Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZurich Citizens News, 1978-05-25, Page 4Page 4 Citizens News, May 25, 1978 1 Port W06A'I ttOuT 1* . STATE ar THE WMR1" Anel Men— I'm lboUNFIED 10 WoMW "Here goes — I'm turning on the news!" naasuussnonsnsnusnunussunsnnnsmosswnnusnscsuusuauunssnssnnusunununusnsssnsnnuunnsnusssususnnsnssnnsnnsnsnunnnnsnsnnuunenuIII I = Vie point Z.C.N. uusuusssnnnnnunuununsnnnnnasantnunnusuwnnnnnunununuunnuuunnnsunnnnn;unnnnnnsssnnnnnnnunl iIIIIJ nnlnsulnunsnInnnnInnt On the defensive There's a saying "when the going gets tough, the tough get going" and it appears Ontario Hydro is taking the offensive with regards to future nuclear power development. Recently, there has been considerable talk about possible safety problems that can and will arise in the disposal of nuclear waste. Presently, there is no known way of diminishing the toxicity of nuclear wastes; only much time reduces the nuclear wastes radiation. There are two methods at present which are used to control nuclear garbage: encasing it in a mixture of lead and concrete and bathing the material in large tanks of water. These are not solutions. They are merely delay- ing the inevitable of what is going to happen to this material a few years down the road from now when there will be more waste to contain and a popula- tion that will be getting closer and closer to the nuclear generating plants of this province. According to a Hydro press release "Working in an Ontario Hydro nuclear -electric station is one of the safest occupations in the country. Since the late 1950s there has not been a single fatality in the workforce nor any lost time attributable to radia- tion in close to 40 million manhours. The safety per- formance is similar to that achieved by office and staff workers in Hydro's head office building in Toronto." This is all fine and dandy but it doesn't come to grips with the hazards involved in handling nuclear material outside of a closed environment. As an aside, the safety records of the two areas might be comparable but no one would deny the fact that working in a nuclear setting is potentially more harmful than working in a non-nuclear develop- ment. The expansion of nuclear development is a chancey thing: let's hope Ontario Hydro is telling the truth when it says contrary to rumour, that a nuclear power plant is not scheduled for this part of the country. Paying the price As anyone travelling by car in the United States will be aware, gasoline prices are considerably lower south of the border. In fact during a recent trip to Pennsylvania we were able to buy brand name regular gas for as lit- tle as 54 cents per gallon and never paid more than 58 cents. Taking into account the smaller U.S. gallon this works out to approximately 65 to 69 cents for an Imperial gallon. A similar trip through Ontario would reveal gas prices ranging from 85 cents to well over 90 cents per gallon. Another interesting point p nt is that while, at least along the route we travelled, gasoline prices south of the border haven't increased during the past year, prices here have gone up at least twice with further hikes planned. It's time that, when the oil czars come to Ot- tawa with outstretched hands hinting they'll stop looking for the stuff unless it's made worth their while, someone starts asking some questions, such as how they manage to get by with tidy profit on' much lower prices in the U.S. but can't do the same here. Can it cost so much more to produce and deliver a gallon of gas here than it does a few hun- dred miles to the south, particularly when the oil . companies are the same and some of the U.S. gas starts out as Canadian oil anyway? What are we getting for the 30 per cent higher prices? Some of it might be due to higher taxes but it's doubtful that accounts for the entire difference since gas is taxed in the U.S. too. The answers might make in- teresting reading. While we're on the topic, we've often wondered how the oil companies set the prices to their retailers. For instance why is gas less expensive in Brussels and Listowel than in Wingham but more expensive in Arthur? Why did prices in Wingham drop two cents at about the same time they jumped 10 cents in Kitchener? And how was it possible to sell gas for 15 cents a gallon less in Kitchener than here before that? It's hard to believe the retailers are responsible, since most operate on a mark-up of only a few cents per gallon, but it's curious how all the prices in an area seem to change together. Wingham Advance Times iiuuaumm�uumsaieIss&snuanuuuoup Miscellaneous Rii ulnbliings By TOM CREECH Conservation saves Man's very existence on this planet earth im- plies that he is, has and will continue to be a con- sumer. Today's society necessitates certain non- renewable resources must be consumed if our re- quirements for food, shelter and transportation are to be met. Until recently (within the past ten years) the consumption of non-renewable resources has been pushed by the firms that would benefit from such consumption. Remember those advertisements from Ontario Hydro stressing the benefits of an all electrical home and other similar advertisements from energy suppliers. It was ten years ago and "muscle cars" were all the rage, a big engine stuffed into a big body which delivered very few miles to the gallon and precious little interior room. Some people would say "those were the days" and you'd have to agree if you love blatant excess. Within the past few years we've seen a switch in attitudes. People are more concerned about con- serving because as in many things, people start to think twice when it starts to hit them in the pocket- book. People might complain about the Arabs and Peter Lougheed getting rich but they at least got us thinking in a more constructive sense. While the Canadian public seems generally receptive to the idea behind energy conservation (witness the rapid rise in the sale of small cars), it is still by and large, not quite in tune with the latest developments in this area. To fill this information gap, the office of energy conservation under the auspices of the federal ministry of energy, mines and resources was es- tablished. Under this program 152 community conserva- tion centres have been set up in New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia. An energy conservation centre serving the residents of Huron is located in Lucknow and is ready to answer any questions the public has about energy conservation. Bev Brown, public relations co-ordinator for the group says they have received a favourable response from the public in the area but that they would like to see more people from this part of the country. The group has several slide presentations for showing to local organizations and the staff is always available for speaking engagements. In addition to a very extensive resource library on energy conservation practices, they have several booklets put out by energy, mines and resources Canada available for the taking. The booklets cover everything from re - insulating your home to how to save money by throwing out less. Another goal of the centre is to serve as place for the exchange of ideas of how energy can be con- served. Both Ms. Brown and Donna Hazelton, the new publicity co-ordinator, are enthusiastic of what energy conservation can achieve. At the centre's office in Lucknow, a solar panel was installed in the front window of the building. On a February day, -the heat coming from the panel was over 100 degrees fahrenheit, they said. While solar energy as method of heating buildings on a continuous basis might not be prac- tical in Canada, much energy could be saved if — Please turn to Page 7 Published Each Wednesday By J.W. Eedy Publications Ltd. Member: Canadian Weekly Newspapers Association Ontario Weekly Newspapers Association eiNA News Editor - Tom Creech Second Glass Mail Registration Number '1385 Subscription Rates: $7.00 per year in advance in Canada $18.00 per year outside Canada Single copies 204