HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Wingham Advance-Times, 1973-03-01, Page 15Cro
ads
yearLister*
* Advent
Forst Conte -
to gid, by UAW people in
"heartland of Mt+
rory weak in The Uistowai Banner/ Tbe Wine Advanc .TiMeS
and Th. t Forest c onf..rate by Welr r Oren. Limited.
DrN E. ,t[. Veva
'have divided ,.thio 4►
parts :general. ob$erval
some special' development pm b-
lems, themeetings th ;
and a conclusion; First of
general .,observation,
Ho>u.
County its. the.
county in Ontario to undertake 'a
comprehensive plan g
program on a pattens goo.. '
the,1971 rs. f sayy<that so that e
people will not refer: to e
sporadic.a Wings. that ,'were
deck. ;art the, ;'Se's , rt
coo ties .'Thein
recogm that; " alb .► ° F
rl la lning tlse a .'r+ieultural`
lend isw ,consideredi the
category rather' than some
that's left over - after
spotted in all the hig
apartmnents,..thecar washes, W
the.�tekinia, courts. The. critldm
that;,' planning consultants y!d
planners are urban oriented ; IS
being answered in Huron c ou y.
It was very interesting,.;to *Oe
this as a process ,being woed
out in the workshops themselves.
- I'd like to suggest that if positions
..are opened in rural and regional
planning these Opportunities
would soon be filled by: y, ,g
planners, many of them coming
from the University of Quelph
and who have ` a . rural
background. Certainly you
wouldn't wait very long bore
you found that there were people
w p defi ;telt' were geared in to
�tt .
`lenasyou have u
eased'planners ay`uf `Hsterifng
only, and being employed only by
urban authorities. ,
Recognized Base/
Huron County, professional
planners seem-' . to have
recognized the bread and butter
base to Huron County and • are
planning for it. Planning in an
agricultural area requires full
knowledge of the functional basis
of land classification and land
capability. Everyone concerned
must learn all he can of the in-
tellectual resources available.
and this applies alike to farmers,
the, town people and government:
workers.
Government Could Learn
I hope you won't think I'm out
of order but I think quite a few
people in the Ministry of Agricul-
ture and Food could learn a lot
more about what has gone on in
the last few decades regarding
the technology of land classifi▪ ca-
tion. and land use and certainly
the elected and appointed mem-
bers, in fact, everyone. This
knowledge should reach into the
colleges ofagricultural tech-
nology and the secondary schools
and there is evidence that this is
already happening in Huron
County.
Now the timing for Huron
County planning is good. Most of
the impact crises brought up in
the workshops, rather interest-
DAVID HOWES: of Har:ristgn keeps a large stock' of ;coal at Howes' [Wilding Centre.
• e
a..:;Y R,� µ •.ir'
50 years ago if was everywhere
today a fuel that is very rare
After a hayday of almost 75
years, coal has just about com-
pletely dropped out of the fuel
league.
History tells us the first coal to
reach Midwestern Ontario
arrived as early as 1856 on the
Grand Trunk Railway. Prior to
that coal was hailed by horse-
drawn wagons . from Hamilton
and Dundas.
. About a century later -in the
middle 1950's—coal and coke hit
their peak in this area and other
parts of Ontario and Canada.
Since then, coal as a fuel, has bit
the dust. No longer is it used to
provide clean, warm heat for
homes, commercial and in-
dustrial establishments, office
buildings br institutions.
Thousands of furnaces (some
of them from Western Foundry in
Wingham) which for many years
burnedcoal, have been converted
to gas, oil or hot water.
In the 1930's advertisements in
the Gorrie Vidette and Wingham
Advance -Times advertised coal
regularly. Elsewhere on this
page., you will see one which
claims over 100,000 Canadian
furnaces burn 'blue coal'.
Still Some Outlets
In the heartland of Midwestern
Ontario, few merchants sell coal
today and most agree it 'isn't
practical to maintain big stocks
of coal or coke.
However, for those of you with
a fireplace or coal -burning stove
in your kitchen as an emergency
measure if the modern heat fails,
the following people will be glad
to sell you some coal.
David Howes of Howes Build-
ing Centre in Harriston usually
has between 100 and 500 tons in
stock depending on the time of
year. He sells both hard and soft,
but hard coal is the much bigger
seller..
"We've been selling coal since
the early 1900's and our biggest
customers today are farmers.
Some .people, not many in town,
buy coal from us but it is just to
supplement their wood burning
stoves," said Mr. Howes.
He indicated his firm had not
considered going out of the coal
business but it comes to a point
where it isn't practical anymore.
Archie Montgomery of Blyth
has sold coal for 30 years from his
yard beside the tracks near the
fgrmer railway station. He
delivers by truck, sometimes as
far away as Seaforth and Dun-
gannon.
Monotonous -
"Sometimes it's pretty mono-
tonous," says Archie, "but we
can get all we want now from
Pennsylvania and its good coal.
We sell mostly hard chestnut, it
seems to be the best. It's hard
and shiney and burns real well.
We also sell hard rice stoker coal
in fall and winter and hard
buckwheat stoker in the fall. No
more coke, it's too expensive, the
same as Alberta coal -the freight
costs are too dear."
Mr,, Montgomery's price is $39
a ton for hard chestnut and the
stove coal.
Gorrie Building Supplies Ltd.,
in Gorrie sell hard chestnut, hard
stove or furnace coal and soft
stoker coal. Proprietor Jim King
admits coal is pretty scarce
around ' this area but he un-
derstood coal was available in
Elmira for about $43 a ton.
Mr. King is correct—Schaner
Fuels Ltd., of Elmira with a coal
yard in St. Jacobs—sell anthra-
cite -at $43 a ton to some
customers in Millbank and Alma.
"We get out coal from Pennsyl-
vania and although wedeliver,
our sales decrease every year,"
adds Mr. King.
We understand Johnson Fuels
and Heating in Palmerston and
Manning Coal in Blyth also still
sell some coal in this area.
But it would appear that coal—
one of the best fuel dollar
values -was dropped to the level
of supplementary heat or strictly
for use in emergencies.
In many instances wood has re-
placed coal as the source of heat
in the fall and spring.
1O�000
CANADIAN fURNfS''�
GIVE r
GNATER lli
$A7IJFACTION:
i.e coa
Don't take chances with unidentified fuer. Follow
the example of over 100,000 Canadian hotineowners
who have changed to better heating. Burn
'blue coal' for the finest, most trouble- free
heating you've ever enjoyed. Order a ton today.
MacLea>c Lumber & Coal Co.
Phone 64W.
BLUE COAL, the modern fuel for solid comfort, was a big
seller for alrno5t 75 year's- in our are Thit advertisemtnt
claimed 1O0;000 Canadian furnaces couldn't be wrong
ingly, were drawn from other
parts of Ontario, but,ttiings that
couldbaPl>er4 in Huron' County.
Now this doesn't mean that
Huron County is spared of
problems, It has plenty of them,
but most of the ones mentioned
are still manageable, especially
to those of us who come from
some parts of Ontario where we.
almost feel we've reached a point
•
of no return .in; regard to problem
solutions.
Garden'S
Now some specific develop.
mental problems, Almost all Of
Huron County is Class I: Ila and '
III land. It' is;,a' veritable garden
spot, a truelood bank. Itreally is
a resourceor the future in the
real sense -of the word. Its
potential productivity must be
measured against the future On-
tario when ° m ist of the Urban cor-
ridor is influenced by urban de-
velopment. The spill out from the
corridor is already felt in Huron
County and already the people of
the. county must. direct their
attention to questions such as
this: Can urban development and
other non rural uses such as
cottages .on the iakeshore,.and
escape, estates, ,be rationalized
withoUtidestroying .t ''agrarian
base of the county. In the London
area we used to refer to the term
• of'urban drones and rural hives. t
don't know whether that would be
applicable. to Huron : County or.
not. Through planning it la: hoped
that justifiable non-agricnitural
uses will be so placed and en.
couragedd that the economy of the
county Will be enhanc, not
weakened. Towns and: cities can
have tidy ,hems rather h,mi rag-
gedRoadscan edges. c n be arteries
of transport rather than invita-
tion to spr4wt.. Cottages can be
grouped rather than becoming a
string of shells one row deep
closing access to the water for the
land locked interland.
Something whichisn't appar-
ent in their planning but I would.
like to put a warning here, be-
cause of the work that I'm doing
in other parts. of Ontario. Man
industries will Neap out of the
`corridor in the next 25 years -It
did ,come up peripherally because
people. did say, what if a 'Ford
plant locates in Huron County, a
Ford plot type .of thing. 1 a'
new pladt necessarily generate a
shadow of urban users or is it
possible for workers to lve in al-
ready well established townand
villages?
The Meetings were well ;or-
ganized, ''the M4440 1011 of all
these meetings has i ` been ex-
cellent and.` I. wish to " commend
from where I'm standing now
those people who hada part; in it.
The consensus of the meetings
regarding Huron: County was that-
• planning w.as desirable' and
necessary. the exact. definitions
of planning varied,' Mit *lost
'agxeed that it involved steering
devebop7nhent .toward ` sociall
desired goals, with befits start,'
Jog now. I thought that this Was
important. Not . seine benefits' in
some 'vague future, but now. '
And hence, planning to be
realistic has to have some trade
offs, some trade offs are
inevitable. These',have to be
rationalized ' by 'the elected
councils ` and decision ' Makers,
now this is, provided the people
.are involved in .these decisions
that are being made:. I mean that
thea decisions 'are nOt
made: by the elected repres ta-
tives. The time scale came up as
being 'important, but it is a
moving target, we all .
'this and °itis like
Godericdz to Exeter,:You want to
go to Exeter, but you n't.
• set .your - course for ' going ;term s fields and 00 on. "'4
have to followroad, and
although .your goal is Exeter you
have to plan for the .'next .100
Yards o•r as,' far , asyou can see
ahead 'as.you drive the car and
Planning has this kind of a :dill
"'sion >i>l a *constantly renewing.
eedOnta Plan
'i mems me. om what 1
t .-.tip �`
..< tis ,platform,.
he ball was in theOrov '.s
side of the urt, and an p .
plan .for. ; ta' io is necessary.
Even if this, merely: °,states
•s if call .ho'1 +.`� a vin swill'
P� y
▪ haodle its-
fes,
ts
frregional: '
apo sibili :ies`
ima `n om
yesterday
• ment is C'l�
xlatttraity tho
counties alrea`
planning
reconcile a
'the severe
Thei
-sibilitIe in
can handle
or expect
sovereign: governments
;everyone, notonly those in
.County;, but again f got`
from 'the reefing
,Byvv, L. . T tishten
a.
_ ..,Pei b �ty],�,�Wilr�
it
•
���� '�itr nt�r�flow
is'planning. That sounds familiar
because, as you are probably
saying, we have been doing that
continuously, and over the years
someone has always been telling
the farmer to plan your work and
work your plan whether it be fi-
nancial, cropping or livestock.
Now, however, it is land use
planning on a broad scale that
will affect the farmer, but is far
bigger and beyond the land use
plan on an individual farm:
The Ontario Soil and Crop Im-
provement Association held a
Land Use Conference in Decem-
ber 1972 in Toronto with some 325
delegates present from every
county in the province, delegates,
not ...dy represented farmers, but
also agri-business, universities,
urban people, selected ministries
of. the Ontario Government and
municipal councils.
There have been some recom-
mendations made as a result of
this conference and if anyone
thinks this is of little importance,
then one sentence included in the
suggestions when a recommen-
dation was made to establish an
Agricultural Land Use Advisory
Board, may make you stop and
think.
Why Agriculture?
I quote, "The terms of refer-
ence for the Advisory Board may
make you stop and think." I
quote, "The term of reference
for theWily � , }: ,. , I lie
quiite_`wide fl ipein the'%bean:
ning. However, it is suggested
that included in the responsibili-
ties of the- Council would be the
development of a policy state-
ment on, Why the Agricultural
Industry is Needed in this Prov-
ince."
Who would have ever thought
that anybody would even think of
questioning the need of an agri-
cultural
gri-cultural industry in Ontario?
Whose responsibility is it at the
local level to take the leadership
and coordinate the thinking and
decision of the local people?
Municipal councils are becoming
involved, but perhaps a .larger
group of farm people should be
providing information to plan-
ning groups already working in
this field.. Is the• County Soil and
Crop Improvement Association
the logical group to take the lead
in suggesting the agricultural
needs of soil for our crops, and
why the • nation requires this
enterprise in Ontario?
Some of the suggested recom-
mendations, as a result of this
Ontario Land Use Conference in
December 1972, which will be
given some consideration across
the province are listed in the fol-
lowing paragraphs.
Name Council
1. The Ontario Soil and Crop
Improvement Association
request the Minister of Agricul-
Deputy Minister says land -use
no more than `lip service'
Ontario will stop being a plea-
sant place to live unless some
way is found to control "a mess of
residential industrial develop-
ment," Ontario Environment
Deputy Minister Everett Biggs
said.
Mr. Biggs said the failure to fit
agriculture into the picture has
been one of the major shortcom-
ings of land -use planning to date.
' As a result, larnd-use planning
in rural areas has tended to be
nothing more than tip service and
rationalization of present land
use trends.
Blames Communication
Mr. Biggs blamed this failure
on a complex communications
barrier between rural and urban
society, and said the urban indif-
ference to rural areas and the
rural anti -urban bias is going to
make It hard to sell land use pl ah-
niitg concepts to farmers.
In the mntime, developers
are going to develop the best`
Act
agricultural land.
"It's easier than rolling rocks
out of the way," Mr. Biggs ex-
plained.
He said the problem with plan-
ning institutions to date is that
they are largely optional and can
only be activated by local muni-
cipal councils.
Mandatory
"The notion that land use plan-
ning can be made effective
through a patchwork of indivi-
dual planning areas is today ,a
myth," he said.
Mr. Biggs said it is obvious that
land -use planning must be made
mandatory throughout the
province.
He told farmers it is impossible
fof' small local governments
today to deal with planning on
terms that will allow implemen-
tation of effective policy.
Mr. Biggs said, in practice,
land -use planning has become
largely.;' oriented to adrnirlistra-
1 ..... 111111Lit tl
tion of development and land
divisions, without ' taking into
account the large needs of society
as a whole.
There hasalso been too much
emphasis on dollar or assessment
planning—development for the
sake of assessment that can be
gained by an individual munici-
pality.
Mr. Biggs said farmers who
asked for compensation for land
reserved for agricultural de-
velopment aren't taking into
account the economics of the
situation.
"From a practical standpoint,
there couldn't possibly be enough
money in the provincial trea-
sury," Remit!.
He also said he disagrees with
farmers who had suggested in
workshop sessions that land
shouldn't pe kept for agriculture
if it doesn't pay enough.
:tore and Food forthe-. rovince, of,
Qnt arl t o'
o to' b
� t;a establish .� �.t
Land Ilse.'0#14OirMtftitr
This advisory council , could
have the responsibility of 'docu-
menting the amount, type and
locations of land that should be
preserved for agriculture. ' It
would have the responsibility . of
presenting agriculture's point -of -
view' when decisions are made
relative to land use.
2. The Ontario Soil and Crop
Improvement Association would
encourage, through their organi-
zation of county, and district asso-
ciations, the developthent and
bolding of meetings to inform
farmers on the planning process,
and the issues in Land Use Plan-
ning.
This would also allow for pro-
viding information to non -
farmers on land use planning as
it applies to agriculture.
3. The Ontario Soil and Crop
Improvement Association en-
courages the participation of
farmers on local planning of
boards. This would ensure grass
root participation in discussion
and decision at the local level.
4. The Ontario Soil and Crop
Improvement Association form a
Land Use Committee from their
own directors. The function of
this committee would be to see
that the previous three recom-
mendations are initiated and to
monitor the progress of the ac-
tions as a result of actions taken.
If the recommendations listed
were put into practice then there
are some additional considera-
tions necessary as discussed in
some of the discussion' groups at
the Land Use Conference.
Three of these questions e,
"Can official plans be presented
to the general public, in a form
that is easier to understand?"
"Should more emphasis on land
use planning be included in the
curriculUh at the Colleges of
Agricultural Technology?" "Is
there a need for some personnel
in the Onario Ministry of Agri-
culture and Food to have as their
main responsibility a planning
function?"
Think About It
We hope, that anyone reading
this article will give it much
thought and then express them-
selves in this regard to the writer,
your Crop Improvement , Town-
ship Director, your Township
Reeve or visit the Stratford office
of the Ontario Ministry of Agri-
culture and Food to tell any one of
the staff members what you
think.
Is agriculture in Ontario need-
ed; can proper land use planning
keep all industry in the proper
balance; .should we, and could
we, then keep the family farm for
rt generations to come?
0 sly
relays of cial_
land use control regulatio
critic°ally important.
specifically,set out:` in
there must not be any eo
about this, The problemsvf.
ing agriculture viabl
technical as well as operatioi
Theeconomics of the martial
place must be recognized, the
came into ° the discUssions all the
time and they 'were covered. pi'
many various ways. Each one.*`,
them was worthy,of a conference
in itself, but the consensus was
that as long as we were dealing
with planning that solutions are
possible only if the physical faces
for the agricultural activities are
maintained, and that's where we
started with 'land use planning.
This returns us to recognizing
Please turn to Page 8
Case study
Heroe. County
In mid December, an intensive
and searching two-day Land Use
Conference was held at the Sky-
line Hotel in Rexdale by the
Ontario Soil and Crop Improve-
ment Association in co-operation
with the Ontario Ministry of Agri-
culture and Food.
More than 400 recognized
authorities on land use and plan-
ning and concerned representa-
tives of conservation, soil and
crop associations, Junior Far-
mers and other agricultural
s were in attendance In
additio , dozens more represent-
ed plann'ng departments from
counties, unicipalities, cities
and province ; real estate firms,
church gro s, conservation
authorities, industry and univer-
sities.
The conference, planned for
months, presented the best cur-
rent information on land and re-
source planning .in two days.
Among the highlights 'of the
conference were three case study
reports.
One of these, the first Ontario
county to undertake a compre-
hensive planning program
geared to the 1970's, was Huron
County and the report on this
page is presented here now as it
was by E. G. Pleva, observer and
chairman of the study.
The report is comprehensive in
itself, but it dogs present a proto-
type which is likely to be followed
by many counties in the imme-
diate future. We urge you to read
it in the hope it will clarify many
uncertainties and possibly an-
swer many questions you may
have on land use altd what it
really is.