The Citizen, 2008-08-28, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, AUGUST 28, 2008. PAGE 5.
Bonnie
Gropp
TThhee sshhoorrtt ooff iitt
Where friends meet
I f earning a tie is like kissing your sister,
losing is like kissing your grandmother
with her teeth out.
– George Brett
Poor old George. He was a great baseball
player and an occasionally funny guy, but he
just didn’t get it. Life really isn’t just about
winning or losing.
Lots of other famous folks whose name
begins with ‘B’ have figured that out – Bono,
Warren Buffet, Brangelina and Bill (as in
Gates).
What do they have in common? They all had
tons of dough and they all gave tons of it away.
If you hope to croak with a smile on your
face, it’s the second part of the last sentence
that really matters. There is no real joy in
Getting Stuff – and that grim truth applies
equally to billionaires and bag ladies.
Whether you’re piling up coffers of
Krugerrands or shopping carts full of plastic
bags, a simple truth applies: a human being
can only use so much crap in a lifetime.
The real happiness comes from giving it
away – there’s even scientific proof of that.
Researchers at the University of British
Columbia targeted a group of youths and
‘gifted’ them with cash. Half the group got to
keep the money; the other half was directed to
pass it along to others.
The second group reported significantly
higher feelings of satisfaction and happiness
than the first.
A follow-up survey of 600 adults showed
that rates of happiness increased
proportionally with the amount of money
people gave away, not the amount they had
earned or spent on themselves.
There is however, another ‘B’ word that
effectively cuts a lot of us potential players out
of the philanthropy game. That word is
‘broke’.
Most of us can’t indulge in the Generosity
Sweepstakes because we’re, ahem, lacking in
financial fluidity. Skint. Busted.
Well there’s good news for us, too. Turns out
you don’t need to hand out cash to feel good.
Paying compliments is just as rewarding as
doling out dollars.
Japanese researchers at the National
Institute for Physiological Sciences in Okazaki
employed a brain scanning technique known
as functional magnetic resonance imaging to
track a group of 19 healthy people through a
series of experiments. It was a complicated
setup, but basically it confirmed that the
human brain does not discriminate between
material and immaterial rewards.
“We found that different kinds of rewards –
a good reputation versus money – are
biologically coded by the same neural
structure, the striatum,” said Dr. Norihiro
Sadato, chief researcher.
Simply put, as far as your brain is
concerned, praise is just as good as cash.
So is simple kindness. And kindness comes
from a well that never goes dry – providing
you prime it.
There was a baseball game at Western
Oregon University recently that would have
made George Brett smile, if not laugh out
loud.
The Western Women’s softball team was
playing a crew from Central Washington and
Sara Tucholsky was in the batter’s box. She
took a couple of strikes, then caught a sweet
pitch that came right over the plate, belt-high.
She swung. She connected. The ball sailed up,
up and over the centrefield fence.
Sara was ecstatic. It was her first homerun
ever. She started to run the bases, but in her
excitement she failed to touch first. Her
teammates shouted, she lurched to a stop on
the baseline so harshly that her legs buckled
and she fell to the ground.
She tore a ligament. She couldn’t walk at all.
Baseball rules are very straightforward. If
Sara Tucholsky couldn’t make it around the
bases then the homerun was cancelled. Under
the rules her teammates were forbidden to help
her.
Tough. But rules are rules.
Unless….
Mallory Holtman, the pitcher for Central
Washington, approached the umpire. What if
the injured batter was carried around the bases
by members of the opposing team?
Nothing in the rule book about that.
The pitcher and the shortstop from the other
side picked Sara up and carried her around all
the bases. The action cost the Central
Washington team the game. When they
touched home plate Sara was crying, but not
from a sore knee.
“They didn’t even know it was my first
homerun,” she said. “It just says a lot about
them.”
Indeed it does. George Brett, please copy.
Arthur
Black
Other Views It’s how you play the game
Ontarians have been given a timely
reminder why they dislike Conrad
Black, after the complex, difficult-to-
understand court hearings that found he
defrauded investors of non-competition
payments and obstructed justice resulted in
him being sent him to jail for 6 1/2 years in the
United States. It left many heads spinning.
The reminder was in the form of an
announcement by the Quebec-based grocery
chain Metro Inc. that it will rename the
remaining Dominion stores and other stores it
has bought, including the former A and P and
Ultra stores, so all will be known as Metro
stores.
The new owner said this will help it market
its chain better by having a consistent store
name and selling the same products
throughout all its stores through the same
flyers, and provide huge savings. Marketing
experts added the Dominion name had been a
“great brand,” but was no longer as relevant.
Dominion Stores, founded in 1919, was
commonly considered before Black bought it
as Ontario’s leading grocery chain. People felt
when they shopped there, they might have to
pay a bit more, but were getting about the top
in quality and service.
Black sold some of its stores, fired many
employees and petulantly charged those who
protested were stealing millions of dollars
worth of its inventory a year anyway, which
further hurt the stores’ image and turned off
some potential shoppers.
Black had no evidence to support this and
the Liberal labour minister, Bill Wrye, pointed
this out and demanded he apologize for
besmirching all Dominion workers.
A spokesperson for Black eventually and
grudgingly conceded that, while some
employees abused their positions, the majority
carried out their duties honestly and
responsibly.
Black had an even nastier encounter with the
New Democrat leader, later premier, Bob Rae,
after he took money from a pension fund
holding it for Dominion’s employees.
Rae called Black “a symbol of bloated
capitalism at its worst” and Black, who never
was outdone in extravagant language,
countered Rae was a coward, liar and “symbol
of swinish, socialist demagoguery” and, if Rae
wanted to sue him, he would come over and
pick up the writ.
Rae won this one, because after a protracted
court battle, Black’s company agreed to return
$44 million to the pension fund to settle the
dispute. When Rae was on the verge of
winning an election in 1990, Black warned
that if Ontario elected him, the financier and
his investment millions would be on a plane
out of Ontario before he could be sworn in.
After Rae won, Black warned Ontario would
“pay dearly for its mindless submission” to
him and he would not invest a dime in Ontario
as long as it governed.
But he found he made too much profit in
Ontario to leave and stayed in the same office
here until recently, when a security video
caught him removing files and led to the
charge of obstructing justice.
Few have got in bitter confrontations with
all three parties in the legislature, but Black
even managed to get in a shouting match with
the Progressive Conservative government of
premier William Davis. Business
entrepreneurs usually get along better with the
Tories.
Davis’s attorney general, Roy McMurtry,
later respected as a non-partisan Ontario chief
justice, recommended charges of breaches of
securities law be laid against Black after a firm
he controlled tried to take over a company in
the U.S., but the sometimes independent
Ontario Securities Commission refused.
McMurtry continued to maintain there were
grounds for prosecution and Black accused
him of “scrambling around like an asphyxiated
cockroach” trying to find grounds to prosecute
him.
Black was never wrong, of course, as he
insisted he was not at fault even after the court
sent him to prison.
Ontario politicians who had battles with
him and the store employees on whom he
unleashed his tirades have been restrained in
their celebrations of the court’s disposition of
him – none has commented in the legislature –
but they must be thinking I told you so.
Eric
Dowd
FFrroomm
QQuueeeenn’’ss PPaarrkk
Well, that was a nice surprise. It was
the early evening hours. A
relaxing supper had passed and
now my guy and I were out for an evening on
the town.
Or perhaps village would be more accurate.
We were spending some time at the theatre in
Blyth. Not a rare adventure for us, for sure. But
as we generally attend the opening nights we
weren’t expecting to run into any familiar
faces.
Yet, there she was, just inside the doors. We
had just entered. I was chuckling over
something Mark had said and in turning my
head to respond, spied a woman beside me.
She was smiling at me, albeit with some
evident amusement as she watched the
lightbulb gradually come on.
For me, it was a bit surreal. Features familiar,
yet somehow not quite the same. A person out
of place and time. Then slowly the dawning as
I recognized my old school friend. We had
chummed with a handful of others in a close-
knit group through several years of elementary
school. The ties loosened with the arrival of
Grade 9, however, and by the time we were in
the thick of secondary school, our association
was happenstance. We would still talk, but with
the widening of our social circle we had
figuratively moved away from each other.
It was nice, therefore, to bump into her this
way. I’m not a reunion kind of girl.
Anticipating conversations with long-gone
acquaintances, being thrust into large
gatherings of people with nothing binding
them to me but the past, gets me edgy.
But to suddenly, without forethought, see a
memory, gave me no time to worry, simply to
take advantage. With precious moments to chat
we touched base and departed with smiles.
Honesty requires us to accept that so many
years have gone between that should we never
meet again, life will go on. I’d also like to
think, however, that if we do it will be a nice
bonus.
With long-gone friends there was obviously
something missing or we would never have
grown apart in the first place we might
suppose. And then, we create a life so separate
from the one in which they played such an
important role that the thread which tied us
together those many years ago is too weak and
frayed to bond us now.
I have often found it interesting that many of
those closest to my heart today, the ones for
whom I would move heaven and earth, had
little or nothing to do with my formative years.
They never knew the shy child, the misguided
teen. They never knew my first puppy, or my
first crush. They weren’t there to comfort me
when my grandparents passed away, nor when
my heart was broken for the first time.
My grandson recently told me his one friend
lets him know when he’s acting like a dork.
What kind of friend, I asked him, is that. My
little wise man said, a good one, because it’s
important that there’s someone to let you know
when you’re acting stupid.
That ‘privilege’often belonged to those girls,
who at various times in my youth I couldn’t
have imagined a life without. They were
confidantes and kindred spirits. They were
giggles at slumber parties, whispered secrets
and fashion advice. With them I came to know
who I was, what I was looking for and what
was right, and wrong, about me.
Since then I have been blessed with the
friendship of some incredible people. I cherish
them and hope to have them forever. But I
never forget my childhood buddies. And it was
very nice to see one again.
Timely reminder of Black
Letters Policy
The Citizen welcomes letters to the
editor.
Letters must be signed and should
include a daytime telephone number for
the purpose of verification only. Letters
that are not signed will not be printed.
Submissions may be edited for length,
clarity and content, using fair comment as
our guideline. The Citizen reserves the
right to refuse any letter on the basis of
unfair bias, prejudice or inaccurate
information. As well, letters can only be
printed as space allows. Please keep your
letters brief and concise.