The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutThe Lucknow Sentinel, 2015-12-30, Page 44 Lucknow Sentinel • Wednesday, December 30, 2015 www.lucknowsentinel.com The Lucknow Sentinel PUBLISHED WEEKLY P.O. Box 400, 619 Campbell Street Lucknow Ontario NOG 2H0 phone: 519-528-2822 fax: 519-528-3529 www.lucknowsentinel.com POSTMEDIA JOHN BAUMAN Group Manager, Media Sales john.bauman@sunmedia.ca JOYJURJENS Office Administrator lucknow.sentinel@sunmedia.ca LINDSAY THEODULE Media Sales Consultant I indsay.theodule@sunmedia.ca MARIE DAVID Group Advertising Director 519 376-2250 ext. 514301 or 510 364-2001 ext. 531024 Publications Mail Agreement No. 40064683 RETURN UNDELIVERABLE CANADIAN ADDRESSES TO SENTINEL CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 400 Lucknow ON NOG 2H0 For any non -deliveries or delivery concerns: 519-528-2822 • lucknow.sentinel@sunmedia.ca SUBSCRIPTIONS Regular one year $40.00 + $2.00 =$42.00 Senior one year $35.00 +$1.75 = $36.75 Two year regular $70.00 + 3.50 = $73.50 Senior two year $60.00 + $3.00 = $63.00 Office Hours: Monday, Wednesday to Friday, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. All advertising and editorial deadlines: Friday 2 p.m. Changes of address, orders for subscriptions, and undeliverable copies (return postage guaranteed) are to be sent to The Lucknow Sentinel at the address indicated here. Advertising is accepted on the condition that in the event of a typographical error, the portion of the advertising space occupied by the erroneous item together with a reasonable allowance for signature, will not be charged for, but the balance of the advertisement will be paid at the applicable rates. The Sentinel is available on microfilm at: GODERICH LIBRARY, (from 1875) 52 Montreal Street Goderich ON N7A 1 M3 Goderichlibrary@huroncounty.ca KINCARDINE LIBRARY, (from 1875 to 1900 & 1935 to 1959) 727 Queen Street Kincardine ON N2Z 1Z9 The Lucknow Sentinel is a member of the National Newsmedia Council, which is an independent ethical organization established to deal with editorial concerns. For more information or to file a complaint go to www.mediacouncil.ca or call toll free 1-844-877-1163. We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada through the Canadian Periodical Fund (CPF) for our publishing activities. Cana I L A1°'flf�'n , Member of the Canadian Community i��.�.1�4 Newspaper Association and the Ontario Community Newspapers Association The remedy for fundamentalist religious sectarianism the greatest moral and political blight of our time Michael Den Tandt Postmedia This season, as Chris- tians celebrate the birth of Jesus of Naz- areth, is as good a time as any to pause and consider what is arguably the great- est moral and political blight of our time — funda- mentalist religious sectari- anism — and the remedy to it. For there is a remedy. It's more than a little astonish- ing, given the carnage wrought by extremists his- torically and now, that it isn't more often discussed. It is, simply, ecumenism — the notion that people of faith, and indeed agnostics and atheists, have far more in common than they sometimes wish to believe. I come to this subject as someone who spends lots of time watching politics. It seems, when examining the messaging of religious organizations throughout history, that the partisan- ship of politics is not at all new. It is rooted in tribal- ism, also reflected in com- mon attitudes towards faith. Very simply, it is about belonging. If you belong to a tribe, just about any tribe, you are — or feel you are — safe. Or safer. What's more remarkable is the commonality in the religious experience. The American philosopher and psychologist William James noticed this and wrote about it more than a century ago in his semi- nal work, The Varieties of Religious Experience. Numerous scholars, teachers, theologians and Column Michael Den Tandt mystics have made similar observations since. There is something in the human condition that gravitates to spiritual experience. Descriptions of such experiences are remarkably similar, regardless of culture, his- torical period or faith sys- tem. The American genet- icist Dean Hamer theorizes this has a bio- logical source, in human DNA. He calls it the "God gene." Whatever its cause, the synchronicity extends beyond belief into the realm of ethics. Ethics — strategies for living in peace with others, more or less — are truly univer- sal. The vast majority of North American agnostics and atheists, like the vast majority of Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists or Shamanists, try to live according to some version or other of the Golden Rule. As Jesus puts it: "You shall love your neighbour as your- self." Islam holds: "Do unto all men as you would they should do unto you, and reject for them that which you would reject for yourself." From Juda- ism: "What is hateful to you, do not to your fellow man. That is the law: All the rest is commentary." And yet: In many religious and some explicitly non -religious traditions, even now, there is a cluster of belief that insists on exclusivity: That is to say, the notion that Jesus is the only path to salvation, or Muham- mad, or Buddha, or Moses. For biologist Rich- ard Dawkins, author of the 2006 best-seller The God Delusion, every way of understanding reality but his own is wrong. His tone and the zeal with which he propagates his message offer hints of early orthodox religious training. To my point: We have in language and the study of language, linguistics, a model of how we might come to a more construc- tive, and far less politi- cally volatile, expression of sectarianism — one that respects cultural dif- ferences but celebrates commonality. This would be to accept that religious systems exist and evolve much as languages do, and with as much claim to owning exclusive rights to the truth, which is to say none. Up to the 20th Cen- tury most human beings adopted the faith system of their parents, whether in India, China, Canada or Portugal. Today, with Facebook and the rest of the Internet extending communities of interest and belief worldwide, per- sonal choice plays a much greater role. Many of us nevertheless still gravitate to a belief system rooted in the cul- ture in which we were raised. It's not a great leap to think that, if there is an Ultimate Reality or Source or Deity, He, She or It is conversant with more than one human belief system and culture, as is the case presumably with language. In fact it's diffi- cult to imagine how it could be otherwise. If I choose the Old and New Testaments as my preferred scripture and someone else chooses the Buddhist sutras or the Qur'an, Bhagavad Gita or the writings of John Stuart Mill, I suggest God will understand the nuance. Much interesting modern scholarship supports an ecumenical view of belief. There's Canada's Tom Har- pur, whose The Pagan Christ caused a stir when he published it in 2004. There's the classic of the genre by former Roman Catholic (now Episcopa- lian) theologian Matthew Fox, One River, Many Wells (2000). There are any num- ber of books by John Spong, also an Episcopa- lian. There's the intriguing 2008 treatise by Toronto United Church Minister Gretta Vosper, With or Without God, which holds that "the way we live is more important than what we believe." "Ah but what of radical Islam? It will never, ever accept ecumenism," I hear some say. That's true. What of it? Surely the end state of universal religious toler- ance must take root some- where. Canada, arguably the world's best example of cultural pluralism, seems as good a place as any — and better than most. Happy Christmas, all. if it's local, it's here Iucknowsentinel.com