Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Huron News-Record, 1889-05-01, Page 4The Huron News -,Record $1,60 a Ycer-83.25 In Advance. Wednesday, MaY 1st, IS89. PROVINCIAL P0WVERS. While collectively Canada is one great nation within another and greater natiuu or empire, each pro- vince is also a limited sovereignty within itself. Provincial powers are fairly well defined in the British North Ameriva Act, which is prac- tically the writtuu constitution of Canada. Now, we must either abide by the Couetitution or do otherwise, By doing otherwise we become rebels to • constituted authority. By be- coming rebels 'we lay the founda- tion for a train of evils which would imperil, if not absolutely destroy, not only our national freedom but that individual freedom we as free- born British subjects so highly prize. Let us see what our written con- stitution says about public lands and education. It may be remarked that under these two heads .come the Quebec Jesuits Estate Act. The B. N. A. Act when defining the "Exclusive Powers of Provincial Legislatures" includes under this head : "The management and sale of Public lands." The Jesuits' Act declares those estates to be public lands, and the s legislature of Quebec is clearly within its powers in disposing of tlfem and appropriating the proceeds for legal purposes under the consti- tution. These purposes are declared to be for the higher educating and civil- izing of the people of the province. Is this a lawful purpose 1 We look at the B. N. A. Act again under the "Exclusive Powers of Provincial Legislatures" and we find that "In each and every Province the legis- lature may exclusively make laws in relation to education." Now, it is quite clear from our written constitution, from which we have quoted, that the Legislature of Quebec has the exclusive power to sell its public lands and use the proceeds for educational purposes. And this is precisely what the Jeauit Act purports' to do. Surely it is also clear that if the Province has exclusive power in the premises the Dominium Parliameut has no right to disallow what the Province bas the exclusive right to do. But we aro tolls that the agency by which this education is to bo car- ried arried ou is composed of two branches of the Roman Catholic Church, the hierarchy and the Jesuits, and that the money expended in this way is giving State aid to .a church, which wo all believe to be unconstitutional. This. position is manifestly unten• able, because for a priest or a Jesuit to receive or expend State money for educational purposes is no more illegal than it would be fur an Eng- lish Church, or Presbyterian, or Methodist clergyman to receive or expend State money for educational purposes, and this no reasonable roan will say is wrong. . Many people in arguing for dis- allowance bring in issues totally foreign, some goiug so far as to even assert that the Dominion Par- liament passed the Jesuits' Estate Act. lint that Act was passed by the Legislate' a of the Produce uf Que- bec. The ouly question before PRrlia• trent was : Had the Province the power to pass the Act? We have above givou positive evidence that they had not only the power but the exclusive power, . All criticism outside the constitu- tional issue of Provincial power is foreign al d misleading su far as regards the vote in Parliament, Parliament to disallow an Act uf a province which it has the exclus- ive power to pass would be guilty of high-handed tyranny and a vio- lation of the fundamental laws of the country as explicitly laid down in the Constitution. We are also told that the opera tion of the Act will tend to strength- en Roman Catholic influence in the councils uf the State. But Parliament has no more right to disallow a legal pieviucial Act been use it will strengthen Mormonism than it world have the right to dis- allow a legal provincial Act that would incidentally strengthen the grit party or the tory party. 14 re repeat that disallowance is confined to whether or not the Pro- vince had the power to pass the Act. Notwithstanding that the Pro- vince has the power to pass the Act, many who concede this, and among them a large number of the best informed man in the Dominion, hold that it has inherent defects which the highest court would de- clare fatal to it from a legal point of view, and that it can bo legally set aside by the courts, though it could not bo constitutionally dis- allowed by Parliament. This is the position we take. . INDIVIDUALISM. • Individualism and indepeudent thought are admirable elements in the units which from either a social or political community. In indiv- idualism lila the germ of reform. Luther• and Knox and John Wesley had that sturdy independence of personal character which has been productive of much ' and lasting good. Tho most successful of these was Wesley, because he combined policy with his personality. Though founding a sect whose ra- mifications permeate the world along with the drurn beat of Eng- land, he never completely severed his moral connection with the Church of England. His indepen- dence did not at first assert itself iu au endeavor to reform the errors of his•mother church by the formation of a third party church. He was too sagacious for that. Had he done so his success would have boon very questionable. He would in all probability have been a failure. For years and years he fought the alleged sins of omission and com- rnisipn of the old church within its own linos. He was a great respecter of constituted authority and organ- izations. With organization and by organization for God and human souls seems to have been the mode and object of that great and good man, In another and mightily prolific field, that of the material develop- ment of this Canada of ours, Sir John A. Macdonald. has; exhibited equally remarkable traits of con- trolled individualism and personal independence of thought, with the result su far that neer during a given period of time has the un- ification of people's of various races and conflicting creeds, been so ,successful in this in any other country. And along with the cementing of the different races and the mollifying of creed anti- pathies he has contributed in- en ormous degree to thoir worldly comfort and to their wealth pro- dueing opportunities. It were an old story to compare the power and wealth and territory of Canada to -day with that of twenty-five years ago. And how was this accom- plished) By his arbitrarily insist- ing on the carrying out to the ful- lest extent the liberal ideas which he iuvariably possessed in advance of his contetmporaries 1 No, but by shaping his policy and legislation so that while lie could not go as far as he desired iu the direction his far-seeing statesmanship could discern was for the advancement of the ivhole peopl,e,f this country, 110 yet always ntadti'eome progress. Had he not e'lcrifieed some of his individuality to the common good we would at this time, in all human probability, bo still a number of petty provinces without a national habitation or aspirations higher than that of the denizens of a miserable 7x9 parish in the stuffy and congested portions of Europe. But how stands our country to- day 1 Away up in the scale of nations. Yes for though only a part of the tHpntust empire in the world which embraces 320,000,000 of people we are a nation within a nation—imperiuln in irnrerio. And in spite of all the sacrifices of self and some of the hobbies, if they may so be termed, of this great statesman, we hear, in unexpected quarters, 'down ith John A. Mac- donald, his government has been long enough in power.' If these persons will but consider a moment they will find out how impractic- able it is to nationally carry out the sectional wishes of any portion of our people. Sectionalism is an enlarged form of individualism. It is very good within its proper sphere. Wo Ontarians pride our- e.elves . upon being the no pro- gressive and enlightened people on this or any continent. We pride ourselves upou our protestautiam, reckoning it as being the lever which has beeni mainly instrumen- tal in effecting our progress. Nor will we say that this is a delusion. But we have no right to force our indi vidualism, our protestau- tism, upon others. Nor have we any right to interfere with the God-given and constitutionally guaranteed rights of others by refusing constitutional legislation to the Roman Catholics in a pro- vince where they are in the majority; just as we would not allow them to interfere in legislation constitution- ally enacted iu this province by the Protestant majority. WHO IS TO BLAME ? The Jesuits; the culprits first making the advances. Mercier, the grit premier of Que- bec; for entering into conspiracy with the Jesuits. . The members of the Quebec 1,eg- islative Assembly, especially the protestant members; for not protest- ing and opposing the Jesuit Act. The members of the Quebec Legislative Council, especially the prOtsstants; for not opposing the Act, - 'l'lte Quebec Lieutonaut-Governor- in-Council; fur not vetoing the Act. The protestant newspapers, pro- testant clergymen, protestant law- ye's, and other citizens euf Q.nebecp for not protesting against the Act before it was allowed. And to these must be added the dodging and trickery of the Grit member M•r. Barron, who gave no- tice of a motion somewhat similar to O'Brien's which could have been considered on its merit, and then absented himself so that it was put at the foot of the paper, which means that it could not be taken up this session; and the bad generalship of Col. O'Brien in •moviug a "want of confidence" amendment, an ac- tion which guaranteed the defeat of his plan. One cannot but review the whole with disgust.• I-Iowever, "profit by the mistakes of the past," is a good 100110. The Jesuits Act has done good; inas- much as protestant Canada is uow aroused, .and the " beginning of the end" is near. Lot every loyal• citizen contribute one dollar, or whatever he ean,.to.the fund to test the matter at law, and success should crown the efforts in that di- rection. It is a great pity that Col. O'- Brieu's motion instead of askiug for disallowance had not been to have the case referred to the law officers of the crown in England. There must bo no compromise. We are proud of -our course, for front the first we have been one of five or six journals in Canada to de- mand disallowance. It was not dis- allowed. Our next move is not to quarrel with our frieuds; but to unite all' iu ouo solid phalanx to test the matters in the courts, where it should long ago have been. EDITORIAL NOTES. The voluminous, reports of the Dominion Labor Commission con- tain much matter of a suggestive ly practical character. The mem- bers are not unanimous in all their recommendations, 'This would have been surprising. Amuug the most urgent of the legislative reforms which all the Commissioners are agreed in recommending we should be inclined to reckon those forbid- ding the practice of inflicting fines upon employees, compelling pay- ment in currency and not iu scrip, establishing boards of arbitration to settle labor disputes; prohibiLing t he sale of liquor in the viciuity of mines, and asking fur the establish• rnent of a Dominion Labour Bur- eau. The uudoubted and sound princi- ples of our Federal coustittt.tiou lay down that the central power shall net only on general or axiomatic principles of public policy. The various provinces have exclusive powers which the Federal power cannot legally encroach upon, Sometimes it is hard to draw the , line between the cunstitutionel ptivII - ilegos of the Dominion, and provin- cial piivileges exercised, in passing statutory enactments. Although R1• we have not in this country, as they hove in the, States, the Supreme Cuutt authorized to settle such points of difference, we yet have the court of the Privy Council of Eng- land to appeal to. Surely when we have such au impartial tri banal to re- fer the Jesuits Act to, it were idle to get up an internecine roligiqus war. When .the action of the Dentin- ion Parliament fur not interfering in the Quebec Jesuit Estates Aot is attacked it should be remembered that that Act is in no manner a part of the legislation of the Dominion Parliatneut. It is purely and solely the act of the Grit government of Quebec, with which the Dominion House had nothing whatever to do other Hutu to determine whether anything in the said Act infringed upon the prerogative of the Federal government. The law officers of the Crown said it dealt with purely provincial matters over which the province has exclusive control. Pavliauteut took thia view of it. And because the measure is alleged to be advantangeous to the me,jority of the people iu a Catholic province, it is unjust to attack 'members of the Dominion House fur t his. It was beyond their con- trol altogether. The Jesuits Act seems to have caused as much irritation among the Roman Catholics in Quebec is amoug the Protestants in Ontario, A paper usually considered .its in- epired'hy Cardinal Taschereau, and other' Erotic!' Catholie• papers, con- sider that the Catholic hierarchy of' the province have been overlooked in the adjustment, and they pitd1h' into the Jesuits as an intermeddl- ing body, largely composed of foreigners having no sympathy with the native Catholic .clergy and people. It will be remembered that Cardinal Taschereau and the Bishops for a long time opposed the incorporation of the Jesuits in Quebec. And the end is not yet. For the Wilnexa the other day published the following :—" A re- port is current that the Hon. •Mr. Mercier has been summoned to Rome to undo the evil caused by 'his unwise legislation in favor of the Jesuits. It is stated that the Pope consented very reluctantly to tho proposition, fearing that it .would cause friction and disturh- anco, which could only result. in injury to his authority, but that Mr. Mercier, on his second visit to Rome, overcame his fears, assuring him that everything was all right, and that there would be no objec- tion made." If a new party is to be formed as a middle one between the existing ones it might be called the "Inter_ fin" Inter- im" party. This suggestion arises from the recollection of a system published by the Emperor Charles the Fifth in the earlier,yeara of the Reformation. It was to be a medi- um between the two then contend- ing religious parties, and it was thought it might he acceded to by both. But even the paternity of the Emperor failed to give it suffici- ent prestige to be a success. The desire expressed by some members of both political parties to form a third or "Interim" party in Canada has no more chance for success than had the origi- nal "Intel -int" party. A third party would, be literally a no party. It' either of the existing parties does not net in accord with .the views of the majority composing the respec- tive parties. they can be forced to do ao. Majorities rule in party organizations as in other aggrega- tions of people. The duty of Con servatives is to fight the supposed errors of the party within the party. But no party urganizttion can be expected to reflect the individual views of every member of it. This would be impossible. And if the members of a party want it to bo ef- fective they should loyally give it their support so long as they are in accord with its chiefest principles, and in spite of the fact that they do not agree with minor portions of ite policy. Any attempt to disrupt the party bodes no good, but is merely playing into the hands of the op- posite party whose principles and policy wo disapprove in foto. It is assuredly better to attempt to re- form our party within party lines than to strengthen the hands of oppo- ' nests whose policy wo know to b. Another Lot of Thos e Wonderful Diss Goods ROBERTSON'S 8c., 10c., 12c. and 15c. Everybody should see them. The best value in the country. Going like hot cakes. OUR SPECIALTIES 11111111m, lIaullcs and Di'ee. Robertson's �reat Cash Store ten thousand times more inimical to the interests of our country than the one we have been allied with, be its faults what they may. CURRENT TOPICS. CONSTITUTIONAL AGITATION. The writ in the case of the Jesu- its v. the Alai! was returued in court. The first proceeding on the part of °the defense will he un exception to the form` of attacking theeJesuit incorporation, 'holding that ' the statute under which the Jesuits were incorporated is illegal and ultra vires, inasutuch as it is beyond the power of Quebec legislature un - dol. the British North America act to enact such legislation. Further more, that by the said incorporation the local legislature has recognized the authority of the Pope, a foreign potentate, to interfere•iu the lotus lotion of the province and in counter authority to that of her majesty the Queen. Other important issues of a similar nature will be raised. This exception to forte is taken for the purpose of widening the issues in the ease, as by the declaration the defence is tied down to the issue as to whether the oath published by the Mail is that taken by the Jesuits or not. By exception of form the whole constitutionality and status ot: the Jesuits in Canada will be raised. It is thought probable that under French law and' before a French court the exception may he thrown out, inwhich case an appeal will immediately be instituted and taken to the privy council for final decision. AN UNRELIABE AUTHORITY. Editor News -Record. DEAR Sia,—I have noticed with re- gret, but not surprise, the awkward position the Era has placed itself in. When cornered, as lie appears to have been very often lately, he cries for a new issue, introduces new matter, or admits the falsity of his statements by saying nothing, The unreliable Era stated what it didn't know about conservatives—in fact walked unblushingly into the secret chamber, had it on the authority of "one who was there•'—and falsified the record. He uow slanders the Orangemen and makes false state- ments concerning them. One might surmise he had gained admittance to an Orange Lodge from the tenor of his statements. You may expect the Era to assert at any time, pos• sihly in its next issue, that its editor has obtained all the regular degrees, passwords and signs of a true Orangemen. .L• When hemmed in, he will as usual fortify his position by asserting he got it all from one who was there. Dear reader and brother Orangeuleu, what roust you think of the elarderer and falsifier, ready at all times to walk boldly into the sacred family circle, soil falsely make use of their doings ? I as a Master of an Orange Lodge received one of the circulars last winter, referred to last week. 1 am informed they were sent to Master's only, and knowing that the editor of the Era has not yet been advanced to that position, be can easily clear himself of the grave charge of falsifying, in this particular case, by making a clean breast of the whole affair. An hon- est confession would be interesting reading for the public generally and Orangemen in particular. Yours, etc., W. M.. L. 0. L. Our Weekly Round Up. —The constitutional prohibition amen tmeat was defeated in Massa chussetts last week by about 50,• 000 majority. —'rhe Connecticut House passed the hill already passed by the Senate prohibiting the use of tubaceo for smoking by h)inore under sixteen. The bill was amended, making the delivery of tobacco to a minor a crime as well as the Hale of it. —The Episcopal bishop of Glas- gow is alleged to have inhibited Canon Wilberforce from talking temperance in the churches of that diocese because be cooperated with the Minister of the church of Scots land in his work. — Large tinniber of young pines are now shipped from the Laude-, in France, to England, to be con- verted into paper. Nearly 175,• 000, tons of older pines' were shut, too, to help in propping English, coalpits. — The. fast express train from Chicago, on the Croat \Vestern ion of the Grand Trunk, ran oft the track at the Junction . Cut, near I-Iarnillon, Sunday morning. Twenty passengers were killed awl twelve were wounded. The fatals ities wore largely 'Inc to the burn- ing of the ears. BIR'1'IiS. WALK an..—In Clinton on Wednesday 24th., tha wife of Mr. Tiro . Walker of a daughter. Coax.—In Clinton on Watinesday 24th, the wile of Mr. 11. W. Cook of a son. DEATHS. Cox.—In Goderteh ou the 24th April. James Cox, aged 79 years. GI.Ew.—In Clinton on Tuesday. 30th April, Nelson Glew, aged 72 years. FARM AND MARKET. —To waterproof muslin a writer recomends four eggs beaten up in a quart of oil and painted on both sides of the muslin, which may be thin. —Be very paticular, says an ex- change, about disinfecting the kitch— en sink. Washing soda, two table- spoonfuls to a gallon of boiling wat- er, makes an excellent wash to pour hot into the sink at night, after the work of the day is over. — The successful farmer must raise good stock, and he should know the history and merits of the various improved breeds of stook,; but how many farmers make the mistake of their lives by blindly raising coin. mon stock, saying and believing that fine stock is no better? — If you dissolve bones by boiling them in a strong potash lye, and then use dry earth or leeched ashes as an absorbent, you get a fertilizer or compost rich in both phosphoric acid and potash. It will contain also most of the nitrogen ivhich was in the bones. --It is unwise to grow hey to be sold off the farm. Stock raising and grass growing are joint occupations. A higher price can be obtained for bay by converting it into beef, while the manure remains behind to add to the fertility of the soil. When bay issold off the farm it will sooner or later be impoverished, and the prices obtained will be less than if stock is kept to consume the hay. —Cut the young trees.bacic when placing them in the around, and also trim back some of the roots. .First remove the top soil, lay it Raid° and then dig_,.the ,,.hole for the tree, When the tree1V in position throw the top soil next to the roots, pour on a bucket of water, stamp the soil down, and then and more earth until the hole is well tilled and Tracked. MARKET REPORTS. (Corrected every Tuesday- afternoon.) TORONTO MARKETS.—Wheat 1.07 to $1.30, the latter price for No. 1 Manitoba hard. Barley 48c to GOc. Oats 32c to 86c. Peas 600 Potatoes 25c to 30c per bag. Eggs, fresh, 17c. Bettor 16e to 19c. Hogs $6.25 to $6.75. DETROIT MA RRI:TS.—Wheat $0.92 to $0.98. Barley 45c to 55c. Oats 27c to 29c. Butter 12c to 14c. Eggs 10c. Apples$1.ut0 to $1.50. Dressed hogs, $5.00 to $5.50. potatoes, 18 to 18c, per bushel in car lots. l3urrALo MAnxn•rs.—Graded steers 1.500 to 1.600 lbs $4.25 to $4.65; from 1,300 to 1.400 lbs $3.80 to $4.15 ; light butchers from $2.50 to $3.0. Hogs $4.90 to $5.25. C LI NTON Flour $•5 00 to 5 50 Fall Wheat, new & old 0 95 to 0 98 Spring Wheat 0 95 to 0 98 Barley C 40 to 0 48 Oats0 28 to 0 28 Peas . 0 '54 to 0 54 Apples,(winter) per bbl 1 00 to 1 50 Potatoes .. 0 25 to 0 30 Butter .. 0 17 to 0 20 Eggs 0 10 to 0 10 nay 12 00 to14 00 Cordwood...) 3 00 to 4 00 Beef . 0 00 to 000 Wool 0 20 to 0 25 Pork 6 50 to 6 70