The Citizen, 2010-03-25, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, MARCH 25, 2010. PAGE 5.
The two most abundant commodities
in the universe are hydrogen and
stupidity. – Harlan Ellison
There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the
universe, and it has a longer shelf life.
– Frank Zappa
Vivienne and Knox could be forgiven for
thinking they’d landed at Stupidity HQ.
They came to earth a couple of summers
back as twins born to Brad Pitt and Angelina
Jolie. Their arrival was greeted with a $14
million inaugural nest egg lobbed in from deep
right field. That’s how much People magazine,
in partnership with Hello, another
dumbass tabloid, paid for the privilege of
publishing the first, exclusive photos of the
kids.
Fourteen million dollars for a one-time
photo with a couple of newborns – pretty
stupid alright. But such rags are devoted to
sustaining the lush groves of celebrity egos
that thrive in the Hollywood Hills and
stupidity is the manure that nurtures celebrity.
How else to explain the continuing fascination
with patent airheads like Christina Aguilera
(“So where’s the Cannes Film Festival being
held this year?”); Don King (“He speaks
English and Spanish and he’s bilingual too.”);
and Arnold Schwarzenegger (“I think gay
marriage is something that should be between
a man and a woman.”) ?
And if that’s not bummer enough for you,
consider this grim stat: as of this writing
Britney Spears has more than four million
followers on Twitter.
The irony is we live in a supposedly
sophisticated age. People have never had
easier access to the accumulated wisdom of
the ages. Our libraries, museums and art
galleries are open to all. We have wall-to-wall
radio, TV and Smart phones. The latest
information on everything from aardvarks to
zyzzyva is available at the punch of a Google
search button.
And yet…Sarah Palin.
We seem to be getting actually dumber.
That may not be an illusion. A University of
Wisconsin anthropologist has analyzed human
skulls collected from around the globe and
spanning the past five millennia. His
conclusion: the human brain is shrinking.
According to John Hawks’data, human brains
have shrivelled by about 150 cubic centimetres
over the past 5,000 years. That’s about ten per
cent shrinkage of total brain mass.
Professor Hawks says that’s not necessarily
bad news; smaller brains don’t have to be
punier brains. It could be simply biological
streamlining at work. “Maybe we got better
with smaller brains,” says Hawks – who then
adds, unhelpfully: “But maybe we’re getting
dumber. How can we know?”
Thanks, professor.
Perhaps we can’t nail down the human
stupidity factor but we can certainly read the
portentous crayon scrawls on the wall. Such as
the fact that Fox News, featuring the spittle-
flecked ravings of Bill O’Reilly and Sean
Hannity (and, oh yes – Sarah Palin) reels in 2.6
million viewers on an average weeknight.
Still, put in perspective, that’s not quite as
scary as it sounds. Two and a half million
viewers amounts to less than one percent of
the American population – and we don’t even
get the service in most parts of Canada – or
Canuckistan, as Bill the Loon likes to refer to
us.
On the other hand…Andy Warhol. I note
that a silkscreen of Andy’s entitled “200 One-
Dollar Bills” sold at public auction last fall at
Sotheby’s in New York. The painting is about
eight feet square and consists of a graphic
representation of, er, one-dollar bills. Two
hundred of them, side by side, marching
across the canvas like a brick wall, only green.
It sold for $43.8 million U.S.
Ah, well. The sculptor Augustus Saint-
Gaudens once said, “What garlic is to salad,
madness is to art.” I guess that goes for art
collectors too.
And for the forces of officialdom, come to
that. While attempting to board an aircraft in
Newark, New Jersey recently, Mikey Hicks
was taken down by airport security. They were
on to him right away because his name was on
a suspected terrorist watch list.
Only problem was, the Newark Mikey Hicks
was an eight-year-old Cub Scout from Clifton,
N.J. His mother says he’s been stopped,
frisked, patted down and questioned at airports
since he was two years old.
Crazy times. As Rita Mae Brown says, “One
out of four people suffer from some form of
nuttiness. Think of your three best friends. If
they’re okay, then it’s you.”
Arthur
Black
Other Views Still nutsoid after all these years
Finally it’s confirmed. In this, the year of
the Tiger, Tiger Woods will return to
professional golf at the beginning of April
for one of the biggest sports events of the year,
The Masters.
I’ll be watching and so will most of the world.
Why they’ll be watching though, I’m still not
quite sure.
I am a golf fan and I’ll admit that I have been
counting down the days to Tiger’s return,
simply for the selfish reason that I like watching
him play golf. He is the best golfer of my
generation and competition in the field is
certainly deflated when Tiger isn’t out there.
Tiger’s “transgressions” have touched few
people, but affected many. Sponsors have
dropped him, television ratings have suffered
and Nike, despite holding him as a sponsor, has
liquidated his clothing collection, filling my
closet for half the price. All the while, however,
a family has quietly suffered.
Tiger will be cloaked in privacy for The
Masters, something the tournament prides itself
on. Only the golfiest of golf media will be there
and only the best-behaved of the well-behaved
will be allowed to stand in the galleries. This is
nothing new at Augusta National Golf Club,
which has been private for decades and has a
waiting list as long as Tiger’s list of
transgressions.
So, I’m not sure why people other than me
will be watching. The people who watch TMZ
every night and read US Weekly will be
watching. So what will they hope to see?
Are they hoping for a Tiger loss? Are they
hoping to see signs of protest? And what if
Tiger wins? Will the world’s newfound
obsession with “golf” end there?
From a competitive standpoint, of course it
will be great to see Tiger in his Sunday red shirt
walking fairways and hopefully in the hunt for
the lead.
Having said that, one of my favourite
pastimes has become PGA Classic on The Golf
Channel. I am often enthralled at the history
golf carries with it down every fairway. Like
another favourite of mine, baseball, its
traditions are steeped in history.
This is a sport in which players often call
penalties on themselves, despite dire
consequences, whether an official has caught
them red-handed or not.
Golf is the consummate gentleman’s game.
I’ve been moved in recent weeks by stories of
Jack Nicklaus, especially. Nicklaus is the
classiest of class acts and just so happens to be
the man Tiger is chasing. His record of 18 major
championships is Tiger’s one and only goal.
In one of the greatest father-son stories in the
history of sports, Nicklaus won 1980 U.S. Open
with his son on his bag as his caddy. Their
embrace on the 18th hole of the final round is a
magical moment between a father and a son.
The U.S. Open, historically, plays its final day
on Father’s Day, by design.
That weekend in June is a time for fathers to
bond with their sons. Throughout the entire
weekend, cameras catch shots of fathers and
sons debating whether a golfer should go for the
green in two or lay up and other fathers carrying
their sons on their shoulders, introducing them
to the game they love so much.
And while we haven’t reached Pebble Beach
yet for this year’s U.S. Open, one has to wonder
how things might have changed by then. Will
Tiger have found redemption by then?
I have supported Tiger and wished him well,
but I can’t help but think that if I was there
introducing my young son to the game of golf,
that we might be ignoring the roars and
following someone else that weekend.
Politicians look at hidden Ontario
Year of the Tiger?
An MPP from rural and small town
Ontario has done what no-one else
could do and forced the province’s
government and this city where it is based to
think about the many problems hidden behind
their barn doors and welcoming front
porches.
Progressive Conservative Bill Murdoch, a
maverick and often a joker, did it by
suggesting Toronto should separate from
Ontario and become a separate province,
which will never happen.
But suddenly he has the ear of government
and the big news media in this city where most
people know almost nothing about farms and
small communities. Liberal Premier Dalton
McGuinty rarely talks about them, because he
likes to boast of giant, high-tech successes and
there are not many of these in rural areas and
small towns.
McGuinty got elected partly by promising to
provide “strong, prosperous rural communities
that work,” but has not dwelled much on this
recently, and most news media in this city
might go a month before acknowledging there
are such things as farms. Many here probably
do not know most farms are struggling,
particularly because of skyrocketing
production costs and low-priced, subsidized
competition from abroad, although farmers
these days demonstrate more regularly outside
the legislature than any aggrieved group.
They feel sometimes government is against
them, because, pushed by well-intentioned,
city-based environmentalists, it imposes
regulations that burden them, including saying
where and how they can use fertilizer and
where they can build.
The province has set aside a massive area
around Toronto as greenbelt to preserve open
space for future generations that draws
admiration from around the world, but at a
cost to owners who counted on selling for their
retirements.
Health services are not as accessible in rural
areas and small towns for reasons including
doctors find they lack amenities they want for
their own families. The province is closing
emergency rooms in some small hospitals to
save money and residents complain
bureaucrats pushing this are not allowing them
meaningful public hearings.
One study has shown women in rural areas
have more serious illnesses, including cancer
and a higher accident rate and die earlier, and
another that rural men and women are more
prone to obesity, high blood pressure and
damage caused by excessive smoking and
drinking. Another found rural residents have a
higher suicide rate than the provincial average,
because they have lower incomes, become
more stressed, abuse alcohol and drugs more
and have suicidal thoughts.
Schools in some small communities are
being closed, because they are considered too
small and residents fear their communities
also will disappear, because people with
children no longer will choose to live there.
Rural areas and towns are not attracting
immigrants, particularly of the type who are
well educated and strengthen communities and
instead flock mainly to Toronto, where there
are many from similar backgrounds and more
suitable jobs.
Smaller cities and towns have been revealed
as often not the idyllic havens of peace, safety
and tranquility many in the bigger cities
assume them to be. Examples include the
abduction and murder of a child in Woodstock
and intense scrutiny that exposed widespread
drug abuse and lack of education.
Violent crime, including use of guns,
assault, robbery and murder, has grown
steadily in small-town Ontario, while it
largely has stabilized in major cities. This has
been blamed on lack of jobs and loss of
community spirit and police cracking down on
crime in Toronto and pushing it into other
areas.
Downtowns in some small cities with their
closed, ghost stores turn into mass drunken
scenes on weekend nights – in Guelph 4,000
drinkers pour out of 33 bars and cause fights
and vandalism, and the province has no ideas
to cool it.
Opposition MPPs have complained the
government puts more effort into helping the
bigger cities, where its most powerful
ministers including McGuinty come from,
and this would not be surprising – politicians
tend to take more care of those that elected
them.
Eric
Dowd
FFrroomm
QQuueeeenn’’ss PPaarrkk
Shawn
Loughlin
SShhaawwnn’’ss SSeennssee
Letters Policy
The Citizen welcomes letters to the
editor.
Letters must be signed and should
include a daytime telephone number for
the purpose of verification only. Letters that
are not signed will not be printed.
Submissions may be edited for length,
clarity and content, using fair comment as
our guideline. The Citizen reserves the
right to refuse any letter on the basis of
unfair bias, prejudice or inaccurate
information. As well, letters can only be
printed as space allows. Please keep your
letters brief and concise.