO carries
out its threat of an illegal walkout.
would agree on the choice of a neutral third person
as chairman. This amendment responds directly
to one of the major demands made by the CSAO
in its campaign against the Act.
(2) Similar changes would be made to ensure full
and equal employee representation on the Public
Service Grievance Board and the Ontario Public
Service Labor Relations Tribunal, the other two
major bodies established under the Act.
(3) If these amendments are accepted by the
Legislature, employees henceforth would be able
to bargain on such matters as promotions, de-
motions, transfers, layoffs and the classification
and job evaluation system. Under the present law,
all of these are considered management's prerog-
ative. The proposed amendments also provide an
opportunity, short of actual bargaining, for em-
ployee representatives to discuss and review with
the employer the governing principles of the merit
system, training and development, appraisal and
super annuation.
The government wants a settlement—
but it must be prepared for
an illegal strike.
During recent days, there has been one new devel-
opment. On December 13th the CSAO, for the
first time, formally dropped its demand for a 611/2
per cent wage increase and said, instead, it wanted
a 41 per cent hike for 1975. At the time this state-
ment was prepared the government had replied
that it could not in all responsibility accept a
demand of that magnitude.
The government, for its part, remains ready to
negotiate seriously and in good faith within the
framework of its December 3rd proposal. We have
already offered to submit the issue to an arbitra-
tion board to be set up on the basis of the proposed
amendments to the Crown Employees Collective
Bargaining Act.
In the meantime, since January 1st isn't far away,
the government has had to formulate contingency
plans in the event the CSAO leadership persists
in calling an illegal strike. We hope that doesn't
happen. We expect that our employees won't
break the law. But if they do, we are determined to
meet our responsibility to maintain those services
you rightfully expect to receive from your govern;
ment.
... time to say thanks
The government has tried to negotiate
in good faith.
The CSAO first served its demands on the govern-
ment on September 27th. The Association told us
then it wanted a 611/2 per cent wage increase in a
one-year contract for 1975.
That didn't seem to government negotiators to be
a serious or realistic demand on which to base
negotiations and we began a series of meetings
with CSAO representatives to try and discover
where the real bargaining area lay. We met twice
in October and again for two days early in
November.
During those meetings we set forth.our counter-
proposals. First, we suggested a two-year contract
with wage increases of 10 to 16 per cent in the
first year and 8 per cent in the second.
Despite writter assurance that this was a negotia-
ble offer, the CSAO leadership insisted on taking
it to its membership and, on that basis, on getting a
mandate for an illegal strike if there was no agree-
ment by January 1st.
The CSAO membership vote took two weeks and
it wasn't until December 2nd and 3rd that we
were able to sit down again with Association rep-
resentatives. At these meetings, as they had from
the outset, CSAO negotiators refused to move
from their initial demand for a 61'/2 per cent wage
increase—an increase that would cost you, the
taxpayers of Ontario, almost $100 million in
additional wage bills in 1975.
Given this situation, government negotiators
decided a major move was necessary. Since the
CSAO had been insisting that the government
make an offer it could take back to its member- to all our customers
and friends who make
doing business
such a pleasure,
ANNE'S
We believe we have been fair and
reasonable with our employees and
responsible to you as taxpayers and
to the economy of our province.
ship, on December 3rd our representatives put
their full mandate on the bargaining table.
The government has made a fair and
reasonable wage offer.
The offer tabled by government negotiators on
December 3rd represented a considerable move
from our-initial position. In recognition of the
uncertainties- caused by Canada's current infla-
tionary climate, we proposed a one-year contract
which would allow both sides to return to the
bargaining table in 12 months when we could
review the economic situation at that time.
For the 12 months of 1975, we proposed wage
increases averaging 20 per cent for the 19,000
employees involved. The increases actually ranged
from 15 to 23 per cent, depending on the employee
group involved, but more than 80 per cent of the
civil servants would receive 20 per cent or more.
The cost to the taxpayers of these increases
would be $32.7 million in 1975.
The government made this proposal in a sincere
attempt to be fair and reasonable with its employ-
ees, while, at the same time, recognizing its wider
responsibilities to the taxpayers and economy of
our province. Our research, based on surveys of
more than 120 employers in Ontario, indicated
that our wage levels would be competitive with
those paid elsewhere in the province for compara-
ble work. In fact, the 20 per cent increase for one
year compared with an average annual increase of
14.5 per cent in contracts signed in recent months
by private employers in Ontario.
The government is moving to improve
the collective bargaining system.
Concurrently, but separate from the actual wage
negotiations, government representatives have
been discussing with the CSAO and other em-
ployee organizations possible changes in the
Crown Employees Collective Bargaining Act
which governs collective bargaining for public
servants.
On December 5tb the Hon. Eric Winkler, Chair-
man of the Management Board, introduced the
government's proposed amendments in the Legis-
lature. The Bill recommends a number of changes
in the Act, including three highly significant ones:
(1) It proposes a revision in the method of ap-
pointing arbitration boards (the ultimate recourse
under the law to settle differences) to ensure that
the makeup of these boards does not appear to
favor either side. Under the proposed change, the
employee agent and, the employer each would
name one member to the board and they, in turn,
Ontario
Government of Ontario
Page 16A December 25,. 1974 Widespread pollution reported
Management Board
Coffee Shop
AND
DINGWELL'S g
g
Variety
EXETER