Clinton News-Record, 1971-11-11, Page 9;Clinton, Ontario'
Second Section
Clinton News -Record
Thursday, November 11, 1971
106 Your No, 45
British hunting rules something else
Th e following article
appeared recently in a British
Columbia newspaper featuring a
well-known personality in
Whiterock, B.C.
Russ Langford and wife
Margaret are relatives of some
well-known Clinton -area people
too, Gus and June Boussey. The
article was passed to us for the
appreciation of the local readers.
ALLOWED ONLY ONE SHOT
BRITISH HUNTING RULES
BIT ODD
Veteran White Rock hunter
Russ Langford went hunting
with an English baronet during a
five-week vacation in the British
Isles.
"It was a tremendous
experience," he said, "but the
British have some funny hunting
rules."
The baronet was Sir Kenneth
Alfred Leader Brown, K.B.E.,
former Lord Mayor of Bristol
and now chairman of the Port of
Bristol Authority. Russ and his
wife, Margie, were his guests on
a private hunt for grouse and
pheasant.
Russ and his wife returned
home to White Rock last week
after spending five weeks touring
Britain, Scotland, Wales and
France.
Their introduction to Sir
Kenneth was the result .of an
incident that took place two
years ago.
Russ owned a house in
Vancouver which he rented to
young people. One of his tenants
was a young lady named Carol
Brown. Knowing of Russ's
fondness for hunting, she invited
him to meet her father, also an
avid hunter and then on a visit
to Canada.
Carol's father turned out to
be Sir Kenneth's brother.
When Russ and Margie
decided to make a tour of the
United Kingdom, they were
invited by Sir Kenneth to go
hunting during their stay. When
they accepted, Russ got his first
experience of the .British in the
hunting field. And he was "very
impressed", he said.
"We went to a stretch of
hunting country near BristoI,'t
Russ said. "We were after grouse
and pheasant. But the rules were
a little different."
Russ described how he was
required to walk through the
hunting area with an unloaded
gun under his arm. The gun is
Mustangs over
'Belmont 5-4
BY BERT CLIFFORD
The 5-4 win and 5-5 tie with
,Belmont gave the Clinton
Mustangs a good hold on first
place in the OHA Western Junior
D League this weekend.
Last season Belmont downed
Clinton on all four occasions
they met and the Mustangs hope
to reverse the situation this year.
Young Paul Johnson opened
the scoring for Clinton in both
the game Friday night at home
and the one in Belmont Sunday.
In Friday night's game he
fired a quick wrist shot from 10
feet out at 4:49 of the first
•eriod. Throughout Friday's
:ame, the Mustangs' defence
i ept going into lapses and
elmont capitalized with goals.
oalie Fred German was really
of during the first period as
Iinton took five penalties.
elntont's Doug Hepburn scored
n the first period to tie the
tame 1-1, then tied the game
gain in the second at 2-2.
Dave Fawcett drilled a shot
rom the point for Clinton's
econd goal. Wayne McDougall
as johnny-on-the-spot and
reflected two shots for goals in
he second to give Clinton a 4.2
ead,
Poor defensive clearing in
ront of Cermet allowed
elmont to come back and tie
he score early in the third. Gord
iley scored what proved to be
he tying goal on a play set up
y defenceman Wayne Arthur.
rthur bullied his way into the
.orner and passed a perfect pass
ut to ftiley in front of the net.
Booster club draw winner was
ori Jefferson. 'd'he lucky
rogram holder was Jerry Riehl
f Huron Park.
Sunday night's game in
elmont had to be delayed for
n hour as the Mustangs had
roblenis with very slow traffic
nd a multiple -car accident to
ass on the way to Belmont. The
ante started out very sluggish
rad before the Mustangs could
et untracked, Belmont had
otie ahead 3-0. Ali the goals
ame off rebounds after German
ad made saves and no one
:leaned the puck. As in Friday's
;acne, Johnson finished off a
ieautiful play started by JIM
Ilanieton and Bill Crawford at
.1:37 of the second.
'The goal really fired up the
,lab. Bill Stirling who had been
Lead scoreless so far in the
ehson, finally came up with a
oal at 12:41 when he outfought
Belniont defencernati for the
yuck and fired in a backhand
hot, in the final minute of the
econd, Stirling hustled into the
outer and passed out to Stu
custard for the tying goal,
With only 1:48 played lit the
hied, Clinton took the lead for
he first time, on a great effort
y _Pawl Johnson, Johnson dug
the puck out of heavy traffic
and laid a pass out to Gary
Cummings who in turn fired in a
quick backhand shot.
After Belmont tied the score
4.4 at. 6:45, Clinton had to fight
for their lives to keep Belmont
-from scaring. Fred German was
simply outstanding in making 26
saves in the third, many labelled
goals.
The scooter line of Wayne
and Bill McDougall and Gord
Riley came on at the 10 -minute
mark and in 12 seconds Wayne
McDougall hit for his fourth goal
of the year. Brother Bill started
off with some good checking
behind the Belmont net, then his
pass went to Riley who passed
quickly from behind the net to
Wayne McDougall for the
winning goal.
Clinton picked up three
Minor penalties in the final
minutes and Belmont really put
on the pressure, even pulling the
goalie in the final minute,
During the hectic 10 minutes,
German put on a display of
acrobatics in kicking out shots
from every angle and catching
some wicked shots from the
point.
Clinton will be out to gain
revenge on Mitchell Friday night
at the Community Centre, Last
week Mitchell stole a win on a
late drive,
CLINTON 5 --- BELMONT 5
PERIOD 1: 1.4:49, 0, Paul
Johnson (3), Bob Cook.
2,12:21, 13, Doug Hepburn.
Penalties -- Clinton, 5; Belmont,
2.
PERIODS 2: 3.9:13, 0, Dave
Fawcett (2), Crawford and
Cummings. 4.12:05, B, Doug
Hepburn. 5.16:45, 0, Wayne
McDougall (2), Cameron and
Mustard. 6.17:17, 0, Wayne
McDougall (3), Arthur and
Mustard. 7.18:03, 13, Don
McPherson. Penalties — Clinton,
3; Belmont, 3.
PERIOD 3: 8,6:45,
Landon. 9.14:33, 0, Gord Riley
(2), Arthur. 10.15:44, B, Ken
Gracer. Penalties Clinton, 3;
Belmont, 5.
CLINTON 5 — BELMONT 4
PERIOD 1: 1.12:18, 13, Doug
Hepburn. Penalties — Clinton, 4;
$elmont, 3.
PERIOD 2: 2.8:52, 13, Lorne
Dale. 3.10:47, 13, Gary Stead.
4.11:37, 'C, Paul Johnson (4),
Cameron and Crawford,
5.12:41, 0, Bill Stirling (1), Ron
Graham. 6.19:05, C, Stu
Mustard (3), Stitling. Penalties—
Clinton, 2; Belmont, 5.
PERIOD 3: 7,1:48, C, Gary
Cummings (2), Johnson., 8.6:45,
13, :Ken Gra sort. 9,10:1 C
�' r r
Wayne Mcbougail (4), Bill
McDougall and Gord Riley.
Penalties -- 'Clinton, 5; Belmont,
1.
not loaded, he was told, until
you reach the spot where you
intend to shoot from.
Having taken position, the
gun can be loaded and when a
bird breaks from cover, it is
permitted to shoot at it.
"But you are only allowed
one shot," Russ said. "If you
miss, the bird is allowed to fly
away. You can't shoot at it
again.
"Not only that, but nobody
else is allowed to shoot at your
bird — and you aren't allowed to
take a shot at anyone else's bird.
The birds get a sporting chance,
which is more than they get in
Canada,"
Russ was equally impressed
withthe hospitality shown to
him by the British, During a visit
to Scotland, he and his wife
attended services at Crathie
Church in the afternoon -- a few
hours after the Royal Family
visited .the church for morning
services,
The couple spent four days in
France before returning. to White
Rock. ".It was a tremendous
vacation," Russ said. "We
travelled through the British
Isles by train and saw some
wonderful scenery.
"But that hunting trip — and
those rules! That was something
else..."
hat's iiety at Baron vte'w?
�r:•r;;; G:•r:;.;r .f* :,rr3'c: ; �;r: rr,.�.;?'• y;�::y..:• r�i 'fr:•,a.�e:•^"� r
.{•� <'f.. rJf .:i}j'}.a .r�6,1'i�•o: r ♦. r r r.•f
��:fliif/�'r'i.G'`'i7S+tr��:�fe.'i..t'•:.r�:.i:C�'s ••r.� V7v °`i� vd6d
It was standing room only in
the auditorium on Friday
afternoon for the annual
Hallowe'en party. Several
residents and staff in costume
led the parade to music by the
Huronview Orchestra assisted by
Mr. and Mrs. Bert Finlay of
Goderich.
Following an hour of dancing
and games, apples, candies, and
cookies were served. The
afternoon proved to be quite a
success and the co-operation of
the staff and volunteers was
greatly appreciated.
A group of Young People
from the Christian Reform
Church provided special musical
numbers at the Sunday evening
song service led by Dick Roorda.
Members of the Senior
Citizens Club of Goderich joined
the residents for an afternoon of
progressive euchre and games on
Wednesday. Twelve tables of
euchre were played with Francis
Inglis and Charles Jeffs sharing
high scores. Consolation
winners were Mrs. McKay and
Tom Clark.
Communion services were
held in the chapel this week with
Reverend Russell of the
Anglican Church officiating on
Thursday morning and Father
Kelly, Clinton on Friday
morning.
The Seaforth Junior Farmers
arranged the entertainment for
Family Night with the President,
Keith Williamson introducing
the program. The Junior Farmer
Choir directed by Rev, Docken of
Walton sang several selections;
there were vocal numbers by the
Henderson sisters, Darlene,
Donna, and Debbie; duets by
Grace Campbell and Ruth
Townsend, Irma Price and
Evelyn Storey; solo by Graham
Craig; step dancing by Bill and
Murray Henderson; and square
dancing by the Junior Farmer
set with Mrs. Orville Storey
calling. Accompanists for the
program were Mrs. Henderson
and Irma Price. Miss Gray
thanked the entertainers on
behalf of the residents.
TODAY'S CHILD
BY HELEN ALLEN
"Healthy and active"
Jininiy is fill, a sinallebonel, slim, and food -looking
boy. Ile has big brown ryes, Brown hair, and a medium
eornplo'don. Healthy ee d active, he likes the outdoors,
especially on n farm. die is keen on hoekey and lacrosse
and mit)) t)'. � to the -arenas to see older hos piny.
going
Jimmy's drsrli ttent has been slow due to t•arly el
rie
rations, but airier eveering nuescrl echool he has elude
great strides. Ills speech is still seemewhni behind mid
S 1. e. is la..
ticz:ttsit►ititlly difficult to unfit rt,tantl. But he i. ,► listable
youngster, ensile pleased and vett' teepintsise to affection
and attention,
Jimmy enjoys Sesame Street., anti ie fond of music and
TV cartoons and likes to lel rend to, dirt chooses; his own
library hooks, usually :inbuilt stories. ills big thrill is
aleej Ing in t slee1ftig bag.
Intal nerds amother :Ind father who wiltelcome
Jimmy . ,.. ..' been -e
kith with the knowledge that he lids lit iia slow ie ehrrl
opulent lint appears to make progress with stirmrlalitin,
Intik-We and attention, To rtrgtdre Meant aatloptinl; Firth'
lora,,, please write 'to Today's Child Department of :social
arttd Family erviees. Parliament ditiildinge, 'Toronto 182.
x?ntr :general ardoption information, ask Cour Children's
AYcI
Soeiely.
Coaservat4rz for the living
An -address prepared by R, .p., Martin,
Resources Manager of the Ausable River
Conservation Authority, from various and
sundry sources, for "Conservation Week" —
Sept. 2Q-26, 1971,
What is your impression of conservation?
Is it similar to the father's in the first
paragraph of a new book put out by .the
Ausable Authority and written by Andrew
Dixon?d
$`Da, what's conservation?"
"Jest talk, son,"
"No, Dad, I said conservation, not
conversation,"
"Same thing, son."
Or is yours a different impression'
Conservation started as a homespun thing,
related .to the obvious. The era of the
wilderness was passing, but the wasteful
methods of those who carne to this country
for a living remained. Too soon there were
problems. Light soils no longer held water —
they blew away. Wells went dry. Farms were
abandoned. Floods appeared every other
spring.
For the first 40 years of this century
conservation in Ontario meant forest
conservation and this, in the minds of most
people, meant tree planting and protecting
forests from fire.
During the Second World War, the
thinking with regard to conservation
broadened to include not only forests but
also all the renewable natural resources,
including water, soil, wildlife, and
subsequently recreation. Management
problems finally got through to us and we
agreed reluctantly to a conservation need.
The Conservation Authorities Act was
passed in 1946, and since then 37 authorities
have been established. Although the former
Etobicoke Creek Authority (now part of the
MTRCA) might dispute it, the Ausable is
proud to be known as the first Conservation
Authority in Ontario,
Only recently, however, have we become
anxious about air and water pollution and
the environment as a whole.
Life grew more complicated. There was
more pressure and competition. There was
more sophistication,
The frontier shifted to exciting things like
communications, data processing and
automation, chemical research, marketing,
consumer reports, efficient management.
This brought us prosperity plus: shorter
working hours, more education, more
money, increasing urbanization.
The arts began to flower. Hobbies became
a big industry. But for many the big problem
was how to spend the time and resources
satisfyingly. There was a rush to the
out-of-doors, It is ingrained in our history
and implicit in the wonderful land with its
lakes, forests, fish and game. It is aided by
our increased mobility and by our cleverness
in making the wilderness comfortable.
Yet problems remained. Recreation lands
assumed scarcity and investment value. As
cities grew, much of this Land was snapped
up by private individuals. Public lands were
in danger of being used to death.
NEW KIND OF CONSERVATION
In the 1960's the need for a new kind of
conservation was upon us.
But this is only part of the story, for the
city was by now producing its own brand of
person, one who knew not the land; to
whom a supply of milk was merely a matter
of a factory replenishing the supermarket
shelves.
Increased use of the land went hand in
glove with an increased ignorance of even its
simplest aspects. Even the hunter, who in
earlier times had been taught by his father to
love the woods, became part of a vast
industry devoted to the sales of ammunition
and equipment, the production of targets,
the pursuit of an elusive and retreating
manliness, and the blind following of
fashion,
Everyone has to have a cottage or a faun.
This was a retreat in earlier times, a return to
the simplicity and quietness and beauty of
the land. But with the mounting need for all
these things, cottage living has become more
and more a taking of the city to the lake;
flower beds and lawns like Don Milts;
broadloom and tiled bathrooms; draglined
shores and concrete retaining walls; a social
round that rivals that of suburbia; pollution
of the once clear lakes and rivers.
Contact with the landscape is largely
through a motor of some kind en
outboard, a car, a snowmobile or a swamp
buggy, a lawnmower or chain saw, a ski tows
These things are not wrong. They are
what people seem to want. Yet they are
changing our nountryside. And we need to
Consider the conservationist's reaetion to
this fact. The rush to the cottage is bringing
newer, wider, more aseptic highways hi place
of the intimate beauty many nostalgically
dream about, We are promised subdivision
buildings several layers deep around many of
our precious lakes, high-rise apartments and
artificial lagoons. The trend, apparently, is
inevitable; for this, people are willing and
:anxious to pay larger and larger sums of
money.
We cannot foresee an end. New methods
of transportation helicopter buses,
air -Cushion boats among them -- ran take us
to remote places with ease. No place can be
thought really safe.
Does it matter? Our edutationai system
has riot concerned 'itself much with the
quality or life, concentrating on econonile
standards of living, And perhaps we don't
care.
Yet there are signs. Canoeing,sailing,
hiking are growing in popularity, now that
industrialization has overtaken tamping.
Wilderness trails are packed. Whiter camping
is catching on. The old concept of the
naturalist es a spinsterish maiden lady is
shoekfngly out of date. We ate finding the
embryo bird -watcher in most of us. The best
hunters ate finding theft deepest satisfaction
in just 'being a part of the landscape.
Expensive 'cameras and telephoto lenses are
popular.
?There is a need, and the beginning of a
demand, for some new approach to
xecreation in our land; for increased
understanding; for an enriched use of the
land's potential.
Simple assumptions — that a tree is a tree;
that the only animal worth considering is a
deer; that fishing and swimming are the basic
uses of waters —• these are a pioneer stage of
conservation for better living.
NEW ETHIC OP THE OUTDOORS
But what we really need is the
opportunity 'for all sorts of people to learn a
new ethic of the outdoors, an ethic based on
an understanding of what the countryside is
all about, end an appreciation of the slow,
careful shaping and intricate relationships of
each element in it. The new ethic is an ethic
of respect; it will not willingly destroy any
Part of this wonderful mechanism, although
it knows that the mechanism is in some ways
self-destructive. If modifications must be
made, it tries to find the least damaging way,
and determines to save what it can.
Is this an ethic for the financier, the real
estate man, the working man with his new
affluence? Can it get through the fog of
small talk and callousness that wafts into
any occasion when men of affairs get
together?
It can and it must. For these men too are
aware of the strains of city traffic night and
morning, of the ever -diminishing sanctuary
of the wild. For everyone who revels in the
challenges of hard-nosed competition there
are a dozen who secretly find it all
increasingly terrifying. They are worried
about their teenagers and they wonder how
to help them find security in themselves and
beyond themselves. They suspect they are
dying slowly from polluted air and from
chlorinated hydrocarbons in their food
and if they are not, no one will
unequivocally say so.
This new ethic, based upon ecology— the
p
science dealing with the relationships
between living organisms and their
environment — has been called the New
Conservation. Former U.S. Secretary of the
Interior, Stewart Udall, named it the "Third
Wave" of conservation thinking. The first
two "waves", preservation and regulation,
were resource centred.
The ideological shift to building
conservation on man vis-a-vis his
environment, forces a radical reassessment of
certain values from another era. Two of
these precepts were that "leisure is bad" and
that "all development is good". The stigma
attached to enjoying oneself is perhaps all
but gone. However, its legacy is apparent in
the slowness with which means are provided
to integrate fulfilling leisure -time
experiences into our daily, and increasingly
urbanized, routine. The precept that
development is always good is all too seldom
the subject of criticism. As a culture, we
tend to measure success in terms of gross
national product, numbers of automobiles
produced, miles of highways completed, and
numbers of new industries or homes built.
Given the ecological ethic, the advantages of
development must be weighed against such
variables as the number of new junkyards,
the acres of open space lost, new levels of air
and water pollution, or the crowded
regimentation of urban and suburban
existence, According to Mr. Udall, "the new
value system sets greatness above growth,
puts quality ahead of quantity -- and
demands that corporate parts of America do
the same."
THREE CHOICES
Public, corporate and private sectors have
one of three choices. They must either
voluntarily accept responsibility to posterity
and act in the best, long-range public
interest; they must accept coercion leading
to the same end; or they must tolerate an
environment that will inevitably decline in
quality, the moral responsibility for which
they will not be here to accept.
A further implication of New
Conservation is that man and his world form
an ecosystem. Man has for many years been
the unchallenged manipulator of that
system, Only recently has he been forced to
acknowledge that his role should not be one
of master, but rather of cooperating
partner.
The systems approach to any problem
rests on the premise that all cotnpbnenis are
interdependent. Any action therefore, Which
alters the equilibrium of the system, must in
some way be compensated, if balance is to
be restored. When one applies this principle
to the complex implications of
environrieentat conservation, one sees that
eurrent forces producing disequilibrium are
staggering. Natural equilibrating forces are
totally incapable of coping with alterations
in the landscape wrought with the speed and
finality characteristic of the technocracy in
which we live. One example would be the
severe lowering of the natural water table in
many parts of North America: With this in
mind, it is apparent that the era is pasted
when we can afford the luxury of -blundering
front crisis to expedient rlecision to crisis.
We must abandon the comparative ease of
compartmentalization, and adopt the
systems approach inherent in the New
Conservation. No longer is it possible to
accept traditionally -isolated conservation
categories such as forest, wildlife, water or
land use. Neither is it possible to ignore any
portion of the landscape by saying "that is
not our problem." The city, the suburb, the
rural landscape and the wilderness are
equally significant in balancing the total
environment, and eventually, the quality le
one sector will influence the quality
throughout.
Just as conservation per se cannot be
segmented, the professional resources
manager cannot be expected to shoulder the
entire responsibility for environmental
quality. Every branch of government, every
corporation citizens' groupr5'
and ever.
, every
individual has both a vested interest and a
responsibility ta collaborate. The highway
builder, the lion* builder,the oil refinery,
the pulp ttiitl, the autontobile industry, the
tourist industry, the motorist, the boater,
the administrator, the planner, the educator,
the parent, the child each :one must play
his part,
REPERCUSSIONS
New Conservation demands that every
decision which alters the landscape (rural or
urban) he made in terms of its repercussions
Within the whole system, It dernands that
the influence upon our primary, resource —.
people — be investigated, It domande that
our concern include not only the traditional
facets of conservation, but also acoustic,
visual and aesthetic pollution, social stress,
mental and physical health and increased
education for utilizing and appreciating
leisure time. In this context, education
assumes an extremely significant role in the
implementation of New Conservation.
Decision -makers armed with tools of
technology have been primarily responsible
for the degradation of our environment;
isolated or uninformed decisions have led tts
to the dangerously wounded environment of
today. Our only hope for environmental
restoration and balance lies in enlightened
decision-making, with controlled use of
technological aids.
Up until very recently we have tended to
view our economy as a type of huge grinder,
fed from above by a hopper filled with
natural resources. When the handle of the
economy is cranked, out come finished
products' and wastes, This is a through -put
economy.
The conservation movement in the past
has been primarily concerned with the rope
puller on the natural resource hopper. The
fear has been that some day there would not
be enough of some vital resource such as
wood fibre, crude oil, fresh water, etc. This
was the "preservation wave" we referred to
earlier.
New technology and changes in relative
prices have worked together in double
harness and we're still able to get what we
need when we pull the rope, at least in
developed countries.
Conservation in the past has been
secondarily concerned, with sinks filling up
with the wastes. As population and wealth
have grown, we turn the handle faster and
crank through more resources. The output
of wastes increases. Sometimes the sinks run
over and we cannot ignore the mess. Because
of this, we've become very conscious about
"sinks" and what's happening to our
"wastes" that cause pollution of our air,
water, soil, and aesthetic surroundings. This
was the "regulation wave" referred to
earlier. The real threat to our continued
comfortable existence will probably be a
high pile of garbage, not a diminished stack
of resources. I would not be surprised if we
run out of pollutable lakes and reservoirs
before our mines and ores are exhausted.
RECYCLED WASTES
It is for this reason that the concept of
the spaceship earth economy presents itself
as an attractive alternative. The principal
difference has to do with what happens to
wastes. Instead of piling up wastes in
"sinks", they are recycled and made into
useful resources.
This spaceship concept of our economy
can be extended to our whole planet. Earth
is a finite spaceship with a finite resource
lease, speeding through space. At a certain
level of technology it can only sustain a
certain population, and presently we are not
sustaining what we have. Man is
undoubtedly the principal polluter of this
globe -- he is also becoming the principal
pollutant,
We are going to have to set down the
standards of environmental quality that we
are prepared to live with, and this must then
serve as a guideline in determining the
earth's carrying capacity. Our environmental
problems cannot be adequately dealt with
unless we take a comprehensive view of
them.
This comprehensiveness of approach was
labelled "environmental Conservation" some
15 years ago, but only now do we seem to
be realty thinking about attempting it, now
that the "New Wave of Conservation" is
rolling in. But the wave will never crest and
break over us if we are not prepared to take
a much longer view of things.
One of the problems in taking this
long-term environmental view is that we
carry on our daily activities hi the short run.
The longest planning period we use is 20 to
30 years, end this is based almost entirely on
the mortgage period used by business, It is
Ole business and profit mentality that
straight -jackets our thinking. We are going to
have to stop treasuring progress by that god
-- the Gross National Product. As we are tied
to this false measure of progress (false
because it measures quantity, not quality),
so we are getting more and more people
hooked on this drug Which destroys not only
mind and body, but the very habitat of man.
A bA1LY HABIT
If conservation is truly to become a daily
habit, it will requite a new relationship and
basis for ethics — a relationship of man to
nature rather than man to man. Nature will
have to be looked on as a part of life, and
man roust see himself as an extension of her,
and relate to her on a community basis.
And who is going to speak for the
environment? On a personal level, I hope
you are. day now you should be
well-informed 'as to What the individual earl
tlo. If you don't know, you shofild feel
ashamed at your ignorance and wake up and
find out.
On the municipal end regional level, the
Conservation Authorities across the province
are in an admirable position to speak for the
environment. They are regional in stature,
based on a watershed boundary. They
involve a wide ran e of people -�- enthusiastic
g
amateurs and professionals, while still
Maintaining well-defined responsibility to
Maintaining
the municipality as a whole. They are close
to local problems and they have always dealt
With all aspects of the envitonmeet, though
Piot always with a comprehensive total
Please turn to Page 6A