The Citizen, 2009-10-29, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2009. PAGE 5.
Bonnie
Gropp
TThhee sshhoorrtt ooff iitt
Zombie: (zom-bee) noun; the body of a
dead person given semblance of life,
but mute and will-less, by a
supernatural force, usually for some evil
purpose.
Back in the Jurassic era, when dinosaurs
browsed, pterodactyls soared and I was trying
to grow a decent set of sideburns, I put in a
stint as a bar boy in a nightclub in downtown
Toronto.
I learned a lot there, such as how to tell the
difference between a quiet drunk and a mean
one; how to carry a full tray of rye shots and
beer chasers without spilling a drop
and…what The Jug was for.
The Jug lived under the bar out of sight of
the customers. It was a big one, maybe 20
gallons, and it had a funnel jammed in its neck.
One of my last jobs each night was to upend
every supposedly empty bottle we had sold
that day into the funnel. Beer, rum, wine,
whiskey, absinthe, lemon gin, crème de cacao,
sherry, port – all the dregs of every pint,
mickey and 26-er went down the funnel and
into the jug.
Sounds chintzy, but you’d be amazed at the
gallonage all those drips and drabs would add
up to at the end of the day.
The resultant admixture was something to
behold. It’s colour varied from mud-brown to
a sulphurous blue-green and sometimes it
bubbled and smoked like a living thing.
Even the fruit flies would have nothing to do
with it.
Mostly The Jug just sat there fermenting
evilly, but every once in a while a customer –
a college kid, usually, or someone else
profoundly green – would order a specific
drink and one of the bartenders would swing
into action. He would grab a tall glass, squirt
in some pineapple, orange and lime juice,
perhaps a shot of cheap bar brandy, a spoonful
of sugar, a fistful of ice and then….
He would siphon off about three ounces of
the vile magma seething in The Jug and add it
to the glass.
The drink was, of course, a Zombie. A truly
horrid alcoholic concoction designed for the
Not-Too-Bright, the Suicidal or those
determined to lose their virginity no matter
what the cost.
It is called a Zombie because it renders the
drinker near catatonic.
We topped our Zombies up with sludge from
The Jug because we knew anyone idiotic
enough to order a Zombie couldn’t tell Mum’s
Extra Dry from Mennen After Shave.
All this preambling reverie to pose a
question: what’s with all the zombies these
days?
Google ‘zombies’ and you get over 21
million hits – and that’s without getting into
zombie games, zombie songs, zombie movies,
zombie wars – even zombie baseball.
We live in zombie times, I guess. Look at the
world financial situation. It cratered last year,
only to be resurrected with massive
transfusions of supernatural plasma (read,
taxpayers’ dollars).
And there it stands, tottering on the world
stage, grunting and snorting incoherently. Our
banks and money markets are being ‘run’once
again by the same geniuses who took us over
the cliff in the first place.
Dead? Hell, no. Zombie bankers walk
among us.
Down in the U.S., zombie politicians
thought to be dead and buried after the
Obama victory have shoved back their
tombstones to once again roil and heave across
the landscape, muttering darkly of Kenyan
passports, Marxist takeovers and (shudder)
Canadian medicine.
And here at home? We have our ongoing
engagement in Afghanistan, the zombie war
that won’t lie down.
We have a zombie deficit, a zombie health
care crisis and I haven’t even mentioned the
Toronto Maple Leafs. (Zombies on skates –
the horror, the horror).
And then we have our leaders: Stephen
‘Our-Lady-of-Perpetual-Minority’
Harper; Michael ‘the Undead’ Ignatieff,
survivor of more knives in the back than
a beef brisket at Swiss Chalet and
Jack Layton: standing firm in the polls at 15
per cent.
And still unaccountably breathing.
The Irish mystic W.B. Yeats was ahead of us
all. Nearly a century ago he wrote a poem
called The Second Coming. It prophesied the
appearance of a man-like creature with ‘a gaze
blank and pitiless as the sun’ stirring in the
sands of the desert.
The poem asks: “And what rough beast, its
hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?”
My money’s on a zombie.
Arthur
Black
Other Views What’s with the zombies?
One way to identify who matters most
in the Ontario legislature is where they
sit and MPPs have shuffled around
between seats a lot lately.
The first moves were because the opposition
Progressive Conservatives and New
Democrats changed leaders, which led them to
change their seating arrangements and
indicated something of the pecking order in
their parties.
The Liberals have changed theirs, because
they fired a minister, David Caplan, after he
failed to protect ticket buyers as minister in
charge of lotteries and later the public,
generally from waste in setting up an
electronic health records registry.
Caplan, once in the front row, where the
heaviest hitters in all parties usually sit, has
been banished to the third, but Premier Dalton
McGuinty may still restore him to cabinet one
day, because in the same breath he brought
back once-fired environment minister Laurel
Broten in a different role.
Education Minister Kathleen Wynne has
been promoted to the front row, first because
she is generally on top of her job, which is one
of government’s biggest, and gets good marks
for its education policies.
McGuinty also owed a large debt to Wynne,
because she defeated then Conservative leader
John Tory in her Toronto riding in the 2007
election, eliminated a possibly dangerous
opponent and plunged that party into two
years of uncertainty and quarreling over its
leadership in which it virtually stood still.
Leaders try to deploy their MPPs like troops
going into battle and McGuinty has arranged
his seating so his women ministers are very
much on display whenever the TV cameras
focus on him, which normally is half the daily
question period.
Health Promotion Minister Margarett Best
and Caplan’s replacement, Deb Matthews, can
be seen because they sit directly behind the
premier and sometimes the cameras also show
Tourism Minister Monique Smith, Children
and Youth Services Minister Broten,
Community and Social Services Minister
Madeleine Meilleur and Citizenship Minister
Michael Chan, all close to the premier.
Best also is black and TV viewers get an
impression of a cabinet in which women and
visible minorities play key roles, which is
good for votes.
The Conservatives’ new leader, Tim Hudak,
an extreme right winger, has Christine Elliott
sitting at his right hand in the front row, which
is an attempt to suggest he respects those in his
party who have more moderate views.
Elliott ran third in their leadership race, but
was the only candidate who expressed
moderate views and Hudak is hoping seating
her next to him will appease some the party is
in danger of losing.
Elliot is the wife of federal finance minister
Jim Flaherty and competent, but has yet to
show she has her husband’s instinct for going
for opponents’ jugular, which will be a
necessity when Hudak is away and she leads
their party in the legislature.
Hudak has shown he appreciates experience
by installing veteran Bob Runciman in the
front row to his left. Runciman was interim
leader twice and kept the party showing some
semblance of unity and purpose during its
trials without a permanent leader and knows
where the bodies are buried and how the
legislature works.
The New Democrats with 10 MPPs have
only four front-row seats and leader Andrea
Horwath and former leader Howard Hampton
automatically have one each.
The party’s House leader Peter Kormos,
who besides being the most entertaining MPP
raises the most damaging questions, has
another and Rosario Marchese, a well-
informed critic on education, has the fourth.
But it is difficult to think of an MPP who
contributes more thoughtful commentary,
particularly on municipal affairs and the
growing influence of developers, than Michael
Prue, who ran for NDP leader.
Prue blew it particularly because he wanted
to revisit issues such as the province unfairly
funding some faith-based schools and not
others, which other politicians more
concerned with their own self-preservation
steer clear of.
Prue remains stuck in the second row – don’t
judge MPPs’ worth solely on where they sit.
Eric
Dowd
FFrroomm
QQuueeeenn’’ss PPaarrkk
Apparently, I have an old 1950’s
automotive relic rusting away over the
fence in my backyard.
Technically the analogy used by the Avon
Maitland District School comparing our area
schools to 50-year-old Chevrolets was
delivered in the broad sense. But with Brussels
Public School on the list in the Huron
East/North Perth accommodation review
primarily because of its condition, one has to
assume it’s the comparison’s primary target.
Granted an old automobile doesn’t come
equipped with modern safety standards, and
even restored will still be lacking. The same
cannot be said of a building, however. An
updated facility done properly can be as good
as new.
Yet, despite the fact that Brussels is over-
capacity it seems unlikely it will be saved. The
board has recommended in its first, albeit
tentative proposal, that it, along with Grey
Central be closed, leaving the four schools in
Perth — Elma, Listowel Central and Eastdale
and Wallace — open.
In speaking with AMDSB superintendent of
education /operations Mike Ash following the
ARC’s organizational meeting last Thursday, I
was told that the seemingly Perth-favoured
option was not in any way deliberate.
Not that I ever actually thought it was.
Unfair, absolutely, but not deliberate. I don’t
envy the board and believe that they are doing
everything that numbers and government
allow. The province’s rules around funding and
how it’s spent limits their options while putting
them on the hot seat. They can’t be faulted that
“big brother” puts stringent rules on their
allowance.
They can’t be faulted either, that Listowel
has seen tremendous population growth in
recent years. However, that the option would
kill any potential in Huron East shouldn’t be
overlooked. While the committee can look at
the area and say that it has been
developmentally stagnant, while they can use
their outside researchers’ projections to
determine enrollment, what they can’t do is
predict the future. No one can be certain what
development may come.
What one can predict, however, is that the
loss of both Huron East schools will probably
guarantee none does.
Ash and his colleagues stressed several times
that the first option is a starting point, and that
never has the starting point been the final
recommendation approved by the trustees.
Also re-iterated was the intention for open and
honest communication.
Unfortunately, they might be off to a rocky
start on that one. Part of the problem with last
year’s North Huron review was the feeling that
things were not always as presented. Sadly,
many feel the trend is continuing. The idea of
moving Brussels students into the new North
Huron elementary school for kindergarten to
Grade 6 was conditional on funding from the
Ministry. With Ash’s statement Thursday that
they had not yet received approval for the
Brussels application, people felt that they were
being asked to work on a scenario based on
“what ifs” rather than reality.
Parents were curious too as to why Brussels
wasn’t involved in the North Huron review if
the intent is to send the students to that school.
Ash said Brussels had been mentioned but was
not included because they didn’t know there
would be funding for a new school at that time.
Ash described the review process as “a work
in progress.” MPP Carol Mitchell last week,
however, said it’s a process that’s already
working.
Maybe somewhere I suppose, but not here.
Seat placement shows clout
This is not working
Letters Policy
The Citizen welcomes letters to the
editor.
Letters must be signed and should
include a daytime telephone number for
the purpose of verification only. Letters
that are not signed will not be printed.
Submissions may be edited for length,
clarity and content, using fair comment
as our guideline. The Citizen reserves
the right to refuse any letter on the basis
of unfair bias, prejudice or inaccurate
information. As well, letters can only be
printed as space allows. Please keep
your letters brief and concise.