HomeMy WebLinkAboutTimes Advocate, 1984-09-26, Page 4Page 4
Times -Advocate, September 26, 1984
Ames -
Times Established 1873
Advocate Established 1881
Amalgamated 1924
dvocate
Serving South Huron, North Middlesex
& North Lambton Since 1873
Published by J.W. Eedy Publications Limited
LORNE EEDY
Publisher
JIM BECKETT
Advertising Manager
Blll BATTEN ROSS HAUGH
Editor Assistant Editor
HARRY DEVRIES
Composition Manager
DICK JONGKIND
Business Manager
Published Each Wednesday Morning at Exeter, Ontario
Second Class Mail Registration Number 0386.
Phone 235-1331
SUBSCRIPTION RATES:
Canada: $22.00 Per year; U.S.A. $60.00
C.W.N.A., O.C.N.A. CLASS 'A'
Challenge for all
Pope John Paul II left Canada this week sug-
gesting he'd like to find some reason to pay a return
visit.
Most Canadians will be hoping it isn't too soon.
Fact is, not many had the stamina to keep up with the
Pope's hectic pace and will need ample time to rest
up before they can engage in another tour which has
to be considered one of the highlights of our time.
It will also take Canadians some time to digest the
passionate messages and the inspiring challenges
which were issued during the 12 -day love -in across the
nation.
The visit is indelibly etched. The Pope gave a
catechism lesson to the young in Vancouver, told the
old they were needed, encouraged the .handicapped,
OCN.A
wowed the native people with his concerns, told the
world humanity was still more important than
technology, reaffirmed his strong stand on contracep-
tion and warned the rich to help the needy or reap the
terrible results.
People stood for hours in pouring rain to hear the
messages or slogged their way through mud and ma-
jor traffic snarls.
They indicated a willingness to overcome adver-
sities to see and hear the man. Hopefully, they will
show the same type of willingness to consider the
messages an 1 put into practice those challenges which
they were handed.
There were challenges for members of his faith in
particular, but the majority were for all who seek to
improve the society in which they live.
Needs full study
The official score in the current debate over com-
mercial trucks parking in residential areas is 2-2. Ob-
viously that's not very decisive and Exeter council will
have to judge other factors than the opinions of the four
neighbors who appeared at the recent hearing staged
by the planning advisory committee into a minor
variance application on behalf of a Sherwood Crescent
couple.
Council have appointed a special committee to
make a recommendation regarding trucks and that
committee is scheduled to make that report at the next
session.
To be fair and thorough in that decision, members
of the special committee should conduct a rather ex-
tensive survey into the number of people who will be
affected by that decision and attempt to ascertain the
ramifications for those currently involved and those
who may be in the future as new laws will govern.
The principals involved in the advisory board hear-
ing have already given an insight into the situation as
far as the truck owners are concerned and a letter in
last week's issue also added some factors as aired by
another couple similarly involved.
Council members have already been criticized for
using hearsay evidence in their official objection to the
minor variance application and obviously must be
prepared to present more convincing arguments than
that in backing whatever proposals they will be asked
to approve.
The special committee should attempt to define the
number of truckers involved and determine the
ramifications for them. At the same time, some poll
of those truckers' neighbors should be considered to
ascertain their private opinions about the matter.
In addition, truckers and ratepayers in general
who wish to have some input into the matter before a
decision is made should do so now, rather than com-
plain if the decision reached is not to their liking.
There also appears to be the necessity for the com-
mittee to establish if a truck tractor is a commercial
vehicle under definition of the Highway Traffic Act and
local bylaws.
The final decision is one of obvious importance to
many residents and should be reached only after
thorough and well-documented research.
Straight talk pays dividend
A few weeks ago, when the sun was
shining hrightly, and most area residents
had an extra spring to their step, it was
noted that the fime weather appeared to
play a significant part in the news of the
day.
Controversial subjects appeared to be
non-existent, and the few that may have
been circulating. were basically avoided
in favor of enjoying more pleasant
pursuits.
At the time, the writer suggested that
indeed the weather was a more in-
strumental factor in our behaviour than
most would imagine.
You may not have agreed with that sug-
gestion, but there's now further proof to
present in backing the argument.
We've just come through a long period
of wet, cold miserable weather. Did it
have the opposite effect on people by mak-
ing them grumpy and ornery? You bet it
did and one has to look no farther than last
week's issue of this newspaper to prove
that.
The Mayor was voicing his criticism of
the area rec board and they in turn were
taking pot shots at council. Neighbors
were arguing the merit of allowing com-
mercial trucks to park in residential
areas and there were reports that things
were not going smoothly in the local police
department.
A member of Zurich council was rak-
ing the provincial government over dump
regulations and members of Hay council
were still voicing their consternation over
Exeter's objections to an agri-industrial
park in the township.
Farmers were becoming intolerable as
they watched the rains continue to inun-
date their corn and bean fields and even
some young soccer players I watched ap-
peared to be more aggressive than usual
as they sloshed their way through mud-
dy sections of a playing field in their at-
tempt to win playoff tournaments.
Not only was the weather serving in its
customary role as the topic of converse -
tion, it was apparently playing an in-
strumental part in the personal manner
in which people were tackling other facets
of their life as well.
That's not all bad. While there's a great
deal to be said for those who manage to
carry with them a sunny disposition
despite the circumstances in which they
find themselves, it is perhaps equally im-
portant that at times people get a little ril-
ed and let off some steam.
It's a delicate balance that is required,
but I maintain that people in positions of
BATT'N
AROUND
with the editor
responsibility have to show a harsh or
even mean streak at times to accomplish
the tasks with which they are confronted.
The very complexities and contradic-
tions of the English language often re-
quire a facial expression or a vocal tone
to clearly indicate the intent of a phrase
or statement. A statement or expression
accompanied with a smile or docile voice
can mean just the opposite when the same
words are used with different enunciation
or a cold. hard stare.
Those who attempt to camouflage their
communications with facial or tonal ex-
pressions that appear contradictory to the
words they are using usually only leave
confusion in the minds of those with whom
they are attempting to communicate.
That has resulted in "what do you
mean?" becoming one of the most com-
monly used expressions stemming from
conversations around the kitchen table
right through to the parliaments of the
world.
* * * * *
The problems associated with those
who attempt to appease or not upset
others by accompanying their words with
a contradictory tone or facial expression,
or vice versa in some instances, are a par-
ticular consternation to those of us in the
reporting business, particularly the print
media.
Not only do we have to report what was
said, but at times it is necesary to indicate
what was apparently intended.
As noted, the words used can be the
same whether they are uttered in jest or
in anger. Sometimes that is difficult to
ascertain, especially when one is con-
fronted with those who are masters at
concealing their intent.
Those who enjoy pulling one's leg or
revel in tongue-in-cheeek antics often end
up having a good laugh, although there
are occasions when that can come back
to haunt them if they are mistakenly
taken serious. It is usually imperative
that those with whom they joke in such
manner have an equal sense of humor and
perception or the results can be rather
disastrous.
The secret to frank and serious debate
is to assume that at least one person in the
audience is blind and another is deaf. In
that way, the speaker must ensure that
his facial expressions convey the true in-
tent of the thoughts being expressed even
for those who may not hear the actual
words or see the facial expression that ac-
companies them.
So, while it appears the weather plays
an integral role in attidues and actions it
can not always be blamed for excesses or
misconceptions that may be
communicated.
Sincerity and clarity are all important
and those who have mastered those facets
of communication are those having no
problem saying what they mean nor in in-
dicating they mean what they say.
It is a gift that too few possess.
•
"The nerve! How DARE the country manage without me?"
Down to serious things
Thank heaven the elec-
tion's over and we can get
down to serious things.
As predicted by all the
pundits, we have a new
Prime Minister, not that
we haven't had a new one
lately. Alias John Turner.
But, shades of Dief the
Chief, Billie King, and
other assorted ghosts, we
now have, with the
greatest number of seats
ever — Ta Da — Prime
Minister Mile Mulrooney.
What's that you say?
It's Brian Mulroney?
Nonsense. Oh, I know.. He
gets the title. She lets him
read the speeches, which
he does quite well, with
her hand on his back: "Is
that a dagger that I can
see behind me?"
Canada, despite Indira
Ghandi of India, Golda
Meier of Israel and Mag-
gie Thatcher of Great
(once upon a time) Bri-
tain, is not yet ripe for a
woman P.M. That's why
they must have a consort
who can read the speeches
and keep his mouth ab-
solutely shut about
everything except the
weather.
Maureen McTeer
almost made it, but her
consort kept trying to ram
both feet in tus mouth at
once, and stubbornly
refused to discuss the
weather.
But Mrs. Mulrooney
(sounds like someone
from the wrong side of the
tracks, but isn't) made it.
I shudder to think what it
will cost us to re -
redecorate the P.M.'s
house on Sussex St. in the
capital city, Bytown.
You think I'm joking?
Didn't you have enough
stamina to stay up and
watch the last ap-
pearances of the party
leaders on election day?
A tired Turner gave up
gracefully and dedicated
himself to something
resembling the re -building
of the Great Wall of China.
A beaming, belligerent
Broadbent reiterated for
Sugar
and Spice
Dispensed By Smiley
the umpteenth time that
he was going to look after
the ordinary people of
Canada, and warned Mrs.
Mulrooney, though he had
grace enough to call her
Mr. Mulroney, that if
she/he did not use every
plank they had lifted from
the NDP platform, she/he
was in dire straits.
Mila, our Prime
Minister -elect, was much
less inhibited, as she
should have been. She
jigged and jogged and
waved for the cameras,
drinking in the applause,
grinning broadly (she
doesn't have a jaw pro-
blem ), and soaking up the
cheers.
She pointed with aban-
don and a wide grin . at
various members of the
congregation who will ex-
pect to be senators next
week, and punched her
consort in the ribs until he
too pointed and bared his
teeth.
She didn't retire
gracefully into the
background during the
victory speech, but stood
so close to her consort that
she could read it and make
sure he didn't make any
boo-boos. She put her
hand, lovingly behind his
back while he was speak-
ing: "This is a dagger that
I feel behind me."
In short, it is not Caesar,
but Caesar's wife, who is,
and must be seen to be,
beyond reproach. I think
she'll make a dandy
Prime Minister.
Not that Mila doesn't
have her faults. She
doesn't have a strong jaw,
like Flora Macdonald.
Maureen McTeer,and her
consort. But because of
that, she has an impish
grin, which none of the
others can achieve, and
which turns people on, if
they are turned on by im-
pish grins.
She speaks too many
languages, at least three,
which is anathema to
those ordinary Canadians
Ed B. is always talking
about. One is enough for
them, two is suspicious,
and three is downright
dangerous.
She is not exactly a
great "build" as we used
to say. But that's in her
favor, in these days of
feminism, when a sweater
is something to keep you
warm, rather than reveal.
Another thing going
against her is the size of
the majority. Huge ma-
jorities are more
dangerous for the winner
than small minorities.
About a third of Cana-
dians who voted Tory are
going to be shouting in the
pubs: "Wattaya talkin'
about. Mila kissed me, an'
the uddaguy shook hands
with me. I'm a cinch for
the Royal Commission of
Highways. I got the boys
warmin' up the machines
right now."
One more thing that
may hurt her, about 1998,
is her femininity. She's
goodlooking, intelligent,
and sophisticated. As long
as there is a secret ballot
in Canada, I can see, in the
future, vast hordes of
Canadian men voting
against her, out of sheer
frustration and envy.
However, she's got a lot
going for her. She has guts
which don't hang over her
belt, as most politicians
do. She has brains, proven
b y the fact that she choose
a blarney for her consort,
instead of a true and tried
politician. She's a great if
slightly elderly cheer-
leader, as witness her
very visible handclapping
every time her consort
stopped for a breath.
Good luck, Mila. I'm
positive unemployment,
inflation, and women's
rights will disappear
under your reign.
Little worries best
In Belfast a young boy
tells of how his father was
murdered in his own
hallway. The killers walk-
ed in, very polite. My
mother didn't know what
they wanted. She gave
them tea. They drank it.
When my father came
home they shot him.
A boy from Cambodia
tells how his father, a doc-
tor, was killed by com-
munist soldiers. His
mother died of starvation
before his eyes.
Another lad, from Viet-
nam, escaped on a
boatload of other refugees.
They were 52 days at sea
and the food was all gone.
The boatmaster told
another boy to take a ham -
children named Einat and
Yael, five and two respec-
Perspectives
mer and hit the lad on the
head so that they could eat
his flesh. Fortunately
somebody else was chosen
to die and so he survived.
Hadara, a girl of Israel,
used to babysit two
By Syd Fletcher
tively. Terrorists burst in-
to the children's apart-
ment, killed the father,
picked up Einat by the feet
and cracked open her
head on a rock. The
mother and the two year-
old were hiding in the utili-
ty room. The little one
started to cry and the
mother clamped her hand
over the child's mouth. It
died of suffocation.
Hadara will never
forget those two little
children that she once
babysat.
Our children worry
about whether they will be
able to buy another
Michael Jackson record or
about tomorrow's history
test.
Rightly so. May little
minds be concerned over
little problems. May our
country remain so
relatively trouble-free.
1