Loading...
The Citizen, 2008-04-24, Page 1The CitizenVolume 24 No. 17 Thursday, April 24, 2008 $1.25 ($1.19 + 6c GST)Serving the communities of Blyth and Brussels and northern Huron County Inside this week Pg. 2 Pg. 6 Pg. 8 Pg. 9 Pg. 22 School band wins first at Festival Local girl wins provincial award Girls teams rule on rinks Local youth gets behind his team Artist’s work on display in London Thousands of chickens perished in a Morris-Turnberry barn fire April 17. Blyth fire chief Paul Josling said firefighters responded to the call on Moncrieff Road at 9:30 p.m. The 48’ by 250’ chicken barn was fully ablaze by that time and the 10,000 birds were already lost, he said. “The roof from about 200 feet of the barn was gone when we got there,” said Josling. Firefighters remained on the scene for two hours. No one was home at the time of the fire. The house was inhabited by the farm manager, Irvine Pease. “They arrived shortly after we got there,” said Josling. A passerby noticed the blaze and called 911. The barn was built in the early 1970s. Josling said they suspect the fire started as a result of an electrical problem. There is no estimate of damage at press time. A day before, Blyth firefighters were called to a grass fire at the Londesborough-area property of Bruce Shillinglaw just before noon. “He had been cutting up some old farm machinery with a torch and the grass and a couple of scrap cars caught fire,” said Josling. The fire was very close to a number of buildings, some trees and a hedge. Firefighters were on the scene for an hour to get the blaze under control. 10,000 chickens perish in barn blaze Big loss Ten thousand chickens perished in this barn blaze which occurred in the evening of April 17 on Moncrieff Road in Morris-Turnberry. Blyth firefighters responded after the call was made by a passerby. (Keith Roulston photo) North Huron council passed its budget Monday night, with an overall increase of 3.99 per cent. One of the highlights, however, was the announcement of a surplus from 2007 of $259,320.86. “We have never had a surplus of this size,” said director of finance/treasurer Donna White. The surplus came as a result of several things, including money left over from the museum. “We didn’t have the museum open full-time last year and we had budgetted that it would be.” Also there were savings on some capital projects, including Dinsley Street. The accumulated surplus, since 2001, now sits at $467,184. White said that they are raising $142,718 more this year from taxation than the previous year, with expenditures totalling $11,213,077. “The total raised from taxes will be $3,719,122 with the base rate being $2,371,596 and the area rate being $1,342,626.” Area rating, White explained has been done in the township since amalgamation for specific services in each ward. The area rates for Wingham total $1,143,122, and cover such things as policing, streetlights, sanitation, recycling and the long-term debt on the complex. In Blyth, the area-rated costs are $135,737 to cover the OPP, streetlights, sanitation, recycling and for the final year, the shortfall on the Blyth arena. In East Wawanosh area-rated dollars total $63,767 to cover OPP, sanitation and recycling. On the revenue side, North Huron has used $80,000 of the gas tax fund to offset the work on Catherine Street in Wingham. They received $422,000 from the Municipal Infrastructure Investment Initiative. “We were also lucky to get a $144,906 increase in the Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund,” said White. This is an unconditional grant. As of March 31 there was new funding announced for road and bridge work in the amount of $242,403 for North Huron. “This came at a time when the budget had been set, so it’s been put into reserves for a 2009 project.” What the bottom line means to ratepayers,White clarified by using a $100,000 residential assessment as a guide. In Wingham the municipal taxes on this type of home would increase by $54.54 or 3.74 per cent. In Blyth the figure is $39.74 or 3.91 per cent, while it’s $34.77 in East Wawanosh or 4.01 per cent. “It’s important to look at the dollars, not the percentage.” Highlights in the budget include partial funding of a new truck for the Wingham Fire Department, a policing study, a portable generator (contingent on a grant), fencing, trees and gates at the Wingham landfill, a niche wall at the Wingham By Bonnie Gropp The Citizen Residents want clean up NH passes budget As North Huron council’s Monday night agenda was wrapping up a small group of disgruntled Wingham residents showed up to voice their disapproval of a decision regarding lawn refuse pickup. A few months ago, at committee of the whole, council came to a decision that they would no longer pickup yard waste placed at the side of the roads by residents. The problem, however, is that the notice did not reach many residents until the yard work had been done this year. John Mann, the spokesperson for the group, comprised primarily of seniors, expressed frustration that as taxes continue to rise, services would disappear. He also questioned the decision that the township would now charge $50 if they had to pickup garden refuse that had been swept to the road. “This service appears to have been arbitrarily removed without our prior knowledge.” Saying the decision was unfair to some residents, Mann noted that not every ratepayer had a vehicle, particularly one big enough to carry all of the yard debris to the landfill. “Also not every resident can afford the new fee.” Mann asked why residents were not consulted, why the notice went out so late and why the service is being withdrawn. “I can’t fathom why when we have such a high rate of taxation that services are reduced.” Former councillor Arnold Taylor said he had been “rather shocked” to receive the notice. “It just came, bang.” He stated that in the past a notice had been put in the paper that refuse would be picked up on specific days. “It couldn’t be out before or after or there would be a charge. However, this was never enforced.” Rollie Kaufman agreed that the decision seemed abrupt and wanted an answer on council’s reasoning. “Is it the thought of council to do away with this altogether?” Elayne Rintoul asked where the refuse was to go. “How do we physically get rid of it?” Councillor Archie MacGowan thanked the residents for their comments and interest. He explained that part of the problem arose because the service had been abused on a number of occasions. “We set dates for pickup then would have a whole other round. Then I received complaints from people who said if we set a date that should be it.” The fee, said clerk-administrator Kriss Snell, was based on an hourly rate for staff and the use of equipment. “We hope this would come as a request from the ratepayer. There are cheaper alternatives. This is obviously a last resort.” Several expressed concerns regarding a specific pick-up date because of the weather’s capricious nature. “Having refuse out on a specific date is unreasonable. This has to be flexible.” He suggested a two-week period, adding that some municipalities provide this service monthly. There was also some discussion regarding a local compost site, which had been closed because of abuse. “A small group ruined it for everyone,” said MacGowan. Councillor Murray Nesbitt said council had made the decision to try and keep costs under control. “It takes a lot of money,” he said, adding that while taxes have gone up, they may have gone up more with this service continuing. Mann pointed out that his taxes had risen 37 per cent in 10 years. “It saves man hours,” said Nesbitt. “It’s small steps. (After the group left the meeting, public works director Ralph Campbell said the pickup cost roughly $8,000, not including fuel costs.) Snell also noted that the public works department is down one employee. ‘Craft bags’ were mentioned as another alternative, as they would not require the staff time as with loose refuse. Councillor Greg McClinchey supported this initiative, saying, “I think it’s absolutely absurd that people get to rake their lawn onto the road.” The bags, which decompose, are used now in many municipalities. Cost, said McClinchey is minimal, about $2.25 for six bags, which are larger than typical garbage bags. Campell explained that the notice had gone into the North Huron By Bonnie Gropp The Citizen By Bonnie Gropp The Citizen Continued on page 3 Continued on page 8