Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZurich Citizens News, 1978-04-13, Page 9OHIP increases To whom it may concern: The unveiling of the Ontario Government's 1978 budget was not an event conducive to loud hosannas. For most Ontarians, the most unpalatable feature of the budget is a further .painful 37 percent increase in OHIP premiums. Despite► the additional revenue of $275 million this latest increase will generate, the budget statement con- cedes that "the financing of health costs continues to be unbalanced." With the hike in premiums single persons will now pay $22 per month and families $44. For a family, this means a levy of $528 annually. The budget statement says that deterrent fees were considered as an alternative to a general premium in- crease, but ruled out because "such a policy would deny access to our high quality health care system for those least able to pay." The budget statement ignores completely the root cause of the problem -- ex- cessive and indiscriminate use of health services. Deterrent fees have been imposed by health authorities in other parts of North America to curb these abuses of the system. British Columbia has introduced deterrents. There are in- dications that Manitoba (where medical and hospital services are paid out of general taxation) is moving closer to some form of deterrent fees. This type of restraint works no hardship on those who do not abuse the service. This heavier cost burden placed upon too many citizens of the province has become untenable and prohibitive. Ontario now has the highest medical -hospital premiums in Canada. Universal health insurance was instituted by the federal government in co-operation with the provinces to rid Canadians of the fear of crushing hospital and medical bills and make available to all the same standards of health care. Unfortunately, the in- troduction of the plan was also an invitation to abuse it. Many Canadians who once simply swallowed an aspirin to relieve a headache now reach for the telephone to dial for an appointment .with the doctor. Access to hospital beds has become all too easy for the multiplying number of neurotics and hyprochondriacs in our midst. And probably the most flagrant abuse of our health system is in the emergency wards of the hospitals. None can legally be refused care when they enter the out-patient department whether it be for a hangnail or a hangover. A doctor must be called and the patient suitably cared for or legal action could be taken against the hospital. This is what our government has laid down in the Public Hospital Act and because of this the rest of us must pay for the growing number of malingers who flock to the Emergency wards on any whim. . The consequence of these abuses is a return to the very situation the federal scheme of universal health care was designed to end: a mounting burden of seemingly endless increases in OHIP premiums. • For those guilty of over utilization and for those whose premiums must be paid or subsidized by the province, the load on the rest of us becomes onerous and inequitable. Federal transport minister Otto Lang brought in the principle of "user pay" to finance airport operations. The same principle is now being applied to ships and shipping companies using the Canadian Seaway. Why not adopt a principle of "abuser pay" in the field of health services? The Davis'government refusal to impose deterrents is ob- viously a political decision. Instead, it bludgeons too many of the populace with a hemeasemeastosamminamtemo health care bill inflated by those who beat a path to doctor' offices, out-patient departments, and those who have a strange craving for all -expense -paid vacations in hospital beds. Deterrents are the only effective method of discouraging excessive utilization. Those who abuse the service should pay highest for the privilege. Rising health care costs is probably the most serious problem facing North Americans. Whatever the proper remedy, the answer does not lie in simply legislating automatic in- creases in OHIP premiums. We've had simply too much of that, Mr. Davis. All Ontarians should convey we get letters that message, loud and clear, to Queen's Park. Jocelyn J. Hogg, RR 2, Zurich, Ontario. Housing Dear Editor: The Awareness League for Physically Handicapped Adults (ALPHA) is con- ducting a survey of private accommodation in Huron County suitable for use by the handicapped. We will appreciate your cooperation in making this known to your readers and would ask any person who has such facilities available to write ALPHA, P.O. Box 1388, CLINTON, Ontario, NOM 1L0. Thanks for your assistance on behalf of ALPHA. Elaine Townshend President Huron Dead Stock Removal Clinton Attention Farmers For dependable, efficient service on all farm stock, call Collect 482-9811 24 hrs. a day, 7 days a week. Call us first, you won't have to call anyone else. April 13, 1978 Page 9 REDI-MIX CONCRETE All Types of Concrete Work McCann Const. Ltd. DASHWOOD Phone 237-3381 (free estimates) DRY FERTILIZER THE 28% NITROGEN (WITH OR WITHOUT HERBICIDES) ANHY'OUSA •NIA IS C PABLE CF DOING UP TO 5 A ' `ES PER DAY 4,14111' Your Best Seed Corn Buy For 78 Our Nursing Equipment keeps our machines in the field or we can fill your bulk hoppers on the farm We are well staffed and have a complete line of Spreading and Anhydrous Equipment, Mitchell 348-8433 Hensall 262-2527 Granton 22572360