HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Goderich Signal-Star, 1972-05-25, Page 24GODERICH SIGNAL -STAR, TRURSPAT'; MAX25, 191,2
r N4411$011 report of fAliC 0. a
ienty
Continued. from Page 3B
�utalc f esponse wou1d • be
directed to Chapter VII
"Potential Centresb of
Opportunity'. and Chapter VIII
"Goals, Needs and Priorities"'
which contain the tau major
,em,)
es and
themes key areas of nc eion c c
presented in the Government
report: 1) regional needs 1101
priorities for development. and 2
potential urban growth centres
�.. The first theme 'elates to
conditions ant problem
c issues r)t
varying degrees of concern in t1it
region that require some forte o1
remedial action. the second
relates to u rba n communities 1ti,tt
could be utilized as focal malts
for economic development in h
plan of regional. economy
unnnly
expansion thatis based upon the
"urban growth centre." concept
Both ark-) fundamental elements
- in the pt•epat'atnon and
implementation of a resion.t1
developmentplan for Midwestern
Ontario: the one1 rovides the
grounds for the " emphasis and
s_di-r'.eoti.on sof--ttte...1a1I1:.. they .t)thor.
P
provides structural' components
nt
s
and the concept for, the .tt at
.
and approach of the -plan.
In mnany'r'espects,,this review`
�
of'thra'PHASE L AtiAL.ISI, has
become a case stint, of
commentary on citizen
particip, ation in r egiona1
development planning.. ',-vs such., it
is a .vindication of the value 'and -
worth
andworth of the ••partner'ship ot
people with . Government'.
approach to developing Ontario
that- has been taken by the
Province.
REVIEWOFSTUDY MATERIALS
. The study materials used in
this review of conditions, and
needs in the Midwestern Ontario
regitin. consisted "(it 'tire
Government's r'epoI't. 1)e:si ri ter -
Development.. 4 Midwestern
Ontario Region Phase I
Analysis, and tw,(T) supplernentat'y
reports, 1 the Development
Council's study an : nissien t(
the Proving'of,196.' ;,: stern
Ontario Development Area
Recommended Program
for
Development 19'69-197:3: and
Comparative Rtiview - Phase 1
the views, -opinions and concerns'
of informed residents of the
region as to the area's
development _ needs and 'their
relative s.levels of urgency for
remedial action.
It was. one of the more
important source studies used. by
the Government in the,
preparation of the Phase. 1 -
Analysis
The official presentation of the
report to the Midwestern OIltario
Regional Development Council
and to the people of t reg ion vias
made to; the 1-Loru)ut:it)le°"Charles
S MacNaughton. at a meeting in
Llstow el. Julv 2 7. 19.70
t)rr that occasion the Minister
requested that a thorough review
evaluation )otthe report It t
and valtlatl
cn e
1
imide by the people 01 Midwestern
()titario. with the particular
ohlect1ve of elhtaining from public
meetings and citizen
I),trticipatiiln 'a broadly-based`y
a,ssesstnent of opinion from the
entire area Those studying the
report were encouraged,,sto'
provide, , the• 1>rovint ia1
govettinient with a Tcandid-awl-
crlticalappraisalof the Phase 1:
Analysis and the tindltl s
contained therein:
• The•Minister stressed that the
'Province was requesting` the:
Development Council to serve as
the coordinator of the review and
-the-- itttn•unte•tltaen--- -Link or
information channel between the
Midwestern region and the
Province in this appraisal of the`
Phase 1: Analysis.)
The Development Council was
to assume responsibility for
taking the report to different. -
parts of the region. to.r •
encouraging. 1)0)110 discussion.
for' eliciting views. and opinions
irons a range of securers. for
assembling and examining the
Ilk sponses, and for preparing a
11)rI114I stll)nllssion to the
'Minister. , NI1•. Mactiau0htnn
then suggested that the
submission from the''
Development Council should be
completed ,and -forwarded to the
Department of Treasury and
Economics by October' 31, 1970'
. I•:xtensive use was macre eine
mass media in the region ; T.V.. .
af `concern for Ntorec,de, ve
picture of the region's structure
and basic functional
eharac•ter•istics it appears to
constitute an interesting and
useful source book ot lntormatlun
on Midwestern Ontario .
It was not until after several
public meetings •and 1111(1rmal
discussion Sessions " Were
completed that an sidoquates.
assessment of the report could he
made .ancf some of the earlier
misgivings ot the 1)eveloprt.lent
C ottnc'il contllined The coheel'11
wa that tthe Development CounriI
asl t t1 l
would iand itself attotnptllr0 P
engage the public in rev 10N 1110 and
reSpokiding to a ,study loc`ns111g 011
needs, pr'ior'ities and "V-rowtli
potentials. which to its content:
structure. length and l,ill,Euage
was basically unsuited tor that
purpc)se
As the fundan1ental
de!icleticleS.of the report becalm'
Mor'eevldellt. It .Sc'e111ed to those
conducting the !'ev'1eWl that it has
teen rushed to completion and
that a great Mass of gellel'ally
related
1711 0 1' 111 .1 t 1 0 11 and
Staitistl('a1 -iaf:i had been -hastily
.assembled. without suite:lent
ccinsldc r ahan. for the report's
pclrt's
put:prs e`. bask concept. format.
content and appropriateness as a
document either for educating and"
intor'nlin the general public. or
for that t Salt public
in
do .t x<11Ii-1-n.i.t1on nL 1.!a
development issues.
different parts of the report were
contradictory.
• The discussion of goals, needs
and priorities in the 'following
chapter contained a number of
serious deficiencies.
Participants continually
experienced difficulty in dealing
,with both th the content an -d
structure of this part of ,the
PHASE 1: ANALYSIS, .
The use of a standardized
system of` tables, and need
categories that was designed tabe.
applicable to all regions of the
province made it very difficult to
relate the needs identified in .this
centres, the. response seemingly Frequently the participants were
reflects the inadequacy of the unablet0 determine exactly what
Pr'ovince's presentation and was to be considered,as part of a,
1)l eparatgry meetings. given need. They often appeared ".
The goals statements that to be either' too broad or too,
precede each of the tables were narrow to'apply to conditions in a
very likely intended . by the particular county, In the Regional
authors of the report as nothing Development Branch's tabular
a
Inure than very genetsally stated arrangement, many needs had
objectives for the future , been simplified to•the point where
development of the province and they ,inhibited,' rather than
the region. Perhaps..the purpese assisted, public understanding
and significance of these goals, )and°participation. ' .
statements were not sufficiently In the case of the PHASE I: .
for the. _ ANALYSIS,the meanings. ..or
y
olltlpled in• the report', X
tended to generate a negative, definitions for many of the
reaction in the various meetings briefly-statedneeds ,in the tables
mann*. to local conditions. In held in the region, .., were buried in the descriptive
practice. the need categories 'Participants remarked that text of earlier background
simply did not relate clearly oi* they were e x c e 8 s i v e 1 y chapters: the process broke `down
dire(tly enough to the ways in generalized and amounted to at this poipt, •for people simply
which the participants tended,to meaningless. ,, 'mot,herhood could not relate ite the detailed
think of their counties and the, statements that furnished no background treatment -of various
needs they observed therein. , ' guidance or specific direction issues in the earlier sections of
The, use of •high (H.), medium r•elative to the report= 'F'urther, . the report to the needs in the h
'.11 . and low; 1. ? categories for the- they considered these goals to be tableS.
Priorities, was not only very' symptomatic of a study that One unforeseen difficulty
confusing, bilt inappropriate .fails to come to grips with encountered in trying to identify
•
singe such broad designations issues in a way that they can needs and to establish,priorities,
defy precise definition and render readily be understood": one that in the public meetings stemmed
the rf n ii o n—a 1 m.o s t is -filled•• with high sou'nrlin- r from -the inability orm'aitty pen1i1e'
g
ltli»arlingless. wards and phrases". to distinguish between existing
the cfext
-.
statements in
Generally speaking, the `these,needs and other needs, that they
pat'ticipantsdemonstrated a high of Chapter VIII -which was -the felt could be expected to develop •
degree of coacern for the future section of the report that was at some future date
physicaldevelopment• andstudied most thoroughly by the
Both current and projected
economic structure of the -region ' Pc'cll)le involved -served - to needs' were considered by
and exhibited a genuine desire. for reinforce the impression that the participants to be important, but
SANALYSIS had',been
lx a sugarsiriaval_varissoi-.sinstlre.s PHASE I: .,._,,._bath col,lrl not_beK.a.cctxxnrnada.#ed --
Government's .program for
Somehow the report mah. 0e,5 to fashioni•rg a development plan for
a p p e a r t O. 0 e• s 1 111 p 1 e din d Midwestern Ontario. During most
straightforward, and at the same .of the sessions. the • level 'of
time poorly organized. cot"nplex particitIation.was unusually high
and 'difficult to inteOrate, and , for such meetings, with 85-90
understand: one participant aptly per cent of those in' attendance
described it as -unnecessarily entering into the discussion and
complex simplicity" • , debate.. _
Among the earliest criticisms , Those taking part represented
levelled at. ,the report by the .l'quite broad cross-section of
general public c•oncer-nt^d ,,the ." backgrounds aud, nterests in the
information on which much of the ` region: a m o n g' t h e m' w e r e
description and analysis was '. farmers, b it s i n e s s m e n,
based. They were quick t)) point to 'tradesmen. workers. educators.
iinportan-t sections ,ot the report students, housewives, elected
"vvhere out-of-date statistics` had officials, civic employees.
heen used otter elated by five or. planners and 'others. ' ' • .
ten year's to, instances where In spite of the peetential
stated trends and changes had . significance of the report. the
been reversed in' subsequent representation from the larger
years. to the frequent absence 01 urban centres of Waterloo County
,information, , to the use of was surprisingly" low: most of
radio and newspapers - to bring subjective assessments . and those attending came from the
public 's attention to tlae:se.ries
Ana-lv.�.i.s.-sr.r1.d-.�1iaii �ts.r r1:..�:�.I:�.1 the ,p
Recommended Program. ani, i of meetings scheduled for cine of Z1�
"discussion paper" which more' evenings ' i nw the th
communities of • Arthur. Avr. an
ti,m,a�tes of both Conclitiotls and smaller communities and rural
tiifsst11at were s`iO1v h�aSod ober area -S.7- Ittipiigh there Was
e authors: value judgements• adniitt 'dry a,predisposition to not
(1 to instances where data in partictipa.te on the part of some
combines, in comparative
fashion, excerpts irotrl the Phase
1: Analysis and the Midwestern
Area Recommended. Program_
reports above. r�
The Midwestern Ontario
DeyelopmentAreaa Recornnlonded
Program for Development 1969-
1973 was preliarod by the
Development Council, ' 1011111;
1968. It p.r,ovides both an
assessment of conditions and
needs in •the four' -county region
and a proposed five-year` program
of development activity to he
undertaken by the Council,
various levels of government. and
a number of associations and
organizations in the region.
The • Midwestern; -.Area
Receminended Program .Was
prepared by tie Development
Council •f'ollowir ' a series of
public meetings and' intensive
Goderich. , Guelph. , Milverton.
New Hamburg and St. Marys.
Large numbers of the three
study documents were sent •hv the
Development Counc-'ii to
individuals. organi•zati,ons,� ancf
municipalities across the region.
Copies also were distributed at
each 1)f the public meetings.
N
• EVALUATION OF STUbY
MATERIALS ..
On the positive'side, the report
presents a reasonably • good
`overview of general conditions
and needs that either have existed
or presently do exist in each of the
four counties. For the most part.
it appears to he a descriptive
rather than an analvtical
treatment: of the Midwestern
region. Emphasis has been placed
upon presenting li.n a variety of
discussion sessions held ways), substantial 'amounts of
throughout the.; folic count, background information for each
�- of, -he .four counties s-tu4ied., 4n -,-
region. H represents a. concerted attempting to provide an overall
effort to •indicate. to the Provinne •
Announces
pooirly conceived and constructed
It the g P
' Regional 1 Development
.
Brand). .
Some of the participants could
see no justification for including
needs s ch as those shown under
Public Safety, feeling that they
„concerned .matters that were
related in only.a general sense,
and were not of sufficient
relevance tp be included as part of
a regional development plan and
by the arrangement of tables and
needs in -the t e P hase 1: Analysis.
Some participants. expressed
the'view that without a reasonably
realistic .understanding of the
monies to be made available by
the Province for .future
expenditure in the region. . and a
general grasp of the relative cost
of meeting particular needs, the
general public cannot be expected
to designate priorities that have
therefore aspar•t of -the PHASE I: any real measure of validity or
ANALYSIS. To -the outside •util,ity,SThey felt that the present
Hthser'ver, the emphasis seemed
to have been placed .on quantity
rather than -on quality.
'The precise meaning of many of
the need categories • remains
unclear due to their brevity,
procedure on. the one hand
disregarded any consideration of
the future financing to -be made
available, and on the other hand
Please turn to 6B
opment.....
•
When you come
tosee
Ontario Place
4
Enjoy a
2 Night
ecial
•
There's end tothethings no n s you
g.
can see and do in Toronto .. like
Ontario Place with its fascinating
sights, acresa
gl s, of p rk4and and ur4que
a ��.-restaurants. .
AndheAti theplace to Stay ist
ty
Lord Simcoe Hotel, in the
• heart of downtown, where
hos italit is a tra iti n
T d o Ri t
oront S
O p Y
now, the. Lord Simcoe is offering a
2 night Special for two at a total cost
of $58.90, subject to advande regisr
tration. It includes deluxe accommo-
dation, dinner at the- famous
Captain's Table, complete
with a bottle Of champagne,
breq_kfast in your rocom
each morning and a bus
tour of Toronto.
Ask your travel agent about
the Lord Simcoe's 2 night special 'or contact us:
150 King Street West, Toronto. Telephone: 362-1848.
s Important That These Restrictions
Be AdherdTo::H,'
E SAVE THIS SCHE' E
FOR REFERENCE
TERING RESTRICTIONS
JUNE -JULY- AUGUST - SEPTEMBER
•
0
0
new riders fiomt
bold new breed at
Bolens
Model 810 5 hp
R' Bolens Husky , Pup)" Lawri-Tractors: "'Bolens "big..
tractor" idea& arebuilt-in and ready fa serve you
j/ear 'round. Cuts , .your lawn' 41own to size during the
sunimet- ..: moves snow in the winter the easy way.
. *Single'urfit, all -steel frame gives you a strong, durable machine with
a choice of 6, 6 or 8 Ni engines for Husky stamina. r Fully enclosed
3 speed,transaxle drive.,1•Wide pneunfatic tires....
M 'Three blade rotary mower attachment with height adjustment
tuts iup to a 98" swath. a Automotive -type steering wheel for easy
Maneuverability. a Electrio start is standard on the 613 and 813.
Don't bly a ridirt nawer until
you check out apthe leattires that
makos [diens your beat buy! See the Musky Pups.
1 • •
Hstchins
OES
Special Rates
A' loan designed exclusively for.property own-
ers. Peoplg like you, who own-br-are buying
real estate. And what it means is that the money
you have invested in the real estate is your
borrowing power. Asmuch as $10,000 at HFC.
" You see, with every payment or improvement
you make,: every increase in property value ..
the money in that property builds up. Whether
it's a house or vacant lot . the value keeps
increasing. And your equity keeps growing.
With an HFC Real Estate Loan, you can make
that equity Work for you. To get the things you
want, now. A new car, home improvements or
vacation proPerty. Consolidate your bilis or pay
for college tuition'.
Whatever your nTOr ey needs, talk to HI,C
about a Beal Estate! Loan. All our offices are
connected by computers. So; we can process
your loan immediately and your rribney can be
ready promptly. A cheque made out to you ..:.
to be used for whatever•you need or want.
HOUSHHNMCE
y HOUSEHOLD REAEYCORPORATION LIMITED
ar GC DERICH
5A West Stre t -Telephone 5244 383
Cabove the Signal Star)
HANOVER:-245-10th'slt•rt • ........ • . °, ).141•0411. 364y3420
Coppo5Ire IGA;
Repafr
west CL1NTOM;
IN AREA NO. 1,
Watering May Be Done On
C'
IN AREA NO.
2
Watering :May 3e- Don/ Oil.
TUES., THURS., SAT. ' MON.; • WED,, FRI.
Between 6 p.r.n.4nd. 9 1)n, Between 6 p4. and 9
The Whole Town 'May Use Hose Service Sunday 8 a.m. to 111 .a.onl
YOUR CO-OPERATION' IN ADHERING- TO THESE TIMES' WILL GFATLY APPRLC1A T�d '
a yr
4
1!