HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Goderich Signal-Star, 1983-10-05, Page 7Wttg l(4114
0
44',
DER 5, IOW
ab
YKES
rl
2 lit
I may be the least bit presumptuous and
peak in vague, sweeping generalltleo, 1
would suggest that everyone, at one time or
another, has had oc .slot) to have certain
items in their posse • ver : illegally.
That is to say, h i, " an I do this i ,rlltel ?,
that most people have taken the I„i. d trinket
or piece of personal property.
Call it stealing, call it pilfering or Inad-
vertent possession of other people's per-
sonal property, we have all experienced It in
some form.
You may have innocently tasted a few
peanuts at the bulk food section, or perhaps
a pen or pencil may have accidentally
followed you home from work. In the
business world it is known as pilfering, and
while it may be done Inadvertantly and
without malice of forethought, the evidence
does not lie. It is still wrong.
It happens all the time and while I hate to
cast any doubt on my sincerity and moral
integrity, I will have to admit to b ,ging in
possession of certain company property.
Signal -Star property, to be exact.
Just to clear the air, I do not pay for
newspapers. It's a fringe benefit, I suppose.
I rarely take one hoarse, but when I do, it's on
the house. My publisher is a generous sort.
But if one was to scan the contents of my
dresser, glove compartment, back seat and
other assorted hiding places, one would be
able to produce 149 rolls of unused black and
white film and at least 829 ball point pens,
most of which didn't work in the first place.
Technically, I suppose, the boss could
have me put away for theft of the minor
variety. It's petty stuff, to be sure, and could
be classified as innocent pilfering.
At the end of each rigorous work day the
pen in my shirt pocket may be idly tossed on
the dresser before the shirt is discarded in
the clothes hamper, I intended to return the
pen, it just slips my mind. Soon there is a
mound of pens,
As for the film, I like to have plenty of it on
hand in ease of emergency. There is nothing
quite as embarassing as rushing off to an
assignment withouth flim in the camera, It's
never happened to this veteran, of course,
but I have been privy to certain horror
stories.
en from
the ofAnyway,
ficeor if cheated oou've n your extaken apense se ac-
count, don't feel guilty -it's good for you a
sociologist study claims.
Cheatingapparently increases job
satisfaction, raises work production and
makes ford a healthier economy a study on
workplace crime has found. The statements
were a result of more than 10 years of
research in more than 30 jobs.
The sociologist divided cheating workers
into four distinct categories; wolves -
garbage collectors and other workers who
cheat in packs; vultures -waiters who hunt
individually; hawks -lawyers, politicians,
academics and journalists, ifrho are in-
dividualists happy to bend a few rules and
finally donkeys -these are workers who have
a keen sense of group loyalty and share the
takings.
So now I have come to the realization my
job satisfaction grows proportionately with
the pile of pens on the dresser and the
• unused films in the back seat of the ear.
I am rather relieved to learn that Offering
is condoned in the work place. I would not.
suggest however, that anyone take home a
grader, for instance, or in the case of a bank
employee, an inch of twenty dollar bills.
There is a limit ‘to job satisfaction.
Member.
•CNA
Second class
mail registration
number 0716
BLUE
RIBBON
AWARD
1983
THE NEWS PORT FOR GODERICH & DISTRICT
SINCE 1848
Founded in 1848 and published every Wednesday at f3oderich, Ontario. Member of the CUNA. OCNA and ABB
Audit Bureau of Circulations. Subscriptions payable in advance '20.95, (Senior Citizens '17.95 privilege card
number required) in ;anode, '55. to U.S.A., '55. to all other countries. Single copies 50'. Display, National and
Classified advertising rates alienable on request. please ash for Rate Card No. 14 effective October 1, 1893.
Advertising is accepted on the condition that in the went of typographical error, the advertising space occupied
by the erroneous item, together with resaonebls allowance for signature, will not be charged for but that
Wants of the advertisement will be paid for at the applicable rate. In the event of a typographical error
advertising goods or services at a wrong price, goods or services may not be said. Advertising is merely en offer
to sell, end may be withdrawn K any time. The Signal -Star is not responsible for the loss or damage of
unsolicited manuscripts, photos or other materials used for reproducing purposes.
PUBLISHED BY: SIGNAL -STAR PUBLISHING LIMITED
ROBERT G. SHRIER - President and Publisher
DON HUBICK - Advertising Manager
DAVE SYKES - Editor
l,
•
P.O. BOX 220r%Aleeproduci
HUCKINB ST.
000ERIINDUSTCIPARK\GN
OOOERICH, ONT. N7A 486
FOR BUSINESS OR EDITORIAL OFFICES...please phone (519) 1524-1133t11
No money for board school
The Huron -Perth Separate School Board is angry, angry
because it seems unable to get funding from any source
for additions to some of its schools.
And the aren't frivolous additions, no grandiose ideas
' here.
The board wants to build some general purpose rooms
which are smaller sized gyms common in elementary
schools across the province. Library resource rooms are
another feature needed in some of the separate schools
throughout the two counties. The project cost is $1.5
million and would benefit five schools.
In some cases these needs are presently being supplied
by portables. Some portables, considered temporary
facilities, have been on site for 13 or more years. One
school in particular was built as a two -room structure,
which has had to have three portables added.
To look back, all the present schools in the Huron -Perth
system were built prior to 1969, when county boards were
formed. In some schools the only common facilities - used
by students of all grades - are the hallways and
washrooms.
Like most boards, this board has followed normal routes
in an attempt to get capital funding. This route is through
the Ministry of Education at budget time. Only twice in
the past six years has any construction money been sent to
the board, and that because the school conditions
deteriorated so badly.
Dr. Bette Stephenson, minister of education, said this
school system is a lower priority for capital funds on a
Province -wide basis.
So, who's getting the money? According to the minister,
90 per cent of capital funding is going to areas where there
is an increase in the student population. Peel region is one
place where student population is rising.
Back here in Huron and Perth, granted the classrooms
aren't crowded, but there is a lack of facilities to house
programs which Dr. Stephenson wants across the pro-
vince. These programs include, physical education,
special education, French and library services.
"No funding available,” is a phrase heard too often by
the separate school board. Granted public boards in the
area are receiving similar rejections, but they do have a
larger tax base from which they are funded.
The board must feel as though it is banging its head
against a brick wall. But to give the board credit, it isn't
giving up. With other government make-work projects be-
ing implemented, there might yet be a chance for this pro-
ject and board administration is investigating this angle.
It's interesting to note that both Dr. Stephenson and
Premier William Davis have supported in principle this
project. The only thing missing is money.
Speaking of depression
Sometimes Canadians feel there is too much control in
air lives. We often complain about the way government
s s to intrude into so many of the things we seek to
accomplish.
True, perhaps, but we really don't know what
r 4pression is all about. For a startling example of how the
other hali is forced to live we should take a look at
Romania, the eastern European country which has been
under communist domination ever since the end of World
War II. Angered by a flood of anti-government pamphlets,
the officials of that nation have set up a control system to
register and take printed samples from all privately -
owned typewriters in the country. Henceforth any person
who feels moved to criticize the government, even in the
secrecy of his own attic, may well be hounded down and
end his days in a prison cell.
Does that give you any thoughts about freedom of the
press in this country and why a free press is absolutely
essential to a free society ( Mount Forest Confederate)
Last respects
By Dave Sykes
DEAR READERS
SHIRLEY KELLER
It has taken well over 400 years, but the dream
of Martin Luther appears now to be within reach.
Many members of the Christian Church rejoiced
this past weekend to see a story in The London
Free Press announcing that Lutherans and
Roman Catholics - in North America at least -
are agreed finally that man cannot buy or earn
eternal salvation. It is a free gift of God, through
faith in Jesus Christ, proclaimed the story.
It is a fitting story for this time of year.
October 31, generally thought of as Hallowe'en,
is Reformation Day in the Protestant Church. It
is the anniversary of the date in 1517 when the
German monk Martin Luther published his 95
Theses which condemned The Roman Church on
many counts. This year, 1983, is exactly 500
years since the birth of Martin Luther who is
sometimes referred to as the Father of the
Protestant Church.
Today's Lutherans, of course, take their name
from Martin Luther. And while Lutherans in
general in 1983 are somewhat divided among
themselves on a few doctrinal issues, they all
claim to follow Luther's Catechism, written in
1529.
The outspoken Luther, according to historical
data, was despondent as a young monk because
of his sins. Luther felt he simply could not do
enough penance as required by the church, to
adequately atone fore blot out - his daily tran-
sgressions. The story is told that young Luther
mistreated himself with regular persistence and
diligence, hoping to feel forgiven by God. But
nothing helped.
The suffering monk was sent on a kind of
sabbatical to help him over his problems ... to
redirect his thinking so to speak. He became a
scholar to study the Holy Scriptures from the
original texts.
While pouring over the Writings, Luther
became fascinated by them and fully engrossed
in them. Before long he was convinced that some
of the practices of The Roman Church of that day
were in direct conflict with the Word of God.
The practice that most disgusted Luther was
the one of selling "indulgences" to anyone with
money to buy. The purchasers were given a
sheet of paper, promising certain entry into
heaven at their death. The receipts from these
sales went directly to the coffers of The Church,
to pay for real estate and costly renovations and
adornments. •
In his studies, Luther had discovered what God
said about such things. For instance: "The
wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is
eternal life." And by way of response, Luther
wrote: "I know and accept the Christ of the Bible
as my personal Saviour and trust only in Him for
my salvation."
I't was heresy in The Roman Church at that
time, but Luther had found the peace of mind and
the joy in God he sought.
Needless to say, The Church wasn't ready for
Luther's radical views and he was eventually
thrown out of the Church and lived in exile from
The Church until his death in 1546.
But Luther had developed a following of men
and women who accepted his teachings - and that
group has grown and grown until today,
Lutheranism is one of the largest Protestant
denominations in the world.
Obviously, others have taken up Luther's work
of bringing peace and union between The Roman
Church and Lutherans. With the recent an-
nouncement that Roman Catholics and
Lutherans are not only talking but are resolving
old grievances, there now seems reason to
believe that Martin Luther was indeed a great
man ahead of his time. •
But what of church unity? Did Martin Luther
envision one church on earth?
Probably. In fact, there's no evidence Luther
set out to divide The Roman Church - only to
make it stronger by pointing it back to the truths
of Holy Scripture.
Very likely, if Luther were alive today, he'd
say there really is only one church on earth - and
that's the body of believers who trust implicitly
in Jesus Christ for their salvation. From what
has been written by and about Luther, it is clear
he wasn't hung up on man-made dogmas - only
those truths revealed by God Himself through
the Holy Scriptures.
With more "churches" now than at any other
time in history - and more springing up all the
time - how can anyone say Luther has ac-
complished anything?
Along with everything else, Luther is credited
with "opening" the Scriptures to the ordinary
layman to study and interpret; to believe or
disbelieve; to accept or reject. When he tran-
slated the entire Bible into German between the
years 1521 and 1534, it made the Scriptures
available in a new way to people who had
previously !leard them only from the mouth of
priests.
And the translating goes on and on today - into
dozens of languages the world over. Now nearly
everyone can read for himself - and decide.
People may still not agree with Luther, but in
his 63 years on this earth, he gave mankind a
legacy that is appreciated by millions. And now,
500 years after Luther's birth, he has been
vindicated in part by his beloved Roman Church.
That's something that would have made Luther
very happy - and grateful.
As one Roman Catholic priest said to me a few
years ago: "Oh yes, Martin Luther. Good man.
Too bad we lost him."
Ed Giesbrecht and I had an agreement
that he should kick my foot under the coun-
cil table whenever I talked too long. Ed sat
across the table from me. Being a
gentleman, he remembers that he actually
had to kick me just once. ) probably deserv-
ed more.
That happened in 1971 and 1972. Ed's first
period as councillor lasted five years and he
did not run again at the end of 1972 when he
moved out of town. After having attended
council meetings for about two years as an
observer, I was appointed to fill a sudden
vacancy in June 1971. That is how I came to
sit across the table from Ed Giesbrecht for
awhile.
After 12 years on the town council, I did
not seek re-election last year. Ed
Gieshrecht, having his home back in town,
won a seat in last year's election. However,
much to everybody's regret, circumstances
have caused him to submit his reisignation
last month.
Thus, between the two of us, Ed and I have
taken part in local municipal government
"then and now", enabling us to reach into
the well-worn bag of direct experiences and
pull out personal memories and com-
parisons in attitudes, methods and
developments over a period of some sixteen
years.
Of course, many things have changed as
inevitably as the years have passed, but
many good things have remained the same.
There are improved services and newly
attractive looks on the face of our town, but
the safe, clean and quiet atmosphere of a
pleasant small town remains. Sometimes
major projects (marine construction, core
area improvements, heritage awareness,
waterfront developments) have had to go
through some periods of minor but noisy
hostilities, but the events have taken their
rightful places in the conscious acceptance
of the people.
Notable and progressive changes have
taken effect in the administrative system of
the corporation itself. Even such relatively
simple and basic elements of council
meetings as each member having an agen-
da copy with accompanying materials, have
been put in place only within the last
decade.
The growth of administration in
sophistication and size coincided with the in-
crease of programs and special funds made
available by senior levels of goYernment.
All this has resulted in new and better ser-
vices to the people.
As far as the council is concerned, there
are more programs and an increasingly
greater bombardment by what I call the
"paper war" from all sides. There are
stacks and stacks of new briefs and pro-
posals, correspondence, reports and all
kinds of other literature.
And yet - thinking about all this and com-
paring the present state of affairs with the
conditions of ten years ago, one is tempted
to express a strange and probably un-
popular contradiction - the individual coun-
cil member was actually better informed
and more involved ten years ago than his
counterpart is today. He had to he - there
was nobody to help him or to do the work.
The following positions were created
within the last ten years: commissioner of
works, building inspector, recreation direc-
tor, recreation program supervisor, by-law
enforcement officer, parks supervisor. Ad-
ditional staff has been hired for the offices.
However, the fact remains that on a
smaller scale things were also done ten,
twelve, fifteen years ago; they had to be
done by council members themselves much
more directly and the members had to know
what they were doing, without daily profes-
sional help. The advanced system has made
gradually life much easier for the council
members, but it has also created a certain
remoteness from the daily toil. Placing
more responsibilities on the very capable
administration results in smooth and effi-
cient running of the whole machinery of the
municipality, but the question is - is the
"grassroots" government losing some
spark of direct interest and initiative, of per-
sonal dedication and even love and in-
dividual touch and enthusiasm? Perhaps
nobody cares.
Another notable change is that now there
is not much discussion of matters at the
council table; things seem to he "cut and
dried" when they arrive. If someone does
ask questions or expresses a different opi-
nion, he appears to be regarded as a bit of a
nuisance and troublemaker. I think it is our
loss.
For what they are worth, opinion polls
show that only a small and decreasing
percentage of the population takes an in-
terest in the governments on any level. How
much of this indifference is caused by the at-
titudes and actions of the members of these
governments?
ELSA HAYDON
&Meet...