HomeMy WebLinkAboutClinton New Era, 1893-12-01, Page 4M.�
A..
P ceinber 1, 18 93
Tfoket W. Jackson
Atha e . f'. Kmersen
cloves=-;Xaoksou Bros.
` Shorthand --Aire Qolenlan
Stray cattle—J.11, Holmes
Muslipe-^$state.,Rod ops
otoii social --Mission Bend
Bend
J. Uotieentt
Overcoat sale—Jackson Bros.
cottage tgrent —Y'<:•,Robiri
sort
Great da ,-Gilrey $t Wtsemart
Munioipa O1e,tion—S, mUlie
Meady;or Xmas-eCoopor & Co
antle sale -.Estate d. HOdgens
EaI4t window -.Ranee Bt Spalding
Unappproaohablo.-.W. L. Quimette . .
Holiday trade—MoSfurray & Witygo
•To theladies--Elurnsteol & Gibbing%
Clinton
Conservatives wasihutniliating The, chief
;sane et the oampargnWas the tarrif, thengh,
legal issues and the "eapabillties of the: eau-
didates also had some weight, 1r Martin.
anneunced himself as in thorough a000rd
with the declarations of the Liberal con-
vention on the tariff and a etaunoli follow-
er of Laurier, Mr Campbell wart the avow-
, ed Feoteotionist candidate, though soaking
oma claim
to i de en aAoe. The verdi
P
t
therefore pap be regarded in no other light
thane complete triumph et the Liberal
policy of tariff ter revenue over the CPO
eervative policy of tariff for protection. It
was not iso numb,' q - eonteet; between' the
choses and perrouages of Martin 'and
Peml!bell as ,between the poligiea and per.
:reneges of Laurier and Thoropaen; and the
(-result is regarded as a Vote of confidence
A a• In the Liberal letCtler and °"°11
-confidence
k in the Government,
lt1ECE11BER 1,~1893.
What's the use of the London Free
Press and Hamilton Times discussing
' w reform of the Senate. It cannot be
done. Agitate for its abolition.
Connolly and McGreevy having been
sentenced to jail for one year, for
their boodling, it is now proposed to
release them. This shouldnot be done:
Rather send to keep them company,
the men who profited by their opera-
tions.
Here's another evidence of the "mod-
-erate.and equitable tariff" the Empire
is continually boasting about: During
the month of October, according to the.
official customs returns, a duty of $77,-
000 was collected on $71,000 worth of
coal oil imported from the United
States, or over 100 per cent. The value
of rice imported was $5,985, which was
taxed $4,202.
The. Globe of Saturday last was one
of the best and most interesting issues
that, has ever appeared of this great
paper. The Globe is. ;the cleanest, fair-
est, most',honorable and most enter-
prising paper in the Dominion to -day,
and as an evidence of the latter, has
sent two commissioners to Iowa and
Kansas to report impartially upon the
working of prohibition in those States.
East Huron Liberals
A Convention for the purpose of se-
lecting a candidate to represent the
East Riding of Huron in the Local
Legislature, will be held in the Town
Hall, Brussels, on Tuesday, Dec. 12th.
The American Tariff Bill.
The United States Tariff Bill, as pre-
pared for submission to both Houses
of Congress, has at last been given to
the public. TheCommittee proposes to
put the raw materials of manufactures
and the food of the people upon the
free list, or to greatly reduce the taxes
which have- heretofore been charged
upon these foundations of industry.
Some of these raw materials and food
stuffs -are largely produced in Canada,
and with regard to a few of them it is
proposed that the duties shall not
be abolished unless the exporting coun-
try shall also abolish its duties upon
similar products. This is a recognition
of the reciprocity idea, which the
United States might well have ignored
since Britain has ignored it since the
adoption of the principle of the Ricardo
-resolution.
Thus we have reason, to hope that the
placing of bacon and hams, preserved
beef, mutton and pork, binder twine,
cabbages, coal and coke, copper, eggs,
feathers, fish, fruits, hides, iron ore,
lard, periodicals, oils, paper stock, peas,
nursery stock, plaster of Paris, ploughs,
harrows, reapers, mowers,horse rakes,
threshing machines, potash, salt, seeds,
soap stone, tallow, wood and luinber
and wool upon the American free list
will not only be the means of getting
the Canadian duties taken off these
things, but will also enable Canadian
producers to sell largely of these things
in the American market. And how
greatly the free list can be enlarged
with advantage to both countries.
The list of reduced duties is hardly
less interesting than the free list,
The glass and iron duties are cut away
down from the high protective stand-
.,ard, Mr Wilson explaining that the
-old; duties returned little to the public
treasury, though they made the people
pay high taxes into private coffers.
The duty on refined sugar is reduced
froii} A to j of a cent per pound, ra w
sugar l emaining free. The barley
.duty, which Canadians would ha ve been
Oad to see abolished, is reduced from
,50 cents to about 12 cents pet bushel.
The cotton, woolen and leather duties
are reduced. The internal revenue
tariff is not yet published. It is be-
lieved that the customs reductions will
decrease revenue, and the method of
refilling the treasury is a matter for
future consideration. Altogether, it is
to be noted that the tariff changes are
made in an antiprotective spirit. It
would be easy enough to carp upon
the half -leaf nature of the Bill, but as
we have said, it will do very well for a
beginning, and we shall be only too
glad when we see the Canadian tariff
taken hold of in the same spirit.
The Winnipeg Election.
Not alone were the Liberals of Winnipeg
ole t. d at their sueceee in that city on Wed -
nee t iy, but Liberals all over the Province
eejbiced. The election of Mr Martin by
27 was an overwhelming defeat for the
: ;unservatives. The significance and com-
t,letenese of the great victory for tariff re-
form cannot be exaggerated and can only
be understood by a careful study of the
faote. Winnipeg since its erection into an
electoral division in 1882, has always re-
turned a Conservative for the House of Com-
mons, and in the general election in 1891
Huh John Macdonald was successful by a
majority of 509 over Ieaao Campbell, a
most popular man. On that occasion, of
Coarse, voters had been brought from all
parts of the globe to vote for the Govern.
mens candidate, and a great amount of
personation was done, but Mr Macdonald
certainly had two hundred majority of the
teeident vote. Iii this contest the Liberals
had not such a personally popular standard
bearer as in the former fight; they were
without funds, had only three weeks' notice
'Of the date of election, and had the most
tgetohediy,00mptled voters' list that ever
eirdted, there being over ten thousand names
ell it, the 'majority being dead 'then and
tibeenteeei The Conservatives, on the
o het+ hand, had all the election ma.
chine*, in their own hands and such
tt11or6tiglf Organization As money alone.
otlriY, efeot. Their candidate, too, ' as a
itfpttlarr and able man. U'tder all hese
, ; ofrotimsiitsticed the 111030081 of the Li rale
o del:xtd Ora, the defeat of the;
1 -
• THE l'RO$InnclON PLEBISCITE.
Te the Editor of the Clinton New Era.
SIR - ' letter
I wish to reply to Mr Houston'e
and to your criticisms of last week, and endea
vour to show you wherein you err. My sole
object in writing on this matter has beep to set
That itehas beeWs n those opposed
ablI prohibition.
aware. I would gladly relinquish my position
to an abler head and pen than my own but so
long' as tilers is nobody to step into the breach,
I for ono am not going to record a silent vote.
The temperance party are advocating their
views pretty thoroughly, Do I object to their
so doing! And if not why may not the other
side do likewise t And now to reply to my es-
teemed friend, Mr Houston. I must confess
my inability to understand the drift of the first
portion of his letter. It is a very bard matter
to pprove the . almount of liquor consumed in
Scott Act time's; government returns will not
.how it; they are useless, for reasons given last
week. �If Mr Houston is at all open to reason,
[ would refer him to the statements of menu -
fa cturers of liquor before the Royal Commis-
sion. If my memory serves me right, they all
stated that they made as much or more during
the years the Scott Act was in existence as at
other times. Will Mr Houston undertake to
say that it less was consumed in Scott Act
counties, the remainder of the country consum-
ed the balance of the manufacture I I doubt it.
What was made, was sold, and the simple
honest inference is the supply went in its old
channel of demand. I am sorry to say (tor my
correspondent is -a man for whom I have the
utmost respect) the questions put to me in the
last paragraph of his letter are of such a nature
as not to be worth answering. I call it folly to
talk of beer and strychnine at the same time.
Mr Houston asks also that they be answered
intelligently. To do so, in his estimation, is
infinitely beyond my powers. Perhaps you,
Mr Editor, would be bold enough to undertake
the task !
Replying now to your criticisms, permit me
to say you have made a good showing of a bad
side. You have said about all yon can say for
total prohibition, but I cannot lot you, inten-
tionally or unintentionally, put a wrong con-
struction on my words. I. of course, think the
latter. You are wrong in your interpretation
of the word "sumptuary," and still more wrong
when you say I regard sumptuary as a substi-
tute for the word liquor. A sumptuary law is
simply a law intended to restrain or limit the
expenditure of citizens in apparel, food, furni-
ture, etc. Therefore total prohibition has been
rightly classed as a sumptuary law. I claim it
is perfectly reasonable to classify sumptuary
laws as distinct to other laws, as those
against stealing, murder, etc. Such laws oe-
nuPY an entirely different position. It is per-
fectly consistent to apply an argument to one
class that cannot be applied to another class,
and whether such reasoning would "be laughed
to ridicule in publio debate" depends entirely
upon whether the audience consisted of the
rank and filo of prohibitionists, or thoughtful,
sober, educated people. If the former, I doubt
not, but that the rafters would ring again ! It
is no extravagance of language to say that the
minority will be compelled by brute force to
accept total prohibition when you consider the
nature of the enactment so called, and the vast
array of the best citizens of the country, in all
walks of life, who are strongly opposed to it.
I must now correct you again, and here you
yourself lead me into using someavhat strong
language. You style my argument about
Adam and the forbidden fruit as weak. Pos-
sibly to your way of thinking and reasoning it
is—I cannot help that. But you must not mis-
use the word prohibit or prohibition any longer,
You either do it wilfully or ignorantly. I must
sot you right. And here lies the major part of
the difference between us: To restrict moans
to restrain or to keep within bounds. To pro-
hibit means to forbid with authority. But tho
question under discussion is "Total Prohibi-
tion" (one of your party, you should be proud of
him, Inspector Archibald, would stop the
growth of apples for a poor farmer to make
cider with,) of all intoxicating beverages. In
the case of Adam, God certainly prohibited, if
by that you mean forbid the eatingof the fruit
of one particular tree. But he dinot totally
prohibit fruit eating. But you go further in
the liquor question. Total prohibition means
with you the entire removal, entire cessation
of manufacture, etc„ of the article in question,
It grows wearisome. Cannot you see any dif-
ference in principle between God leaving a
large variety of fruit in the garden, and of one
kind alone that in company with the rest -He
lett there, forbidding, restricting, or prohibiting
'(whichever you like) Adam from eating of that
one tree; and the ENTIRE REMOVAL of a thing
that some people now consider a source of evil?
If you cannot see a wide difference between the
two, a difference makieg them as far apart as
the two poles, I am vary sorry for you.
You ate quite right that God meant only to
restrict in all His commandments. You cannot
find total prohibition in Scripture. Else, ac-
cording to your theory, everything that was a
source of temptation would have been removed,
and man would have been a miserable, useless,.
untried creature. It seems to surprise you for
me to say that liquor is not the cause of crime.
Were I to allow that, I would be compelled to
charge upon the Maker the cause of crime. The
wine, the strong drink is all right. Turn up
your Bible, friend Holmes, and read where
Moses commanded the people to drink both.
Both are all right. I again assert it is the man
that is wrong: who uses it unlawfully. You
profess to believe the Bible. Show me a pass-
age commanding total prohibition on the part
of a nation, and I will show you plenty of com-
mands enjoining the proper use of all kinds of
liquor so called. The judges doubtless repeat,
what the prisoners tell them. It is an old story
ever ready to blame anybody, anything but
themselves. "The woman tempted me."
I gave you credit for more reasoning how-
ever, than to say, in the latter portion of your
criticisms, that my argument contradicts itself.
Read it over again, and you will eeo that I
blame that accursed Scott Act for the scene on
the race ground. Again remember, the liquor
is all right, the man all wrong. in this case
the vbters imposed that nuisance upon the
community. A glues of beer in the legitimate
way was a crime ! The result was that whis-
key (save the nano) wassold on the race ground
whore it, ought not to have been, and the literal
poison (for one effect of our temperance friends'
exertions is to make what might be harmless
positively damnable in its quality)produced
inevitable result. The direct bame of all
that trouble lies on the heads of those who
brought the Scott Act into oxietence.
In conclusion, I would remind you of one
thing more. Your party aro ver fond of using
strong language, and talking of y the accursed
traffic, accursed drink, etc. etc. Lot mo say,
that while they talk in that; manner, many of
them defile their own bodies, destroy their
nerves with an amount of abomination in the
shape of tea," that many a poor, depraved
man (in their eyes) who thinks it no sin to drink
a glass of good, honest boor, would not touch
with a ton toot pole. Yours, until next week,
Stapleton, Nov, 25, JORN RANSFORD.
ithore is only one point in the first paragraph
of the above letter that we wish to refer to. Mr
Ranelord assumes that as much liquor was con-
suthed when the ScottAct was in force, as when
it was not, and says "government returns will
not show the amount of liquor consumed" for
the reasons ho gave horde, viz: that it is sold
illicitly. This is partially true, but government
returns show the amount manufactured, and
we would like MtRansford to tell us how it was
that in one year when the Scott Act was in
ore( in 24 counties of Ontario, the gallons of
spirits taken out of bond for consumption worn
L342,989 than the average of the previous
five years; and the coneumption of beer fell off
21 per cent during the same year, as compared
with the previous tonears. This is not an "in-
ference" either, but a tact.
In the second paragraph there is no real argu-
ment bearing on the prohibition question, con -
Sequently there isnotial/forreply. AsMrRans.
ford speaks of the "vast ,,aarraof the bosh esti
rens of the country wild aro opposed to proh' i
tion," are we to suppose tho judges, senas,-
members of parliament; lawyers and all ot ars
who aro in fairer of it Will be classed as he
worst citizens of the cot trv'1
In the third paragraph mr Ransford apo
SOS tdr the use of strong language: It is U
emery'. Blit his explanation and opinien
not affect our position. We ooutend the
diving rohibition in the arson of Edon
beebremoveettj eeonte dfuras iherthatthe1
\mandntents tbtallr prohibit+: the VIOos
alltide to., a tifideritatid exaotly the d
HTR. Cl -`TTO NE. E1A
...T•�,,f,TgR
tion lir Ransford draws but do not concede his wife, is eoiiductln ,special servigeli in
interonaos. He admits shat in referonq( to the
eatinget the forbidden fruit, it was , u proliibi,
tion, but claims that God only intended to re*
strict by leaving the tree there, ' Then it vvould
bele icalInd•scrlptural for .the..ggovernmentto.
"Prohibit'? by restricting the individual use of
llgior, whi]o allows_ ng its manufacture. We.
fa . tq eco yet how Mr Ilansi'ord can, logically
deny the existence: of crime;, a% ono result of
drinking. In one breathhestates s b.
at
"it the
man that is wrong,'" in the next be lamest e
scene on the race ground to "the aecursef Scott i the same Church. Evangelistic meet -
Act," Now t[he mon on the track had certainly ings every evening (except Saturda )
t im o m qh t AO: bu Choy w0ro gong services commener t 7
the Baptist chute , w111 hold a conn
'dential talk, to men only, in the town
hall, on Stlrad,ay, at 2.90, ,At the same
time in the Baptist church' a meeting
for I Others and wives will be address-
ed by Mrs Pugsley,. Saturday even-
ing, Bee, 2nd, at 7,45, a talk by Mrd,
Pu s
le o
t it
isand sun women n
i
g Y o
gy nr
g
no bibed o u Soot A t '
supposed to have imbibed liquor. It hatters ,. ng a "
not whether it was "positivel damnable" in Everybody welcome.
e o ui ren , 01
whether
the elegant language f o. f f ;1 + t
it was the genuine artiole, ,Whatever theyhad
taken was the pause ot- their acting as they did.
and no fallaoieuareasotling,such as Mrllausford
Indulges , in, will make it otherwise,
Tnere are several other points that knight .be
noted, but spaoe forbide. There may be some
truth in what Mr Bander(' says about %bomi-
nable tea, (we've had sumo, ourselves, ono in
a while, anddidn'tknow what was the matter)
but it is so infinitesimally little in the comparl.
son, that the stron est mierosoopo would hardly
discover it. Has Mr Ransford ever heard of a
man under the ipauenoo of "tea" goingtome
and smashing the furniture, braining his wife,
turning his family out in the cold, and "raising
the devil generally" if the phrase will be allow-
ed. Mr Ransford has seen men on the streets
of Clinton supposed to be "the worse of liquor"
and he has heard of similar eases in prohibition
Maine, but has be over seen men "the worse of
tea." Tho trivial nature of this argument is
such that we are positively surprised at ite be-
ing used. Generalities have been pretty fairly
dealt' with so far, and we would like Mr Rans-
ford to take up some particular point and con-
fine his argument to that, say prohibition in
Maine.—ED. NEW ERA.]
[A couple of other communications on the
same subject are unavoidably crowded out but
will appear next week. We are quite willing
to do what we can to further this cause, but
find it impj1osible to publish all that is wanted
on the subject.—EDITOR.]
ti
Sabbath School Anniversary.
The anniversary services in connec-
on with the Sabbath School of Willis
Church were held on Sunday and Mon-
day evening last. On Sunday two
very appropriate sermons were preached by
Rev. Mr. Henderson, of Hensall. In the morn-
ing he addressed his discourse to the children,
who occupied the centre pews, taking as his
subject the feeding of the five thousand, but
more particularly the lad's partnership with
Jesus, in providing the five loaves and two
fishes. He spoke pleasingly and effectively
upon this subject, and hold the attention of the
children throughout. In the evening the ser-
mon was based upon the 9th of John,.35th verso
and the preacher showed how negligent many
Christians were in helping others, and poiuted
out the various ways in which young people
startingin Christian life could be aided.
For the Sunday services the church was
nicely decorated with'beautiful flowers, and
the music was specially suited to the children,
who sang well.
On Monday evening the service consisted of a
song service, entitled "The unfolded seed," re-
presentative of harvest time. Tho church was
decorated with the various grains in sheaves,
and many products of the garden. There was
also a profuse display of flowers, which added
greatly to the scene. Tho credit for these dec-
orations belongs to the young ladies of the
school, who certainly did their work well.
The chilJron were trained for the program of
the song service by Misses MoMurohie, Mc-
Garva and Coats, and they acquitted them-
selves very creditably. Mr Jas. Scott, barris-
ter, the Superintendent of the school, occupied
the chair, and epoko briefly about the school,
its succuss and prospects. Rev. A. Stewart
conducted the opening services. The program
was as follows:—Organ prelude, Mies McGarva;
hymn by the school; solo and chorue, Lily Do-
herty and school; recitation, Harvest, Lionell,
Paisley; recitation by fifteen children, each car-
rying baskets with vegetables, fruit and seeds,
Pearl McDonald, Frank Swallow; Maude Dow-
ser, George Gordon, Maisie Kennedy, Robert
Stewart, Maggie Wiseman Alex. Baird, Lizzie
Claridge, James Keane, Tessio Biggart, John
McKenzie, Annie Forrester, Edna Manning
and Alex Houston; semi -chorus and full chorus
by school Ida Ross, Jenny Robertson, Jenny
Lindsay,'tVinnie O'Neill, Winnie Paisley, Jessie
Wiseman, Jos. McMurray,Clara Chidley and
Lizzie Aitken; recitatio,i bsix boys, The Seed,
Malcolm Aitken, John Cook, Walter Irwin,
John Walker, Kirk Houston, David Gardner;
recitation, Where to Sow, Ruby Paisley; reci-
tation, What little hands can do, Lizzie Chid ley,
recitation by three boys, Scatter yo seed Rob
Beatty, George Chidley, Harry Irwin_ solo and
chorus, Wallace Irwin and school; recitation by
seven girls, The reaping time, each carrying a
sickle and sheaf of grain, Dot Fair. Belle Mur-
ray Maggie McMurray, Amy Howson, Ada
Mctlonald, Linnie,Irwin and Mary Irwin, this
also included a solo by Maggio McMurray, with
a chorus of the rest, entitled, 0, whore are the
reapers; recitation by twenty-seven girls each
carrying a maple leaf with a letter en it, and
making altogether the sentence, The harvest
is the unfolded seed; duet, Harvest home, Clara
Wiseman and Elsie Dowser, with chorus by
the twenty-seven reciters; recitation, Gregg
Irwin, being the closing salutation; hymn of
praise by the school.
The school is an exceedingly prosperous one,
and has been steadily growing. It possesses an
excellent library, and, from the treasurer's
statement, does not lack for funds. We con-
gratulate all concerned upon the successful an-
niversary just over.
Town and County Church
Cb imes.
Rev W. H. Watson, of the Congre-
gational church, of Wingham, has re-
ceived a unanimous call to Emmanuel
church, Hamilton.
Rev Mr Cunningham, of Guelph, has
declined the call extended to him by
the Witigham Methodist church, to be-
come their pastor at the commence-
ment of next Conference year.
The gospel temperance address last
Sunday by Rev. Mr Henderson, of
Henson, was an excellent one, and the
singing by Ontario St. choir was of an
unusually high order. The meeting;
on Sunday next will be addressed b
Rev. A. Stewart; chair taken by Mr -
Swallow.
Rev.. Geo. Richardson, whose term
in the pastorate of Trinity church, Ber-
lin, terminates in June next, has re-
ceived three calls. He has been invit-
edto Centennial church, London; the
Methodist church, Milton, and the
Mount Forest church. It is under-
stood that he has accepted the last
named charge.
The new opera chairs for the gallery
of Rattenbury street church are now
in position, and it is expected they will
be ready for use next Sunday. They
are upholstered, with folding seat,and
make a fine appearance, being quite
an improvement to the church. With
these the seating capacity of the church
is increased by about forty seats.
The attendance at the union thanks-
giving service, on Thursday last, was
not as large as in former years, doubt-
less due to the unfavorable state of the
weather. The sermon, by Rev. Mr
Smyth, was an able and appropriate
one, other clergymen taking part in
the exercises. The collection, which
was on behalf of the poor, amounted
to a little over $20.
Referring to an entertainment given
in St. Thomas' church, Seaforth, the
Expositor says :—"Among the most
pleasing features was the stereopticon
exhibition by Mr Brewer, manager of
Molson's Bank, Clinton. The views
were of places of Biblical and local in-
terest, and also of several prominent
citizens. They occasioned much inte-
rest and mirth, pleasing both old and
young,"
Rev B. B. Keefer, well known as a
former clergyman in this county, but
now stationed it1 Pennsylvania, was in
town last week.' He does not like the
other�side`as well as Canadal the gene-
ral moral tone; in his opinion, being
lower there than here. Although an
gi ardent prohibitionist, he is not satis-
y,p (` liquor law, based o his own bs a
ad �
b ' 'fled wit the wor ing of the Maine
o ery -
iae" tions, though he admitit has done
m-ffo
�, i.
- 4
d ould cis()
more rf n-
0o stn
uch d
icedg tl the rigor that it a#1ould e.
Evan�eliet. Pus whet lwith rid
•
$olmesvillle.
THANusonnee SEnvron,--,Public service
was held at 10.30 a, m. in the Methodist
Church, last Thursday, when Mr Fear
gave' a very appropriate sermon to a fair
oongregatiop.
WOop 13E5 AND Quirrise,^-Laet Friday
afternoon. W, Ramsay bad a wood bee in
B, Forster's bush, there were 16 of the
boys (?) who- took part in a quilting en-
gaged themselves far a short time.
Orr THE Tiace,=--There w,es something
wrong. last week either the week was a day
a head or we were a day behind at any.
rate we got off the traok,'bnt fortgnately (?)
we are back to the Old thing again this
week.
TEMPLAR%.—Owing to the rain no Council
was held last Monday night. Will the
members please take notice that next Mon-
day night will be the election of officers and
it is desirable that all be present who can
do so.
RETURNED.—Mr W. Stanley and wife,who
have been visiting in Michigan, returned
on Saturday last. Mr Stanley thinks
Michigan e, very nice stretoh of country
with the exception of around Port Huron,
which is very low. •
SUNDAY SOHooie—It is intended to give a
literary entertainment on behalf of the
Sunday school, on Friday, Deo. 29th.
Everything is being done to make it the
best of the kind ever held here. Anniver-
sary sermons will be preached by the pastor
Sunday, Deo. 31.
BR) CROWD.—At the free concert given
by the Royal Tempters a week last Mon-
day the hall was peeked, not even sufficient
stadding room. As the program was hard-
ly up to to some former ones it was heartily
appreciated and no doubt will benefit the
council in a number of ways.
YOUNG PEOPLE'S SOCIETY.—It is talked of
starting a Young People's Society in con-
neotion with the Methodist ohuroh here,
something that would be a very good thing
both for the church and themselves, and
along this line there will be a half-hour
prayer and praise meeting before the even-
ing
vening service on Sunday next. Let all the
young people especially be present.
Moven.—Mrs J. Prootor who has been
living on station St., has removed to the
14th con., where she will reside with her
father, Mr Wm. Connell, her mother who
was very sink at the time has since died,
Mr S. Phipps intended moving into the
house vacated by Mrs Proctor and had
part of hie) furniture moved in,. but has
since decided to remain where he is.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN?—The other day we
noticed a team and light i;leigh going up
the outline, with a horse blanket thrown
over something in the box, we could not
tell what it was as the blanket only ex-
posed a few lengths of new stove pipes,
that in itself was nothing but the sleigh
turned into a vacent stone house at the top
of the hill. Anyone that is at all suspicious
may rest easy for he is tired explaining the
minutest detests and will batch it this
winter.
Cnuncii.-Mr Fear preached a grand"ser
mon Sunday morning from the text "the
sword of the Lord and of Gideon" and in
the evening his subject was "How to make
life a success" from the text "Not slothful
in business; fervent in spirit, serving the
Lord,"Romans 12, 11. In the treatment of
the subject he divided it into six divisions
1st, Start right; 2nd, Be in earnest; 3rd, Be
dilegent; 4th, Be honest; 5th, Ask the
Lord's blessing on your work; 6th, Keep
your religion. Next Sunday evening, Mr
Fear intends giving a temperance sermon.
Christmas Sunday Mr Fear and Rev. Mr
Baugh, of Auburn, will exchange pulpits.
NOTES.—Mr W. Wade, of Dakota, was
hi the village last week. Rev. Mr Fear
and wife took in the union tea meeting ai
Bayfield the evening before Thanksgiving.
Miss Emma Acheson was visiting in Gode-
rioh last week. Miss Bessie Mugford, of
Benmiller, is visiting her sister, Mrs W.
Ramsey. Miss S. Acheson is spending her
winter holidays at home. Mr G. Huller
was the successful applicant for the posi-
tion as caretaker of the Methodist church;
he commences his duties Deo. lat. J.
Walker, Goderioh, was in the village on
Tuesday. Messrs E. Jervis and W. Mc-
Roberts were in Goderioh Friday and Sat-
urday attending the teachers' convention;
the latter remained until Monday.
Smoot REPORT.—The followings is the
standing of the pupils in the public. school
here, for the months of October and No-
vember: Fifth class.—Mand Dempsey,
Nelson Trewartha. Senior Fourth, elass.—
Alburn Murch, Bertha Stanley, Fred
Stanley. Junior 'Fourth class.—Edith
Huller, Matilda Cololongh, Mabel Dempsey.
Third class.—Louis Graven, Willoughby
Tebbntt, Harry Evans. Senior Second
class.—Minnie Evans, Winnie Sturdy,
Mary Gravell. Junior Second class.—
Harvey McCartney, Lorne Fear, Harry
Williams. Second Part plass.—Edgar
Trewartha, Harvey Mulholland, Luella
Fear. First Part otass.—Nettie Ramsey,
Fred Potter, Robert Colclongh. Average
attendance for the two months, 54. W.
MCROBERTS, Teacher.
From another ccrrespondcnt.
DISGRACErtm CONDUCT. — On " Tuesday
some evil -disposed person or persons re-
moved part of the fenceenclosing the
premises of Mrs Jenkins. It's a pity an
aged lady cannot be allowed to live in peace;
the authorities should endeavor to stop
such proceedings at once.
[We are unavoidably compelled to
omit part of Holmesville this week.]
Grand Trunk Railway.
Trains leave Clinton station for all points as
per following time table :
'ICING EAST GoatG wirer
246pm 11.28pm
4.50 p m 7.06 p m
9.22pm
WING NOM GOING 8017211.
10.12 am 7.45 a m
6.55pm 4.48pm
Grand Trunk R'y
Through Tourist Sleeping Cars leave
every Wednesday and Friday for the
Pacific Coast.
For tickets and allinformation in
reference to travel, consult ,
Jp KSON.
io 1 Pa$s« ?Agent 1 R
eady'dor Xmas
A glance at our store windows and an inspection of our stock
will show you that • are busyreceivingand sendingout
IfolidayGoods. DQn't delaymaking selection ntil
the last few days of Christas week b tt come in now and we
will lay aside for you anything you wish pick kept. It will cer-
tainly be to your advantageget et the of the stock,k.for
although it is large, the best goes first.
BOYS' OWN ANNUAL, -
GIRL'L OWN ANNUAL,
THE BOYS' ANNUAL (new)
CHATTERBOX, INFANTS
MAGAZINE, The BRITISH
WORKMAN and all the popu-
lar Illustrated Annuals.
tib.
BOOKLETS and
XMAS CARDS
For this season's trade are
exceedingly pretty and
astonishingly cheap.
THE CANADIAN ALMANAC for 1894,
(Price 20c. in Paper, 30c in Cloth
The Montreal Star Almanac, Price 25c
DIARIES (Office and Pocket) large
selection for 1894 use
0
SLEIGHS and SLEDS
We can give :you a small Sled for 25c—better
ones- at 35c and 50c up to $1.50. Sleighs that
arc the best value, to be had at 50; 75c, $1, $1.75
BABIES SLEIGHS & CUTTERS from $2.50 to $8
OAK is the newest cover for an
Albums while the white metal makes
a very pretty ornament and adds
Duch to the appearance.
PLUSH is again shown in many
different styles, and for real service
nothing can equal them
o
Christmas Numbers of the
MONTREAL : STAR,
Toronto Saturday Night,
Also the leading; English numbers, including •
Illustrated London: News, Graphic, YuleTide1
Black and White and Pears Annual.
Id
,