HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Times Advocate, 2005-02-02, Page 66
Exeter Times -Advocate
Wednesday, January 26, 2005
Opinion Forum News
Seniors' perspective
Continued from page 5
journal can help you identify unhealthy eating patterns
and reveal where you need to make changes.
Nutrition Information:
Fats & Oils:
Food: Carbohydrates Calories
Barbeque Sauce 1 tablespoon 0 12
Salad Dressing 2 tablespoons 0 71
Bacon 2 strips 0 73
Oil teaspoon 0 45
Mayonnaise (light) 1 teaspoon 0 15
Cream 10% 3 tablespoons 0 55
Butter 1 teaspoon 0 35
Meat & Alternatives:
Nuts, dry roasted 1 tablespoon
Hummus commercial 6 tablespoons
Egg hard boiled (1)
Legumes Lentils, chickpeas _ cup
Peanut butter 2 tablespoons
Poultry, cooked 3 ounces
White fish cooked 3 ounces
Lest We Forget
Donald Elliott Hicks was born on February 17th 1915
at Centralia Ontario. He attended Centralia Public
School, and after graduating from grade 8, he continued
on with his education by attending Exeter High School
and graduating at the end of Grade 13.
After graduating from Exeter High School, he fur-
thered his education by attending O.A.C. Ontario
Agriculture College at Guelph. After College, he was
employed by Canada Packers Exeter Ontario.
In August 1940, he decided to enlist in the Royal
Canadian Air Force. He then completed his tests and his
selection procedure. He was admitted into Air Crew and
finished his basic training at Manning Depot in Toronto,
which was located at the Toronto Exhibition Grounds.
He was then given his service # J/22450.
Then he was posted and received further training at
Debert and then to Sky Harbor, north of Goderich. Later,
he traveled on to Summerside, where he graduated and
received his pilot's wings.
Following this, he took an instructor's course at
Trenton Air Station and was posted to instructional
duties at Hagersville, Ontario. After a year and a half as
an instructor, in February 1943, he was posted overseas
to England .
Flight Lieutenant Donald Elliott Hicks took further
training in operational flying missions Twelve missions
were then completed flying over enemy territory, includ-
ing attacks on Berlin.
On November 11th 1943, Mr. & Mrs. Andrew Hicks of
Centralia, received word from Ottawa that their son was
missing. He had been piloting a bomber on operations
over Germany on November 3rd 1943 and failed to
return. Donald had been in the Air Force for about 4
years up to that time.
Later on January 6th 1944, word was received that
Flight Lieutenant Donald Elliott Hicks, who was reported
missing after a mission over enemy territory two months
prior, was now officially reported to have lost his life at
that time. He was the Pilot of a Halifax
Bomber and was 28 years of age.
In a letter to his parents the Commanding
Officer of F/L Hicks Squadron, states - your
son was one of our best Captains, and a man
possessing a fine sense of duty and courage.
He will be sadly missed in the mess and on the
squadron.
Flight Lieutenant Donald Elliott Hicks # J/22450 from
Centralia Ontario was killed in action on November 3rd
1943. He was attached to #76 Squadron, flying a Halifax
Bomber # LK 948. His plane was shot down at
Monchen-Gladbach, Germany during a mission to
Dusseldorf, Germany Donald was buried at Monchen-
Gladbach, later exhumed and reburied in the War
Cemetery at Rheinberg Germany.
Flight Lieutenant Donald Elliott Hicks was the son of
Andrew and Ethel Maude Hicks of Centralia Ontario.
Besides his parents he was survived by one brother
Lorne of Centralia, and 3 sisters Mrs. JL McCaulay,
Montreal Quebec, Helen of Vancouver, British Columbia
and Mrs. Sidney Henry of Harriston, Ontario.
Next week: Gifford `ord Waldron Hicks.
• A man and his wife were dining at a nice restaurant
when they overheard the couple at the next table dis-
cussing their bill. "Well Mary," said the man, "Near as I
can figure, based on the price of the ham dinner you just
ate, we've got a hog back on the farm that's worth at
least $37,000."
0
15
1
20
7
0
0
90
139
78
115
200
152
95
The Municipality of South Huron has had a lot of dis-
cussion on what rates to charge and still has not got it
right. So far we have not had any discussion about how
much water we should get from Lake Huron or who
should get it.
Water rates legally have to reflect the cost of providing
the commodity. We currently have in place a costing
system to recover water costs and provide a reserve
fund for future capital expenditures. Council has real-
ized that the current pricing structure with a high per
meter fixed charge creates an advantage for high vol-
ume users. I feel it is now time to ask one important
question: How do we set rates to support the conserva-
tion of water. The answer is simple lower the fixed cost
to reflect the bill processing costs and set water rates
based on volume ideally a variable rate with large users
paying more. Lower water consumption is a valuable
goal as long term cost savings in equipment and extend-
ed ability of the system to meet demand will occur. The
present water rate with over half the bill a fixed per
meter charge provides little economic incentive to cut
consumption of water. The pricing structure for water
needs to be an incentive to conserve unless we want
Lake Huron to be the size of Morrison Dam. North
America is the largest per capita user of water in the
world. We need to develop some new water use habits.
The Municipality of South Huron is currently working
on a proposal to use Lake Huron water to meet our
needs. The amount of water available and its related
disposal will determine the size of all communities along
the pipeline. The current discussion is focused on the
cost. We cannot forget to ask and answer some of the
more important questions like: How large should com-
munities be in South Huron? Where should growth
occur? Should a major community be developed
between Grand Bend and the water treatment facility or
perhaps Crediton, or Exeter or maybe the industrial
park at Huron Park could be expanded? Should growth
be allowed at all? The land we are talking about is the
most productive farm land in Canada. Currently based
on a Chamber of Commerce survey people in South
Huron like the friendliness of the community. At what
point do we lose that?
South Huron has for several years experienced virtual-
ly no growth. The amount of water available from the
Lake Huron pipeline will determine the ultimate size of
the community. This decision needs to be a good one as
the future will be determined.
FRED SIMMONS , EXETER
Be careful how
quickly you reply
ear Editor:
The same-sex marriage issue followed Prime Minister
Martin on his journey around the world last week. After
he heard Stephen Harper had made some connection
between polygamy and same sex marriage, Martin
almost became indignant and over -reacted a bit, leading
the media to believe this issue was so dear to his heart
that he might call an election over it. But wait. Seems
now the media must have heard him wrong, because by
the time our Prime Minister reached Hong Kong he clar-
ified his earlier statement. No, he did not mean to call an
election over the issue of same-sex marriage, but he
would call an election if the likes of Harper were to get
their way. Should the traditional definition of "mar-
riage" remain as is, that would in effect deny
minority rights to all gays who have 'tied the knot'
so to speak. Since minority rights are protected by
the Canadian Charter of Rights, such denial would
essentially mock the Charter. What he really meant was
that an election would be called if the Charter is ever
mocked. And as he was quick to point out, a free vote in
the House of Commons on the [as yet hypothetical]
same-sex bill, can not in itself topple our minority
Liberal government.
It would do us well to reflect on these 'sound bites'
from our political leaders. Like, is the reference to
polygamy by Stephen Harper really outrageous? And
the Charters' inclusion of minority rights, would such
rights be denied if "marriage" is not redefined to include
two people of the same sex? Without thinking this
through, most people may easily say "yes" to both these
questions. And that is exactly my point. We should never
be hasty, or give knee-jerk responses to issues that are
deeply engrained in the fabric of human society. Rather,
we should think about the issue for a time, and carefully
reflect on what has brought us to this point in the history
of human society.
Why is it that all through time, in every country, and
in every society of this world, marriage is considered the
unique relationship between a man and a woman? And
why has the traditional definition of marriage come into
question in the late twentieth and early twenty first cen-
tury? The answer to the first question is obvious.
Marriage has always been considered the beginning of
new family units, and in the majority of cases, such
We need toget it right.
Water rates and Lake uron waterwi determine the
future of South Huron. Water and sewage disposal are
the two conditions that determine the size of a commu-
nity.
man/woman relationships produce children, which in
turn assures the continuance of human society. Until
recent times, marriage between a man and a woman,
has to a varying degree, given stability to the homes in
which children are raised.
Recent pressure to have marriage redefined also has
a root cause, and two words says it all: Gay rights.
Granting rights to gays followed a two-step process.
Until the early eighties the sexual union of two people of
the same sex was called sodomy, and was forbidden by
law. Step one was the striking down of this law by the
then Trudeau Liberal government. The second step fol-
lowed quickly, in the granting of rights to minorities
through the Canadian Charter of Rights, a document
instituted by the same Trudeau government.
So..., here we are today. Same sex unions, although
naturally repugnant to the majority of society, are now
permissible, and as a minority (liberally estimated as
less than 10% of society), safely protected by the Charter
of Rights. And now this same minority wants their union
together to be classified as a "marriage". Do you see
how one thing has led to the next? And I suspect this is
what Harper had in mind when he made a connection to
polygamy. Did you notice how quickly Liberal politicians
appeared on camera and to point out that polygamy was
"not part of their agenda"? No doubt not a part of the
agenda today, but it may well be on someone's agenda
in the near future! If we allow marriage to be redefined
to include the union of two people of the same sex, then
what's to stop a small group of like-minded men to later
request that we allow marriage to include the union of a
man and multiple women? Ridiculous you say? Be care-
ful in how quickly you reply. Be mindful of how easily
one thing leads to another, once we brush morality
aside.
JERRY DE BOER, EXETER.
Proud of our young people
Dear Sir,
On Friday evening January 28th 2005, the Exeter
Branch 167 of the Royal Canadian Legion played host to
a Tsunami Relief Benefit Show put on by the young peo-
ple of the area to raise funds for the victims of the Asian
Tsunami. The evening was attended by over 250 people
who had a great time dancing or just plain listening to
eight of their favourite bands.
Now we have to admit that Heavy Metal music was
not necessarily of the kind we poor old Legionnaires
understand or that our delicate ears can tolerate for too
long but being in the presence of such a dynamic group
was an experience we would not have missed. We were
bemused at the style of dancing of course and were
thankful that we were not invited into the "Pit" for sure-
ly had we done so, we would have spent the balance of
the evening recuperating on a hospital bed somewhere.
Being of the foxtrot and waltz generation, we wisely
resisted the temptation. It mattered not of course
because it wasn't our evening. It belonged to those play-
ing the music, those listening to it and those dancing to
it, which everyone did with enough energy to power a
dozen diesel locomotives.
The evening was a huge success thanks to the hard
work the young people put into their show. Those par-
ents who were on hand to help out did a great job. We
were impressed with our young guests. Their music
might have been unintelligible to our ears but a more
polite, courteous and pleasant group of people you could
not have wished to meet. Through their initiative the
Red Cross Tsunami relief fund is the beneficiary of a
good sized donation.
Well done bands, Kill the Lights, Bleeding Green, A
Dying Melody, Paris Burning, Shadows of May, Going
Down Screaming, Hope is last to Die and The Summer I
Lost Everything.
We are proud of our young people and look forward
to being involved with them again in the future.
RON HELM PRESIDENT BRANCH 167
THE ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION
We couldn't have done it
without you!
Dear Editor:
I am writing to say thanks to the Exeter Legion for
donating use of the hall for our Tsunami Relief Benefit
concert this past Friday night.
We had eight bands playing to a crowd of 200+ pre-
teens, teens and even a few parents. Everyone had a
great time and we raised more than $1500 for the Red
Cross.
Thanks to all the bands who donated their time and
talent: Kill the Lights; Bleeding Green; A Dying Melody;
Short Change; Shadows of May; Going Down Screaming;
Hope Is Last To Die; and The Summer I Lost Everything.
Special thanks goes to the Exeter Music Studio and the
Exeter Legion for all their support - we couldn't have
done it without you!
NATE DOUGHERTY AND THE MEMBERS OF BLEEDING GREEN.