HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Goderich Signal-Star, 1987-08-26, Page 24GODER1CH SIGNAL -STAR, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26,
Entertainment *Feature
® Religion *Family *More
moommor
SECTION
Putting their lives back together
Offenders try to get back into a society they feel failed them
BY YVETTE ZANDBERGEN
The Young Offenders Act has
become a controversial subject
• in today's society and is spark-
ing opinions from those in the
court system, law enforcement and the -
young offenders themselves.
The Young Offenders Act has drastical-
ly changed the dispensation of justice and
the rehabilitation of the young criminal.
Some believe the act is a fair piece of
legislation while others disagree and
want changes made.
Bill, a 17 -year old young offender, said
society dealt him a 'raw deal. He commit-
ted several crimes, the first at age 11, in-
cluding criminal negligence five times,
failure to remain at the scene and failure
to report an accident, possession of over
$1,000 worth of stolen goods, driving
without a licence, and robbery, to get at-
tention from his mother who was an
alcoholic.
MANY PROBLEMS BEGIN AT HOME
Many young offenders problems begin
with a family breakdown, said Probation
Officer Tom Ewer from the Ministry of
Community and Social Services,.
Teenagers vent their emotions in the
community or school and are unable to
bring them under control.
Bill ( not his real name) has served one
year in Bluewater Centre, a maximum
security facility for young offenders, and
must serve another 20 months. His
parents were divorced when he was
young and he lived with his father until
he was 11 and was well provided for.
Then, he moved in with his mother.
"This is when the trouble started," he
said. "She didn't care what I did. She
wash an alcoholic and that made it harder.
I couldn't talk to her." There were also
many -arguments that took place.
Ewer said he sees a lot of non -caring
attitudes from the young offenders he
comes in contact with. '
''In some cases they feel responsible
for their parents separation and they are
emotionally confused," he said.
Bill started to hang around with his
older brother who was into crime. He
committed his crimes for attention and
his mother was little support.
"I never did it for money, I never need-
ed' money," he said.
Bill regrets most of his crimes and said
he would never do them again.
When he first came to Bluewater Cen-
tre, he became depressed and tried to
commit suicide. Now he is just waiting
for the day he gets out. He said
Bluewater Centre also helped him to con-
trol his temper and he has the chance to
attend school.
"If I was on the street, I would not be
going to school," he said. "It helps you
deal with life in general."
.Carl DeGrandis, superintendent of
Bluewater Centre, said programs at the
centre lead to some kind of introspection
among the residents. .
Along with social and educational train-
ing, medical situations are also dealt
with from a psychological or psychiatric
angle, with help groups such as anger
control or drug and alcohol abuse offered
to residents.
Although it is too early to'have an ac-
curate estimation on the cost of housing
one young offender, he estimated the cost
at $55,000 to $60,000 a year. According to
DeGrandis, the young offender is dealt
with on an individual basis and counsell-
ing is done to explore why he became in-
volved in crime.
Bill said Bluewater is strict enough but
has one complaint.
"There are certain people in for dif-
ferent crimes and there is not enough
staff to help out with problems." They
need more time to deal on a one to one
basis with a person."
Chris, another young offender at
Bluewater Centre who is in for a number
of break and enters and thefts of car
stereos, said the centre helps you get
ready to get back on the street by giving
encouragement and by helping unders-
tand problems more clearly.
PEER GROUPS REINFORCE
Probation Officer Tom Ewer (top left)
comes in contact with many young of-
fenders and Carl DeGrandis, right,
superintendent for Bluewater Centre, a
maximum security facility for young of-
fenders, also deals with them on a daily
basis.( photos by Yvette Zandbergen)
he was 11 years old and has been in
Bluewater Centre for eight months. He
started his crimes with an autobody shop
break-in and from there it went downhill.
Chris began getting into drugs at 12,
mostly marijuana, hashish and in later
years, LSD. When Chris was 15, he got
picked up by police and spent six months
in juvenile secure custody for breaking
into a Canadian Tire warehouse store. He
broke into the store because he thought it
would be' "fun."
Chris attributed his 'involvement in
crime to boredom and sometimes lack of
money.
"I didn't like hanging around people
my own age so I always hung around
with people older, thinking they are older
so they know more, and look how I ended
u According to Ewer, in many cases, a
youth will find a peer group attractive
because they want to be accepted.
"The peer group may reinforce the ir-
responsible beh'aviour already
developed," he said. According to Ewer
loyalty is strong in a peer group and
there is "bravery in numbers."
The school environment is sometimes
the first place young offenders act out•
their emotions because in many cases,
they can get away. with it.
According to Ewer, because the youth
may have the non -caring attitude, this
may lead him to experiment with drugs
and alcohol„ as in Chris' case.
Chris said his family plays no part in
the crimes he committed and described
his childhood as being "funny." His
mother was a minister of a Pentecostal
church and Chris "couldn't get into
that."
His friends didn't encourage or
pressure him but they when they were
going out to commit a crime, he would
ask to go with them. Before he did a
break and enter, there was one thought in
his mind.
"You keep on walking until everything'
looks clear and it takes 10 to 15 minutes
to go in and out. You never think of
police, you just concentrate on what you
want to do." Chris used to pick houses
randomly by knocking on the door to see
if someone was home and sometimes
looked in the window to check out the
merchandise to see if the house was
worthwhile.
He said one week after the crime, you
might feel regret.
"Every once in a while you think it's
not worth it but you've done it now and
you can't give the stuff back. You think
of it because you are paranoid."
When asked about authority, Chris said
he always listened to his mother. There
were a -few times when he would be away
from home for three months at a time.
He said his view of the police has
changed.
"I used to say 'Screw them!', and that
no one can tell me what to do except my
mother," he said. "Now I still say `Screw
them,' but I realize they have to do their
jobs and it's my fault that I got caught,
not theirs."
FUTURE PLANS .
Both Bill and Chris said if they had the
chance to do things over again, they
would. Chris said instead of break and
enters, he would be doing a lot better in
school and be working, while Bill would
have stayed in school and would have lik-
ed to live with his current foster parents
earlier. Chris still has doubts about the
future and the plaguing fear that the law
is playing with him "like a doll on a
string."
When they leave Bluewater Centre, Bill
plans on becoming a welder in his
father's company and Chris plans on get-
ting his Grade 12 or 13 and working part
time. As,.a long-term goal, he has given
thought to becoming a psychologist to
people his age.
The Young Offenders Act helps youths
like Bill and Chris get on with their lives'
and according to DeGrandis, the young
offender does not have to carry the
burden.of his criminal past for the rest of
his life.
"They are able to become useful
citizens," he said'. "They shouldn't have
to carry the stigma of their youth ac-
tivities throughout their entire lives."
Goderich Police Chief Pat King
disagrees with him on this point. He call-
ed this part of the act "discriminatory,"
explaining if a young offender and an
adult commit the same crime, they do
not get the same treatment. The adult
gets a criminal record and his name can
be published while the young offender
gets neither.
"They should not have the anonymity
they get."
Bluewater Centre has been opened
since August, 1985. Currently, there are
100 residents with the capacity for 108.
After renovations are completed, which
DeGrandis predicted will be in 15 mon-
ths, the maximum capacity will be 130
people. He predicts when renovations are
completed, Bluewater Centre can become
a leader in programs for young
offenders.
This has been the first part in a two-
part feature on the Young Offenders Act
on a local angle. Next week, interviews
with Crown Attorney Bob Morris and
Goderich Police Chief Pat King will be
featured with their conflicting opinions on
the act.
WILLIAM
THOMAS
Offenders Act brought overdue reform
The Young Offenders Act carne into force on April 2,
1984 and replaced the Juvenile Delinquents Act which was
an act which began in 1929. Many needed changes were
made.
According to resources from the Goderich Public
Library, the Juvenile Delinquents Act stated that "every
juvenile deliquent shall be treated, not his a criminal, but
as a misdirected and misguided child, and one needing
aid, encouragement, help and assistance." To accomplish
this, the child was shielded from publicity, has a special
kind of hearing in a particular kind of court and is dealt
with as someone needing treatment rather than punish-
ment. In 1972, the Canadian Criminology and Correction
Association presented a brief with a number of'recom-
mendations pertaining to the Juvenile Delinquents Act.
Included was a recommendation that only children and
youths charged with more serious offences be dealt
through juvenile court.
On July 7, 1982, Parliament enacted the Young Of-
fenders Act, which came into effect two years later. This
brought about a long overdue reform of Canada's juvenile
justice system. Under the Juvenile Delinquents Act, a
juvenile who contravened any federal, provincial dor
municipal laws was tried, convicted and sentenced.
The system that evolved under the Juvenile Delinquents
Act permitted many injustices including different age
limits for juveniles from province to province, informal
eourt proceedings, the criminalizing of young persons for
acts and behaviour that were not illegal for adults, the
subjecting of the young offender to indeterminate
sentences that were not always related to seriousness of ,
offence and an arbitrary review process whereby the
young offender could be brought back to court at any time
until he reached 21 to have new sentences imposed.
The Young Offenders Act changed all this. The main
theme of the act is although young persons should be held
responsible for their behaviour, they nevertheless have
special needs which demand a lesser standard of accoun-
tability than that imposed on adults. But at the same time,
they should have the same right to fair and equal treat-
ment before the law as adults.
Dispositions or sentences too are related to the needs
and circumstances of the young offender. If a young per-
son is found guilty of an offence, the court may impose a
variety of sentences including an absolute discharge, a
fine (not exceeding $1,000), an order to pay compensation
to the victim such as a personal service or an order to per-
form community service. Other sentences could include
placement of the young offender on probation for up to two
years and for certain cases, three years or placement of a
young offender in custody for a period of up to two years
or for certain serious offences, three years.
J+,
4
Arm wrestling.
Are you
pulling my leg?
All you ever hear about Sherkston
Beaches is a drowning in the quarry or
that a rock musician slipped his leash
and bit a fan but as I walked the grounds
on a Saturday past, I was most impress-
ed by this lakeside camp town. It's huge
and cavernous, combining deep-set quar-
ries suitable for sailing with wooded
hollows and hilly sand dunes.
Management has wisely segregated
the campers — new wave people on the
roadside where ghetto blasters and emp-
ty beer bottles adorn the picnic tables
and the old guard on the lakeside where
only the mildest of oaths is uttered after
an ace gets trumped.
The campsites along the lakeside are
more attractive and neater than most
summer cottages. Some have flower
gardens, bricked driveways and patios;
all have screened dining nooks and a pen-
chant for cleanliness. Along the sandy
shoreline a dozen brightly -coloured
Hobie" Cats await ,a wind, overhead a
parasailer creates his own behind a purr-
ing outboard motor boat.
It's quite the casual summer hamlet,
Sherkston is, and there are even a few
Canadian campers too.
But I was not there to sop up the
scenery or even have fun, I was there to
spectate at the International Armwrestl-
ing Championships and root for the home
town favorite, the queen of quick falls,
the lady with the long arm and the short
fuse — Anne "Two Tall" Topa! Wild
cheering and shrill whistles followed
Anne all day as 14 hangers-on, all dress-
ed in blue. and red T- shirts emblazoned
"Anne's Fans" — and all candidates for
psychological overhauls - stalked their
heroine relentlessly.
Anne is one lean, competitively mean
lady. She's also my banker. Really.
Years of rifling through dollar bills at the
teller's window have given her an arm of
steel and a deadly rotating wrist. It's also
given her lower back problems but hey,
she's not a back wrestler is she?
I asked Anne how she got started in
arm wrestling.
"It was eight years ago in the Reeb
House in Gasline" she answered like a
true pro reflecting on humble
beginnings.
"You've—been wrestling for eight
years?" I repeated rather incredulously.
"No, just once... eight years ago... at
the' Reeb House." When you're good, I
guess you know how to pick your spots.
"What made you enter that match at
the Reeb House?"
"My husband."
"Your husband?" -
"Yeah, there was a men's event and a
women's event. He wanted a trophy. He
knew he couldn't win with the men but he
figured I could beat the women that were
there... so he entered my name in• the
draw."
Behind every successful woman is a
conniving husband with a hole in his
trophy case.
So here she was eight years later, the
idol of a group of fanatical supporters
who looked like they cried real tears the
day Laverne and Shirley got cancelled.
Anne stood out from the other com-
petitors in that for the most part, she
looks normal. Arm wrestlers range from
the very weird to the chronically odd.
First of all, they are lopsided, their right
arms being twice as large as their left
arms. Secondly, they all walk around
wearing the right sleeve of a wool
sweater. To the uninitiated, your first
glimpse at an arm wrestling match is
like sitting in the front row at a broken
arm convention, Everybody's wearing
one wool sleeve. It looks like the end
result of a sheep shortage in the Outer
Hebrides.
When you see a person walking down
the street wearing a sweater with the
right sleeve missing, you can bet it's the
spouse of an arm wrestler.
Arm wrestlers have tatoos but no
necks, they wear cut-off sweat shirts and
earrings. The short ones stand on
elevated shoes.
Arm wrestling is a great spectator
sport for four people — the two opponents
and the two referees in striped jerseys
who huddle so close nobody can possibly
see an arm being wrestled. A match lasts
about 3 seconds — somebody says
"GO!" you hear a grunt, the announcer
says "WOW " and two guys walk off the
stage to a smattering applause from a
crowd who doesn't know who won and
frankly couldn't give a fig.
It's a lot like standing in a bathroom in
Hamilton for three days looking at a hole
in the floor except in arm wrestling when
it's all over, you don't end up with a dead
snake.
This. particular event, the Interna-
tional Open Arm Wrestling Champidn-
ship was so poorly organized and so bad-
ly run once it did get going that I couldn't
help but feel the cool capricious hand of
the federal government ip there
somewhere. But no, Molson's was the
sponsor. The competitors came from as
far away as Fairfax, Virginia, and Win-
nipeg, Manitoba to register at 9 a.m. and
sit around doing nothing all day.
One couple drove half the night from
Pennsylvania to be there for 9 a.m. and
he didn't take the stage until 2:15 in the
Turn to page 2