HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Huron News-Record, 1889-07-03, Page 4!. •
IN+
The Huron Nem4800rd
41.504 Year --41.20 Adv*.ace.
40' The matt does sot du Justice to lad Inktinedd
ut* would lead to, atluorlising dupe lid does ill
1114e. I A. T. SniWAlcr, the aitittiunatre eterehatt
of Neat York.
WedueedaY, July 31-4 ISS)
BARNUMS AMONG TIM THIR-
TEEN.
Doubtless the pleasure is ILO great
. Of being cheated as tolaheat ;
lookers-ou feel most delight
That least perceive the juggler's sleight ;
And still the less they understand,
The mere they admire his sleight of
hand.
—Hudibras
The humorous poet -philosopher,
Butler, very aptly dectibes the
foibles of human nature in the above
Hues. In what is called the Jesuit
agitation great pleasure is taken in
cheating aid being cheated. Some
of the noble thirteen having cheated
themselves iu voting for O'Brien's
resolution, although they knew it
was mere buncombe, are DOW enjoy-
ing the double pleasure of cheating
others—those who the loss they un-
derstand, the more they admire the
thirteeu juggler's slight of hand.
The "noble thirteen," at least
some of them, have earned a cheap
notoriety. Some of the thirteen
can be proved to have said after the
vote that they believed the posi-
tion Luken by the government aud the
Majority in parliarneut was theright
one, but that their seats in. the House
depended on their voting with the
thirteen. These members foEswore.
themselves iu order to retail.' their
seats in the- House, and get the bub-
ble reputation of being members of
the "noble thirteen," while at the
sante time they stand, on their own
eonfeSsion, convicted of being
perjured hypocrites. In a letter to
his constituents, Mr. Geo. Taylor,
M. P., of Ganan.oque, says: "more
properly, yes, a thous -and times
more properly, should they- brand
as traitors 801110 of' the noble band
of thirteen whom I kn)w, and
whom every member ef the House
knows, that they stated that if they
did nut vote for Cul. O'Brien's
amendinent, owing to the excitement
being raised over this qnestiuu ni
their constituenr.ies,they never could
be elected again, and not because
they approved of the amendment.".
These be mauly men; ! These the
: public men now held up for the
admiration of preseut and coining
13,,e orations ! -It can be shown that
it was by 'eolf abasetnen't, the, viola-
tion of well reasoned convictions,
and the sacrifice of what every
honorable and honest man holds
dearest that some of the noble
thirteen arrayed themselves on that
side. They preferred their seats
with dishonor rather than face a hue
and cry which they expected would
be raised by unprincipled demago-
gues. They are miserable wretches
who concentrated all in self for the
purpose of enjoying temporary
renown, but in their political death
they shall go down to the vile dross
from whence they sprung. Of
course others of the thirteen niust
be assurned to have acted according
to their light and conscience, as did
Mr. Porter on 'the oppo •te side,
Contrast his.. ' • with that o
e time -servers of the the thirteen
who supported O'Brien's amend-
ment knowing at the tirne, and
acknowledging afterwards,that they
were perjuring themselves by so
doing. These men martyrs '1 Yee
indeed,martyrs to pocket and pelf!
But Mr. Porter had the courage of
his convictioge. What he believed
was right, what he knew was right,
he dared defend. And a majority
of the /people ef West Huron will
again show their confidence in him
for his honesty and bravery. He
had everything to gain by playing
the part of the demagogue and
charlatan, as John Charlton of
Orange incorporation opposition
fame did. Mr. Porter could have
done as the abandoned portion of the
noble thirteen did, and sacrificed
his manhood and his intelligence
(rather he could not, because then
he would not have been Robert
Porter). But he preferred to do
right and trust to the intelligence of
the people of West Huron for his
vindication rather than do wrougand
win ummerited popular applause, es
evanescent as it would have been
undeserved. Mr, Porter is sincere-
ly patriotic, is more worthy of
public confidence to -day than when
he first sought the suffrages of the
kr
ralairetilakarv,eaMit7=reetairsreafealeienes, ........_.,traeletairallairrilkitavedereitatIrdOrMiereheeeroeseterfeilftrrree „.....0.10gereltertriSirrispritrexiip'esarefeeseSsireersre'neee*.i.g..2.5.iii•Seaste.:::.,.
Liberal OtUservotives of Seutb and
West IInron. It week' be
meliseelealy eitisfeetion to him,
indeed, to have marred the record
of a hitherto spotless and statesman-
like public career by pandering to
the fury of a few,or even to",the farm-
tioistn of a continuality, when their
religious prejudices are worked upon.
He has adhered tu the fundamental
principles of both the British
Canadiau Constitution, and the
great tuaxims and established forms
of British equity and law. To have
departed form these would have
been to have worke'l excesses of in-
justice, cruelty auc1absurdity. Mr.
Porter seetns' to have adopted the
motto of "No Surrender" so
dear to all protestants. Had Mr.
Porter taken auy other course than
he did on O'Brien's resolution
he would have surrendered his civil
liberty and his liberty of conscience.
His civil liberty by trying to take
away the civil liberty guaranteed Ly
the constitution to the people of an-
other province, and which liberty lie
might expect in time be taken away
from the people aids own province
and himself as a resident of it.
!Ms liberty of conscience, because,
though as staut a protestant as
ever drew freedom's breath in Scot-
land's }leathered hills, he believes
that others are fully entitled to be
protected in the exercise of that
religious faith which he protests
againet. Ite squared his vote in the
Housa in accordance with "equal
rights to all; injustice to none,"
MIGHT NOT it L WA YS RIGHT.
We have several times stated
that the Jesuit Estates Act, of
Quebec, is likely to be set aside if
it is tested in the higher courts.
Some have asked ne: "Why •then
did not the Governor General in
Council disallow it 1" The answer
is that he had not the power to do
so. By doing se he would he
violating the constitution be has
solemnworn to siinnort in its
integrity. This because Quebec
has theexelitsive pow pr weepy the
constitution to deal with the subject,
matter of the Act. But ,iu exercis-
e.
leg this . power the province can
au Appeal t9 the powinion' parlitt.
went, (sr even. to The imperial par-
liement1 ; but by an appeal to a
tribunal whose futons are to
construe the laws and eet in motion
the machinery for their enforce-
meut—the courts. This is plain
common sense : that parliament or
any law making body is not the
proper tribunal to decide legal
questions, but That the courts are.
$1000 IF THE 188 ARE WRONG.
Mr. George Taylor, M, P. for
South)tiding of Leeds, one of the
188, a prominent Oratagentan and a
delegate at the recent meeting of
Orange Grand Lodge has taken the
same position 'on the O'Btien re-
eolutione as Tne News-REconu has,
and concludes a printed address
to his constituents as follows :—
And to more fully convince those
who from iuterested motives or other-
wise doubt that I have stated the
case fairly, honestly and in accord.
ance with the facts relating both to
the constitutional question and to
Parliamentary practice, I wake this
proposition, that if any one believes
what I have stated is not true in
any particulars, either as to the
course to Kaye been pursued by the
Government or by myself as ouo of
its snpporters,
1st. That the Government have to
review all the acts of the Provincial
Legislatures.
2ud. That they have no right to
disallow acts dealing With local
affairs.
3rd. That this act is one which the
Governmeet could not properly have
disallowed.
4th. 'Flint this act was reviewed
by the Governor in Connell and signed
by his Excellency, and allowed to be
loft to his operation, on the littlt
January, 1881i,
5t11. That by no vote of the [louse
ou Col. O'Brien's ituieudtuent could
the act be changed or disallowed.
Etth. That if Col, OBrien's amend-
ment had carried the only course the
Government could have pursued
would be to resign and ask his Ex-
cellency to semi for the Hon. Mr.
Laurier to fornaa Government.
7th. That the vote I gave was the
only consistent one I could have
given.
To refer this letter to )Ts [tenor
,1 ulge 'McDonald, of Brockville, who
is acquainted both with the constitu-
tional question and Parliamentary
practices, or any judge with similar
experience who may be agreed upon,
and if he ,does not answer these
questions as follows: To No. l,,yes ;
to No. 2, No ; To No. 3, yes ; To No,
4; yes ; To No. 5, no ; To No. II, yes ;
and to No. 7, yes, then I Will COD,
unlawfully use it. If itLloes 'un- tribute $1000 to any charitable pur-
im;fully use it, it is for the courts pose the party referring the qnestions
to determine, not fur any :legislative may uatue, or resign ruy seat,
1 have the honor to he,
011' llor making body, much less tiny
lrours Faithfully,
ministerial body or.assemblage of•
GEORGE TAYLOR.
Gananoque, M
men devoid of judicial functions ay 28, 1889.
id the restraint of sworn solemn
obligation to interpret the law with- - EDITORIAL NOTES.
out fear, favor or affectioe._
We may illustrate what we lateen
by censtitutioual power and the un-
lawful or illegal use of that power.
A man 6i feet high, robust and
muscular in proportion, has the
physical constitutional power to
assault, rob and maltreat a man 5i
feet high • and of puny muscle.
Nature has endowed the former
with physical constitutional power.
it is his`' rightfully and lawfully.
Should he exercise it on his puny
neighbor and rob and maltreat him
he is making an illegal use of his
lawful power. And if ho does do
so the puny man h3a.141,--eestiergiii
the courts. But. -leis would not think
of going loseile municipal council,
the county council, the Ontario
Assembly, the Dominion Parlia-
ment or any other law making body
for that redress. He would go for
his remedy to the courts.
Now, the province of Quebec has
the power under our constitution to
devote monies to educational pur-
poses. But it has exercised that
power unlawfully. One way iu
which,to our mind, it has acted un•
lawfully is in granting educational
money to an illegal body, the
Jesuits. Also, it has legislated so
that the apportionment of money
which it has the power to grant to
an illegally constituted body and
to others, is coutingent on the dictum
of the pope who is a foreign potent.
ate, and who as such can have no
civil power or jurisdiction in any part
of the British Empire ; and legisla-
tion in a British colony which can
only become law on its ratification
by a foreign potentate would appear
on the face of it to be illegal.
'Thus by the 'recognition of the
civil jurisdiction of the pope, and
the recognition of the Jesuit society
as a legal body, has the Province of
Quebec vitiatod,and transcended the
legal use of its constitutional power.
How then shall the province be
punished for this illegal use of its
rightful constitutional power ? By
In his address at Clinton Mr.
Porter let light in on a very much
befogged point in the Jesuit Bill.
It is ,said that in it the pope is
made to usurp the place of the
Queen. .Now any one who will
read the Bill will find that it com-
mences :—"HEn MAJESTY, by and
with the advice and consent of the
Legislative Council and Legislative
Assembly of the Province of Quebec,
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS :" The Bill
positively affirms that it is Her
Majesty that enects• aud Completes just. THE PEOPLE of West Huron,
the legielation. The pope comes regardless of busy -body political
wire pullers, are free and by
in' merely as the legatee or repro -
endorsing Mr. Porter they litve
tates, and Her Majesty ou the
nutritive et' claitnants to the Es-
showu how to be just. A few
part of the province agrees to give soured politicians and fanatics
a certain sum of money
to are trying to make believe
him .
they are the people, but Robt. Porter
renounce his claims to the property,
has the confidence of the electorate
claims which, whether just or not,
of West Huron to a greater extent
lessen the value of the property to
the extent of five times the amount than ever,
. ... _ .. ..
the pope is to receive. If he _
Mr. Porter in his very lucid
agrees to accept the sun offered
Her Majesty assents to the bill
exposition of the reasons why he
;
voted against O'Brien's resolution
it is not the Pope who assents to or
asking the Governor-General to do
confirms the Bill. And surely the
province is doing a good stroke of
a constitutional impossibility, inci-
business if it gets a cloudless title dentally referred to a matter in
which the people of this province
to a property worth $2,600,000 for
$460,000 given to Catholic and are interested and which they have
Protestant educational purpoees. the control of -the permitting French
And it must be remembered the to be the language of instruction in
the public schools of Ontario. He
province would have to give this
h
sum, and more, for therm purposes referred to Freud aggression in
even though the title to the Jesuits Ontario where English speaking
Estates remained forever unsettled. people largely predominated. He
held that the French should con -
The Globe cannot understand form themselves to our educational
why thegreat political party of system if they wished to receive
Canada is called the Liberal- public funds for sehool purposes'.
Conservative party. The Globe But they have already buldozed the
queries :—"Who ever heard of a ministry of this English speaking
Reformer calling himself a Con- province into winking at Fiench
servative Liberal or a Reformatory?" being the language of instruction in
Certainly no Reformer should cell some of the public schools. They
himself a Liberal, as this term is are even agitating for a French
used now in connection with a speaking representative in the
political party in this country. Ontario Ministry. It is even
The so called Liberal party practice hinted, he said, that owing to many
le
illiberality in Canadian affairs, af thi ei people being only able to
except when' speaking of This read tench, (the outcome of the',
.
°gantry, utcu they ave very liberal
in their denunciation of it aud
uuatiuted iu their.belittlewetit of
it. Tho so-called Liberal pally are
also liberal iu their offers of this
country to the United States. If
they bad their way they would
hand it over, body and bones, to
Uncle Sam. 0 dear, no. No Rea
(miner could call himself a Con-
servative -Liberal, This would
tneau that he would conserve or
preserve illiberality and treason to
his country. A Liberal -Conserva-
tive is one who wants to liberally
couserve uud preserve the best
iuterests of this country and liber-
ally develop the valuable heritage
which Canadians are the foitunate
possessors of. Mr. Mowat is a
Conservative -Liberal when he passes
laws which oouserves the illiberal
policy of making the French lan-
guage the language of instruction
ill some of the public schools in
this English -speak ing province of
Outario.
1ofn'ii conventione iu Welling-
ton and Bruce counties not long ago
passed resulutious coudemuing the
course of patliameet iu not VeC411-
111eu(lii g the government to
the Quebec Jesuits Act. Then
they passed votes uf confidence in
their respective members who were
atoong the 188 which supported the
governmeut. Consistency is a tare
jewel and was conspicuous by its
rarity at those Reform conven-
tions.
It seems as if tho " noble thir-
tsen:' are made of very cenamou
clay indeed, even of poorer stuff
than the "perjured 188." Some of
the 188 knew that their support bf
the constitution would be teamed
by demagogues among their protest-
aut and orange constituents,by far the
greatest number, into political capi-
tal. But they were made of suffici-
ently stern stuff to not be moulded
by political tricksters as clay in,the
hands of an expert potter. Some of
the noble thirteen telegraphed their
conscience keepers before .voting
and allowed themselves to be
moulded into conscienceless voting
machines in . order to retain their
seats at the next elections. Perish
consciende, perish self respect,perish
the constitution so they could but
hold their dishonored seats.
Mr. Robert Porter, M. P., for
West Huron, visited his constitus
onts last week and addressed thorn
in public meetings at Clinton, God:-
erich tp.', Belfast, Ilentuiller and
Manchester. The chief topic of his
discourses was the constitutional
phase of the Quebec legislation in
the Jesuits Estate Act. At all
poiuts was his explanation and
justification of the position taken
by parliament tonsidered satisfac-
tory. At only one place, Belfast,
was a vote of disapproval offered
and it was defeated. It • has been
well remarked that they only are
fit to be free who know how to be
0
ROBERTSON
is holding a THIRTY DAYS
SLAUGHTER SALE.
pAbb and GET PEES or SEND for SAMPLES.
Robertson's Great Cash Store
not being taught English in the
public schools) they want all the
public documents of the province
to be printed in French as well as
English. This, as every ono knows,
would entail au enormous expendi-
tote. '111118, like the first lie, it is
hard to say whore did first conni-
vance' at wrong cl oing will end.
However, there is time to check
this French aggression in Ontario.
Let our school system be carried
out in its entirety Ft Id it will be
better for all concerued, for both
French and English speaking
On tit:dans. There is certain i y cause
to resist French aggression athome
without going into a French pro-
vince to seek to chuck it.
Editor iVele8-Record.
DIAfi Slit,—,1tISI a few words if you
please in regard to the opinions and
alleged Pets presented by your
truthful local contemporary about Mr.
Porter's reception and meeting.
The .7\"( w Era lies when he says
"Mr. Porter must be convinced that
he no longer represents the elector-
ate of West Huron." So far as this
town and his vote on the Jesuit
question are concerned, and that is
where and what your very Christian
contemporary is speaking about, M.
Porter had the unanimous approval
of the electorate of Clinton, if the
teelings of the 300 or more who
attended his meeting here may he
taken as a criterion. 1 1 attended the
meeting and must say I never was at
one where the audience was so entire-
ly in accord with the speaker. •Not
a dissen tent voice .was raised,Ithough
the speaker several times asked,
"Din 1 NuT DO BMW ?" And the
audience was a fairly representative
one. It was not made up of hood.
lums, and ward heelers and profes-
sional politicians, and consequently
there were no clap -trap resolutions,
no frothy declamation, no empty
sound and fury .signifying nothing.
metssemisimmin
CURRENT TOPICS.
' A SENSIBLE view.
1Ve are as earnest 08 any Cana.
than .journal in our condemnation
of the ineori.ortition 01 1141 Jesuits,
of the grit of public money to that
society, tel of the reference for an
adjustnier t to the, Pope ; but we
decline to advice fl resort to Olt -
COliSul u Lionti.1 itit•ilifuls, or to play
into the hands Of those who do not
ch•sire. a sett letnen t of 41u cliffieult y,
but who only ss isli to prolong the
agony for. political purpeses, by
arguing a eonrse of aution that they
know well means nothing and will
end in smoke,__
The fast is that the monieut Mr
Mercier:. passed lis iniquitous
measure the whole question became
one of law eeetred upon the
constitutiontdity or unconstitution-
ality of the act. The matter, then -
fere, should first have been tested hi
the Canadian cout ts, and if necesss
sal y carried to the highest tribunal
itt the Emnire, whers. it must now
go if finality is desired, It is plain,
therefore, Illlt wit limanding what
the Globe or pther pplitics1 special-
ists no.), aver to the contrary, that
the advice tiliiicrod to the, oreege...
men and Pretest awe of Canada by
this journal and by the highest
legislative budy in the Orange
order is sound, and in spite of
every thipg ,inuet in the end be
acted upon, unless, indeed, the
Canadian people desire a civil war
and the destruction of this Con-
federe tion —borne of . the dilemma
upon which' we do not think They
are prepared to impale themselves. -
0 range. Sentinel.
- Another fib is when the Era says
only 123 persons present.' And he
intensely lies when he says, "Mr.
Porter made many attempts to pro-
duce applause, stopping frequently
at what he considered pod places."
1 appeal to youpir. Editor, as chair-
man,whether 1 am not right. [You are
—Emelt]. I will give from memory a
few of the gentlemen present who
listened attentively, and to all ap-
pearance approvingly, indeed. rever-
ently to Mr. Porter. Those I think
of are Messrs Jas. Fair,• Jos. (ihidley,
N. Robson, Peter Cantelon, sr. and
jr., Ex•Mayors Forrester and Searle,
Stewart Plummer, David Cook, S.
Davis, A.. II. Manning and scores of
others.Yourconitemporary says these
men were too "mean to do bim
(Mr. Porter) reverence." 1 know
from personal remarks made by the
majority of these gentleman that, on
the matter which Mr. Porter spoke
about, they are in accord with him.
But the Nov Era must lyingly insult
them by saying they are too mean"
to be so. If the New Era calls such
as these "mean" men 1 nould ask
where does he find , his honorable
ones ? Among those traitors and
feline-pahied '1.7riah Sneaks" from
whom he obtained his information in
this matter as he has about others 5ot
which he personally knows nothing ?
Of course censure of Mr. Porter in
this case is as much the funeral of
the New Era and Reformers as of
Mr. Porter. .gr. Porter did not cothe
here, as I understand it, to indulge
in party or partisan talk. And he
stuck to bis text. I will give the Re-
formers credit for common sense on
this question. They do not find
fault with Laurier and Blake and Mc-
Kenzie, and Milia and Cartiright
snd Patterson and Edgar for acting
conatitutionally, It has remained
for the New Era to say that these
Reform leaders and the leading Re-
formers of Clinton are too "mean" for
anything. Probably the editor of°
thatjournal will feel like going out
into the back yard and kicking him-
self now that be has found out be has
again been made a °Marley, of, by
his two-faced tory informants, to
slander the most intelligent fleform,
era and others in town, whom he says
are too "mean"for anything; because,
while endorsing their own party lead-
ers, they necessarily endorsed Mr.
Porter and the Conseratiye leaders
on a constitutional question on which
both are agreed.
Yours,
ONE Wito Was TIMER
URON mteor) TALK,
"fhatin the opinion of this..
Synod the Jesuit Order by its prineia
pies and constitution and historical-
ly has been proved to be dangerous,
to civil liberty and a menace to the.
rights of all classes or tIer Majesty's
subjects, and that it is therefore
most desirable that the legality of
the incorparution of t he Jesuit Order,.
and,by consequence, of the action of
the Quebec. Legislature in the,
matter of the Jesuit Estates Act,,
by tested by din highest Courts of
the Dominion and the Empire, and,
that the members of Synod will,
support every effort to obtain such
testing of the said incorporation,
and should the Act ultimately be
found to bo lege!, the members of
the L'yeod will use all constitutional
means towards obtaining the repeal
of such incorporation "
. _
—In the Philadelphia dam flood
disaster Johnstown physicians say
10,000 people perished iu the
flood.
MARKET REPORTS.
(Corrected every Tuesday a(ternoon.)
CLINTON
Flour 85 00 to 5 50
Fall Wheat, new & old 00 to 00
Spring Wheat 90 to 00
Barley C 40 to 0 48
Oats .. 0 yP to 0 OS
Peas . 0..Jto 0 54
Apples,(winter) per bbl 1 00 to 1 50
Potatoes .. 0 85 to 0 40
Butter .. 0 121to 0 18
Eggs 0 10 10 0 11
Hay 8 00 to 9 00
Cordwood 3 00 to 4 00
Beef 0 00 to 0 00
Wool 0 18 to 0 20
Pork 6 50 to 6 70
NOTE LOST.
A note made by the undersigned In favor of
Ferran & Tisdall, Clinton, payable in June, 18811,
has been lost or mislaid. Alt parties are there•
fore cautioned against negotiating the same, 35
payment has been stopped.
JOHN SCRI:TON,
E. MERLES,
Clinton. June Mb, 1098. 585..it
OWENS & JOHNSON,
Orirristers, (Srd.,
ALBERT STREET, - - CLINTONe.
AND QUEEN STREET, • - BLYTII
E. W, J. OWENS. T. F. JOHNSON.
4. .