HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Times Advocate, 2005-10-19, Page 44
Exeter Times–Advocate
Wednesday, October 19, 2005
=CNA
Editorial Opinion
TIMES ADVOCATE
PUBLICATIONS MAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER 07511
We acknowledge the Financial support of the Government of Canada, through the Publications
Assistance Program (PAP), toward our mailing costs.
Jim Beckett
Publisher and Editor
Deb Lord
Production Manager
&Published by Metroland Printing,
rt Publishing & Distributing Ltd.
Metroland 424 Main Street South, P.O. Box 850
Exeter, Ontario NOM 1S6 • (519) 235-1331
EDITORIAL
A real solution?
Als the province strives to shut down its pol-
ution-belching coal-fired generating sta-
ions while at the same time trying to
ensure its citizens have enough electricity to
meet demands, the controversy surrounding
nuclear power has again reared its head.
On the one hand, nuclear creates a massive amount of
much-needed electricity; on the other, critics point to the
environmental concerns, cost overruns and the
province's sketchy history trying to get nuclear units
back online.
On Monday, the province announced it had struck a
deal with Bruce Power to restart two nuclear power
units at the Bruce Nuclear Station at a cost of about
$4.25 billion. The reactors, shut down since the mid-
1990s, are expected to be back online starting in 2009
and will provide 1,500 megawatts of power to the
provincial electricity grid until 2036.
Bruce Power, a private consortium, will pay the cost of
refurbishing the two Bruce units and getting them back
online, as well as refurbishing another unit and extend-
ing the operating life of another once the first two are
back online This, according to a press release from the
province, "will ensure that much of the risks of cost
overruns related to the refurbishment and restart of the
units are transferred away from Ontario ratepayers." In
exchange, Bruce Power will receive 6.3 cents per kilo-
watt hour for the electricity the units produce.
In the past, nuclear power unit refurbishments have
not gone well — restoring a unit at the Pickering station
was years late and millions of dollars over budget, lead-
ing to the firing of three Ontario Power Generator exec-
utives. There were also huge cost overruns with getting
two other Bruce units online in 2003.
In August, plans to restart two other mothballed reac-
tors at Pickering were scrapped because it was deemed
the project wasn't economically viable.
There are those who won't like the province's new
commitment to nuclear energy, but it should come as no
surprise the province is taking this route — after
promising to mothball the province's coal-fired stations,
increasing the province's reliance on nuclear was a fore-
gone conclusion. Getting rid of the coal-fired stations is a
positive move, although it also takes a lot of electricity
away from the grid. But the air, and our lungs, will ben-
efit.
Nuclear energy doesn't pollute the air, although there
are understandably concerns among environmentalists
about storing nuclear waste and what that does to
future generations. But that's the trade-off you get with
nuclear — it would be nice to power the province on
wind energy, but that simply isn't possible.
Dalton McGuinty still has much work to do. Over the
next 15 years, the province needs to refurbish, rebuild
or replace 25,000 megawatts of supply. It can't all come
from nuclear — that's simply not affordable or feasible.
The province (and the feds) needs to continue investing
into alternative energies such as wind and solar. And we
need to hope the Bruce project goes better than the
Pickering debacle.
I'm a redneck woman!
I don't know about any of ya' all out there but I
love living the small town life.
Not only that I'm proud of it, yes proud of
what's that word...being a 'hick'.
I've lived in Nairn for over 12 years and I think
that's one of the best moves my parents have ever
made, literally.
Sure it's only about 350 people and the
'cool thing' to do back in the day was sit
with your friends at the park doing noth-
ing or sitting at the coffee shop doing
well, nothing but it wasn't so bad.
An e-mail circulated a little while ago
titled "You might be from a small town
if..." and it definitely explains small town
life perfectly.
Among some of the points listed were,
you might be from a small town if anyone
you want can be found at either the local
gas station, coffee shop or town pub, your
teachers remember when they taught
your parents, you don't give directions by
street names, but by references (turn right at
Billy's house then a left at Bobbie Sue's, it's three
houses down right beside the corn field (yeah,
which one.) And how about this, you always went
to a party in a barn or field or went to the stag
and doe that everyone comes to.
There's many different aspects of the small
town life that are appealing.
I love the fact that everyone (most of the time) is
so friendly, everyone waves or nods, it doesn't
matter if you know them or not.
I also find customer service a lot better in the
smaller towns.
You're not just a number for instance.
'The hurry up and get out of the store act is not
present.' I'm not saying this is in all cases but I
can't count on my fingers how many times
I've had a store employee be rude to me in
the city.
That's okay though, I'm sure they're just
upset they have to go home to their house
in the city, surrounded by the sound of
traffic and bright street lights.
I'd go crazy if there were no stars to look
at in the evening and when a car goes by
my house, my whole family practically
jumps up and runs to the window.
A vehicle motoring down our street is not
a common sight and in fact neither are
street lights, there's not too many on my
gravel road.
Actually Nairn just had a few street lights
put up on the 'main street' and I swear it was the
talk of the whole town.
I guess what I'm trying to say is I love the coun-
try, everything about it.
I can even handle the smell of manure, I'd take
that over smelly factory stench any day.
In fact the only thing I don't like about the coun-
try is well, most of the country music, but don't
get me started on that...
NINA
VAN
LIESHOUT
KICK THIS
AROUND
About the Times -Advocate
Address & Office Hours
Times -Advocate, 424 Main Street South, P.O. Box 850,
Exeter, Ontario NOM 1S6. Our office is open Monday to
Friday, 8:30 am to 4:30 pm. Closed on Holidays.
Contact Us By Phone or Fax
Classified ad & subscription sales ....(519) 235-1331
24-hour automated attendant (519) 235-1336
Fax number for all departments (519) 235-0766
Subscription Rates
One year rate for addresses in Canada: $38+GST
Two year rate for addresses in Canada: $70+GST
One year rate for addresses outside Canada:
$130 Call (519) 235-1331 to order a subscription.
Classified Rates
Word ads: $11.00 for 20 words, 20¢ for each addition-
al word+ GST. Notices (births, deaths, announcements,
coming events, memoriams, cards of thanks): $15.00 +
GST for up to 50 words, All ads must be pre -paid. The
classified ad deadline is Monday at 10 a.m.
Display Advertising
To place a display ad, (519) 235-1331 weekdays 8:30
to 4:30 p.m. or evenings (519) 235-1336 (leave mes-
sage) or toll-free at 1-888-270-1602. Deadline: Fri. 4
m.
-mail Us
Web site: www.southhuron.com
TA e-mail addresses consist of the person's first initial
and last name followed by @southhuron.com.
For example, Jim Beckett's e-mail address is <jbeck-
ett@southhuron.com> Our general e-mail address is
ads@southhuron.com.
The Times -Advocate Team
Publisher/Editor Jim Beckett ext. 109
ADVERTISING
Deborah Schillemore ext. 112
REPORTERS
Scott Nixon ext. 105
Pat Bolen ext. 113
Nina Van Lieshout ext. 107
CUSTOMER SERVICE
Sue Rollings ext. 101
Kim Hern ext. 102
COMPOSITION DEPARTMENT
Manager Deb Lord ext. 103/114
Heather Bilcke ext. 103
Kelly Gackstetter ext. 103
ACCOUNTING STAFF
Anita McDonald ext. 104
Ruth Slaght ext. 106
Christina Scott ext. 108
MargPertschy ext. 111
Heather Clarke