Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Goderich Signal-Star, 1969-11-27, Page 15THE PIWITHI BY G. MacLEOD ROSS It seems doubtful whether the soul of Major General Charles George Gordon, Royal Engineers, Companion of the Isk Bath, Mandarin of China, Pasha of Turkey and finally Governor General of the Sudan will ever be 41owed to rest in peace, 'for now yet another -book has been w published to add to the many already available, which seek to' pin point the man. In the Royal Engineer Mess at Chatham, Kent, stands the Dragon Throne he brought back from Peking, plus the yellow robes of .a Mandarin. Outside is a life size statue: Gordon in fez, seated on 4, a camel. Only last month a benefactor presented to the R. "E. Museum "A message in Arabic, written on silk, sent secretly by Gordon to the Mudir of Dongola." Near Aldershot the Gordon Boys Home provides a • further memorial. Yet this perverse character shared with Custer something of the egomania displayed by Samson when he pulled the temple down about himself. Told to report how to evacuate the garrison of Khartum, he stayed. to try and hold the Sudan and thus sacrificed the lives of the - garrison and of himself. He suffered from a fanatical belief in his own powers; a man who felt himself capable of far more than he understood; the 4 epitome of the Victorian amateur. In the result, in this his final mission, he undertook, against orders and .without help; to save Egypt and the British interests there from the Mandi. When atked by Wolseley, ' the 4 Commander in . Chief at the Horse Guards, what.he would do about the Sudan,. he replied: "Send myself";, himself alone. "When will you go?" "Tonight," and off off he went in the clothes he stood up in, having first handed Ir Wolseley a religious tract. Opening his written orders. in the train, they bade him "to REPORT on the best way to evacuate the Sudan and to perform such other duties...as may be communicated to you by Sir Evelyn_: Baring," the British Commissioner in Cairo. Baring was perhaps twenty years younger and a gunner. They had met before and disliked one another cordially, so it was not surprising that when Baring was cabled by the government that Gunder his orders, he repliedordon: was "A man who habitually consults.the prophet Isaiah when in difficulties is not apt to obey the orders of anyone." In proof of Baring's belief, Gordon wrote out, in the train, a memo to the • Government explaining what ought to be done in the -Sudan. SAVE DOLLARS ON OUR SPECIALS ON ELECTROHOME HUMIDIFIERS AND EUREKA VACUUMS AT Hutchinson. Radio — TV — Appliances 308 Huron Rd. 5244831 ARENA SCHEDULE FRIDAY PUBLIC SKATING slot) P:M. 10:00 P.M. SUNDAY --PUBLIC SKATING '- 2:00 P.M. • 4:00 P.M. Then, having overruled his orders, he continued to rush across Europe, back to his beloved Sudan, on a mission which was dangerous, difficult and probably impossible. "If God goes with me, all must be well." In the year of Our Lord 1969, with two Wo7rld--Wars d- numerous `brush wars' behind us,- it will be hard for anyone who missed the public mafficking over the Boer War to realize the hero worship which followed Gordon on his way. The English public swallowed at face value the picture of Gordon as the stainless Knight of the 19th Century. It continued to worship this glorious. English eccentric for his'incorruptibility, his obstinacy, his fearlessness, his defiance of every kind of authority, his kindness, his truly English devotion to every cause but that of England, his cool - cheek, his frightful temper, his sheer impossibility. But this was how Englishmen relished- their heroes around A.D. 1884 and even to this day. Though 20 years Gordon's junior, Kipling really epitomized the genus which pervaded a number of Sappers of the 19th. century school when he wrote them off as "Mad, married or Methodist." Speaking professionally, Gordon was too much of a prima donna to have been entrusted'with `orders,' still less with' troops. He was a loner - of the first order, but his breed, the amateur, lived on into the successive wars • of the 20th century and beyond them, if in somewhat different form. 1 Cd 'P^ ga"G`!!l^ OAF A. fi e military amateur MODERN MILITARY ' AMATEURISM 1. In his recent book, "Mission to Khartum The Apotheosis of General Gordon," John Marlowe shows how the drama of Gordon was . -pretty_ much what arises__ from the confrontation of an inspired amateur and a caucus of cautious professionals; in this case politicians., such as. Gladstone. But then the English genius is notoriously anti -professional, its affinity being always for the amateur, and how well this affinity has survived since Gordon was murdered in 1885! To exemplify this amateurism specifically to the British Army, before and during World War 2, you can divide it into two distinct halves. There were the men._ respobsible for using the weapons and those responsible for developing them. .If you epitomize the former as the General Staff, you have a cadre drawn from all arms and selected for staff college training, solely in the art of war, i.e. the training of troops, their movement and supply, until they were manoeuvred into.a position from which to engage the enemy forces. These troops had been long enough armed with rifles, bayonets (the modern version of the pike), machine guns and artillery pieces. Some of these weapons had remained virtually unchanged for years, for the General Staff seldom gave them a thought. Although all major decisions were vested in the military members of the Army Council, all members of that exclusive club - the Staff College, it was the rare exception for even one of the four Army Councillors to have received any engineering education. As far as weapons old or new were concerned, they were amateurs, yet in their hands reposed the yea or nay on any new or improved weapon. The only arm which trained a proportion of its officers in weapon development was the Royal Artillery, and ,while these technically trained officers could originate an idea, it fell to the ss3sxsAsxss SUNDAY _ 8:00: P.M. • CHHL HOCKEY Goderich Building Centre vs. Goderich Combined 4 TUESDAY PRE-SCHOOL SKATING 2:00 P.M. - 3:39 NM. LIONS FREE SKATING 3:30 P.M.- 5:00 P.M. THURSDAY ORE -SCHOOL SKATING 2:00 P.M. - 3:30 P.M. • LIONS FREE SKATING 3:30 P.M. - 6:00 P.M. .SKATES NOT ALLOWED IN NEW WASHROOMS. UNLESS PROTECTED WITH SKATE GUARDS DRESS UP YOUR NOME WITHq/jp And SUNWORTHY WALLPAPER • PREPASTED VINYLS • MURALS PAINT $2.00 OFF PER GAL. For The JIOLIDAY EJL SON! AREA AS LOW AS -RUGS $79951 MARTHUR and REILLY Ltd. General Staff to..approve and to vote the funds. The Field . Gun is a good example of how -the process worked. From the 'end of World War 1 to the opening of World War ; 2, some 20 years elapsed. World War 1 was fought with tire 18 -pounder gun and the 4.5 inch howitzer." The --25•pouttde- gun/howitzer took eleven years and 2 months to appear ,in the field. Of this period; 7 years and 4 months were, consumed by the General Staff "determining policy." The Sten gum's story has a, more peculiar twist. In July 1940, long after war had started, the General Staff asked the Director of Artillery for a "machine carbine," or what is known pow as. a Tommy gun, or Burp gun. The prototype of the Sten was demonstrated to the General Staff in January 1941, but they were reluctanttorder any. On June 9, 1941, Churchill went to Shoeburyness to witness an anti-tank gun shoot. The Director of Artillery deliberately demonstrated the Sten, whereupon Churchill demanded one for his personal use. Only then did the General Staff order a`quarter million of them, to 'be increased later to 21/2 million. The 6 -pounder anti-tank gun was initiated by the Director of Artillery from his meagre experimental funds as soon as he realized the Germans, having captured the Matilda Tank at Dunkirk ' mounting the 2 -pounder gun, would soon produce a better gun. In this instance a post war search of the War Office files failed to disclose any General Staff request for the 6 -pounder whatsoeverp In the face of the foregoing evidence It is not surprising that the tank was nobody's baby., for there was no cadre of engineers to deVeiop it. Nothing -to parallel the Artillery cadre. Actually in. 1930 . the Tank Design Department at Woolwich consisted of 3 officers, two of whom were gunners. The War Office branch in executive charge of Armored Fighting Vehicles was, at a crucial period, 1930 to 1936, headed by a Colonel who, whenrequired to write out a general specification of the, characteristics required of a new tank said: "I don't know why I should be . expected to write a specification. I never asked to be appointed to this job and- I _knownothing about -it" - At this period the sole criterion of a tank was its speed. When the above mentioned colonel found that 'his' tank only did 211/2 miles per hour on roads, with the wind, whereas 25 to 30 had been . promised by the contractors, he confessed he was very depressed. • However he related later, that when he got home and found his son had been invited to play cricket for Cambridge University versus Essex, he was much bucked up. As my boss remarked when I told' him of this revelation: "And I suppose when A9,(tank) proves a complete failure and d 4 . 25,000 pounds have gone down the drain, the situation will be redeemed by P.... (the Colonel's: son) getting his cricket blue,*' •l This is the sort of background information which never gets into the official histories! On March 11, 1944,, the Select Committee uon National Expenditure;- reporting--- - --on wartime tank production (Cmd 6865) wrote: "No British tanks. during 1943 have been considered worthy of a place in the main battles." The moral of this story is that a modern army must have professional military engineers on its Staff. You cannot call it a general staff when it only covers he art of warfare and ignores the science of weaponry. It is not `general' by any stretch of the imagination. However the `virus Victorian military amateur' still holds sway on the . staffs `of '-all Allied armies - British, American and Canadian, whereas the heyday of the ignorantly omniscient amateur continues. But the lesson has Mill to be learnt that weapon development is far too serious a matter to be left to the General Staff. *1. Mission to Khartum. The Apotheosis of General Gordon. John Marlowe. (Victor Gallancz. 42/-) *2. STEN was formed thus: S for Shepherd, in charge of Small Arms design. T for Turpin the chief designer and EN for Enfield where the work was done. For 'or .INC Sok ar.l NIOSIO.-. ' h li 44 North St. 5249031 Donald G, MacEwen LISTINGS AND ENQUIRIES INVITED PeterS, MacEwan - Realtor. Donald G. MacEwan Salesman EXPEIENC 0 DECORATOIS Exterior And Aterior Painting & Wallpapering Let us do your interior decorating and wallpapering before the festive season arrives. REASONABLE -RATES FREE , • ESTIMATES W. PEDERSEN J. McCREIGHT 101 Victoria St. 115 St. David St. Phone 524-6667 or 524-9287 Prices Effective Nov. 26-29 Inclusive we reserve the right to limit quantities g with GARLIC FLORIDA ZIPPER SKIN 1 YOUR COMPLETE HOME DECORATING CENTRA '38. WEST STREET GObER ICH vglogotaosottgostotomeottgoraotgivtosAmvsliamotomovsAvstistic 1 �yNM.-µtWw. ir-Aar i iAtAit, �'Ha\Alis�WW ...r::ylhti Al SHORT RIB PRIME RIB Kleenex Assorted Colours (2 -roil pack) PAS ,. ER ,r.TOWELS 4 rolls 100 Duncan Hines Assorted Varieties CAKE MIXES ..219.0=.1.00 Pepsodent Reg. or Action Mint TO a. TOOTHPASTE ... rumb®1.00 LO AL ANTISEPTIC 221:7' 1.00 CALIFORNIA NO. 1 IIAD pRIME) RIB ROAST LETTUCE Table Ready Trimmed Choice Cut Round Bono Shoulder STEAKS Ib. Imperial (Boneless Blade) OVEN ROAST .. �. Table Ready Wall Trimmed RIB STEAKS . :1 lb. 1.09 Imported Chops or Roast LAMB SHOULDER gib. sit ti - y k ti».+Io:N. a'hq.:t. �i i?i�_f, ,•.rat�1