HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Goderich Signal-Star, 1986-05-14, Page 22ITt U itV
• Entertainment • Features
• Religion • Family • More
SECTION
At()
Business Air Services supplies charter air service predominantly for Champion
Road Machinery of Goderich. At left, the Goderich Municipal Airport terminal.
The airport has approximately 14,500 landings a year. ( photos by Sharon Dietz )
BY SHARON DIETZ
A Goderich pilot, who has been flying
commercially since 1956, testified at the
hydro hearings in Clinton last week that
turbulence and the lack of altitude preci-
sion will cause planes to be very close to a
proposed hydro transmission line as they
approach runway 1028 at the Goderich
Municipal Airport to land.
Murray Ward, chief pilot for Business
Air Services, testified it is very difficult to
maintain a constant altitude .in the gusty
south west wind, which sweeps across the
Maitland River valley, as the planes ap-
proach the runway from, the east. Ward
said the strong south west wind causes
wind sheer on the east - west approach
which causes the plane to lose altitude sud-
denly and unexpectedly. Wind sheer can
also cause a change in the speed of the air-
craft which is very critical to a jet on ap-
proach, because the speed is not to change.
A jet can drop 200 to 300 feet in a severe
wind sheer during a thunderstorm, said
Ward.
The town of ,Goderich and the Goderich
Municipal Airport are presenting evidence
at the hearings to support their contention
that the proposed hydro transmission cor-
ridor from the Bruce Nuclear Power
Development through Huron County to
London poses a -serious safety ,threat to
pilots attempting -to' land at the airport on
an approach from the east. The Con-
soldiated Hearings Board comprised of
two members of the Ontario Municipal
Board and one member of the En-
vironmental Assessment Board has been
hearing submissions from groups and in-
dividuals since November, 1985. They con-
ducted hearings in Guelph, Markdale and
London before coming to Clinton.
Ward testified that when a pilot is
.preparing to make a landing at the
-Goderirh airport he radios London for an
altitmeter reading to calculate the altitude
level of the plane, if he cannot raise anyone
on the radio in Goderich where the radio is
only manned a third of the time. Ward ex-
plained that the altimeter setting at
ydro tower
are threat
says pilot
Goderich can be much different than at
London due to barometric pressure. The
pilot must make the necessary allowance
by adding 230 feet to the -London altimeter
reading to stay clear of obstructions.
After the pilot crosses the Business Air
Services beacon at a minimum altitude of
1600 feet above sea level, the pilot
d'e'scends to 519 feet and with associated
turbulence and lack of altimeter precision,
he will be very close to the preferred
transmission route, said Ward.
"Many companies do not allow their
planes to make circling approaches to any
airport because of the hazard to safety that
( sic) it is not permitted in their operation
manuals, observed Ward.
"Altimeter error based on a London set-
ting, wind sheer, wind turbulence and
slight pilot error causing loss, of altitude
could result in a loss of 230 feet and the
most westerly transmission route would
present a safety, hazard in my opinion,"
said Ward.
Ward continued by pointing out that a
pilot approaching Goderich airport can on-
ly raise the London radio if he is above
2,000 to 2,500 feet. The radio will not work
below that range. A pilot can get a reading
from London before he leaves Toronto and
under normal conditions he could rely on
that reading from 45 - 50 minutes it takes to
get to Goderich.
Ward pointed out however, that in the
winter time the weather can change in five
minutes with snow squallti coming in off
the lake.
Board member Ward Rodman asked
where the pilot circles the airport while at-
tempting to land the plane. Ward testified
the pilot could wander over into the area,..
where the towers are, very easily while
staying within the required 1 'mile visibili-
ty range of the airport, as they circle back
to make their fihal approach. Ward said if
the pilot is using the accurate altitmeter
reading for the Goderich approach, he
would be circling at 519 feet.
Ward admitted 200 feet is a very ex-
treme variation on flight level due to wind
sheer or turbulence.
"It frightens me that you could go below
200 feet in extreme wind sheer conditions,"
said Rodman.
Ward replied that 747s can drop 300 feet
on the approach in extreme turbulence.
With the bigger planes a longer recovery
action is required, said Ward, meaning it
takes longer to recover the altitude. It is
more important for recovery time for
large jets, he added.
Ward also explained that a single pilot
doesn't have the guidance from "someone
in the right seat (co-pilot)". "It's hard to
get visual contact as to where you are, as
you make the right -turn (in the circling
procedure as the pilot approaches runway
28 from the east).
Rodman made the observation that "if
pilots follow proper procedure, they should
be able to land (transmission) lines or no
lines."
Ward replied that landing is one of the
biggest frustrations in flying. "You do
minimum approaches, go back up for as
long as two hours. Naturally you are ner-
vous as you make all these approaches,
waiting for snow showers to end." said
Ward. "The most critical part of the flight
is getting the plane down." Ward testified
he is concerned about student pilots at-
tempting to land at the airport. From his
experience teaching students, he said he
knows they become disoriented and can
pass over several transmission lines
before they find therselves. A student
pilot on a solo cross country flight has dif-
ficulty staying on course and maintaining
the flight level. Student pilots can be off by
1,000 feet, said Ward. "That could be a
critical error coming in over the hydro
lines."
If an engine fails on takeoff it is especial-
ly critical with older planes because they
cannot maintain the rate of climb and
there is no chance in the world of getting
over the lines, Ward observed. A pilot
would have to make a turn and fly parallel
to the lines in such a situation.
"I'm not saying he could do it," said
Ward. "It's a very dangerous situation
making a turn on take off with one engine
failed. It's almost impossible."
Ward said he recommended to Ontario
Hydro where the lines should be located
and suggested anything east of the
Turn to page 2A •
Consultant says hydro towers impact on airport
BY SHARON DIETZ
Advice from individual inspectors for
Transport' Canada is "hardly ever consis-
tent", the manager of the Goderich airport
told the Ontario Hydro hearings in Clinton,
May 7.
"Every inspector that comes to 'the air-
port has a different idea about the height of
the trees and whether they encroach on tine
transitional zoning," commented Ed
Scruton referring to the trees at the west
end of the airport runway. Scruton
testified that pilots approaching runway 10
from the west have clipped the tops of the
trees as they come in to land because wind
sheer will cause the plane to drop suddenly
and unexpectedly. He explained that even
though the plane is aligned properly with
the runwa' and is approaching at the pro-
per altitude, the wind will suddenly change
direction as the plane comes over the trees
and the plane loses altitude.
Scruton, who has been airport manager
for eight years, said Transport Canada in-
spectors can be very meticulous at times
in their requests for safety. He has been in-
structed to trim the tassles from the tops of
corn stalks in the cornfields which abound
the two grass runways at the airport. He
has also been told to grade the six to eight
inch edge along the plowed area of the run-
way during the winter. Transport Canada
is responsible for licensing the airport and
establishing safety regulations.
Scruton said he was concerned with the
responses the airport's consultant Russell
Killaire was receiving from Transport
Canada, when he inquired whether the air-
port., could _still be • licenced, if Ontario
Hydro erected a transmission line running
from the north to the south 1.8 miles east of
runway 1028 at the airport. Scruton said he
felt safety was the major priority of
Transport Canada and he could not
understand their response to the safety of
the proposed transmission line.
In their reply to Killaire's grhestions,
Transport Canada stated• the proposed
hydro' towers would not impact on the
• licensing of the airport or the operation of
the aircraft in the vicinity of the airport.
' Scruton met with two Transport Canada
officials and showed them maps which in-
dicated Hydro's preferred route just east
of the airport and alternate rout es through
Auburn and Wingharn. ,The one official,
Brian Campbell said he was not aware
there was a route acceptable to Hydro
which ran through Wingham.
Scruton testified he showed them the
correspondence Transport: Canada had
sent to Killaire and they agreed the lines
were not a safe thing and if there was an
alternate route, they would prefer the lines
go through Wingham.
The town of Goderich and the Goderich
Municipal Airport are presenting evidence
to the Consolidated Hearings Board, an
impartial three member board, which Itas
been hearing submissions concerning the
proposed hydro transmission corridor
from the' Bruce Nuclear Power Develop-
ment through Huron County to London.
The board has been hearing submissions
from groups and individuals since the,
preliminary hearings opened in Guelph in
November, 1985. The'hearings continued in
Markdale and London before coming to
Clinton. The board held three days of hear-
ings last week and Goderirh airport
testimony was heard on Tuesday and
Wedesday when I hrec witnesses were call-
ed.
The town of Goderich and the municipal
airport contend the proposed transmission
lines will pose a serious safety hazard to
planes circling the airport in . their ap-
proach to runway 28 from the east and on
takeoff on runway 10 towards the east.
Under cross examination by Hydro
lawyer Bruce Campbell, Scruton agreed
that Transport Canada has the • respon-
sibility for air safety in Canada and it is
the major consideration they bring to the
execution of their duties.
Campbell suggested that he found it an
incredible proposition that Transport
Canada would tell the airport manager
that they would license the airport when
they agreed the lines were an unsafe thing.
Campbell suggested to Scruton that the
Transport Canada officials had said that
technically they could license the airport
but on the other hand it would be better if
the lines wereRast of Carlow.
Transport Canada did not actually say
the lines in this position are not .a safe
tiring, said'Campbell.
"They generally agreed lines around the
aerodrome are not a safe thing but there
are situations they can get around,"
replied Scruton.
"It is their general proposition about the
lines, that the further away the better,"
said Campbell and Scruton agreed.
The airport's consultant Russell Killaire
testified April 29 when Ire appeared at the
hearings,'that he was surprised to find that
Transport Canada did not agree that the
transmission lines would impact on the
airport's outer surface, a horizontal plane
150 feet .above the airport with a radius of
4,000 metres from the centre of the existing
runway. The,intention of the outer surface
is to prevent the placement of obstructions
within that radius which would be hazar-
dous to air safety.
In Killaire's opinion, the transmission
. Turn to page 3A •
The Goderirh airport committee on behalf of the town of Goderirh
presented evidence at the Onario Hydro hearings in Clinton last
week. Members of the Consolidated Hearings Boated include from
the left, Jaynes Mills of the Ontario Municipal Board, Robert Eisen
of the Environmental Assessment Board and. R. Ward Rodman of
the Ontario Mnniclpal Board. An impartial board, they are hearing
submissions concerning the proposed hydro transmission corridor
from the Bruce Nuetear Power Development through Huron Coun-
ty to London. The hoard has been hearing submissions since the
hearings opened ha Guelph in November, last year. (photo by Alan
Rivett) -
Pregnant men
Yin i l -=bo•
g lin eV
I was appalled to learn aver the
weekend that card companies have
started to make Mother's Day cards for
fathers who "have been like mothers" to
their children,
Does that mean these fathers have nur-
tured and cared for their children? Have
these fathers changed their children's
diapers, heated their bottles, got up for
midnight feedings, encouraged their first
steps, sewn on their buttons, washed
their clothes, wiped away their tears,
hugged away their nightmares, attended
their school concerts and helped them
with their homework?
If so, these fathers are to be commend-
ed. They've been good and loving parents
to their children. But, they've not been
mothers. Loving, nurturing and the rest
of that gushy stuff is not relegated to
motherhood. Fathers can join in
anytime. But, that doesn't make them
mothers.
Even so, I can't help but wonder
whether fathers will become mothers if
science gets its way. A report in the daily
press last week said that the technology
exists to enable men to give birth. With
the newfound ability to bring life into the
world, will these men be mothers or
fathers or fothers or what? But, the
semantics isn't the only thing that is
mind-boggling.
Just for fun, let's pretend that the now
risk -ridden procedure with which science
thinks it could make men mothers has
gained widespread popularity and use.
What would the world be like if men
could get pregnant?
The way I` see it, there aren't a lot of
logical or economic incentives to become
a mother right now. After nine months of
physical
painful, sometimes life-threatening iscofort, women o pro-
cess appropriately called labor and im-
mediately become more economically,
physically and psychologically
dependent.
Once they're mothers, women become
less marketable in the world of business
;'.but.. more responsible. for the develop-
ment
{ of humanity. (Who else would
psychiatrists blame for the world's
psychoses if there were no mothers? )
In short, motherhood is not usually one
of the contributing factors when one
becomes rich and/or famous. (Unless,
like Princess Di, your reproductive
system produces royal offspring)
Of course, that could all change once
men become mothers. Once that hap-
pens, I envision a revolution of the social,
economic, political and cultural kind.
Though men have so far reaped great
benefits from their freedom from
childbearing, you can be sure they will
not become second class citizens if they
become mothers: Society will change to
suit them.
The most obvious changes would in-
clude legislation that would make
motherhood more economically viable.
Men would be given economic incen-
tives to give birth. For contributing to the
future of humanity, men would be en-
couraged with open-ended maternity
leaves including full pay, benefits and a
guaranteed job when they returned.
And, for those men who find fulfillment
by both parenting and working outside
the home, the government would make
:workplace daycare centres mandatory
so that the demands of childcare
wouldn't slow down productivity on the
job.
Psychological studies would prove
without a doubt that children become
stronger, more independent, more in-
telligent and more Well-balanced when
they're placed in the stimulating en-
vironment of daycare at an early age.
If men gave birth, "welfare mothers"
would be non-existant. Giving birth
would be likened to serving and giving
blood (literally) for your country. Like
ar veterans, men would be decorated
or difficult births and given a pension
or each time they "served."
Men would laugh in the face of the mor-
ality rates associated with giving birth.
hey would brag about their labor pains;
t would be macho to go the distance
ithout epidurals and other pain killers.
Men would find inspiration from the
ovie "First Blood" which would detail
ambo's first death -defying childbirth
xperience while sequels would describe
ach ensuing birth in living technicolor.
And you can bet that men would not let
heir doctors take the credit for "deliver -
ng" their babies. If men could go
hrough the nine months of carrying their
hildren, they would be the ones giving
irth. Doctors might be given some
redit grudgingly for assisting.
YGwig (nen 'rvhv had uauie5 while Still
married would not be shunned by
ociety or regarded as immoral. Instead,
heir budding sexuality would be praised
nd they would be chuckled about with
hrases such as "boys will be boys" or
'he was just out harvesting his wild
ats." Babies, illegitimate or not, would
e proud proof of their manhood
And, if men could give birth, more of\
hem might develop a deeper concern for
he future of the planet. With a greater
tense of the cycle of life, they might end
he madness of the nuclear arms race. •
A maternal instinct shared by all peo-
rle could only benefit us all. Let's hope
ve don't have to wait until science
iterally makes men mothers to find out.
4