Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZurich Herald, 1941-09-04, Page 6CANMA P ACKERS LIMITE
REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
The fourteenth fiscal year of Canada •Packers Limited closed March
NWith, 1941.
et Profit, after Bond Interest, Depreciation and Taxes, was $1,555,028,47
Equivalent (on 200,000 Shared of Common Stock) to
$7.77 per Share. $1,667,809.78
Previous year $8.34 per Share.
DIVIDENDS
The Company was organized in August, 1927. a�
Until April, 1935, no Dividends were paid on the Common Shares.
At that time Dividends were begun at the rate per $3.00 per Share
year (payable quarterly) of
In July, 1939, and July, 1940, an extra Dividend was
paid of $.1
00 per Share
This brought Dividends for each of those two years to $4.00 per Share
The Directors have decided the Working Capital position is now such
that $4.00 per Share may be adopted as the regular Dividend. To give
effect to this decision an extra Dividend was paid April ist, 1941, of 50c.
per Share, and until further change, regular quarterly Dividends will be
at the rate of $1.00 per Share, preceding year Increase
Sales for the year were $110,291,839.97
'Weight of product sold, lbs1x 91, 28 ,352
Net PToolt 1.4% of Sales)
to
and to 14c per 100 lbs.
that is approximately —.1/7 cent per lb.
* * * *
$88913,5251,116 19.5%
was therefore equivalent
1.9% of Sales
18e per 100 lbs.
1/5 cent per lb.
* *
The following analysis of the Profit & Loss Account expresses the
operations of the year h comparison with those of the previous year:—
Year ended. Year ended
March, 1941 % March, 1940 %
Sales $110,291,839,97 100.0% $88,205,639.75 100.0%
•
Cost of products,
chiefly Live Stock 88,959,695.51 80.7
Cost of materials
and packages 3,279,579.72 3.0
Salaries and Wages, 8,879,264.37 8.1
Including Bonus
Expenses, - Selling,
Advertising, Re-
pairs, and general
operating costs _.
Bond 'interest
Taxes
Total cost of product,
plus Expenses
Wartime Inventory
Reserve
Depreciation on Fix-
ed Assets
4,612,385.85
69,825.00
1,575,637.94
107,376,391.39
380,000.00
907,656.60
108,664,047.99
,Profit from Opera-
tions
Income from Invest-
' ments
Write-off of Invest-
ments
Net Profit $ 1,5� 55,028.47 1.4% $ 1,667,809,78 1,9%
1,627,79118
4,037.00
76,800.51
4,1
1.4
97.4
.S
.8
98.5
1.6
69,767,159.36
2,461,790.30
7,738,780.98
3,808,775.20
95,564.79
1,194,515.13
'79.1
2.8
8.8
4.3
.1
1.3
85,066,585.76 96.4
579,000.00 .7
898,081.71
86,543,667.47
1.0
As late as July 1940, the Ministry advised they wished, --and would con-
tinue to wish, --from Canada, not more than 50,0 mats.
Canadaweekly
reserves
This advice was very disturbing. Not only had
in the freezers, but all forecasts agreed that in the approaching crop yeted
ar
(beginning September 1940) the increase in the number
true, Cf anmarIcanted
would be not less than 25%, If those forecast pa
need an export outlet for '70,000 cysts, of 13acon weekly.
(It was under these conditions the second Bacon Contract,—referred
to in the next section,—was negotiated,) 1940, the Cana-
Tlie situation was finally cleared. In early August, ,ts to a level
dian Bacon Board received permission to step up s ipinea
which would clear Canadian storage stocks by the end to e September.aThe,
e
fear was thus removed that heavy reserves would have
the conning crop year. SECOND YEAR
1st, 1940 to Aug. 31st, 1941
98.1
1,661,972.28 1.9
5,837.50
Sept.
An increase in marketinga,was expected of approximately 25%,
ally, the increase proved to' be 31'%,
Total marketings (second year) were 6,100,499 hogs
Total marketings (first year) 4,640,762
Increase 1,459,737
After providing for normal; domestic consumption, this made
able for export approximately 70,.000 cats. weekly.
THIRD YEAR '
Sept. 1st, 1941 to Aug. 31st, 1942
Actu-
avail
(b) That the price should be in no way influenced by the urgency o..
British need for ,Bacon, Tia war is Cenada'e war as well 114
Britain's, and to suPpy the sorely needed Bacon is one of Canada's
first duties,
In the discussions, Canadian negotiators will also have in mind eon.
siderations which go beyond the 'immediate centtact,
When the war as over, Canada will be producing Hogs
anada eeale lSuc r
a1
exceeding l previous experience, Prior to the •wnada'. weekly.
quota (under' the Ottawa Agreements) was48,000But her heaviest shipments in any one year hadbeen
,00
3 0 cwt'. weekly.
50,000 cwts. weekly.
74,000 eats. weekly.
(1937)
In the two war years, shipments haveen:—
September 1st, 1939 to August 31st, 1940
September 1st, 1940 to August 31st, 1941
(August estimated)
And in the coming (third) year Canada expeets to
deliver115,000 eats. weekly,
At the end of the war, Canada will have alsurplus production
of at
Bx ta'-. will be
`leant ....100,000 cats, weekly, and for that sup us sea
I the only outlet. Canada will then need a quota in the British market such
as (in peace time) has never before been thought of. In the main, quotas
ult of discussions involving economic give and take;—
Owing to conditions .to. be mentioned later, no increase in production
is expected in Ontario and Quebec. In these. Provinces some well-informed
persons look for a slight decrease.
In the West there will undoubtedly •be another substantial increase,
except insofar as it may be•,lirnited in certain areas by an unfavourable
crop.
An average estimate of, the total Canadian increase for the coming
crop year (over the second year).. would perhaps be 15%, 915 000 Hogs.
equivalent to, approximately ti • - ••-
If this estimate proves accurate, marketings during the crop year
September 1941 to August 1942,wil1 be,.approximately .... 7,000,000 Hogs
(2) BRITISH REQUIREMENTS StaiC :TTHE
BEGINNING OF THE WAIT
'r_.
* w • * • .
are fixed as a res.
but also an important element in such discussions is 'good will ,
At that time good will on the part of the British Government will
have a high importance for Canada.
There is another type of good will still more important. That is the
good will of the British consumer. In the past, Canadian Bacon has held
`second' place in the favour•of the British housewife. Danish Bacon came
first.
In this respect, the present is Canada's opportunity. `Canadians' is,
now the only imported Bacon the British housewife can buy. More than
ever before, it is important that now, during the war, Canadian Bacon
should become established on the highest level of quality, flavour, and
sizeability.
Toward this objective a good deal has already been accomplished. In
spite of difficulties in transportation (due to the slow speed of convoyed
ships), Canadian Bacon to -day stands higher than ever before in British
estimation. The improvements have been brought about by co-operation
between Producers and Packers under very expert guidance by Officers
of the Federal Department of Agriculture. Though little has been heard
of it, this is one of the most important and far-sighted achievements of
the war period.
To some extent this subject has been dealt with in Section (1), So
that a brief recapitulation 'tali;' be suffielent1940,the British Ministry of
(a) From September;1.939,.to February
Food accepted all the:Bacon• Canada wished to ship.
(b) From February 1'40 t'b early August 1940, the Ministry rigidly
limited Canadian shipments to' 50,000 eats. weekly. During this
period it' was frequeictily stated no larger shipments would be
required.' T'•
In• November 1940,'" the 'Mm1s$xy agreed to take 70,000 cwts.
weekly. The Ministry_ ,stipulated the sum paid for the 70,000
cwts. should not exceed that formerly paid for the 50,000 cats.,
but in the end. the sum paid was somewhat higher.
By May 1941,, the situation had been transformed. Although
Bacon was rationed 'to 4 ounces. per person per week (one-half
pre-war consumption) Britain was receiving from all sources less
than sufficient to fill the ration. From that date forward, Can-
ada was urged to produce and 'to ship all the Bacon possible.
This bald summary of the facts may appear to imply a criticism of the
Ministry of Food. This is not intended. _In wartime, conditions change
with great rapidity, and policy must be adjusted to the changes.
Perhaps there was some delay in recognizing the inevitable implications
when Denmark and Holland were overrun. .If so it is easy to understand.
It must be remembered, Bacon -teas ',only one Of scores of food products,
for 'the supply. of wwhich the. Mi Sti7 , hsd to lay its plans.
(3) CONTRACTS BETWEEN THU`:MINISTRY OF'FOOD
AND T,HE CANADIAN pVllaINMENT
•Soon after the declaration of, azar, the British Ministry. of Food asked.
the Canadian Government to quite a price on 40,000 cwts. weekly. After
exchange of canes extending t ught several. weeks, the first contract
was' cannpieted:' is terms were as wallows.----
•
FIP.ST CONTRACT
The increased volume was due to war conditions. Export volume
showed the greatest increase. This was due to demand from Britain. In
the domestic field, the increase was less but still substantial. The follow
Ing table sets up the comparison with the previous year: --
COMPARISON OF VOLUME txg
'Exports 1941
To Britain. 138,682,956 lbs.
To other countries 27,954,290
(Domestic Volume
In Canada 892,762,340
In U.S. 31,863,766
1,091,263,352
1940 Increase
76,693,288 lbs. 81%
18,623,124 50%
789,638,081
28,296,623
913,251,116
13%
12%
19.5%
The increase of 188% in Canadian volume is probably a fairly accurate
;measure of the increase in domestic food consumption. It is due to the
'increase of purchasing power, resulting from expanding industrial activity.
The increased volume to Britain was due almost entirely to heavier
shipments of Wiltshire Bacon, And since this Report will deal largely with
!the subject of Bacon exports, it is well to set ap a framework for the
idiscussion. The factors involved are: --
(1) Number of Hogs marketed in Canada.
• (2) British requirements since the beginning of the war.
(3) Contracts between the British Ministry of Food and the Canadian
Government.
(1) NUMBER OF HOGS
It happened that just at the time war was declared, Canada's Hog
population stood at (to then) a record level. (Space does not permit a
review of the causes of this, but the subject was dealt with fully in the two
.previous Annual Reports of this Company.)
As the war began September 1st, it will assist in measuring its effect
on Hog production if marketings are quoted in years September 1st to
Anrgust 31st. (In any case this is the natural crop year, as the heavy Fall
marketings begin in September.)
Following is a table of Hog marketings for crop years 1929/30 to
1940/41, inclusive:—
Crop
nclusive:Crop Year—
Sept. 1 to Aug. 31 Hog 1IIarketings
•
1929 1930 2,493,339
1930 — 1931 2,334,320
1931 — 1932 3,251,916
1932 — 1933 3,097,048
1933 — 1934 3,073,251
1934 — 1935 2,975,316
1935 1936 3,195,056
1936 — 1937 4,141,158
1937 -- 1938 3,429,857
1938 — 1939 3,264,856
1939 1940 4,640,762 42.1%*
1940 — 1941x 6,100,499 31.3%*
* Increase over previous year.
x August 1941 estimated.
FIRST YEAR
Sept. 1st, 1939 to Aug. 31st, 1940
(c)
(d)
The amount of ause ofvtheainterest in tin this he tsubjeto cteon the part both
acon contracts
seemed necessary,
of Producers and pubic.
In the carrying throughthis contracts, these incomplete gfreview would bthe
e without so some
hadar vital part toe
pay. And
reference to the manner in which the job has been done. It is especially
called for by the fact that not infrequent criticisms of the Packing Industry
have been heard.
The reasons for such criticisms are easily understood. The Prodslcer
is constantly told that the price of Hogs hinges chiefly upon the outlet for
the country's surplus. that,during the past year, the price of
This is equivalent to sayingg
Hogs has depended chiefly upon the British contract price. That price
has been constant. And yet the price of Hogs has not been constant. At
times it was higher than the contract parity. At other
times
may not fully
When the price is above the export parity, producers
understand the reason, but they naturally do not whose Hogs a Oain. the
otherr
hand, when the price is below parity, producers
marketed feel they have a grievance.
In both cases the explanation lies in the fact that other factors also
have an influence on Hog prices,—at times a quite important influence,
During the past year such factors have been:—
(a) The dramatic advance in American Hog prices. (Between April
and July, 1941, top prices at Chicago advanced fronn...8c low
to..__12c high.)
Fluctuating conditions of supply and demand in the domestic field.
Within the past fifteen months there was one period in which
Canadian housewives were urged to consume all the pork pro-
ducts possible. Supply exceeded demand. During that period
Pork products sold as much as ....2c per lb. below the export par-
ity. At a later period exactly the opposite happened. In order
to make larger quantities available for Britain the Bacon Board
restricted the amount of Pork product whch could be offered
for sale in Canada, first by ..__25% and later by a further
__..25%. By reason of these curtailments, domestic supply
was
much below demand,.. and the price advanced above the export
• parity to a maximum of ....2c per lb.
.As to the manner in which the Packing Industry has discharged its
obligations, certain facts are essential, and they are clear enough:—
(1) The Packing Industry performs a vital service in processing the
• Live Stock and distributing the resultant meat products.
(2) Its obligation is primarily to the Producer. That obligation is: -
to produce good meats by the most efficient processes, and
to perform this service at a reasonable margin of profit.
It can fairly be claimed the Industry has measured up to these
obligations. In the year under review an unprecedented volume
of Live Stock was handled. The product was admittedly good,
particularly the vital export product. The reputation of Can-
adian Bacon in Great Britain today stands higher than ever
before.
The margin of Profit for the whole Industry is not known, but in
the case of this Company the margin was ..__ 1/7 of a cent per 1'b.
For the total Industry, it would perhaps note1/10 of higher cent per lb:
than
(3) Most of the anomalies which puzzle the Producer are caused by
the highly competitive character of the Industry. Nevertheless,
it is this highly. competitive feature which is the Producer's chief
safeguard.
(b))
(c) equivalent, to
Terni—November 11th,,;4939, to Octgber 31st, 1940.
Quanity iced t take as, muchmo em :50,090 cwts. easlcould be used. . The my prom -
Price— 91/1 per cwt. (112 lbs.)
$18.02 per 100 lbs.
f.a.s., (free, alongside)
Atlantic Seaboard.
When the contract was ivade, it was estimated that, for its total
period, the price would work back to approximately ....9c per ib. live weight,
Toronto (for Bacon Hogs),
Actually the averageprice throughout the contract period was almost
one-quarter cent per lb. less. I't`was ..8 7.7c. This was due to the influence
of conditions in the domestic field. From April to August, 1940, the
apparent surplus was . such that product had to be `forced' upon the
domestic market. During this period domestic prices v. ere on a level much
below the export parity.
The contract price was,' a fair one. Xi to Beef t As in past years, the outlet
For the five years preceding the far, average prices of Bacon Hogs, prices. Canada's was h Uni•
ted to States. And if numbers alone were
Toronto, bad been as follows tl k seemed less important than in the imine
The increase in marketings during the first war year (42,1%) derived
from breedings datingSeptember 1938 forward. It was due to causes
leritirely unconnected with the war.
f . However; it was fortunate the Hogs were available. For there 'was
need of them all.
In the early months of the war this need seemed by no means certain.
Until April/May 1940 when Denmark and Holland were overrun, Britaiiin
continued to receive large quantities of Bacon from the Continent.
addition, because of the heavy Canadian marketings, very large quantities
41 Bacon were going forward from Canada. Total arrivals in Britain
exceeded current consumption. The surplus was placed in freezers through-
aut Britain, to be held as a food reserve.
By February, 1940, all available freezer space was filled. The Min-
. lady was actually embarrassed by the quantity of Bacon it had on hand.
. instructions were cabled to cut down Canadian shipments to 50,000 cats,
'weekly. The surplus over 50,000 cats. had to be placed in freezers in
anada. The quantity stored asa result reached its peak (31,000,000 lbs.)
MaytSt 1940. For several months there was serious doubt as to whethernot hese Canadian reserves conid
be cleared before the beginning of ter
tt e`w crop seasonrnSSeptember 1940.
'h
When Denmark and Holland were overrun (April/May 1940) it was
ected that increased quantities would soot be needed from Canada.
'Nit reserves in. Britain were so large that this demand was long delayed,
(b)
e;.
s,
4,
*
*
Although this review is already long, a section must be added in
respect of the Cattle Industry. Within the Live Stock field, Cattle are
second in importance only to Hogs.
dace the war has not seemed directly to affect Cattle
has been shipped to Britain.
for surplusdate
considered, even thatoutlet
pre-war year.
Shipments to United States for the last four crop years have been
as follows:— Crop Year Cattle Shipments
Sept. 1 to Aug. 31 to United States
81,245
292,0.78
134,071
158,000
1935 " 8.94e per lb.
1936 T 8.43
1937 8.92
9.45
1938
1939 to Sept. 1st "_,
Average 6.89c 1937 — 1938
It may appear that a price of 8:77 in a•a•rar year, was Iow in coin- 1938 -- 1939
parison with —8.89 for the five pee -war years. But two countervailing 1939 _. 1940
factors must be kept in mind -< 1940 u 19esti
(a) But for the war, „• ivy delitieries, Canadian prices °Agust estimated
would undoubtedly hat 'be:;,ii loner;- perhaps much lower.
Throughout the whole te'r,Xn of this contract, Hog prices in AIthough. nambers have been reduced, these exports to L nited•Statas
United States were much belba. those prevailing in Canada. , have been vitally important. It was because the Beef was needed in
As against a Toronto 'price ter the year of :_.. $8.77 per 100 lbs., Canada that fewer Cattle were exported. Nevertheless, the outlet in.
top Chicago Hogs in the aa.ne pealed sold for 5.94per 100 lbs. the United States for the surplus has been the factorwhich chiefly cteteriu-
(average)• lied prices. The United States -Canadian Trade Agreement of 1935, and
had a
the subsequent modified Agreement of 1938, have had a value to Caci-
SEGONOCUNTRA.CT adian Cattle Producers corresponding (in respect of the Hog industry) to
the Ottawa Agreements and the later war demand for Bacon.
Throughout the two war years, Cattle prices have steadily advanced -
Cattle breeding and Cattle feeding have both been much more pxof;table
than at any time since 1930.
The following table indicates the advance in prices:—
(b)
Term— November lst,'1940, to October 31st, 1941,
Price—
equivalent to 80/per cwt.
``$15.82 per 100 lbs.
f.a.s. Atlantic Seaboard,
Quantity -70,000 ewts weekly.
The conditions under whiclii .this: contract was negotiated have already,
been explained, *.
An '`apparent' surplus of bugs existed, and the price was fixed accord-
ingly. The reduction in price proved ;discouraging to Canadian Pig Pro-
ducers, especially in Quebec and Ontario, In these 1: rovinces many sows
were marketed which otherwise .would have been- bred.
To 'some extent the situation was relieved by bonuses paid by the
Provincial Governments of these two Provinces. But at the 'end of six
months the contract had to be revised,:
The immediate cause of the revision was an advance in the price
of American Hogs. In April the American market reached a level at
which Canadian Hogs began to move South. This movement had to be
stopped, and on May 2nd 1941 the contract was amended.
ThMinistry of Food raised its price from 80/—per cwt.
to 85/—per cwt.
The Canadian Government undertook to pay whatever additional sum
was necessary to prevent the Hogs moving to United States. To implement
this clause, the following payments (by the Canadian Government) have
been. necessary:- 7bc per 100 lbs.
On June 2nd, 1941 .
On June 24th, 1941, a further 76c per 100 lbs. 1
On july 23rd, 1941, a further, $1.00 per 100 lbs.
At the present time, on every Hog exported from Canada,, the Domin-
ion Government is contributing ....21c per lb. (Wiltshire weight). This
contribution amounts to approximately --1$150,000.00; pea week, ' 1
THIRD CONTRACT
Negotiations for the third contract are now in progress. The terms
are as yet unknown, and only general comment in regard to it would be in
place, This much may properly be said i
('a) That the price should be fair t4 Canadian producers, --indeed,
such as to insure maximum pod:, 'tion, .
(1)
(2)
Crop Year
Sept. 1 to Aug. ,31
Average price for
year, Good to Choice Steers
1,050 lbs, down, Toronto
1934 1935 $5.27 pea 100 lbs.
1935 — 1936 5.21
1936 — 1937 6.32
1037 — 1938 6.10
1938 — 1939 '7.556.28
1939 ---1940 8.4.5
1940 --1941*
'August estimated.
This rather dramatic advance was duo to two major; causes:—
Demand for Beef was greater than nominal. For this there were two
reasons.
(a) Exports of Bacon were heavy, and a domestic `vacuum', was
created for Beef.
(b) The very large number of men in military' camps set up a new and
important 'demand' factor.
In the face of this extra demand, supplies were barely normal, as will
be seen front the following table of Inspected 1' illingsi
Crop Year
Sept. 1 to Aug. 81
1937 - 1938
1938 1939
1939 -- 1940
1940 — '.1941*
Killings in
Inspected Houses
912,355
870,096
884,053
915,000
'"August estimated,
Canada produces, and must continue to produce, a surplus both of
Hogs and of Cattle. And the prosperity of her Agriculture depends
upon securing a satisfactory export outlet for those surpluses.
(Continued on following page)