HomeMy WebLinkAboutTimes Advocate, 1991-02-13, Page 4T
Page 4
Times -Advocate, February 13, 1991
Publisher: Jim Beckett
News Editor: Adrian Harte
Business Manager: Don Smith
Composition Manager: Deb Lord
Published Esc,' Wednesday Morn at 424 Main St.,
Exeter, Ontario, NOM 188 by J.W. E y Publications Ltd.
Telephone 1-516.2351331
Second Class Mad Registration Number 0388
SUBSCRIPTION RATES;
Canada: S27.00 plus $1.89 G.S.T. Per year
U.S.A. 568.00 plus $4.76 G.S.T. GAT. MO5210835
•
"Men are never so likely
to settle a question rightly
as when they discuss it
freely."
... Thomas Macauley
E1)ITOIZI:\I.
Au revoir mes amis
F or years - generations, in fact -
English Canada has viewed
Quebec as th4. ' polled child of
confederation.
Quebecers reject this English conceit
out of hand. English Canada is the op-
pressor, they say, denying them lan-
guage, culture and economic power.
Since 1965 when the royal commis-
sion on bilingualism and biculturalism
informed us we had crisis on our
hands, English Canada has spent its en-
ergies trying to appease its unappeasa-
ble partner.
Quebec, meanwhile continues to de-
mand a disproportionate share of na-
tional attention and transfer payments
while it offers nothing but contempt in
return.
Now Canadians have been given the
ultimatum that has in fact always wel-
tered behind the dealing and whining
and complaining.
Shape up Canada - or we're shipping
out.
Quebec Premier Robert Bourassa told
reporters last week that the people of
his province "are tired, very tired" of
constitutional discussion.
They want change and they want it
now.
Here is a partial list of what is cur-
rently a shared or federal jurisdiction
that Quebec wants direct, complete
control over, according to a report re-
leased a week ago:
Education, housing, health, family
policy, research and development, agri-
culture, regional development, energy,
language, unemployment insurance and
the environment.
It wants the parliamentary system re-
designed and a new super government
put in charge with control over defence
and the all -mighty Canadian equaliza-
tion payments.
It wants to join an economic union
with Canada, sharing currency and cus-
toms and excise and is prepared to al-
low the free movement -of people, capi-
tal and goods across the 'border'.
It also wants to dump the federal
Charter of Rights and create a new con-
stitution over which it has complete veto
power.
It's generally willing to share control
of native affairs, foreign policy, trans-
port and justice.
And they want it all by the fall of 1992
- or else.
It leaves one breathless.
All three federal leaders reacted to this
report with the kind of cowardly ap-
peasement that has characterized Eng-
lish Canada's negotiations with our sister
province for twenty years.
Prime Minister Mulroney said, "Obvi-
ously there are a lot of changes that can
be made..."
Liberal Leader Jean Chretien said, "the
time has come to look at all the powers
to see where they should be placed..."
And New Democratic Party leader Au-
drey McLaughlin said the federal gov-
ernment should surrender some powers
and keep others.
She then made the curious comment:.
"If you don't stand for something then
you don't stand for anything.":
Certainly in the last few years Canadi-
ans have come to expect very little
worth while from their leaders and we
have seldom if ever been disappointed
Here is no exception.
We are reminded constantly of Que-
bec's unique character and place in the
world,and we are beginning tp ,lieve , a
it.
Quebec is a distinct society, with a
view of democracy not shared by many
others in this country. Its language legis-
lation is ample proof of that.
But if that is not enough, these outra-
geous demands should bring it home to
every 'Canadian' that not only does Que-
bec not want to remain within confeder-
ation, but it does not deserve it, either.
Perhaps the time has come for us all to
admit that Quebec will never be part of
Canada.
But no lop -sided, bastardized union
such as that described above should be
considered as a remedy.
Let them go.
And meet them in court.
Journal Argus
Believing in love
Yes, Virginia, you and all of
us know there is a Santa Claus.
He holds court in the shopping
malls, surrounded by his mini-
skirted elves, lucky devil. How
could there be doubt? There is
good evidence that he exists.
The Easter Bunny, too, is easy
enough to believe in. After all,
where else would chocolate
Easter eggs come from?
I also believe in fairies, elves,
goblins, demons, spirits, vam-
pires and ghosts. How else
would they have crept into our
literature, art, music, movies and
videos? I acknowledge them all.
Does St. Valentine exist?
But until recently Eve had
trouble accepting the patron
saint of lovers, the chap called
St. Valentine. I just couldn't
pl him in the scheme of
ngs.
Reading about him in the en-
cyclopedia was very unsatisfy-
ing My doubts hardened when I
leamed that there may have
been two saints of that name,
neither of whom had anything to
do with St. Valentine's Day.
Confusing? Read on! Britanni-
ca thinks our tradition of send-
ing Valentine cards may ,come
from a Roman fertility festival
called Lupercalia. It was held on
February 15. But the version I
like better is that the custom cel-
ebrates the mating season of
birds.
PETER'S
POINT
•
by
Peter Hessel
Valentine nothing but hum-
bug?
The whole thing sounded so
suspicious to me that I decided
to lay the matter to rest. Saint
Valentine? Bah, humbug!
But a couple of nights ago my
sleep was disturbed by a strange
sound. I glanced at the clock:
half past midnight. There was
the sound again. I slipped out of
bed and looked out the window.
No moon. But a flickering light
was dancing up and down me
driveway. Then another sound: a
loud knock on the door.
I rushed down in my house-
coat and peeked out. At the door
stood a bearded old man. I
haven't met too many bishops in
my lilb, but I recognized instant-
ly that this guy was one. He
wore a peaked hat and a long,
richly omamented 'cloak. In his
hand he held a tall crook with
which he was knocking against
the door. I don't know what
made me open the door, but I'm
glad I did.
Imagine my surprise!
"How do you do?" he said in
English with a Greek or Turicish
accent. "I want to straighten you
out about my existence. Eve
come all the way from Asia Mi-
nor. I'm St. Valentine."
Imagine my surprise! "Why
me?" I asked, "why do you hon-
our me with your appearance,
your Excellency?"
"Call me Your Grace, if you
don't mind," he said. "I came be-
cause you have doubts. And I
want you to tell your readers
about me and about love."
I asked him in, and he walked
straight over to the living mom,
slushy boots and all. Good
things Elizabeth was fast asleep
upstairs. In a mini -sermon, he
told me about his job, his mis-
sion.
St. Valentine's mini -sermon
"Centuries ago everyone be-
lieved in me and in love. The
trouble began when too many
Please tutu to page 5.
Lunchtime, with the police
It's not every day one gets an
invitation to a luncheon to be
surrounded by the police, but I
went anyway.
OPP District 2, of which the
Times -Advocate covers the go-
ings on of the Lucan OPP de-
tachment, held a media day in
London last week. It's a charm-
ing idea, in which the police and
the media informally get togeth-
er to better understand one an-
other and their respective jobs/
The police don't want to be por-
trayed by the media as donut
munching goons who thrive on
intimidation. The media don't
want to be treated as irresponsi-
ble leeches whowill exploit any
grain of truth for a headline.
While the media were outnum-
bered by OPP, the newspapers
of the district were well repre-
sented, along with several radio
station reporters.
Nevertheless, I heard one re-
porter say that, all things consid-
ered, police and joumalists are
on the same side, they both want
to see the bad guys caught.
While one officer seemed to dis-
agree, I thought it more or less
an accurate assessment.
The media, of course, not only
want to see the bad guys caught,
we want to let the public know
they've been caught. Which is
where the new Freedom of In-
formation Act (oxymoron any-
one?) is getting in the way.
Since January, several police or-
ganizations have drastically cut
back the amount of information
they are giving to the press
all in the name of protecting the
innocent, so the police will no
longer release the names of (still
living) victims of crimes. As
was revealed at Friday's meet-
ing, the degree to which those
regulations are being interpreted
varys widely, posing a definite
problem for both media and po-
lice.
Hold that
thought...
By
Adrian Harte
It's an endless source of fasci-
nation here at the T -A to discov-
er how many versions of a story
you can hear before you get
your hands on the facts. It's
worse with crime reporting.
False rumours can circulate
wildly cn what happened here or
there and who was involved.
Part of the role of a newspaper
is to set down in writing the
public record - to stop the specu-
lation once and for all. With vi-
tal pieces now missing from the
news, the number of people who
are believed to be victims or sus-
pects will far exceed reality.
Somebody fixed something
that wasn't broken. With the ex-
ception of a few rabid reporters
in Toronto who delight in put-
ting video cameras in people's
faces seconds after a crime,
most crime reporting has been a
civilized affair. The media gen-
_ orally have looked to the police
as a source of accurate and sen-
sitive information about crimes
and accidents. As those chan-
nels of information are closed
up under this new Act, more
mistakes are bound to be made.
Police routinely withhold cer-
tain information to protect their
investigations or to keep one
step ahead of suspects. As long
as the media are notified of what
is being withheld and why, eve-
rybody gets along fine. But as
was suggested at Friday's meet-
ing, the press are going to have
to do more of their own investi-
gating from now on. Unfortu-
nately, that means the news may
unwittingly spoil an investiga-
tion, or tip off a criminal that the
police are ontohim or her.
That's bound to , lead to' `band
feelings somewhere along the
line.
Friday's luncheon was a pleas-
ant pause for both police and
media to remind each other that
they are just doing their jobs,
both believing they are working
in the public interest. The po-
lice want to let the world know
that the bad guys get caught.
The public want to 'read about
the capgire. The media sits in
the middle, keeping score.
But along comes Queen's Park
with a new set of rules, well in-
tended, but destined to spoil the
game. As far as anyone can tell,
the new restrictions on police re-
ports (keep in mind• the media
are still free to print nearly any-
thing they can find out) were in-
tended to protect victims of sex-
ual assault, but the media
haven't been publishing the
names of those victims for
years.
Somebody fixed something
that wasn't broken.
Letter to Editor
How do we work for peace?
•
Dear Sir.
The numbness which spread
through me with the onset of the
Gulf War has passed. I am func-
tioning normally again, but a deep
part of me is preoccupied with the
events in the Persian Gulf. I am
not alone in this state. Many have
told me they feel a similar way.
This preoccupation, at a feeling
and thinking level, necessitates
that this report be centred in the
war.
-There is no doubt that Saddam
Hussein is a tyrant who has per-
formed many acts of torture, bru-
tality and assassinations in order
to develop and maintain his posi-
tion. There is no doubt that his vi-
sion must be curbed. mere is
pave doubt about how this is be-
ing done.
Sanctions were working. In De-
cember William Webster, director
of the C.I.A. iepotted to conven
that sanctions had reduced Iraqi
exports by 97t and imports
by 90 permit. � figures show
how effective the embargo had be-
come. Whyy then, did Mr. Bush,
Mrs. 7ltatc er and Mr. Mulroney,
lead the world down s hasty path
to wit? Mr. Binet said be could
not afford the economic cost of
ng American troops Indefi-
i in the Middle tit. Was this
a good enough reason- to plunge
into war'/
The United Nations succumbed
to U.S. pressure and agreed to the
use of force after January 15th.
However, the subsequent military
assault on Saddam Hussein is not
being led by United Nations gen-
erals but by American generals.
Britain and America have consis-
tently refused to• activate the
U.N: s Military Staff Committee,
under whose auspices a truly au-
thentic U.N. campaign would have
to be controlled. And so, the haw-
kish energy of the human psyche
is being acted out again; this time
in the Persian Gulf.
It's interesting how rhetoric can
be changed to suit new situations.
Mr. Reagan once described the
U.S.S.R. as: "that evil empire A
few years later, as Russia skies
with America in the Gulf crisis, 1
wonder if Mr. Bush would care to
update Mr. Reagan's earlier com-
ment? In what way does this kind
of rhetoric manipulate our collec-
tive response to war?
In the 1980-1988 Iraq -
Iran war, billions
of dollars worth
of U.S. military `\\
res were sold
to req. Mr. Bush re -
candy said. "rve got
k boiled down very
clearly to good versus evil". It
helps Mr. Bush to be that clear in
his mind.
What is clear in my mind is that
when Saddam Hussein was bomb-
ing Iran, he was "good" in the eyes
of the Pentagon. Now that his war-
mongering threatens American oil
supplies, he is "evil". How quickly
good and evil can be exchanged to
suit one's point of view and a coun-
try's oil supply.
Political rhetoric is one thing; the
use of God's name is another. God's
name has been repeatedly invoked
by politicians and militarists on
both sides. If God has ears, I sus-
pect He/She has shed many tears
over the past few days. At this criti-
cal time, there are many quotations
that are relevant from the world's
Christian and non-Christian wis-
dom literature. The following quo-
tation ressonates with me: "Blessed
are the peace -makers, for their shall
be called the children of God". This
is reassuring until one realizes that
is a contemporary fashion for those
who wage war to describe them-
selves as peace -makers.
The human suffering is already
great. Civilians, military personnel
and their families on both sides are
affected Here in Huron county,
parents are reporting high levels of
anxiety and sleeplessness in their
Please turn to page 5.
1