The Citizen, 2018-04-12, Page 5Other Views
We fool ourselves so many ways
April Fool's Day has just passed and
many people probably survived
attempts of friends or family to fool
them with some prank or other. Many more of
us will continue to fool ourselves all year long.
We all tell ourselves convenient little lies,
and we believe them unless someone calls us
on them. One of the most common is when we
say "I can't afford that" when what we really
mean is that "I don't want to spend money on
that because I want to save my money for
something else, instead."
Now there are people who really can't
afford things. For people on social assistance,
single parents, those with low income jobs and
some senior citizens, the high cost of things
like housing can leave little for basics like
food.
In our family, though, we often made a joke
of the fact my late father-in-law would go out
of his way and wait minutes in line to get any
discount for senior citizens he heard about.
Then he'd go on an expensive cruise.
I've never been on a cruise. I could claim
it's because we can't afford it but that's only a
little true. We could probably afford it if we
really wanted to go. We've probably spent
enough for a cruise while collecting a library
of books that threatens to take over our house,
and a movie collection that overflows our
shelves. For us, it's money well spent.
People who like to travel would probably think
we've wasted our money.
My father-in-law's family also used to have
fun at his expense because he had a large house
but tried to save money by keeping the
thermostat low in winter and not putting on the
air conditioning in summer while visitors
sweltered. I'm guessing I'm the brunt of
humour among my own kids and
grandchildren because we also keep the heat
lower than they'd prefer.
Keith
Roulston
From the
cluttered desk
We also made ourselves an easy target for
jokes when we put an addition on our house —
after the last of our four children had moved
out when we could really have used the extra
space. Now we have more space to heat.
We have two of the things that many people
claim they can't afford these days: a land -line
telephone and satellite television. People
already paying high monthly bills for cell
phones understandably resent the expense of a
regular phone they seldom use anyway.
I'm amazed at the number of people who
say they can't afford to pay for cable or
satellite television services and substitute
Netflix instead. They don't seem to mind
missing out on authoritative network news
broadcasts, and are satisfied getting their news
from sometimes frighteningly unreliable posts
on Facebook instead. Call me old-fashioned
but my priority will be to pay more to get news
I can trust.
Many people complain about
the cost of food, yet more meals are eaten
outside the home than ever before instead of
making inexpensive home -cooked meals.
But you don't have time to cook, you say.
Fooling ourselves about how little time we
have is almost as common as fooling ourselves
about our finances. Again, it's not so much
about the time we have, but how we want to
spend it.
How much time do people actually save by
THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, APRIL 12, 2018. PAGE 5.
going out to eat, anyway? Even if you don't
take into account the travel time to get to the
restaurant, a sit-down meal usually takes at
least an hour from ordering until the bill
arrives. Do a little research to find simple
recipes and you can save time and money for a
nutritious home -cooked meal.
Not that money apparently matters much
when it comes to the kitchen. The less time
people seem to spend in the kitchen, the more
money is being spent to furnish and equip it —
more cupboards than ever, more stone -covered
counter space, double ovens, larger cooking
surfaces.
In our house we save time and money by
cooking larger portions of some meals, then
freezing what remains for quick meals at other
times. This won't work for some people we
know because they refuse to eat leftovers.
Many people who claim to be short on time,
also insist on travelling out of town to shop for
groceries because they get larger selection and
think they save money, even with the cost of
gas. I figure we save at least an hour a week in
our household by shopping at home. (I'm
amazed that local stores don't more
aggressively promote this one advantage they
have.)
I'm not sure how I make use of this hour I
save. I know it's not checking social media. If
you want to see the biggest fib many people
tell themselves about being busy,
it lies on their cell phones. Recent studies show
average users check their phones 150 times a
day. Add it all up and smart phone users spend
three to five hours a day looking at their
phones — the equivalent of seven years over an
average lifetime.
Want to make good use of
your time? Spend an hour or so
examining how you fool yourself that you have
no time.
Blyth needs some fairness, not equity
Being the forgotten child can be both a
bit of a burden as well as a benefit, but
when we're talking about Ontario's
amalgamated municipalities, it's never
something to envy.
I've been the forgotten child. I'm not
complaining, simply stating a fact. I will meet
people who know my parents, siblings,
cousins, aunts and uncles, but they don't know
me.
It's an odd situation because I'm the eldest
of my siblings and it's usually the younger
ones who get overlooked.
As far as the communities I grew up in, I
guess I must have been socially quiet because
these people talk about my siblings, mother
and father, but then say they didn't know I
existed. I tell them I get that a lot and chalk it
up to being so well behaved that I passed by
without notice. (In the words of the great
Foghorn Leghorn, "That's a joke son")
Like I said before, however, being a
neglected child of a municipal council can be
more of a burden than a benefit.
It's funny that it's taken me this long to write
about this, but the communities The Citizen
covers have become forgotten.
We have municipalities in Huron County
that tie smaller communities to larger ones and
the smaller ones often get forgotten. As far as
The Citizen's area is concerned,
Londesborough is dwarfed by Clinton in
Central Huron. Brussels competes with
Seaforth in Huron East and Blyth has to
compare to Wingham. Auburn, split three
ways, is just too messy to get into here.
As a newspaper, we are expanding all the
time, but originally, we were here for
communities that were left without and those
communities have became the kind that rate
second when it comes to municipal decisions.
Some may say there are no favourites. They
are, at best, misinformed.
Denny
Scott
Denny's Den
Brussels, for example, has to scrimp and
struggle to have its community centre
considered on par with the Seaforth centre.
Before anyone wants to tell me I'm wrong,
please keep in mind I grew up in Seaforth. I
know how much that centre has changed since
I was lacing up my skates for 6 a.m. practices.
I also know when and how those changes
occurred (with council's financial support in
2010, in case you're wondering).
It pains me to admit that Blyth is no
different. I say it pains me because, for eight
years now, since I started covering North
Huron Council, I've defended them. I wrote
columns about how, coming from Goderich, I
didn't see the taxes as too high. People
complain to me that North Huron only focuses
on Wingham and I constantly tell them there
are projects everywhere. Someone even said
I'd drank the North Huron Kool-Aid. If that
were true, it isn't now.
Why the about-face? Well the "equal"
stance that some councillors cower behind just
doesn't make sense anymore.
Sure, when amalgamations happened, it was
a necessary evil to treat everyone the same
until issues were worked out. Several elections
later, however, we should be talking about
what's fair and logical, not what's equal.
It's easy to claim a need for equality when
you're sitting in the largest urban centre in a
municipality — you know, the ones with
hospitals and pools and municipally -funded
gyms. The rest of the municipality, however,
will justifiably see it differently.
North Huron Council recently denied the
chance to investigate better snow removal in
Blyth after slashing it, unceremoniously and
without public consultation, last year.
Blyth has narrow streets and narrow
sidewalks and, without proper snow cleaning,
it's just a matter of time until someone gets
hurt as a result of the snow removal plan that
North Huron Council has put Blyth under.
This isn't sour grapes: Blyth businesses
have tried to become accessible with ramps
and renovations, but it's all for naught if poor
planning stops people from leaving their cars.
There's only two logical ways to handle this
issue: Revisit the snow removal plan and apply
it to the entire municipality because everyone
benefits from clean streets or start area -rating
everything. I'm fine paying for better snow
removal in Blyth if my tax dollars stop being
sunk into Wingham-centric projects year after
year.
The North Huron Museum? Area -rated. The
Howson Dam? Area -rated. The North Huron
Wescast Community Complex, all post -
mortgage? Area -rated. The Blyth and District
Community Centre? Area -rated. The Richard
W. LeVan Airport? Area -rated. Everything
area -rated. Then we'll see which ward is really
getting the benefit of amalgamation.
Then again, if we're going to area -rate
everything, we might as well take the next
logical step and de -amalgamate. With
decisions like this, hurting one ward so it's
"equal" with another, it's just a matter of time
until people begin to push, en masse, to exit
North Huron.
Equality only works with identical
comparisons and, as Councillor Brock Vodden
pointed out, Blyth, Wingham, Belgrave,
Auburn and East Wawanosh aren't equal.
We're all different and those differences need
to be respected.
�_► Shawn
Loughlin
Shawn's Sense
Bullying for the good
Antler, a Toronto restaurant, has become
the latest target for vegan activism.
Antler's owner and chef, Michael
Hunter, however, made his own headlines
when he staged a counter -protest, carving a
deer leg in his restaurant's window.
The restaurant specializes in serving various
game meats, with a menu that features
venison, wild boar, rabbit, bison, duck and the
always -controversial foie gras. As a result, it
has attracted the attention of local vegan
protestors, who have been holding up a large
banner that says "murder", among others.
Protests like these are not unique, but when
Hunter staged his counter -protest, his brash
response garnered worldwide attention. The
reason that Hunter's response to the protest
was so celebrated is because it's so rare. It's
rare to see people stand up to bullying in such
a definitive way, especially when the bullying
purports to be on the "right side" of an issue.
Make no mistake, Hunter and his employees
at Antler are being bullied. The protests have
been peaceful and the vegans calling Hunter
out suggest that not eating meat is doing the
right thing for the environment, but at the heart
of the issue is a business owner being bullied
into bankruptcy despite doing no wrong.
So often, bullies come bearing smiles and
insisting they're on the side of righteousness.
Despite their sunny dispositions, they are no
different from the lunch money -stealing
meathead or the snickering group of girls.
People utilizing a legal service should never
have to wade their way through protestors to
do so, whether we're talking about the meat is
murder folks or the dead baby picture people.
In my mind, if you want to affect change,
take it to the lawmakers. You don't scold law-
abiding citizens for living their lives. Trust me,
life is better when you tend your own lawn and
don't worry about your neighbour's.
I like vegans. I think their life choice is great
and it's likely healthier than mine. But no one
wants to be told how to live their life, which is
why Hunter did what he did.
So many of us don't have the courage to do
what he did. That might sound silly, but it's
true. Protesting, rightly or wrongly, can be
very powerful. It has the power to crawl up
into your brain and make you believe what's
being said about you. Then, shame kicks in,
because you're doing something wrong (they
say) and now you feel wrong about doing what
it was you were doing in the first place.
National Post columnist Rex Murphy was
among the first to come to Hunter's defence,
calling him a hero. "He's probably braver than
he knows. He's up against a surprisingly rough
bunch," Murphy wrote on March 30.
Farmers have often felt this sting. Whether
it's local producers living in fear of animal
rights groups despite having implemented
industry best practices (the protestors called
for a health inspection of Antler as well — it
passed) or livestock transportation drivers
never knowing when someone will heave a
large stone through their windshield (which
happened to a Brussels Transport truck years
ago and was suspected to be tied to animal
welfare activism), you never know when
you'll catch the eye of protestors, whether
you've done something wrong or not.
However, like many people have already
pointed out, Hunter is just a chef trying to run
a successful business in one of the most hostile
industries in the world. Life is hard enough for
him without having to endure unwarranted
bullying, but he has the courage to fight back.
All he did was what he's been doing his
whole life, but he's an example to us all.