Loading...
The Citizen, 2010-06-24, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, JUNE 24, 2010. PAGE 5. Do not go gentle into that good night Rage, rage, against the dying of the light. – Dylan Thomas Getting old ain’t for pussies. – Anon Indeed it ain’t. Getting old is a curious journey and the trail signs are sometimes confusing and hard to read. The writer Robert Thomas Allen said “You don’t grow old gradually, or on purpose, the way you go downtown on a subway. It’s more like finding yourself standing in the last station and wondering how you got there.” And the stations aren’t well marked. I never realized I was ‘getting on’ until people started telling me how good I looked. Nobody commented on my vitality when I was seventeen, twenty-five or even forty-five, but now that I’m a greybeard, the air is full of “Hey, you’re looking great!” and “Wow! Did you lose some weight?” I’m pretty sure what they mean is: “Hmm, I see you’re not dead yet.” You bet I’m not. And I’ve got no plans to ‘go gentle’ either. I’ve long admired the poem Dylan Thomas wrote for his dying father – and especially his advice to ‘rage, rage, against the dying of the light’. Not that the Welshman knew what he was talking about. Dylan Thomas boozed his way into oblivion long before he became eligible to receive his old age pension. The man’s last words before he passed out in a heap on the floor of a New York City gin joint were: “I’ve had 18 straight whiskies. I believe that’s a record”. Dylan Thomas was just 39, still decades away from any first-hand knowledge of the dirty tricks advancing age dispenses – the stiff joints, the bad sleeps, the, as Leonard Cohen put it, “aches in the places where I used to play”. I believe there’s another well-known consequence of aging but I can’t recall it offhand. But I do recall a report from the Canadian Institute for Health Information that came out last month. It indicates almost half – 45 percent – of residents in nursing homes and similar residences show symptoms of depression. Imagine that. You take old folks out of their homes, away from their families, their pets, their routines and ensconce them in unfamiliar surroundings among strangers and caregivers serving institutional food prepared by other strangers – and they tend to get a little down in the mouth? Who could possibly have foreseen that? What’s worse, according to the report, is that the depressive symptoms are frequently undiagnosed and hence left untreated. It doesn’t have to be that way. Dr. Marie- France Rivard, an Ottawa psychiatrist who specializes in geriatrics, says it’s crucial to get our elders’ caregivers onside because “depression is a very treatable illness and with appropriate identification and treatment, the quality of life of people can be much improved.” Of course one must always be alert to the danger of too much attentiveness. Take my pal Steve. He’s a well-respected elder with lots of good friends, but alas, no living family. He finally got a little too old and frail to look after his farm so he sold it and moved into an extended care facility. And it’s a high-end joint. The rooms are warm and roomy, the food is great and the staff is incredibly helpful and devoted. On his first day there, a nurse sat Steve on his bed and began to explain the facilities. As she talked she noticed that Steve was slowly beginning to lean to one side. The nurse sprang up and gently pushed him upright. As she was leaving the room she happened to look back and there was Steve, sitting on the bed but definitely teetering to starboard again. She rushed back and straightened him up. Just to be on the safe side she called a nurse’s aide and asked her to stay with Steve in case he started to fall over once more. Sure enough, five times Steve started to lean; five times the nurse’s aide got him vertical again. I went in to visit Steve that night and asked him how he liked the place. “It’s not too bad,” Steve allowed, “except they won’t let you fart”. Arthur Black Other Views Old age: thinking outside the box It’s been called the passion that unites us all and it’s commonly referred to as this planet’s largest sporting event: World Cup. Unity, however, isn’t really what I felt was going on when I watched one of the early stage matches in the U.S.A. This could have, and I’m sure, has been, happening everywhere, so nothing personal against our neighbours to the south, who I love, but when watching U.S.A. versus England at a pub on a recent trip to Boston, Massachusetts, the borders between us actually felt stronger than ever. Having been familiar with the pub – as it is one of my three regular stops in Boston, including the home of the Red Sox, Fenway Park, and whatever hotel I happen to be staying in that weekend – it seemed significantly smaller than usual. Upon further investigation, the whole back half of the pub was fenced off by an English flag, while American supporters occupied the front half of the bar. Soccer fight songs and national anthems drifted from the back to the front, but were quickly muted by chants of “U-S-A, U-S-A!” As most fans know, the match ended in a draw, after a very questionable goaltending error by England’s keeper. The draw, however, was looked upon as a loss by a strong English squad and held in slightly higher regard by the Americans (the next day’s front page of the New York Post read “U.S.A. Wins 1-1”). However, it was the decision I was faced with when entering the bar that struck me as odd, as I had never really had to make such a decision before. I had to decide where to sit and who to support in a bar that stood nearly empty the previous day as Shepherd’s Pies and Guinesses were enjoyed in preparation for a contest between the Red Sox and the hated Philadelphia Phillies. However, it was at Fenway Park that fans of clam chowder and cheesesteaks alike sat side by side, cheering on their squads, calling each other names, yet high-fiving and tipping hats to one another at the conclusion of a rain-soaked blowout for the Red Sox. This banter and the calling of names that cannot be repeated in The Citizen is something that I have grown up with in bleachers throughout my life. It is the inalienable right to heckle and call someone a bum. In playing baseball for decades, I yelled at umpires and when I umpired, I expected to be yelled at. However, in the world sport of soccer, when buying tickets, the question is almost always raised as to where your support lies. Sections are (literally) fenced off to ensure no contact between rival supporters, you buy a ticket and pick a side, as your seat might depend on it. I love soccer, I love going to games and I love the World Cup, but as I sat in that pub, I sat next to an Englishman who took me for an American supporter, it seemed more divisive than usual to me. There was no room in the back for him, so once I established myself as a friendly, he and I discussed the game, in muted tones, as he quietly cheered on his beloved English national team, keeping his English accent to himself. It hardly seemed like unity as I talked to the young man and his girlfriend, helping them get a bartender’s attention so they could join the rest of the bar in drink and eventually offering them our seats when we left for Fenway to catch the afternoon start of the Red Sox game. So we strapped our Red Sox jerseys to our backs and walked in the rain to Fenway Park, where we cheered for the home team, but didn’t have to do so to be allowed in our seats. Ontario forgetting history The world stage Ontarians are in danger of losing some of their their history, including parts that would help them better understand those who ran the province. There was a good example when the legislature, before adjourning for the summer, paid tribute to Len Reilly, a Progressive Conservative MPP from 1962 to 1975. An MPP from each party, as is the tradition, took turns praising the former MPP and, as also happens often, said they had never met him personally. This is understandable, because the longest- serving current members, Liberal Jim Bradley and Conservative Norm Sterling, were not elected until 1977. The MPPs said Reilly was hardworking, served well on committees, had been been a chief whip and Deputy-Speaker and sacrificed a lot of his family life to be an MPP. The latter is what they say of all MPPs who died and gives themselves and their profession a pat on the back and mostly is true. One noted Reilly seemed to have had no difficulty getting elected, which is germane to this story. But none mentioned his special place in Ontario politics, which started taking shape in the early 1970s, when Conservative premier William Davis was looking for a seat in the legislature for a close friend, with whom he played football at University of Toronto, Roy McMurtry. McMurtry had worked on Davis’s campaign for leader and premier in 1971 and soon was seen hovering around the new premier’s media conferences and obviously had his ear. Davis appeared to have located a safe seat in 1973 in a by-election in downtown Toronto, where McMurtry lived, which had voted Conservative for 40 years. But the Liberals chose Margaret Campbell as candidate, a feisty prominent municipal politician, who had left the Conservative party, saying it had become complacent after 30 years in government and it was time for a change. Campbell did not mind taking on odds. She told this writer when she was a young lawyer, a judge refused to recognize her when she stood to speak for her client, but she kept rising until he did. She wiped the floor with the premier’s buddy in one of the most memorable by- election upsets in Ontario history. But Davis was determined to get McMurtry in the legislature and when a general election was held in 1975, privately ordered Reilly to step aside so McMurtry could run in his adjoining, even safer Conservative riding. Reilly, although popular and comfortable in his riding, felt his future would be bleak if he ignored the premier and gave up his seat and McMurtry ran and won. Davis tried to make it look as if he was rewarding Reilly by appointing him chair of the Ontario Science Centre, a sinecure in which he tried to throw himself enthusiastically. He never said publicly Davis forced him out, but he told this reporter. McMurtry went on to have a mostly valuable career as attorney general and, after Davis left, high commissioner to the U.K. and enlightened chief justice of Ontario, particularly in pointing to how poverty and racism contribute to crime. Reilly was given a testimonial dinner by the Conservative party and without embarrassment McMurtry hosted it and Davis led the parade of speakers testifying what a useful MPP he had been. Davis became the longest serving premier of recent decades and has become an icon, on a pedestal particularly because he was more politically moderate than some of his successors and is seen as having governed with less controversy and more concern for others. The MPPs who paid the recent tribute to Reilly would have obtained their information about him from biographies written by parties, clippings from newspapers filed in the legislature library and books written, unfortunately infrequently, on Ontario politics, but often these do not contain the full stories. One is that political leaders can be ruthless and without shame and this is something that should not be forgotten. Eric Dowd FFrroomm QQuueeeenn’’ss PPaarrkk Shawn Loughlin SShhaawwnn’’ss SSeennssee Letters Policy The Citizen welcomes letters to the editor. Letters must be signed and should include a daytime telephone number for the purpose of verification only. Letters that are not signed will not be printed. Submissions may be edited for length, clarity and content, using fair comment as our guideline. The Citizen reserves the right to refuse any letter on the basis of unfair bias, prejudice or inaccurate information. As well, letters can only be printed as space allows. Please keep your letters brief and concise. You can’t live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you. – John Wooden Final Thought