Loading...
The Citizen, 2015-09-03, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2015. PAGE 5. The barista looks me up and down, smiles and asks “So, where ya from?” This is more than annoying, it’s crazy-making. This barista lives on an island. I live on the same island. I’ve been living here for 20 years. A couple of times a month as I’m walking through town or lined up to pay for something, somebody will look me up and down, smile, and ask some variation of “Where ya from?” It’s not their fault – it’s mine. I look like a tourist. Not that I try to. I don’t wear a Tilley fedora, I avoid shirts with palm trees and surf boards on them. I can’t remember the last time I slung a camera around my neck. Still, strangers look at me and something in their brains says ‘tourist’. This goes ‘way back to my days as an international movie star. True story. I was a 25-year-old vagabond sitting in a Madrid cafe, on a break from hitchhiking my way through Europe. As I nursed my cafe con leche I suddenly felt the hairs on the back of my neck doing a little impromptu tango. Somebody was staring at me. Unfortunately it wasn’t a smoldering senorita, it was an oily little guy in a beret sitting at a corner table. He sidled over and when he realized I didn’t speak Spanish, switched to broken English. “You lahk to make mon-ee?” he asked. I allowed as how my wallet could use a top- up. What was he proposing – selling blood? Becoming a drug mule? ‘Losing’ my passport? I didn’t need money that badly. But his answer stunned me. “I wan to put you in a film.” Well, FINALLY! I thought. I knew that Lana Turner had been scouted for the movies when an agent saw her sitting at the counter of the Top Hat Malt Shop in Hollywood. Pamela Anderson was discovered in the stands at a BC Lions football game filling out a Labatt Blue t-shirt. Harrison Ford was working as a carpenter when somebody thought he might look good playing Han Solo in Star Wars. And now my turn had come. This, I smirked to myself, is how stars are born. We negotiated a bit. The money he was offering was pathetic, frankly, but this was Spain, not Hollywood. Not yet, anyway. Besides, he was promising a week’s work minimum and all the food I could eat on set. I signed the contract – which was even more bewildering than most contracts as it was in Spanish. As I gave him back his pen I asked him what it was about me that made him think I belonged up there on the silver screen. Was it my fine and manly baritone? My regal bearing? My noble profile? He shook his head. “No, man. You will play ‘extra’. You look like American tourist.” Which is how I got to appear in a movie called Oscuros Suenos en Agosto – Dark Dreams in August. It was ‘oscuro’ all right. I don’t think the movie even made it to the Spanish rural circuit, never mind the international film world. Still, if by some miracle, you come across a copy, pay special attention at the 35- minute mark. It’s a crowd scene and you can spot me in the bottom left hand corner of the screen. If you don’t blink. It’s been a lot of years, but it’s unmistakably me. I look exactly like an American tourist. Arthur Black Shawn Loughlin Shawn’s Sense The Ashley Madison hack has caught a lot of my attention over the past few weeks because of people referring to those who were outed as victims. And no, I’m not a member of that site or any other like it, in case you think my interest is more of a personal one. For those of you who aren’t familiar with the site (and if you are among that group reader, good on you for being moral and upstanding), Ashley Madison is an infamous site that married individuals can visit to seek outside assistance in sating certain appetites. The hack involved 36 million individuals’ e-mail addresses and other identification information being stolen from the site which enables users to have extramarital affairs. I’ve read stories about users who were seeking someone to comfort them because their partner was paralyzed and unable to meet certain needs, I’ve read other stories where a partner had been in a coma for years. I’ve also read stories where people, when outed by the hackers, committed suicide. The list of accounts is out there in some of the darker corners of the shallow web to download (read-as be careful what you click on) and several sites have popped up that will allow users to see if their e-mail (or the e-mail of the partner) is part of the leak. Despite anyone’s reason for having an account on the site, I just can’t see these people as victims. If this were a bank website, or a credit card site (like the Home Depot hack of 2014 or the Target breach of the same year) or anything innocuous, yes, I would have no trouble understanding how these people had been victimized but, in this particular case, I feel more for the hackers than for the hacked. Team Impact, the group that claimed responsibility for the hack, said they did so to force the site to shut down and, after years of hearing and watching their brazen advertisements encouraging people to step out on their partners, I can’t help but feel that these cheaters or would-be cheaters or could-be cheaters brought this on themselves. Even the people who made an account for the sole purpose of checking to see if their partner was on the site (which speaks volumes to the level of trust in their relationships) should know better. I have no sympathy for the people who were outed by this attack. They were looking for a means of having their cake and eating it too at the cost of the trust, love and respect of their partner and if the worst thing that happens to them is they are outed by this, I think they’ve gotten off lightly. The lack of sympathy extends to most the people on the list, however, when it comes to those brazen (or stupid) enough to use a known personal or work e-mail address to sign up for a site like this, I find myself swinging to downright outrage. How horrible does a person need to be to use their work e-mail to set up an extra-marital rendezvous? Well, fortunately for me, the list can answer that question. Early analysis reports that upwards of 400 e- mail accounts used by people who are paid by our federal taxes happen to be in that group that would draw my ire. There are 228 government of Ontario e-mail addressess, 170 Department of National Defense e-mail addresses, 40 parliamentary e-mail addresses and 10 accounts made using sentate e-mail addresses in the leak. The City of Toronto may also want to look at a changing of the guard as more than 70 addresses at toronto.ca accounts were registered. (To be fair, the list has both verified and unverified e-mail addresses, meaning both active users and e-mails that may not have actually been submitted by the owner of the e- mail, so some of those numbers may need adjusting down the road.) It’s a lot of information to parse so local addresses are something that I haven’t seen as of yet, but rest assured, if someone around here is on the site, eventually, someone will find out. So whether those people thought they wouldn’t get caught or didn’t know how to set up a secondary, private e-mail address, I can’t help but feel anything but contempt for them. Yes, in the truest sense of the word, they are a victim of this hack because their personal information and (possibly) credit card information was released on the internet. However the term victim denotes a sense of undeservingness, and anyone who is willing to be a part of a service that helps them cheat on their spouse is deserving of, at the very least, being outed to the public regardless of the circumstances. A friend of mine, when discussing the issue, had this to say: “You can’t be in love with two people at once. If you fell in love with a second person, then you didn’t really love the first.” Regardless of why people had information on the site (even a fellow journalist who claimed she was using the site for research), they got involved with something detestable and, as far as I’m concerned got what they deserved. To those considering using a site like Ashley Madison to find something “on the side” as it were, I’ve got only one thing to say: grow up. If you need more, tell your partner that. If you can’t get more, end it and move on and take the lumps that will come from it. Otherwise your actions will catch up with you. Maybe it’s in the form of this hack, maybe it’s in the form of slashed tires and a scratched truck like a Carrie Underwood song or maybe it’s something worse, however, I’m a strong believer that, in the end, what you sow is what you reap. Denny Scott Denny’s Den Ground floor, please! Since the Toronto Blue Jays have really turned it on and began winning, there has been a lot of talk about people jumping on the bandwagon. Let me be the first to say that the bandwagon shouldn’t exist. Its mere concept goes against everything sports is about. The idea behind the bandwagon is that once a team starts winning, a fan (whose actual favourite team is presumably out of the playoffs) will begin cheering for that team, because, really, who doesn’t like a winner? Sport is, by definition, a competition. It’s one team standing on a field with another team in a contest in which there can only be one winner. Similarly, when it comes to all of this bandwagon talk, there is a similar competition that happens in the stands/bars/living rooms, etc. It revolves around who has been a fan the longest and honestly, it makes no sense. This idiotic discussion is not just reserved for sports, however. You can find it with just about anything that has a “coolness” level to it. If it’s cool to like something, you can guarantee that people will be arguing over who liked it longer – presumably making them more cool. It is a concept that has even been mocked in the world of music, where hipsters are often rewarded by their peers for being the first on their theoretical block to listen to a band who then hits it big (at which time, it’s no longer cool to listen to them, so people complain about how the band sold out, but that’s a discussion for another day). I have seen, on more than one occasion, someone wearing a t- shirt that states “I listen to bands that don’t even exist yet.” A quick Google search brings you plenty of results for this shirt. It can be yours for just $19.95 U.S. Back to sports, the whole idea of the bandwagon employs this idea – that whoever has been cheering for the team that has recently started playing well is more of a fan than the guy who started following the team five years ago. So now, with the Toronto Blue Jays virtually tearing the cover off of the baseball since the All-Star break, the competition amongst fans has begun. Well, I have been going to Jays games since they started! I was at the very first game! I watched every game of the 1992 and 1993 seasons! Who, then, is the biggest fan? And does it matter? No, it matters not. Baseball teams spend millions and millions of dollars to attract new fans, whether they be young, old, from the area or not. And this, on occasion, works. It could also be – as is the case with a few friends of mine – that they had no interest in sports until recently, but have since discovered how great baseball can be and can relate to several Blue Jays. So are my friends, fans for a few years, now less important than those fans who have been going to games since the 1990s? No. At a meeting of Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous, they hand out chips to folks who have been sober for certain milestone durations – a month, a year, five years, 10 years. But the most important chip, as they always say, is the first chip: one day sober, or declaring a sincere intention to quit. In many ways, the most important fans are the ones watching their first games, learning about baseball and growing to love it. Growing the game is what every sport strives to do. When fans reward a sport by becoming a fan, they shouldn’t be punished for doing so by the “veteran” fans. You all cheer for the same team, now go watch your team together. Other Views It’s tourist season: can we shoot them? Asking sympathy is just too much