Loading...
The Lucknow Sentinel, 1959-04-01, Page 7W;E;DDNiESDA,Y . APRIS.r .1st, 1959 TIE 'LUCK IOW 'SENTINEL, .LUOKIIOW, ONTARIO .. PAGE SEVEN VI/arden Joynt Scans County Home Costs Urges Adtion To Care For ChronicSenile (By Warden George W, Joynt) 'At he January sesaion of . the Bruce County Council, 1959;. County Council approved con- struction of on-structionof a new, 103 -bed wing to be attached , to the:. present County •. Hotiie; The cost of the wing was as follows:. • ,Conatrizction cost.. .. $814,800; (Cost per bed, $7,900). Furnishings ,., .., .::, 38,625. •• Architect's fee.48,888. Total ,,,;,,, ,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,, $902,313:.. •This makesan overall cost : of approximately $8,760. per At the same session, the Cou-, ray Home Cprn.mittee submitted • costs `'to County Council :for an 'entire new county haine, This Scheme called. for a 163'. - gybed. structure . vvith cost as follows:. Construction- cost, , including cost. of tearing down • County 'Home ,..,.,..., $ 955,300, (Coat per +bed. $5,890) Furnishings • . 61,125. Architects fees >: 57;318. Overall cost $1,073,743, This .'makes an overall cost of $6,587 'per gibed: , • . • • • • Both estimates were submitted by Mr. Klein, associate architect With the firm of Fluff and . Kiuff of •Toronto, which was "employed by the County Home Committee., • :The Department pays. 50% of the cost . of : construction and 10%. of .maintenance costs.' Taking a corriparison of .'the cost .per' bed between' the '. two, schemes, there is a, difference. of $2,020, between Scheme No..1 And 'Scheme No. 2, after considering , the fact that '.the cost of :scrapping. `the present County Dome is• , included in '.Scheme No: 2. . if ,personally feel :th'et . County Council voted on the number of 'ibeds. that was needed; not en • a cost `per bed structure, .realizing the Department would have.:•'a fixed .approval cost 'per :.bed: . The .Past fir weeks .I' have checked on construction" costs of similar' homes, ranging ;in .size from, 75 to '200 -be d structures, and ave found their cost to be fr $f,200 to '$6,800- per bed, and this cost includes, everyth- March 23rd, 1.959,E I discussed with Messrs..Jaames Band, •Lud. low and .Ralston of the Depart- •trent of Welfare, the following questions:.. • (1) Relation !between, a • County Home and Ontario Hospital Plan : in regard .to chronic patients: and senile '.persons, (2) Department of Welfare's• de- cision• in forcing counties • to b.ulld, new homes and is' to their.. size and cost. • • James Band, Deputy Minister of the Depar.;trneht• of Welfare,: elaborated , on the fact that the counties; within the Province of Ontario do not realize; the dire" need for a home of this type, to 'care 'for riot only its chronic patients, ,but its .senile; persons. Due • to modern medicine, this group .is increased'. in•• numbers upwards to: 400% in the . last ten to''45 years:, Under the` Ontario Hospital. Planthis group is ex- chided from hospital treatment. The. Department of Welfare does: not force ,any coupty to build this type :of hearse., A: county must decide itself when it needs. a home ' of this type and also .as to its :size. ' I asked i1VIr'. Band if it would be, more. feasible • toY build small- er .:homes ` in various sections of the . County, ' I 'is" • answer ' Was,. administration costs would be too, ;high. The'.question.. was "'brought up as . to whether a', new: County' Home would -put ,,new nursing. homes within the county, . out of exist- ence. This question was also an- swered' emphatically "No.":• 'He mentioned. that there are certain types of patients, . or persons, 'who would . sooner have nursing home -Care,' who do. not require the: .bed care• given... in 'a county home:: These could ,be, patients paying their own 'way,' ;or taken care of by ;municipalities under the General. Welfare Act. • Later that day I met ' with Messrs Ludlow, 4R,alston. and.. Architects Kluff & Kluff, Plans were submitted by the architects to the Department for. a 122 -bed wing, at an overall cost of $7,900 per bed. .I asked Mr. Klein why phis •firm submitted: this .plan.. for a 122 ;bed . wing when . • County' Council had approved a' 103 -bed wing.,. This was • not clarified, Both • 'Messrs. Ludlow . and Rals- ton told' the architectsthey had eight meetings with "them, but, still they had not .:.brought . the overall' cost per :bed dow'hlf 'to. ap- prc ;ximately,., $6,400. .The :Depart- ment heads, told ane . they, use $6;400 as a., abasic, figure' in det- erminirg, overall costs • with a plus or minus of around $300. depending. on ' the size of the structure; The architects were told to prepare' plans. for 103 -bed. structure at approximately • an overall, cost of $6,400 per bed. March 24th, 1959, • 1 met with the County:Horne Committee:. They informed .me they were not aware • what : the ,Department's: overall • approval, cost was. *per I inforrned ' the Committee' at this meeting that ' the • plans and' costs of all county home projects. which have been .'approved the Department' of Welfare, were. 'at- my disposal to. study while in the Department's ;Office, after the 'Committee had . stated that the' Department had been• hesit'-• ant in 'showing them any' such 'Plena, including cost' of 'same.. • MY suggestion, to ` the County' Home Committee was to 'instruct the architects either . to 'getlin:- mediate- approval frorn the De- Pertinent 'for. the 103 -bed wing. as ` .approved by 'County Council at the January : Session, or. fail-: ing this, to take whatever steps are then deemed necessary:. As Our iio ' i- el sp to s are over- crowded with chronic patients, .let us in..Bruce meet this errier- gency and build a home without the frills.- Our patientsneed care .and 'comfort. 'They are.::not con- :cerned• about "Canadian Rooms and a . "Royal. York Entrance."` deerain � Special No. 1 RODNEY OATS No. `I HERTA BARLEY Mixed at the rate. of 6 ' pecks Oats and . : pecks . Barley per acre. Seed Mixed, Treated and in New fiags Price $i.30 (' per:bush of 34 pounds A Small' Acreage of. GRAIN CONTRACTS ;.AVAILABLE 0 Anderson Flax Products Phone 21..W,: Lucknow EZEKIEL PHILLIPS• DIED I•N : HIS 87th 'YEAR• • Ezekiel Phillips, well known Auburn • resident, died ifi Clinton: .hospital Thursday . evening. : He had• been a patient there since suffering. a fracture of the hip in a fall. Mr: Phillips was in his 87th year, . • , Born in Fqrdyce, West Wawa-, nosh, he was a son• of the late.'. Mr. and • Mrs. .Ezekiel Phillips. Sixety-four years ago she married Ellen Medd, at unknow. They had . resided at Whitechurch for 12 years, where' Mr. Phillips had a. blacksmith. shop. He .continued• at this trade after. their removal to Auburn 52„ years. ago. ' He was a member of St. Mark's Anglican Church Auburn. Surviving are his wife, one son Obert, and two daughters, Mrs. Tom' (Ellen) Johnston 'and Miss Laura Philips, Auburn: The funeral service was held. in St. Mark's Church ,Sunday. In� •terment, followed in Ball's Ceme- tery. HIGH-QUALITY PROTEIN, AND CALCIUM TO BUILD STURDY BODIES • Freet Marie Frasers new milk. recipes; Write today! pAInvr Aw. •� a or oca MA'ow A MORAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY During April, religious leaders of all faiths throughout Ontario will stress the moral aspects of the traffic accident. problem. , They will be asking you, , as a motorist -:or -pedestrian, to accept indi- vidual' responsibility , for obeyingthe traffic laws and the rules of ,the road: This :personal appeal to the users of .our. streets _and highways is the basis of the Moral, Responsibility • Campaign . spon- ,sored by. .the ' Ontario Department of Transport. It is receiving enthusiastic endorsement and active support from the Ontario Federation' of Agriculture. and from local safety councils, police departments, service clttbs, women's groups and other community organiza- tions. . You 'can help the Moral Responsibility Campaign achieve succes$ by practising ' the Golden Rule of traffic Safety --drive arid walk as you would have others dive and .walk: ONTARIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT' HIGHWAY SAFETY BRANCH •.9014 FOUR . AUXILIARIES ' IN CARD TOURNAMENT The : Auxiliaryto the Legion Card. Tournament for ..Kincard- ine, Ripley, Luoknow `and Wing ham,, wasplayed in Lucknov!r on Wednesday ` night, ' March 18th, with 9 tables of euchre, 4 of• Bridge: and •• 10'. of. Cribbage: Bridge. _'prize winners • were: high, Vera. Hackett, Ripley; 2nd, Elsie , ,Sturdy,. • Winghan; Norma Srong, Winghann.'Conso- lation, Annie Mason, Ripley, Euchrehigh, Grace J ,hnston, Lucknow; ' 2nd, ` Doris . Walden;'. Ripley, ;:3rd, Gladys Nicholson, Ripley; Consolation, Violet Web- ster, Kincardine. Cripbage: high, • Helene Buck- ingham, Kincardine;'.Consolation, Eva Black, Lucknow; Eileen ;Em- Merton, Kincardine: • ' Lucky ,"Chair,.:.VelmaGGibson, Wingham; Birthday, Lola 'San-` ,derson; Door Prize, Donated by, Mr, 'William Schmid, Lueknow,' won by Kathleen Forster, :Luck now. GUARANTEED STCERTIFICATES': • issued in amounts from $100 upwards for= 3, 4 or 5 years. • earn 5% interest, payable•' half-• ,yearly by cheque. • • authorized investment for all Canadian Insurance. Companies and trust funds./ YOUR MONEY ,'DOUBLES 1 &SELF IN 14 YEARS! THE TERLINO TRUS 372 Bay Sts, Toronto Mpire 47495 (Mr. Lovatt) 35 Dunlop St., Barrie PArkway 8-5181 (Mr. Alcorn) . Yt _, ..:.. _9994..:iirfi•xai`? iia. Yi^i��ireice: